{"id":4100,"date":"2026-03-31T07:40:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T11:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?page_id=12"},"modified":"2026-04-01T00:32:48","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T04:32:48","slug":"archive","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/","title":{"rendered":"Archive"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>PDF format requires <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.adobe.com\/products\/acrobat\/readstep2.html\">Adobe Acrobat Reader<\/a>, which is available free of charge. Should you desire a piece that is not posted, please contact us to order a <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/contact\/\">back issue.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 61, No. 1, Spring 2026<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/criminal-procedure-redemption\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Criminal Procedure Redemption<\/a><\/strong><br>by Zamir Ben-Dan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/disguised-extradition-how-interpol-red-notices-in-u-s-immigration-removal-proceedings-violate-due-process-and-non-refoulement-obligations\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Disguised Extradition: How INTERPOL Red Notices in U.S. Immigration Removal Proceedings Violate Due Process and Non-Refoulement Obligations<\/a><\/strong><br>by Eleni R. Bakst<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/out-of-the-closet-in-on-bail\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Out of the Closet, In on Bail<\/a><\/strong><br>by Deborah Lolai<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/the-right-to-seek-joy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The Right to Seek Joy<\/a><\/strong><br>by Tyler Rose Clemons<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/between-a-limestone-rock-and-a-hard-place-class-certification-in-suits-alleging-pattern-or-practice-foia-violations-on-immigration-records-requests\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Between A (Limestone) Rock and a Hard Place: Class Certification in Suits Alleging Pattern- Or-Practice FOIA Violations on Immigration Records Requests<\/a><\/strong><br>by Narintohn Luangrath<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/its-just-a-pinch-conceptualizing-inadequate-pain-management-for-womens-healthcare-as-sex-discrimination\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u201cIt\u2019s Just a Pinch\u201d: Conceptualizing Inadequate Pain Management for Women\u2019s Healthcare as Sex Discrimination<\/a><\/strong><br>by Kirsten \u201cShaw\u201d Mettler<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-6c531013 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 60, No. 2, Spring 2025<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Building State Constitutionalism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/08_HLC_60_2_Bannon803-822.pdf\">Foreword: Giving State Constitutions Their Due<\/a><\/strong><br>by Alicia L. Bannon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/09_HLC_60_2_Farinacci-Fernos823-864.pdf\">Defederalizing State Constitutional Law<\/a><\/strong><br>by Jorge M. Farinacci-Fern\u00f3s<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/10_HLC_60_2_Van-Kley865-886.pdf\">The Statewide Injunction: State Judicial Power and Meaningful Remedies<\/a><\/strong><br>by Constance Van Kley<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/11_HLC_60_2_Lavender887-918.pdf\">Barriers to Vindicating State Constitutional Rights in Civil Litigation<\/a><\/strong><br>by Julie A. Murray &amp; Bridget Lavender<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/01_HLC_60_2_Williams443-516.pdf\">Abolition in the Real World: A Case Study of Cash Bail Abolition in Illinois<\/a><\/strong><br>by Christopher Williams<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/02_HLC_60_2_Sinha517-566.pdf\">Hidden Takings and the Communal Burden of Punishment<\/a><\/strong><br>by G. Alex Sinha &amp; Janani Umamaheshwar<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/03_HLC_60_2_M.-Crespo567-598_compressed.pdf\">Root and Branch: Lawyers, Movements, and the End of Mass Incarceration<\/a><\/strong><br>by Andrew Manuel Crespo<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/04_HLC_60_2_Brady599-660.pdf\">Toward Liberation: Reclaiming the Eighth Amendment\u2019s Promise in the Era of Climate Change<\/a><\/strong><br>by Aletta Brady<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/05_HLC_60_2_Hoag-Fordjour661-718.pdf\">Universal Public Defense<\/a><\/strong><br>by Alexis Hoag-Fordjour<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/06_HLC_60_2_Peay719-762.pdf\">Dividing the Will of God: The Unconstitutionality of Nonunanimous Verdicts in Courts-Martial<\/a><\/strong><br>by Richard J.S. Peay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/08\/07_HLC_60_2_E.-Corsico763-802.pdf\">(Un)Delegating Discipline: Standard Condition 12 as an Exclusionary and Unconstitutional Delegation of Judicial Authority<\/a><\/strong><br>by Maria Sofia Pe\u00f1a<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 60, No. 1, Winter 2025<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Voting Rights, Sixty Years Later<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/07_HLC_60_1_Johnson.pdf\">Foreword: Marching to Freedom<\/a><\/strong><br>by Theodore R. Johnson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/08_HLC_60_1_Hayduk.pdf\">Immigrant Voting Rights and the Quest for Universal Suffrage<\/a><\/strong><br>by Ron Hayduk<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/09_HLC_60_1_Desmond-Meade-Angel-Sanchez.pdf\">Desmond Meade and Angel Sanchez:&nbsp;<em>In Conversation<\/em><\/a><\/strong><br>by Desmond Meade &amp; Angel Sanchez<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/10_HLC_60_1_Daniels.pdf\">Ending the Cycles of Voter Suppression<\/a><\/strong><br>by Gilda R. Daniels<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/11_HLC_60_1_Ross.pdf\">A Reprieve for Democracy: Reading&nbsp;<em>Allen v. Milligan<\/em>&nbsp;on the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Voting Rights Act<\/a><\/strong><br>by Deuel Ross<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/01_HLC_60_1_Yarrell-compressed.pdf\"><strong>Administrative Exhaustion After&nbsp;<em>Perez<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br>by Chris Yarrell<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/02_HLC_60_1_Carroll.pdf\">Fee-Shifting Shortcuts<\/a><\/strong><br>by Maureen Carroll<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/03_HLC_60_1_Morris.pdf\">Paramilitary Property<\/a><\/strong><br>by Meghan L. Morris<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/04_HLC_60_1_Tsuruda.pdf\">Race, Unconscionability, and Contractual Equality<\/a><\/strong><br>by Sabine Tsuruda<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/05_HLC_60_1_Faulkner.pdf\">Critical Analysis: How Mandatory Arbitration Agreements Perpetuate Racial Inequality in the NFL<\/a><\/strong><br>by Ryan A. Faulkner<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2025\/03\/06_HLC_60_1_Corsico.pdf\">Epistemic Injustice in Removal Proceedings: Disability, Disablement, and the Subjugation of Knowledge in the U.S. Immigration System<\/a><\/strong><br>by Sarah E. Corsico<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 59, No. 2, Spring 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Indigenizing Civil Rights and Civil Liberties<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/01_HLC_59_2_RileyMalveaux.pdf\"><strong>Chief Justice Angela R. Riley and Professor Suzette Malveaux in Conversation at the Eleventh Annual John Paul Stevens Lecture: The Third Sovereign: Tribal Courts and Indian Country Justice<\/strong><\/a><br>by Angela R. Riley &amp; Suzette Malveaux<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/02_HLC_59_2_Stark.pdf\"><strong>Responsible Governance and Tribal Customary Rights<\/strong><\/a><br>by Kekek Jason Stark<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/03_HLC_59_2_Carlson.pdf\"><strong>Access to Justice in the Shadow of Colonialism<\/strong><\/a><br>by Kirsten Matoy Carlson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/04_HLC_59_2_Dolan.pdf\"><strong>Where\u2019s Mr. Postman? The Struggles of Voting by Mail in Indian Country<\/strong><\/a><br>by Torey Dolan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/05_HLC_59_2_Menka.pdf\"><strong>Native Nation Resistance to the Machinations of Settler Colonial Democracy<\/strong><\/a><br>by Nazune Menka<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/06_HLC_59_2_Brett.pdf\"><strong>Policing State Police: System Reform Within the \u201cFiction\u201d of&nbsp;<em>Ex parte Young<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br>by Sharon Brett<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/07_HLC_59_2_Friedman.pdf\"><strong>\u201cSilent Revolution\u201d: The Rockefeller Foundation\u2019s Invisible Influence on the Model Penal Code<\/strong><\/a><br>by Daniel Butler Friedman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/08_HLC_59_2_Johnson.pdf\"><strong>The Missing Half: Revisiting Monetary Remedies to Redress Racial Segregation<\/strong><\/a><br>by Olatunde C.A. Johnson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/09_HLC_59_2_SchindlerZale.pdf\"><strong>Neighbors Without Notice: The Unequal Treatment of Tenants and Homeowners in Land Use Hearing Procedures<\/strong><\/a><br>by Sarah Schindler &amp; Kellen Zale<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/06\/10_HLC_59_2_Alpert.pdf\"><strong>Disability Environmental Justice: How \u00a7 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Can Be Used for Environmental Justice<\/strong><\/a><br>by Joshua M. Alpert<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The Enduring Value of the Past: Why History Suggests the Supreme Court Reconsider Watson, Terry, and the Doctrine that Followed<\/strong><br>by Ryan Miller<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 59, No. 1, Winter 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Topics in the Law of the Transgender Rights Movement<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/01_HLC_59_1_Kylar-W.-Broadus.pdf\">Foreword: The Current State-Federal Dichotomy in Transgender Law<\/a><\/strong><br>by Kylar W. Broadus<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/02_HLC_59_1_Mia-Yamamto-Shelby-Chestnut.pdf\"><strong>Mia Yamamoto &amp; Shelby Chestnut&nbsp;<em>In Conversation<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br>by Mia Yamamoto &amp; Shelby Chestnut<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/03_HLC_59_1_Katie-Eyer.pdf\"><strong>As-Applied Equal Protection<\/strong><\/a><br>by Katie Eyer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/04_HLC_59_1_Kendra-Albert.pdf\"><strong>You Should be Ashamed of Yourself: Privacy Claims by Transgender Litigants and Navigating Transnormativity<\/strong><\/a><br>by Kendra Albert<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/05_HLC_59_1_Seth-E.-Packrone.pdf\"><strong>Educational Death Sentences: Addressing the Plight of Students with Disabilities in Adult Jails and Prisons<\/strong><\/a><br>by Seth E. Packrone<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/06_HLC_58_9_Susan-Hazeldean.pdf\"><strong>Illegitimate Families<\/strong><\/a><br>by Susan Hazeldean<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/07_HLC_59_1_Cassie-Chambers-Armstrong.pdf\"><strong>Gideon Is in the House: Lessons from the Home-Renters\u2019 Right-to-Counsel Movement<\/strong><\/a><br>by Cassie Chambers Armstrong<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/08_HLC_59_1_Ryanne-Bamieh.pdf\"><strong>The New Abolition: The Legal Consequences of Ending&nbsp;<em>All<\/em>&nbsp;Slavery and Involuntary Servitude<\/strong><\/a><br>by Ryanne Bamieh<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2024\/02\/09_HLC_59_1_Mimi-Goldberg_.pdf\"><strong><em>Quiz\u00e1s Se Puede<\/em>: Evaluating Union Success in Incorporating Immigrant Workers<\/strong><\/a><br>by Mimi Goldberg<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 58, No. 2, Summer 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC201_Starr.pdf\"><strong>Statistical Discrimination<\/strong><\/a><br>by Sonja Starr<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC202_Morgan.pdf\"><strong>On the Relationship Between Race and Disability<\/strong><\/a><br>by Jamelia Morgan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC203_Alexander-Sudeall.pdf\"><strong>Creating a People-First Court Data Framework<\/strong><\/a><br>by Charlotte S. Alexander and Lauren Sudeall<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Critical Race Theory, Education, and Civil Liberties<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC207_Procaccini.pdf\">(E)Racing Speech in School<\/a><\/strong><br>by Francesca Procaccini<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC208_Watson.pdf\"><strong>The Anti-\u201cCritical Race Theory\u201d Campaign\u2014Classroom Censorship and Racial Backlash by Another Name<\/strong><\/a><br>by Leah M. Watson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC204_Rana.pdf\"><strong>Anti-\u201cCRT,\u201d A Century Old Tradition<\/strong><\/a><br>by Aziz Rana<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC205_Roberts.pdf\"><strong>Theorizing a Restorative Response to Homicide<\/strong><\/a><br>by Thomas Roberts<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/09\/HLC206_Sanches.pdf\"><strong>Rights Stripped Down: A Fourth Amendment Challenge to Cross-Gender Strip Searches of Transgender Inmates<\/strong><\/a><br>by Camille Sanches<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 58, No. 1, Winter 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Ambivalent-Advocates.pdf\">Ambivalent Advocates: Why Elite Universities Compromised the Case for Affirmative Action<\/a><br>by Jonathan P. Feingold<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Studying-the-Hazy-Line.pdf\">Studying the Hazy Line Between Procedure and Substance in Immigrant Detention Litigation<\/a><br>by Laila L. Hlass &amp; Mary Yanik<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Pinkerton-Guards.pdf\">Pinkerton Guards and Debtors\u2019 Prisons: The Historical Precursors to the Modern Practice of Restitution Exploitation<\/a><br>by Carrie Leonetti<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/The-Limits-of-Judicial-Resegregation.pdf\">(The Limits of) Judicial Resegregation<\/a><br>by David Schraub<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Surveillance and Expansion of the Carceral State<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Carceral-Control.pdf\">Carceral Control: A Nationwide Survey of Criminal Court Supervision Rules<\/a><br>by Kate Weisburd<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/The-Great-Replacement.pdf\">The Great Replacement: White Supremacy as Terrorism?<\/a><br>by Khaled A. Beydoun &amp; Nura A. Sedique<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Surveillance-Normalization.pdf\">Surveillance Normalization<\/a><br>by Christian Powell Sundquis<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Fulfilling-the-Promise-of-Our-Preamble.pdf\">Fulfilling the Promises of Our Preamble: A Holistic Approach to Transitional Justice in the United States<\/a><br>by Sujaya Rajguru<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Harnessing-religious-Arguments.pdf\">Harnessing Religious Arguments for The Benefit of Trans Advocacy: A New Approach<\/a><br>by Nitsan Plitman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/04\/Contracting-for-Debt.pdf\">Contracting for Debt: The Relationship Between Debt Capitalism, Higher Education, and the Black-white Wealth Gap<\/a><br>by Magali Duque<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 57, No. 2, Fall 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/BlacknessAsStateProperty.pdf\">Blackness as State Property: Valuing Critical Race Theory<\/a><\/strong><br>by Mitchell F. Crusto<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/SecuringAccessToJusticeForChildren.pdf\"><strong>Securing Access to Justice for Children<\/strong><\/a><br>by Lisa V. Martin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/IdentityByCommittee.pdf\">Identity By Committee<\/a><\/strong><br>by Scott Skinner-Thompson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/ANewAgeIndigenousInstrument.pdf\">A New Age Indigenous Instrument: Artificial Intelligence &amp; Its Potential for (De)colonialized Data<\/a><br><\/strong>by Ian Falefuafua Tapu &amp; Terina Kamailelauli\u2018i Fa\u2018agau<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Environmental Justice<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/ReflectionsOnFightingEnvironmentalRacism.pdf\">Reflections on Fighting Environmental Racism in St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana<\/a><\/strong><br>by Maryum Jordan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/ReframingEnvironmentalJusticeAtTheMarginsOfUSEmpire.pdf\">Reframing Environmental Justice at the Margins of U.S. Empire<\/a><\/strong><br>by Susan K. Serrano<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/TheDutyToAlohaAina.pdf\">The Duty to Aloha \u2018<strong>\u0100<\/strong>ina: Indigenous Values as a Legal Foundation for Hawai\u2018i\u2019s Public Trust<\/a><\/strong><br>by D. Kapua\u2018ala Sproat and MJ Palau-McDonald<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/DisabilityAsAbnormal.pdf\">Disability as \u201cAbnormal\u201d: Court Sanctioned Violence Against Individuals with Disabilities<\/a><\/strong><br>by Karsyn Costello<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2023\/01\/RiskyBusiness.pdf\">Risky Business: Prenatal Substance Use and Risk of Harm under the G2i Framework<\/a><\/strong><br>by Nicole Rubin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 57, No. 1, Summer 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/WattsGangTreaty.pdf\">The Watts Gang Treaty: Hidden History and the Power of Social Movements<\/a><\/strong><br>by William J. Aceves<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/UnOfficialCityscapes.pdf\">(Un)Official Cityscapes: The Battle Over Urban Narratives<\/a><\/strong><br>by Katya Assaf-Zakharov &amp; Tim Schnetg\u00f6ke<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/MandatoryVotingConstitutionalContext.pdf\">Mandatory Voting in Constitutional Context<\/a><\/strong><br>by Tavi Unger<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong>: Incarcerated Labor<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/UnconvictedIncarceratedLabor.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Unconvicted Incarcerated Labor<\/strong><\/a><br>by Andrea C. Armstrong<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/ThirteenthAmendmentPunishmentClause.pdf\"><strong>The Thirteenth Amendment\u2019s Punishment Clause:<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>A&nbsp;Spectacle of Slavery Unwilling to Die<\/strong><\/a><br>by Michele Goodwin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/MadeWhole.pdf\">Made Whole: The Efficacy of Legal Redress for Black Women Who Have Suffered Injuries from Medical Bias<\/a><\/strong><br>by McKenzi B. Baker<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/AbolitionInternationalHumanRights.pdf\">Abolition and International Human Rights: Taiwan\u2019s Affirmation of Black American Abolitionist Movements<\/a><\/strong><br>by Kiah Duggins<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2022\/09\/Blockchains.pdf\">Blockchains and Environmental Self-Determination for the Native Hawaiian People: Toward Restorative Stewardship of Indigenous Lands<\/a><\/strong><br>by MJ Palau-McDonald<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 56, No. 2, Summer 2021<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Foreword<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/Batts.pdf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Boyer.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Foreword to the\u00a0<em>Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br>by Spencer H. Boyer<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Hasbrouck.pdf\">The Unconstitutional Police<\/a><br>by Brandon Hasbrouck<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Trivedi.pdf\">My Family Belongs to Me: A Child\u2019s Constitutional Right to Family Integrity<\/a><br>by Shanta Trivedi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Barak-Corren.pdf\">A License to Discriminate? The Market Response to<em>&nbsp;Masterpiece Cakeshop<\/em><\/a><br>by Netta Barak-Corren<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Rankin.pdf\">Civilly Criminalizing Homelessness<\/a><br>by Sara K. Rankin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Polonsky.pdf\">Equal Protection Through State Constitutional Amendment<\/a><br>by Daniel Polonsky<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/10\/Summers.pdf\">Rebuilding Antitrust Admidst Forced Arbitration<\/a><br>by Matt Summers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 56, No. 1, Spring 2021<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>In Memorium: Judge Batts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/Batts.pdf\">In Memoriam: Judge Deborah Batts<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/condon.pdf\">When Cruelty Is the Point: Family Separation as Unconstitutional Torture<\/a><br>by Jenny-Brooke Condon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/Swab.pdf\">Swab Before You Enter: DNA Collection and Immigration Control<\/a><br>by Tally Kritzman-Amir<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/IIED.pdf\">Words Still Wound: IIED &amp; Evolving Attitudes Toward Racist Speech<\/a><br>by Tasnin Motala<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong>: In Memorium: Justice Ginsburg<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/minow.pdf\">Tribute to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg<\/a><br>by Martha Minow<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/Nagin.pdf\">In Memoriam: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, The Last Civil Rights Lawyer on the Supreme Court<\/a><br>by Tomiko Brown-Nagin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/klarman.pdf\">Tribute to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg<\/a><br>by Michael Klarman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/gilman.pdf\">Proliferating Predation: Reverse Redlining, the Digital Proliferation of Inferior Social Welfare Products, and How to Stop It<\/a><br>by Sam Gilman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Online Codicil<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2021\/04\/OSullivan_upload.pdf\">Putting a Check on Police Violence: The Legal Services Market, Section 1983, Torture, Abusive Detention Practices, and the Chicago Police Department from 1954 to 1967<\/a><br>by Philip O\u2019Sullivan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 55, No. 3, Summer 2020<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-732.pdf\">Cultivating Community Through the Third National People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference: A Chair\u2019s Retrospective<\/a><br>by Solangel Maldonado<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/12\/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-761-1.pdf\">Communion: Envisioning and Executing the Fourth National People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference \u2014 The Largest Ever Gathering of Minority Law Scholars<\/a><br>by Anthony E. Varona<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-788.pdf\">Exile from Main Street<\/a><br>by Deborah N. Archer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-840.pdf\">Unconstitutional Food Inequality<\/a><br>by Andrea Freeman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/55-Harv.-C.R.-C.L.-L.-Rev.-915.pdf\">Outsourcing Discrimination<\/a><br>by Llezlie L. Green<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 55, No. 2, Summer 2020<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Adediran.pdf\">The Relational Costs of Free Legal Services<\/a><br>by Atinuke O. Adediran<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Bagenstos.pdf\">Consent, Coercion, and Employment Law<\/a><br>by Samuel R. Bagenstos<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Carbado.pdf\">Stop-and-Strip Violence: The Doctrinal Migrations of Reasonable Suspicion<\/a><br>by Devon W. Carbado<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Gentithes.pdf\">Suspicionless Witness Stops: The New Racial Profiling<\/a><br>by Michael Gentithes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Rogers.pdf\">The Law and Political Economy of Workplace Technological Change<\/a><br>by Brishen Rogers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium: Whom the State Kills<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/08\/08.10.2020-Phillips-Marceau-For-Website.pdf\">Whom the State Kills<\/a><br>by Scott Phillips &amp; Justin Marceau<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/O%E2%80%99Brien-Grosso.pdf\">Response: Expanding the Record: Whom the State Kills, A Comment<\/a><br>by Barbara O\u2019Brien and Catherine M. Grosso<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Gruber.pdf\">Response: Race-of-Victim Disparities and the \u201cLevel Up\u201d Problem<\/a><br>by Aya Gruber<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Radelet.pdf\">Response: Race as a Semi-Measurable Component of Social Status<\/a><br>by Michael L. Radelet<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Butash.pdf\">The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine in Civil Rights Litigation<\/a><br>by Charlotte Butash<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/10\/Jarwala.pdf\">The More Things Change: Hundley v. Gorewitz and \u201cChange of Neighborhood\u201d in the NAACP\u2019s Restrictive Covenant Cases<\/a><br>by Alisha Jarwala<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 55, No. 1, Summer 2020<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Brenner-et-al.pdf\">Constitutional Dimensions of Predictive Algorithms in Criminal Justice<\/a><br>by Michael Brenner, Jeannie Suk Gersen, Michael Haley, Matthew Lin, Amil Merchant, Richard Jagdishwar Millett, Suproteem Sarkar, &amp; Drew Wegner<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong>: United States of Debt<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Appleman.pdf\">The Treatment-Industrial Complex: Alternative Corrections, Private Prison Companies, and Criminal Justice Debt<\/a><br>by Laura I Appleman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Baradaran.pdf\">Credit, Morality, and the Small-Dollar Loan<\/a><br>by Mehrsa Baradaran<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Jimenez-Glater.pdf\">Student Debt is a Civil Rights Issue: The Case for Debt Relief and Higher Education Reform<\/a><br>by Dali\u00e9 Jim\u00e9nez &amp; Jonathan D. Glater<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Montag.pdf\">Lien In: Challenging Municipalities\u2019 Discriminatory Water Practices Under the Fair Housing Act<\/a><br>by Coty Montag<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2020\/09\/Drucker.pdf\">Creating \u201cCriminals\u201d: Homelessness in the Sunshine State<\/a><br>by Karin Drucker<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 54, No. 2, Summer 2019<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Blank.pdf\">City Speech<\/a><br>Yishai Blank<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-K-Bell.pdf\">A Stone of Hope: Legal and Empirical Analysis of California Juvenile Lifer Parole Decisions<\/a><br>Kristen Bell<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Gibbs.pdf\">Paper Courts and Parental Rights: Balancing Access, Agency, and Due Process<\/a><br>Tianna N. Gibbs<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong>: Black, Poor, and Gone: Civil Rights Law&#8217;s Inner-City Crisis<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Alfieri.pdf\">Black, Poor, and Gone: Civil Rights Law\u2019s Inner-City Crisis<\/a><br>Anthony V. Alfieri<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-M-Bell.pdf\">Safety, Friendship, and Dreams<\/a><br>Monica C. Bell<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Laniyonu.pdf\">Assessing the Impact of Gentrification on Eviction: A Spatial Modeling Approach<\/a><br>Ayobami Laniyonu<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Williams.pdf\">Fair Housing\u2019s Drug Problem: Combatting the Racialized Impact of Drug-Based Housing Exclusions Alongside Drug Law Reform<\/a><br>Emily Ponder Williams<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Oliveri.pdf\">Vouchers and Affordable Housing: The Limits of Choice in the Political Economy of Place<\/a><br>Rigel C. Oliveri<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-J-Bell.pdf\">The Hidden Fences Shaping Resegregation<\/a><br>Jeannine Bell<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Paikowsky.pdf\">Jails as Polling Places: Living Up to the Obligation to Enfranchise the Voters We Jail<\/a><br>Dana Paikowsky<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Jarwala-Singh.pdf\">When Disability Is a \u201cNuisance\u201d: How Chronic Nuisance Ordinances Push Residents with Disabilities Out of Their Homes<\/a><br>Alisha Jarwala &amp; Sejal Singh<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/07\/54.2-Robb.pdf\">Pluralism at Work: Rethinking the Relationship Between Religious Liberty and LGBTQ Rights in the Workplace<\/a><br>Marilyn Gabriela Robb<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 54, No. 1, Winter 2018<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/12\/Brodsky.pdf\">Against Taking Rape &#8220;Seriously&#8221;: The Case Against Mandatory Referral Laws for Campus Gender Violence<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Alexandra Brodsky<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Baker.pdf\">Anti-Resilience: A Roadmap for Transformational Justice within the Energy System<\/a><br>Shalanda H. Baker<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/AhrensSiegel.pdf\">Of Dress and Redress: Student Dress Restrictions in Constitutional Law and Culture<\/a><br>Deborah M. Ahrens and Andrew M. Siegel<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Crimsumerism.pdf\">Crimsumerism: Combating Consumer Abuses in the Criminal Legal System<\/a><br>Alex Kornya, Danica Rodarmel, Brian Highsmith, Mel Gonzalez, and Ted Mermin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Sternlight.pdf\">Mandatory Arbitration Stymies&nbsp;Progress Towards Justice in Employment Law: Where To, #MeToo?<\/a><br>Jean R. Sternlight<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Kohn.pdf\">For Love and Affection: Elder Care and the Law\u2019s Denial of Intra-Family Contracts<\/a><br>Nina A. Kohn<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Hanna.pdf\">A Constitutional Right to Appointed&nbsp;Counsel for the Children of America\u2019s Refugee Crisis<\/a><br>Andrew Leon Hanna<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Reisinger.pdf\">Redrawing The Line: Retroactive&nbsp;Sentence Reductions, Mass Incarceration, and the Battle Between Justice and Finality<\/a><br>Nathaniel W. Reisinger<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 53, No. 2, Fall 2018<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Anderson.pdf\">Indigenous Rights to Water &amp; Environmental Protection<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Robert T. Anderson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Baldwin-Clark.pdf\">Beyond Bias: Cultural Capital in Anti-Discrimination Law<\/a><br><\/strong><em>LaToya Baldwin Clark<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Burkett.pdf\"><strong>Behind the Veil: Climate Migration, Regime Shift, and a New Theory of Justice<br><\/strong><\/a><em>Maxine Burkett<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Chang.pdf\"><strong>Our National Psychosis: Guns, Terror, and Hegemonic Masculinity<br><\/strong><\/a><em>Stewart Chang<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Rahman.pdf\"><strong>Infrastructural Exclusion and the Fight for the City: Power, Democracy, and the Case of America\u2019s Water Crisis<\/strong><\/a><em>K. Sabeel Rahman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Ristroph.pdf\"><strong>Farewell to the Felonry<br><\/strong><\/a><em>Alice Ristroph<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Sarkar-Rosenthal.pdf\"><strong>Exclusionary Taxation<\/strong><\/a><em>Shayak Sarkar &amp; Josh Rosenthal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Leung.pdf\"><strong>Prison Labor as a Lawful Form of Race Discrimination<br><\/strong><\/a><em>Katherine E. Leung<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2018\/11\/Ponder.pdf\"><strong>The Irrational Rationality of Rational Basis Review for People with Disabilities: A Call for Intermediate Scrutiny<br><\/strong><\/a><em>Jayne Ponder<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 53, No. 1, Winter 2018<\/h3>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2026-03-31T07:40:00-04:00\">March 31, 2026<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/03\/Balisacan.pdf\">Incorporating Police Provocation into the Fourth Amendment \u201cReasonableness\u201d Calculus: A Proposed Post-Mendez Agenda<\/a><br>Ryan Hartzell C. Balisacan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 52, No. 2, Summer 2017<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Ahmad.pdf\">Beyond Earned Citizenship<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Muneer I. Ahmad<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Brown.pdf\">Different Lyrics, Same Song: Watts, Ferguson, and the Stagnating Effect of the Politics of Law and Order<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Lonnie T. Brown, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Cover.pdf\">Hybrid Jury Strikes<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Aliza Plener Cover<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Fairfax.pdf\">The Grand Jury&#8217;s Role in the Prosecution of Unjustified Police Killings\u2014Challenges and Solutions<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Ziegler.pdf\">Liberty and the Politics of Balance: The Undue Burden Test After&nbsp;<em>Casey<\/em>\/<em>Hellerstedt<\/em><\/a><br><\/strong><em>Mary Ziegler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Chiappetti.pdf\">Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Birth and Death of Intersecting Notions of Race and Sex Discrimination in&nbsp;<em>White v. Crook<\/em><\/a><br><\/strong><em>Caroline Chiappetti<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Kuhlik.pdf\">Pregnancy Behind Bars: The Constitutional Argument for Reproductive Healthcare Access in Prison<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Lauren Kuhlik<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/07\/Smith.pdf\">The Gendered Impact of Illegal Act Eviction Laws<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Leora Smith<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 52, No. 1, Winter 2017<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Chacon.pdf\">Privatized Immigration Enforcement<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Jennifer M. Chac\u00f3n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Fenton.pdf\">Disarming State Action; Discharging State Responsibility<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Zanita E. Fenton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Hensel.pdf\">People with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Workplace: An Expanding Legal Frontier<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Wendy F. Hensel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Brennan-Marquez-and-Tutt.pdf\">Offensive Searches: Toward a Two-Tier Theory of Fourth Amendment Protection<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Kiel Brennan-Marquez &amp; Andrew Tutt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Minow.pdf\">Alternatives to the State Action Doctrine in the Era of Privatization, Mandatory Arbitration, and the Internet: Directing Law to Serve Human Needs<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Burton2.pdf\">A Commonsense Conclusion: Creating a Juvenile Carve Out to the Massachusetts Felony Murder Rule<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Alison Burton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Burton1.pdf\">What about the Children? Extending Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction to Crimes Against Children<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Alison Burton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2017\/02\/Zapana.pdf\">The Statement of Interest as a Tool in Federal Civil Rights Enforcement<\/a><br><\/strong><em>Victor Zapana<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 51, No. 2, Spring&nbsp;2016<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/barmore.pdf\"><b>Authoritarian Pretext and the Fourth Amendment<\/b><\/a><br><em>Cynthia&nbsp;<\/em><i>Barmore&nbsp;<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/george.pdf\"><b>Agency Nullification: Defying Bans on Gay and Lesbian Foster and Adoptive&nbsp;Parents&nbsp;<\/b><\/a><br><em>Marie-Am\u00e9lie&nbsp;George&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/strine.pdf\"><b>Corporate Power Ratchet: &nbsp;The Courts&#8217; Role in Eroding &#8220;We the People&#8217;s&#8221; Ability to Constrain Our Corporate Creations<\/b><\/a><br><em>Leo E. Strine<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/fisher.pdf\"><strong>Civil Disobedience as&nbsp;Legal Ethics: The Cause-Lawyer and the Tension&nbsp;between Morality and &#8220;Lawyering&nbsp;Law&#8221;<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Louis Fisher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/lee.pdf\"><b>Bundling &#8220;Alt-Labor&#8221;: How Policy Reform Can Facilitate Political Organization in Emerging Worker Movements<\/b><\/a><br><em>Dayne Lee<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2016\/10\/medley.pdf\"><strong>&#8220;Gender Balancing&#8221; as Sex Discrimination in College Admissions&nbsp;<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Shayna Medley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 51, No. 1, Winter&nbsp;2016<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC101_crop.pdf\"><b>Genetic Data and Civil Rights<\/b><\/a><br><em>Ifeoma Ajunwa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC105_crop.pdf\"><strong>Ideological Drift and the Forgotten History of Intent<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Katie R. Eyer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC106_crop.pdf\"><b>Discrimination in Evictions: Empirical Evidence and&nbsp;Legal Challenges<\/b><\/a><br><em>Deena Greenberg, Carl Gershenson, and Matthew Desmond<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC104_crop.pdf\"><strong>What Exposes African Americans to Police Violence?<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Devon W. Carbado and Patrick Rock<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC102_crop.pdf\"><strong>A Fine Scheme: How Municipal Fines Become Crushing Debt in the Shadow of the New Debtors&#8217; Prisons<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Tori&nbsp;Atkinson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC103_crop.pdf\"><b>Employment for People with Disabilities: A Role for Anti-Subordination<\/b><\/a><br><em>Zo\u00eb&nbsp;<\/em><i>Brennan-Krohn<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 50, No. 2, Summer&nbsp;2015 <\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Institutionalizing-Rights-in-the-National-Security-Executive.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Institutionalizing Rights in the National Security Executive<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Shirin Sinnar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Removing-the-Malice-from-Federal-Malicious-Prosecution.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Removing the Malice from Federal &#8220;Malicious Prosecution&#8221;: What Cognitive Science Can Teach Lawyers About Reform<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Sofia Yakren<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Two-Fs-for-Formalism.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Two Fs for Formalism: Interpreting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Light of Changing Demographics and Electoral Patterns<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Dale E. Ho<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Applying-Section-2-to-the-New-Vote-Denial.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Applying Section 2 to the New Vote Denial<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Daniel P. Tokaji<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Paying-for-Pushout.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Paying for Pushout: Regulating Landlord Buyout Offers in New York City&#8217;s Rent-Stabilized Apartments<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Louis W. Fisher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/11\/Closing-Pandoras-Box.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Closing Pandora&#8217;s Box: Limiting the Use of 404(b) to Introduce Prior Convictions in Drug Prosecutions<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Deena Greenberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Vol. 50, No. 1, Winter 2015 <\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/StabilizingLowWageWork.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Stabilizing Low-Wage Work<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Charlotte Alexander, Anna Haley-Lock, &amp; Nantiya Ruan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/SaviorThroughSeverance.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Savior Through Severance: A Litigation-Based Response to <em>Shelby County v. Holder<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br><em>Cody Gray<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/EvolutionOfAccommodation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>The Evolution of Accommodation: Comparing the Unequal Treatment of Religious Objections to Interracial and Same-Sex Marriages<\/strong><\/a><br><em>James M. Oleske, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/WorkInProgress.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Work in Progress: Civil Rights Class Actions After <em>Wal-Mart v. Dukes<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br><em>Katherine E. Lamm<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/EndingLochnerLite.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Ending <em>Lochner<\/em> Lite<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Burt Neuborne<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/InformedStudentConsumer.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>The Informed Student-Consumer: Regulating For-Profit Colleges by Disclosure<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Jacob Alderdice<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/05\/USAsylumEligibility.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>U.S. Asylum Eligibility: Citizenship in the Dominican Republic<\/strong><\/a><br><em>Marie Ren\u00e9e Cita<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><br>Vol. 49, No. 2, Spring 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/293_Chen.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Governing By Guidance: Civil Rights Agencies and The Emergence of Language Rights<\/a><\/strong><br><i>Ming Hsu Chen<\/i><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/343_Geddicks.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RFRA Exemptions from the Contraception Mandate: An Unconstitutional Accommodation of Religion<\/a><\/strong><br><i>Frederick Mark Gedicks<\/i><i> and<\/i><i> Rebecca G. Van Tassell<\/i><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/385_Pope.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Snubbed Landmark: Why United States v. Cruikshank (1876) Belongs at the Heart of the American Constitutional Canon<\/a><\/strong><br><i>James Gray Pope<\/i><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/449_Cahn.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">On Retiring Blight as Policy and Making Eastwick Whole<\/a><\/strong><br><i>Amy Laura Cahn<\/i><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/493_Truong.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Addressing Poverty and Pollution: California\u2019s SB 535 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Vien Truong<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/531_Mamo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cThe Dignity and Justice That Is Due To Us by Right of Our Birth\u201d: Violence and Rights in the 1971 Attica Riot<\/a><\/strong><br><i>Andrew B. Mamo<\/i><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/569_Weiss.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Into the Breach: The Case for Robust Noncapital Proportionality Review Under State Constitutions<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Samuel Weiss<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 49, No. 1, Winter 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/front491.pdf\">Front Pages<\/a><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC101.pdf\">Local Government, &#8220;One Person, One Vote,&#8221; and the Jewish Question<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Kenneth A. Stahl<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC102.pdf\">Workers Disarmed: The Campaign Against Mass Picketing and the Dilemma of Liberal Labor Rights<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Ahmed A. White<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC103.pdf\">The Agency Roots of Disparate Impact<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Olatunde C.A. Johnson<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC104.pdf\">Assessing HUD\u2019s Disparate Impact Rule: A Practitioner\u2019s Perspective<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Michael G. Allen, Jamie L. Crook, and John P. Relman<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC105.pdf\">Banning the Box but Keeping the Discrimination?: Disparate Impact and Employers\u2019 Overreliance on Criminal Background Checks<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Johnathan J. Smith<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC106.pdf\"><em>Boumediene<\/em> at the Border?<br>The Constitution and Foreign Nationals on the U.S.-Mexico Border<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Eva L. Bitran<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/HLC107.pdf\">Too Cruel for School: LGBT Bullying, Noncognitive Skill Development, and the Educational Rights of Students<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Jason Lee<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 48, No. 2, Spring 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_Gilden_print-version.pdf\">Cyberbullying and the Innocence Narrative<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Andrew Gilden<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_Cahill_print-version.pdf\">Abortion and Disgust<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Courtney Megan Cahill<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_Jaffer_print-version.pdf\">Known Unknowns<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Jameel Jaffer<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_McCraw-Gikow_print-version.pdf\">The End to an Unspoken Bargain? National Security and Leaks in a Post-Pentagon Papers World<\/a><\/strong><br><em>David McCraw and Stephen Gitkow<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_Aftergood_print-version.pdf\">An Inquiry into the Dynamics of Government Secrecy<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Steven Aftergood<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>NOTE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/09\/CRCL_Marcin_print-version.pdf\">Migrant Workers&#8217; Remittances, Citizenship, and the State: The Case of El Salvador<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Joshua David Marcin<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 48, No. 1, Winter 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/King_1-49.pdf\">Beyond \u201cLife and Liberty\u201d: The Evolving Right to Counsel<\/a><\/strong><br><em>John D. King<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Goodmark_51-104.pdf\">Transgender People, Intimate Partner Abuse, and the Legal System<\/a> &#8211; <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/\ufffctransgender-people-intimate-partner-abuse-and-the-legal-system-\ufffc\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><br><em>Leigh Goodmark<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Levin_105-164.pdf\">American Gangsters: RICO, Criminal Syndicates, and Conspiracy Law as Market Control<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Benjamin Levin<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Schlanger_165-215.pdf\"><em>Plata v. Brown<\/em> and Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts, and Politics<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Margo Schlanger<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Simon_217-256.pdf\">The Return of the Medical Model: Disease and the Meaning of Imprisonment from John Howard to <em>Brown v. Plata<\/em><\/a><\/strong><br><em>Jonathan Simon<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/DeVeaux_257-277.pdf\">The Trauma of the Incarceration Experience<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Mika\u2019il DeVeaux<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Freeman_279-323.pdf\">Giving <em>Casey<\/em> Its Bite Back: The Role of Rational Basis Review in Undue Burden Analysis<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Emma Freeman<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/04\/Livengood_325-356.pdf\">Organizing for Structural Change: The Potential and Promise of Worker Centers<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Rebecca J. Livengood<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 47, No. 2, Spring 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Levinson1.pdf\">Who Will Supervise the Supervisors? Establishing Liability for Failure to Train, Supervise, or Discipline Subordinates in a Post <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Levinson1.pdf\"><em>Iqbal\/Connick<\/em> World<br><\/a><\/strong><em>Rosalie Berger Levinson<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Rogers.pdf\">Passion and Reason in Labor<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Brishen Rogers<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Sultany.pdf\">The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/sultanycolloquium\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><br><em>Nimer Sultany<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Levick.pdf\">The United States Supreme Court Adopts a Reasonable Juvenile Standard in<em> J.D.B. v. North Carolina<\/em> for Purposes of the Miranda Custody Analysis: Can a More Reasoned Justice System for Juveniles Be Far Behind?<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"Roper, Graham, and J.D.B.: Re-Defining Juveniles\u2019 Constitutional Rights\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/roper-graham-and-j-d-b-re-defining-juveniles-constitutional-rights\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><br><em>Marsha Levick and Elizabeth-Ann Tierney<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Guggenheim.pdf\"><em>Graham v. Florida<\/em> and a Juvenile&#8217;s Right to Age-Appropriate Sentencing<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"Roper, Graham, and J.D.B.: Re-Defining Juveniles\u2019 Constitutional Rights\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/roper-graham-and-j-d-b-re-defining-juveniles-constitutional-rights\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><br><em>Martin Guggenheim<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Schwartz.pdf\">The Legal Significance of Adolescent Development on the Right to Counsel: Establishing the Constitutional Right to Counsel for Teens in Child Welfare Matters and Assuring a Meaningful Right to Counsel in Delinquency Matters<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"Roper, Graham, and J.D.B.: Re-Defining Juveniles\u2019 Constitutional Rights\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/roper-graham-and-j-d-b-re-defining-juveniles-constitutional-rights\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><br><em>Jennifer K. Pokempner, Riya Saha Shah, Mark F. Houldin, Michael J. Dale, and Robert G. Schwartz<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Segal.pdf\">&#8220;All of the Mysticism of Police Expertise&#8221;: Legalizing Stop-and-Frisk in New York, 1961-1968<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Josh Segal<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 47, No. 1, Winter 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Morris.pdf\">The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"CR-CL Presents a Colloquium, \u201cThe Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement.\u201d\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/cr-cl-presents-a-colloquium-the-case-for-local-constitutional-enforcement\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/MacKinnon.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Kathleen Morris<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Rebell.pdf\">The Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211; <\/strong><a title=\"CR-CL Presents a Colloquium, \u201cThe Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity.\u201d\" href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/cr-cl-presents-a-colloquium-the-right-to-comprehensive-educational-opportunity\/\">Colloquium Page<\/a><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Benkler.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Michael Rebell<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Singer.pdf\">Subprime: Why a Free and Democratic Society Needs Law<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Burbank.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Joseph Singer<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Davidson.pdf\">Property and Identity<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Dinner.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Nestor Davidson<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Weinstein.pdf\">The Role of Labor Law in Challenging English-Only Policies<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Rose.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Lauren M. Weinstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Baranetsky.pdf\">The Economic-Liberty Approach to the First Amendment: A Story of Pornography<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Abrams.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Victoria Baranetsky<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2012\/03\/Noveck.pdf\">Case Comment, <em>Michigan v. Bryant<\/em>, 131 S. Ct. 1143 (2011)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2011\/08\/Freedman.pdf\"><br><\/a><\/strong><em>Michael Noveck<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 46, No. 2, Summer 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/MacKinnon.pdf\"><strong>Trafficking, Prostitution, and Inequality<\/strong> <\/a><br>Catharine A. MacKinnon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Benkler.pdf\"><strong>A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate<\/strong><\/a><br>Yochai Benkler<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Burbank.pdf\"><strong>Litigation and Democracy: Restoring a Realistic Prospect of Trial&nbsp;<\/strong><\/a><br>Stephen B. Burbank &amp; Stephen N. Subrin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Dinner.pdf\"><strong>The Costs of Reproduction: History and the Legal Construction of Sex Equality<\/strong><\/a><br>Deborah Dinner<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Rose.pdf\"><strong>The Exclusion of Non-English-Speaking Jurors: Remedying a Century of Denial of the Sixth Amendment in the Federal Courts of Puerto Rico<\/strong><\/a><br>Jasmine B. Gonzales Rose<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Abrams.pdf\"><strong>Emotions in the Mobilization of Rights<\/strong> <\/a><br>Kathryn Abrams<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Freedman.pdf\"><strong>Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions: Dimension I: Habeas Corpus as a Common Law Writ<\/strong><\/a><br>Eric M. Freedman<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Koenig.pdf\"><strong>Distributive Consequences of the Medical Model<\/strong><\/a><br>Jonathan L. Koenig<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/Mayor.pdf\"><strong>Borderline Constitutionalism: Reconstructing and Deconstructing Judicial Justifications for Constitutional Distortion in the Border Region<\/strong><\/a><br>Philip Mayor<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 46, No. 1, Winter 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/1-50.pdf\"><strong>Rethinking the Fourth Amendment: Race, Citizenship, and the Equality Principle<\/strong> <\/a><br>Bennett Capers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/52-80.pdf\"><strong>Sexual Judgments: Full Faith and Credit and the Relational Character of Legal Sex<\/strong><\/a><br>David B. Cruz<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/81-102.pdf\"><strong>Searching for Harm: Same-Sex Marriage and the Well-Being of Children<\/strong><\/a><br>Courtney G. Joslin<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/103-148.pdf\"><strong>Willing Suspects and Docile Defendants: The Contradictory Role of Consent in Criminal Procedure<\/strong><\/a><br>Nirej Sekhon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/149-194.pdf\"><strong>Equality by Other Means: The Substantive Foundations of the Vagueness Doctrine<\/strong><\/a><br>Tammy W. Sun<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/195-222.pdf\"><strong>A Sunny Deposition: How the In Forma Pauperis Statute Provides an Avenue for Indigent Prisoners to Seek Depositions Without Accompanying Fees<\/strong><\/a><br>Shon R. Hopwood<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/223-252.pdf\"><strong>The \u201cMost Deserving\u201d of Death: The Narrowing Requirement and the Proliferation of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing Statutes<\/strong> <\/a><br>Chelsea Creo Sharon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/253-270.pdf\"><strong>Dangerous Deference: The Supreme Court of Canada in <em>Canada v. Khadr<\/em><\/strong> <\/a><br>David Rangaviz<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>AMICUS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2013\/01\/Schweik_Vol46_Amicus.pdf\"><strong>Kicked to the Curb: Ugly Law Then and Now<\/strong><\/a><br>Susan Schweik<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 45, No. 2, Summer 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/261-328.pdf\"><strong>Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law<\/strong> <\/a><br>David S. Ardia<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/275-296.pdf\"><strong>Introduction to the Symposium: The Jena Six, the Prosecutorial Conscience, and the Dead Hand of History<\/strong><\/a><br>Andrew E. Taslitz and Carol Steiker<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/329-3741.pdf\"><strong>Body and Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, and the Unitary Right to Abortion<\/strong><\/a><br>Jennifer S. Hendricks<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/375-4341.pdf\"><strong>Discretionary Pricing, Mortgage Discrimination, and the Fair Housing Act<\/strong><\/a><br>Robert G. Schwemm and Jeffrey L. Taren<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/435-4821.pdf\"><strong>The Emerging Criminal War on Sex Offenders<\/strong><\/a><br>Corey Rayburn Yung<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/483-5161.pdf\"><strong>Following the Bright Line of <em>Michigan v. Summer<\/em>s: A Cause for Concern for Advocates of Bright-Line Fourth Amendment Rules<\/strong><\/a><br>Amir Hatem Ali<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/517-5621.pdf\"><strong>Discriminatory Intent Reconsidered: Folk Concepts of Intentionality and Equal Protection Jurisprudence<\/strong><\/a><br>Julia Kobick<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/563-5761.pdf\"><strong>The Internet and Press Freedom<\/strong><\/a><br>Jonathan Zittrain<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/577-6001.pdf\"><strong>In Defense of Dignity<\/strong><\/a><br>Andrew Friedman and Deborah Axt<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/601-6341.pdf\"><strong>Pulling Teeth: The State of Mandatory Immigration Detention<\/strong><\/a><br>Geoffrey Heeren<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/635-6541.pdf\"><strong>Today\u2019s Deliberate Indifference: Providing Attention Without Providing Treatment to Prisoners with Serious Medical Needs<\/strong><\/a><br>Joel H. Thompson<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 45, No. 1, Winter 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/1-561.pdf\"><strong>Immigration as Invasion: Sovereignty, Security, and the Origins of the Federal Immigration Power<\/strong><\/a><br>Matthew J. Lindsay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/57-941.pdf\"> <strong>Intragroup Discrimination in the Workplace: The Case for \u201cRace Plus\u201d<\/strong><\/a><br>Enrique Schaerer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>NOTE<\/strong><\/span><br><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/95-1341.pdf\"> <strong>The Evolution and Limits of Title IX Doctrine on Peer Sexual Assault<\/strong><\/a><br>Grayson Sang Walker<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/span><br><em><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/135-1461.pdf\"><strong>Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder<\/strong><\/a><\/em><br>Randall T. Adams<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/147-1621.pdf\"><em><strong>Ricci v. DeStefano <\/strong><\/em><\/a><br>Luke Appling<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/163-1801.pdf\"><em><strong>Forest Grove School District v. T.A. <\/strong><\/em><\/a><br>Emily Blumberg<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>SPECIAL PROJECTS<\/strong><\/span><br><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/181-2041.pdf\"><strong>No One Leaves: Community Mobilization as a Response to the Foreclosure Crisis in Massachusetts<\/strong><\/a><br>Nicholas Hartigan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/205-2461.pdf\"><strong>Working With Clients to Develop Compatible Visions of What It Means to \u201cWin\u201d a Case: Reflections on <em>Schroer v. Billington<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br>Sharon M. McGowan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/06\/247-2601.pdf\"><strong>The Measure of a Society: The Treatment&nbsp;of Unaccompanied Refugee and Immigrant Children in the United States<\/strong><\/a><br>Wendy Young &amp; Megan McKenna<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 44, No. 2, Summer 2009 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><strong>INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/275-296.pdf\">Introduction to the Symposium: The Jena Six, the Prosecutorial Conscience, and the Dead Hand of History<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Andrew E. Taslitz &amp; Carol Steiker <\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/297-312.pdf\">The Law of the Noose: A History of Latino Lynching<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/313-328.pdf\">Burning Shoes and the Spirit World: The Charade of Neutrality<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Frank H. Wu<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/329-360.pdf\">The Hangman\u2019s Noose and the Lynch Mob: Hate Speech and the Jena Six<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Jeannine Bell<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/361-392.pdf\">The Jena Six and the History of Racially Compromised Justice in Louisiana<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Gabriel J. Chin<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/393-460.pdf\">Judging Jena\u2019s D.A.: The Prosecutor and Racial Esteem<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Andrew E. Taslitz<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/461-476.pdf\">Race-ing Prosecutors\u2019 Ethics Codes<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Ellen S. Podgor<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/477-510.pdf\">The Jena Six, Mass Incarceration, and the Remoralization of Civil Rights<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Joseph E. Kennedy<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/511-546.pdf\">You\u2019ve Come a Long Way, Baby: Two Waves of Juvenile Justice Reforms as Seen from Jena, Louisiana<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Sara Sun Beale <\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ESSAYS<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/547-570.pdf\">Restorative Justice in Schools: Learning from Jena High School<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Cara Suvall<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>SYMPOSIUM RESPONSES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/571-580.pdf\">Confronting Racial Disparity: Legislative Responses to the School-to-Prison Pipeline<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Tona M. Boyd<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/581-596.pdf\">Separate and Unequal: The Disparate Impact of School-Based Referrals to Juvenile Court<\/a><\/strong><br><em>Heather Cobb<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2009\/07\/597-608.pdf\">On Responsible Prosecutorial Discretion <\/a><\/strong><br><em>Kerala Thie Cowart<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 44, No. 1, Winter 2009 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/1-42.pdf\">Voter Fraud or Voter Defrauded? Highlighting an Inconsistent Consideration of Election Fraud <\/a><br>Jocelyn Friedrichs Benson<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>43<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/43-78.pdf\">Policing, Race, and Place <\/a><br>I. Bennett Capers<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>79<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/79-132.pdf\">Churches as First Amendment Institutions: Of Sovereignty and Spheres<\/a><br>Paul Horwitz<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><strong>NOTE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>133<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/133-172.pdf\">From Madness to Method: The Americans with Disabilities Act Meets the Internet<\/a><br>Ali Abrar &amp; Kerry J. Dingle<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ESSAY<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>173<\/td><td colspan=\"2\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/173-196.pdf\">Exporting Miranda: Protecting the Right Against Self-Incrimination when U.S. Officers Perform Custodial Interrogations Abroad <\/a><br>Fred Medick<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>RECENT DEVELOPMENT<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>197<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/197-212.pdf\"><em>Boumediene v. Bush<\/em>: Legal Realism and the War on Terror<\/a><br>Megan Gaffney<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>213<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/213-230.pdf\">Cruel and Unusual? The Bifurcation of Eighth Amendment Inquiries After <em>Baze v. Rees<\/em><\/a><br>Mark B. Samburg<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>SPECIAL PROJECTS<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>231<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/231-254.pdf\">A House Divided: The Invisibility of the Multiracial Family <\/a><br>Angela Onwuachi-Willig &amp; Jacob Willig-Onwuachi<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>255<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol44_1\/255-274.pdf\">Networks and Norms: Social Justice Lawyering and Social Capital in Post-Katrina New Orleans<\/a><br>John N. Tye &amp; Morgan W. Williams<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 43, No. 2, Summer 2008 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>289<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/289-352_Markowitz.pdf\">Straddling the Civil-Criminal Divide: A Bifurcated Approach to Understanding the Nature of Immigration Removal Proceedings<\/a><br>Peter L. Markowitz<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>353<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/353-384_Green.pdf\">Insular Individualism: Employment Discrimination Law After <em>Ledbetter v. Goodyear<\/em><\/a><br>Tristin K. Green<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>385<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/385-434_clarke.pdf\">The Congressional Record Underlying the 2006 Voting Rights Act: How Much Discrimination Can the Constitution Tolerate?<\/a><br>Kristen Clarke<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>435<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/435-490_Cate.pdf\">Government Data Mining: The Need for a Legal Framework<\/a><br>Fred H. Cate<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>491<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/491-538_Fischbach.pdf\">Race at the Pivot Point: The Future of Race-Based Policies to Remedy De Jure Segregation After Parents Involved in Community Schools<\/a><br>Jonathan Fischbach, Will Rhee, and Robert Cacace<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>NOTES<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>539<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/539-580_Levy.pdf\">The Collateral Consequences of Seeking Order Through Disorder: New York\u2019s Narcotics Eviction Program<\/a><br>Scott Duffield Levy<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>581<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/581-594_Simon.pdf\">Equal Before the Law: Toward a Restoration of Gideon\u2019s Promise<\/a><br>David A. Simon<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>RADICAL PROPOSALS TO REFORM LEGAL PEDAGOGY<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>595<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/595-598_Chemerinsky.pdf\">Rethinking Legal Education<\/a><br>Erwin Chemerinsky<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>599<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/599-604_Sheppard.pdf\">Teach Justice<\/a><br>Steve Sheppard<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>605<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/605-610_cohen.pdf\">Legal Learning for Life: Legal Immersion Fluency Education (LIFE)<\/a><br>Beth D. Cohen<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>611<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/611-614_Stanchi.pdf\">Step Away from the Case Book: A Call for Balance and Integration in Law School Pedagogy<\/a><br>Kathryn M. Stanchi<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>615<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/615-618_Torrey.pdf\">Actually Begin to Satisfy ABA Standards 211(a) and 212(a): Eliminate Race and Sex Bias in Legal Education<\/a><br>Morrison Torrey<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>619<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/619-624_Davis.pdf\">Slay the Three-Headed Demon!<\/a><br>Peggy Cooper Davis<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>625<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/625-628_olivas.pdf\">\u201cMajors\u201d in Law? A Dissenting View<\/a><br>Michael A. Olivas<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>629<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/629-632_Schlegel.pdf\">Eighteen or Thirty, But Not Twenty-Two<\/a><br>John Henry Schlegel<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>633<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/633-638_Kim.pdf\">Who\u2019s Learning What? Toward a participatory legal pedagogy<\/a><br>E. Tammy Kim<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>639<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/639-644_Cordell.pdf\">The Joy of Judging<\/a><br>Hon. LaDoris H. Cordell (Ret.)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>645<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_2\/645-650_Brown.pdf\">Reform at the Micro Level: Planning for a Life in the Law<\/a><br>Jennifer Gerarda Brown<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 43, No. 1, Winter 2008 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>1<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/1-64.pdf\">Is Acquisition Everything? Protecting the Rights of Occupants Under the Fair Housing Act<\/a><br>Rigel C. Oliveri<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>65<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/65-126.pdf\">The Tyranny of the Minority: Jim Crow and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty<\/a><br>Gabriel J. Chin &amp; Randy Wagner<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>127<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/127-164.pdf\">Trampling Whose Rights? Democratic Majority Rule and Racial Minorities: A Response to Chin and Wagner<\/a><br>Taunya Lovell Banks<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>165<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/165-182.pdf\">Rereading the National Bank Act\u2019s \u201cAt Pleasure\u201d Provision: Preserving the Civil Rights of Thousands of Bank Employees<\/a><br>Miriam Jacks Achtenberg<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>183<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/183-212.pdf\">Aging Out of Foster Care: Towards a Universal Safety Net for Former Foster Care Youth<\/a><br>Melinda Atkinson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>213<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/213-238.pdf\"><em>Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation<\/em>: Sitting This One Out \u2013 Denying Taxpayer Standing to Challenge Faith-Based Funding<\/a><br>Lauren S. Michaels<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>257<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/257-266.pdf\">Correlative Rights and the Boundaries of Freedom: Protecting the Civil Rights of Endangered Women<\/a><br>Diane L. Rosenfeld<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>267<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/267-270.pdf\">Maximal Safety, Minimal Intrusion: Monitoring Civil Protective Orders Without Implicating Privacy<\/a><br>Leah Satine<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>271<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/271-276.pdf\">A Racial Justice Perspective on Monitoring Domestic Violence Offenders Using GPS Systems<\/a><br>Alanna Buchanan<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>277<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/277-280.pdf\">Domestic Violence Defendants\u2019 Jury Trial Rights in GPS Monitoring<\/a><br>Fred Medick<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>281<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/281-284.pdf\">Applying the Lessons of GPS Monitoring of Batterers to Sex Offenders<\/a><br>Pamela Foohey<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>285<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol43_1\/285-288.pdf\">GPS Monitoring and Constitutional Rights<\/a><br>Zoila Hinson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"42\" name=\"42\"><\/a>Vol. 42, No. 2, Summer 2007<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>259<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Latino Inter-Ethnic Employment Discrimination and the \u201cDiversity\u201d Defense<\/a><br>Tanya Kater\u00ed Hern\u00e1ndez<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>317<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Pluralism: A Principle for Children\u2019s Rights<\/a><br>Holning Lau<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>ESSAYS<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>373<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash<\/a><br>Robert Post, Reva Siegel<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>435<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Backlash\u2019s Travels<\/a><br>Cass R. Sunstein<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>NOTE<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>451<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Trademark Law and Free Speech: Protection for Scandalous and Disparaging Marks<\/a><br>Regan Smith<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>CONVERSATION: RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS ON SEX OFFENDERS<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>483<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Next-Generation Sex Offender Statutes: Constitutional Challenges to Residency, Work, and Loitering Restrictions<\/a><br>Chiraag Bains<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>501<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">My Life Before and After HB 1059<\/a><br>Lori Sue Collins<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>513<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Challenging the Banishment of Registered Sex Offenders from the State of Georgia: A Practitioner\u2019s Perspective<\/a><br>Sarah Geraghty<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>531<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Exile at Home: The Unintended Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Residency Restrictions<\/a><br>Richard Tewksbury<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>541<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Judicial Recognition of the Harms of Slavery: Consumer Fraud as an Alternative to Reparations Litigation<\/a><br>Tara Kolar Ramchandani<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>557<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\"><em>Doe v. Kamehameha<\/em>: Section 1981 and the Future of Racial Preferences in Private Schools<\/a><br>Christopher W. Schmidt<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>THE HARVARD CR-CL PUBLIC INTEREST HONOREES<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>569<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">The Role of Community-Based Clinical Legal Education in Supporting Public Interest Lawyering<\/a><br>Robert Greenwald<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>573<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">Indigent Defendants and Enemy Combatants: Developing Prototypes for National Security Cases<\/a><br>James Klein<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>577<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_2\/CRCL422.pdf\">In Defense of Children<\/a><br>Patricia Puritz<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong>Vol. 42, No. 1, Winter 2007<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>1<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/haque.pdf\"><em>Lawrence v. Texas<\/em> and the Limits of the Criminal Law<\/a><br>Adil Ahmad Haque<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>45<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/buchanan.pdf\">Impunity: Sexual Abuse in Women\u2019s Prisons<\/a><br>Kim Shayo Buchanan<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>89<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/hopebren.pdf\">\u201cThis Is Happening in Our Country\u201d: Two Testimonials of Survivors of Prison Rape<\/a><br>Hope H., Brenda L.<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>99<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/johnhing.pdf\">The Immigrant Rights Marches of 2006 and the Prospects for a New Civil Rights Movement<\/a><br>Kevin R. Johnson, Bill Ong Hing<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>139<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/choi.pdf\">Veritas, Not Vengeance: An Examination of the Evidentiary Rules for Military Commissions in the War Against Terrorism<\/a><br>Eun Young Choi<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>191<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/levine.pdf\">If You Cannot Afford a Lawyer: Assessing the Constitutionality of Massachusetts\u2019s Reimbursement Statute<\/a><br>Kate Levine<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>223<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/cacace.pdf\"><em>Samson v. California<\/em>: Tearing Down a Pillar of Fourth Amendment Protections<\/a><br>Robert Cacace<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>239<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/gerry.pdf\"><em>Jones v. City of Los Angeles<\/em>: A Moral Response to One City\u2019s Attempt To Criminalize, Rather than Confront, Its Homelessness Crisis<\/a><br>Sarah Gerry<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>253<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol42_1\/allison.pdf\">Confronting the Myth of Choice: Homelessness and <em>Jones v. City of Los Angeles<\/em><\/a><br>Tanene Allison<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a name=\"41\"><\/a>Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 2006 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Symposium: Pro Se Litigation Ten Years After AEDPA<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>289<\/td><td>Foreword<br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/simonson.pdf\">Breaking the Silence: Legal Scholarship as Social Change<\/a><br>Jocelyn Simonson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>299<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/obryant.pdf\">The Great Unobtainable Writ: Indigent Pro Se Litigation After the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996<\/a><br>Thomas C. O\u2019Bryant<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>339<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/stevenson.pdf\">Confronting Mass Imprisonment and Restoring Fairness to Collateral Review of Criminal Cases<\/a><br>Bryan Stevenson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>369<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/feierman.pdf\">\u201cThe Power of the Pen\u201d: Jailhouse Lawyers, Literacy, and Civic Engagement<\/a><br>Jessica Feierman<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>391<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/fellner.pdf\">A Corrections Quandary: Mental Illness and Prison Rules<\/a><br>Jamie Fellner<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>413<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/hanson.pdf\">The Blame Frame: Justifying (Racial) Injustice in America<\/a><br>Jon Hanson &amp; Kathleen Hanson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>481<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/ugarte.pdf\">Reconstruction Redux: Rehnquist, <em>Morrison<\/em>, and the <em>Civil Rights Cases<\/em><\/a><br>Francisco M. Ugarte<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Note<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>509<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/jois.pdf\">Marital Status as Property: Toward a New Jurisprudence for Gay Rights<\/a><br>Goutam U. Jois<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>553<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/jackson.pdf\"><em>Comfort v. Lynn School Committee<\/em>: Illustrating the Untapped Potential of an Explicit Link Between Voluntary Desegregation and Local Constitutionalism<\/a><br>Randall L. Jackson<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>581<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_2\/lee.pdf\"><em>Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/em>: Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Schools<\/a><br>Brenda Lee<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>591<\/td><td>Book Note<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 41, No. 1, Winter 2006<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/tushnet.pdf\">Weak-Form Judicial Review and \u201cCore\u201d Civil Liberties<\/a><br>Mark Tushnet<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>23<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/delgado.pdf\">Rodrigo\u2019s Roundelay: <em>Hernandez v. Texas<\/em> and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma<\/a><br>Richard Delgado<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>67<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/herman.pdf\">The USA PATRIOT Act and the Submajoritarian Fourth Amendment<\/a><br>Susan N. Herman<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Notes<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>133<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/hildner.pdf\">Defusing the Threat of RFID: Protecting Consumer Privacy Through Technology-Specific Legislation at the State Level<\/a><br>Laura Hildner<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>177<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/shiffrin.pdf\">A Practical Jurisprudence of Values: Re-Writing <em>Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB<\/em><\/a><br>Joshua B. Shiffrin<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>219<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/tepperman-gelfant.pdf\">Constitutional Conscience, Constitutional Capacity: The Role of Local Governments in Protecting Individual Rights<\/a><br>Samuel P. Tepperman-Gelfant<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Recent Development<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>265<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol41_1\/sydow.pdf\">A \u201cShrink\u201d-ing Privilege: <em>United States v. Romo<\/em> and the \u201cCourse of Diagnosis Requirement of the Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege<\/a><br>Nicholas Sydow<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>\n<table border=\"0\" summary=\"toc\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"top\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"40\" name=\"40\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 40, No. 2, Summer 2005<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>327<\/td><td>Balancing the Right to Protest in the Aftermath of September 11<br>Christopher Dunn<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/dunn.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>359<\/td><td>The Future of Community Justice<br>Adriaan Lanni<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/lanni.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>407<\/td><td>State, Be Not Proud: A Retributivist Defense of the Commutation of Death Row and the Abolition of the Death Penalty<br>Dan Markel<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/markel.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Note<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>481<\/td><td>Unconscious Bias Theory in Employment Discrimination Litigation<br>Audrey J. Lee<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/lee.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>505<\/td><td><em>Clark v. Martinez<\/em>: Limited Statutory Construction Required by Constitutional Avoidance Offers Fragile Protection for Inadmissible Immigrants from Indefinite Detention<br>Jose Javier Rodriguez<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/rodriguez.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>523<\/td><td><em>Cuno v. DaimlerCrysler<\/em>: Dormant Commerce Clause Limits State Location Tax Incentives<br>Veena Iyer<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/iyer.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>539<\/td><td><em>United States v. Booker<\/em> and <em>United States v. Fanfan<\/em>: The Tireless March of <em>Apprendi<\/em> and the Intracourt Battle To Save Sentencing Reform<br>Douglas B. Bloom<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_2\/bloom.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/editorial-board\/\">Editorial Board<\/a><\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 40, No. 1, Winter 2005<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Essay<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td><em>Goodridge<\/em> in Context<br>Mary L. Bonauto<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_1\/bonauto.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Articles<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>71<\/td><td>Intersex Surgery, Female Genital Cutting, and the Selective Condemnation of \u201cCultural Practices\u201d<br>Nancy Ehrenreich with Mark Barr<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_1\/ehrenreich.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>141<\/td><td>The Disabling Impact of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions<br>Wendy F. Hensel<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_1\/hensel.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Note<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>197<\/td><td>Protecting the Innocent: The Future of Mentally Disabled Tenants in Federally Subsidized Housing After <em>HUD v. Rucker<\/em><br>Anne C. Fleming<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol40_1\/fleming.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Recent Developments<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>223<\/td><td><em>Crawford v. Washington<\/em>: Confrontation Clause Forbids Admission of Testimonial Out-of-Court Statements Without Prior Opportunity to Cross-Examine<br>Won Shin<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>239<\/td><td><em>Hamdi v. Rumsfeld<\/em>: Due Process Requires That Detainees Receive Notice and Opportunity To Contest Basis for Detention<br>Allison Elgart<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>251<\/td><td><em> Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court<\/em>: Stop and Identify Statutes Do Not Violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendments<br>Shelli Calland<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>265<\/td><td><em>Rasul v. Bush<\/em>: Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction over Habeas Challenges and Other Claims Brought by Gauntanamo Detainees<br>Meredith B. Osborn<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>277<\/td><td><em>Smith v. City of Salem<\/em>: Title VII Protects Contra-Gender Behavior<br>Thomas Ling<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>289<\/td><td><em>Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain<\/em>: United States Courts as Forums for Human Rights Cases and the New Incorporation Debate<br>Benjamin Berkowitz<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>301<\/td><td><em>Tennessee v. Lane<\/em>: Relaxing the Requirements for Civil Rights Legislation<br>Garrett Yoni Rosenzweig<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>313<\/td><td><em>Yarborough v. Alvarado<\/em>: Self-Incrimination Clause Does Not Require Consideration of Age and Inexperience in the <em>Miranda<\/em> Custody Context<br>Tara L. Curtis<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Editorial Board<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"39\" name=\"39\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 39, No. 2, Summer 2004<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Essays<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>291<\/td><td>Democratic Honor: Liberal and Populist<br>Richard D. Parker<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/parker.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>317<\/td><td>My Harvard Law School<br>William B. Rubenstein<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/rubenste.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Articles<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>335<\/td><td>O Say, Can You See: Free Expression by the Light of Fiery Crosses<br>Jeannine Bell<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/bell.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>391<\/td><td>The Law and Genetics of Racial Profiling in Medicine<br>Erik Lillquist<br>Charles A. Sullivan<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/lillqui.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Notes<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>485<\/td><td>Turning Lemons into Lemonade: Making <em> Georgia v. Ashcroft <\/em>the <em>Mobile v. Bolden<\/em> of 2007<br>Jocelyn Benson<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/benson.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>513<\/td><td>Challenging Punishment and Privatization: A Response to the Conviction of Regina McKnight<br>Shalini Bhargava<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/bhargava.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>543<\/td><td>Reaching Out to the Most Insular Minorities: A Proposal for Improving Latino Access to the American Legal System<br>Daniel J. Rearick<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/rearick.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>585<\/td><td>Book Note<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_2\/lee.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Editorial Board<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 39, No. 1, Winter 2004<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Essay<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td>About Your Masthead: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Compatibility of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties<br>Richard Delgado<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/delgado.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Articles<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>17<\/td><td>A Thirteenth Amendment Framework for Combating Racial Profiling<br>William M. Carter, Jr.<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/carter.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>95<\/td><td>Secrecy in the Immigration Courts and Beyond: Considering the Right To Know in the Administrative State<br>Heidi Kitrosser<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/kitrosser.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Notes<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>169<\/td><td>Can New Americans Achieve the American Dream? Promoting Homeownership in Immigrant Communities<br>Charu A. Chandrasekhar<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/chandrasekhar.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>217<\/td><td>Divining Hazelwood: The Need for a Viewpoint Neutrality Requirement in School Speech Cases<br>Susannah Barton Tobin<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/tobin.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>267<\/td><td>Book Notes<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol39_1\/booknotes.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Editorial Board<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"38\" name=\"38\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 38, No. 2, Summer 2003<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Essay<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>279<\/td><td>Repairing the Past: New Efforts in the Reparations Debate in America<br>Charles J. Ogletree, Jr<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/ogletree.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Articles<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>321<\/td><td>Criminal Law Sanctuaries<br>Wayne A. Logan<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/logan.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>393<\/td><td>The Constitutional Tort Action as Individual Remedy<br>James J. Park<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/park.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Book Review<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>455<\/td><td>Intimacy and Racial Equality: The Limits of Antidiscrimination<br>R. Richard Banks<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/banks.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Notes<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>479<\/td><td>Reconceptualizing Meritocracy: The Decline of Disparate Impact Discrimination Law<br>Nicole J. De Sario<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/desario.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>511<\/td><td>Marriage, Cruising, and Life in Between: Clarifying Organizational Positionalities in Pursuit of Polyvocal Gay-Based Advocacy<br>Douglas NeJaime<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/nejaime.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>563<\/td><td>What\u2019s the Big Deal? The Unconstitutionality of God in the Pledge of Allegiance<br>John E. Thompson<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_2\/thompson.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Editorial Board<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 38, No. 1, Winter 2003<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Articles<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>1<\/td><td>The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism<br>David Cole<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/cole.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>31<\/td><td>Statutory Speech Bubbles, First Amendment Overbreadth, and Improper Legislative Purpose<br>Alan K. Chen<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/chen.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>91<\/td><td>Discrimination in Workplace Dynamics: Toward a Structural Account of Disparate Treatment Theory<br>Tristin K. Green<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/green.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>159<\/td><td>Queers Anonymous: Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech, and Cyberspace<br>Edward Stein<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/stein.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Notes<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>215<\/td><td>Keep Out: Responding to Public Housing No-Trespass Policies<br>Elena Goldstein<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/goldstein.pdf\">(PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>247<\/td><td>\u201cHead Start Works Because We Do\u201d: Head Start Programs, Community Action Agencies, and the Struggle over Unionization<br>Eloise Pasachoff<\/td><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol38_1\/pasachoff.pdf\"> (PDF)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Editorial Board<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"37\" name=\"37\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 37, No. 2, Summer 2002<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>Articles<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/horwitz.pdf\">A Brief History of the <em>Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review<\/em><\/a><br>Morton Horwitz<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/ross.pdf\">The Sexualization of Difference: A Comparison of Mixed-Race and Same-Gender Marriage<\/a><br>Josephine Ross<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/schuck.pdf\">Judging Remedies: Judicial Approaches to Housing Segregation<\/a><br>Peter H. Schuck<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Book Review<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/delgado.pdf\">Explaining the Rise and Fall of African American Fortunes\u2014Interest Convergence and Civil Rights Gains<\/a><br>Richard Delgado<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Notes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/mutterperl.pdf\">Employment at (God\u2019s) Will: The Constitutionality of Antidiscrimination Exemptions in Charitable Choice Legislation<\/a><br>Laura Mutterperl<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/quinn.pdf\">Mommy Dearest: The Focus on the Family in Legal Feminism<\/a><br>Kerry L. Quinn<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_2\/sakaria.pdf\">Worshipping Substantive Equality over Formal Neutrality: Applying the Endorsement Test to Sect-Specific Legislative Accommodations<\/a><br>Anjali Sakaria<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vol. 37, No. 1, Winter 2002<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td>Articles<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/chin.pdf\">Regulating Race: Asian Exclusion and the Administrative State<\/a><br>Gabriel J. Chin<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/overton.pdf\">Rules, Standards, and <em>Bush v. Gore<\/em>: Form and the Law of Democracy<\/a><br>Spencer Overton<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/singer.pdf\">Something Important in Humanity<\/a><br>Joseph William Singer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Notes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/arkush.pdf\">Preserving \u201cCatalyst\u201d Attorneys\u2019 Fees Under the Freedom of Information Act in the Wake of <em>Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources<\/em><\/a><br>David Arkush<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/gupta.pdf\">Republic of South Africa\u2019s Prevention of Orgnaized Crime Act: A Comparative Bill of Rights Analysis<\/a><br>Deepak Gupta<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/harrison.pdf\">The Problem with Posner as Art Critic: <em>Linnemeir v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University Fort Wayne<\/em><\/a><br>Lindsay Harrison<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/crcl\/vol37_1\/weinrib.pdf\">Reconstructing Family: Constructive Trust at Relational Dissolution<\/a><br>Laura Weinrib<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"36\" name=\"36\"><\/a><strong>36 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 2001)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Punitive-Damages-in-Fair-Housing-Litigation-Ending-Unwise-Restrictions-on-a-Necessary-Remedy.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Punitive Damages in Fair Housing Litigation: Ending Unwise Restrictions on a Necessary Remedy<\/a><br><em>Timothy J. Moran<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Undocumented-Immigrants-in-the-Workplace-The-Fallacy-of-Labor-Protection-and-the-Need-for-Reform.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Undocumented Immigrants in the Workplace: The Fallacy of Labor Protection and the Need for Reform<\/a><br><em>Lori A. Nessel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Disabling-Discrimination-in-Our-Public-Schools-Comprehensive-Legal-Challenges-to-Inappropriate-and-Inadequate-Special-Education-Services-for-Minority-Children.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Disabling Discrimination in Our Public Schools: Comprehensive Legal Challenges to Inappropriate and Inadequate Special Education Services for Minority Children<\/a><br><em>Daniel J. Losen &amp; Kevin G. Welner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Legitimizing-Community-Consent-to-Local-Policing-The-Need-for-Democratically-Negotiated-Community-Representation-on-Civilian-Advisory-Councils.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Legitimizing Community Consent to Local Policing: The Need for Democratically Negotiated Community Representation on Civilian Advisory Councils<\/a><br><em>Reenah L. Kim<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Broadening-the-Scope-of-School-Finance-and-Resource-Comparability-Litigation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Broadening the Scope of School Finance and Resource Comparability Litigation<\/a><br><em>Julie Zwibelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Reforming-Welfare-after-Welfare-Reform-Reynolds-v.-Giuliani.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reforming Welfare after Welfare Reform:&nbsp;Reynolds v. Giuliani<\/a><br><em>Alice Bers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>36 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 2001)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/On-Postmodern-Feminist-Legal-Theory.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">On Postmodern Feminist Legal Theory<\/a><br><em>Maxine Eichner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Marriage-as-a-Trade-Bridging-the-Private-Private-Distinction.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Marriage as a Trade: Bridging the Private\/Private Distinction<\/a><br><em>Martha M. Ertman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Accommodating-Linguistic-Difference-Toward-a-Comprehensive-Theory-of-Language-Rights-in-the-United-States.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Accommodating Linguistic Difference: Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Language Rights in the United States<\/a><br><em>Cristina M. Rodr\u00edguez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Public-and-Private-Child-Troxel-v.-Granville-and-the-Constitutional-Rights-of-Family-Members.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Public and Private Child: Troxel v. Granville and the Constitutional Rights of Family Members<\/a><br><em>Alessia Bell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"35\" name=\"35\"><\/a><strong>35 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 2000)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/The-Sexual-Freedom-Cases-Contraception-Abortion-Abstinence-and-the-Constitution.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;The Sexual Freedom Cases&#8221;? Contraception, Abortion, Abstinence, and the Constitution<\/a><br><em>David B. Cruz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/The-Puzzle-of-Interlocking-Power-Hierarchies-Sharing-the-Pieces-of-Jurisdictional-Authority.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Puzzle of Interlocking Power Hierarchies: Sharing the Pieces of Jurisdictional Authority<\/a><br><em>Ayelet Shachar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Ghettoes-Made-Easy-The-MetamarketAntimarket-Dichotomy-and-the-Legal-Challenges-of-Inner-City-Economic-Development.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ghettoes Made Easy: The Metamarket\/Antimarket Dichotomy and the Legal Challenges of Inner-City Economic Development<\/a><br><em>David Dante Troutt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Massachusettss-Sexually-Dangerous-Persons-Legislation-Can-Juries-Make-a-Bad-Law-Better.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Massachusetts&#8217;s Sexually Dangerous Persons Legislation: Can Juries Make a Bad Law Better?<\/a><br><em>Lisa Kavanaugh<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Reading-the-Privileges-or-Immunities-Clause-Textual-Irony-Analytical-Revisionism-and-an-Interpretive-Truce.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reading the Privileges or Immunities Clause: Textual Irony, Analytical Revisionism, and an Interpretive Truce<\/a><br><em>Daniel J. Levin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>35 <strong>Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 2000)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Expressive-Indentity-Recuperating-Dissent-for-Equality.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Expressive Indentity: Recuperating Dissent for Equality<\/a><br><em>Nan D. Hunter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/The-Domestic-Fourth-Amendment-Rights-of-Undocumented-Immigrants-On-Guitterez-and-the-Tort-LawImmigration-Law-Parallel.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Domestic Fourth Amendment Rights of Undocumented Immigrants:&nbsp;On Guitterez and the Tort Law\/Immigration Law Parallel<\/a><br><em>Victor C. Romero<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Creating-Criminals-The-Injuries-Inflicted-by-Unenforced-Sodomy-Laws.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Creating Criminals: The Injuries Inflicted by Unenforced Sodomy Laws<\/a><br><em>Christopher R. Leslie<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/The-First-Amendment-after-Reno-v.-American-Arab-Anti-Discrimination-Committee-A-Different-Bill-of-Rights-for-Aliens.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The First Amendment after Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee: A Different Bill of Rights for Aliens<\/a><br><em>Maryam Kamali Miyamoto<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Protecting-Consumers-from-Predatory-Lenders-Defining-the-Problem-and-Moving-toward-Workable-Solutions.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protecting Consumers from Predatory Lenders: Defining the Problem and Moving toward Workable Solutions<\/a><br><em>Deborah Goldstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Development<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Immunity-as-an-Essential-Element-of-Statehood-Alden-v.-Maine.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Immunity as an Essential Element of Statehood: Alden v. Maine<\/a><br><em>Archis Parasharami<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Personally-Professional-A-Law-Student-in-Search-of-an-Advocacy-Model.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Personally Professional:&nbsp;A Law Student in Search of an Advocacy Model<\/a><br><em>Sophie Bryan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"34\" name=\"34\"><\/a><strong>34 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1999)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Operations-of-Legal-Rhetoric-Examining-Transsexual-and-Judicial-Identity.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Operations of Legal Rhetoric: Examining Transsexual and Judicial Identity<\/a><br><em>Susan Etta Keller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Resistance-to-Same-Sex-Marriage-as-a-Story-about-Language-Linguistic-Failure-and-the-Priority-of-a-Living-Language.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Resistance to Same-Sex Marriage as a Story about Language: Linguistic Failure and the Priority of a Living Language<\/a><br><em>Mae Kuykendall<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Live-Art-and-the-Audience-Toward-a-Speaker-Focused-Freedom-of-Expression.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Live Art and the Audience: Toward a Speaker-Focused Freedom of Expression<\/a><br><em>Anne Salzman Kurzweg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Expanding-the-Market-for-Justice-Arguments-for-Extending-In-Person-Client-Solicitation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Expanding the Market for Justice: Arguments for Extending In-Person Client Solicitation<\/a><br><em>Amy Busa &amp; Carl G. Sussman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Silent-Segregation-in-Our-Nations-Schools.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Silent Segregation in Our Nation&#8217;s Schools<\/a><br><em>Daniel J. Losen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/School-Finance-Battles-Survey-Says-Its-All-Just-a-Change-in-Attitudes.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">School Finance Battles:&nbsp;Survey Says It&#8217;s All Just a Change in Attitudes<\/a><br><em>Joseph S. Pratt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Multiple-Masculinities-A-New-Vision-for-Same-Sex-Harassment-Law.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Multiple Masculinities: A New Vision for Same-Sex Harassment Law<\/a><br><em>Rachel L. Toker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Reaching-Mrs.-Murphy-A-Call-for-Repeal-of-the-Mrs.-Murphy-Exemption-to-the-Fair-Housing-Act.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reaching Mrs. Murphy: A Call for Repeal of the Mrs. Murphy Exemption to the Fair Housing Act<\/a><br><em>James D. Walsh<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>34 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1999)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Memoriam<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUDGE A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, JR.\u2019S CIVIL RIGHTS LEGACY<br><em>Charles J. Ogletree, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE WARREN COURT AND THE CONCEPT OF A RIGHT<br><em>David Luban<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IS THIS AMERICA? THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND THE RIGHT TO VOTE<br><em>Jamin B. Raskin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: A WINDFAL FOR DEFENDANTS<br><em>Ruth Colker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>LOVING\u2019S <\/em>LEGACY: THE OTHER ANTIDISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLES<br><em>Allison Moore<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RECOGNIZING A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER TITLE IX FOR STUDENT-STUDENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT<br><em>Courtney G. Joslin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE TEXAS TEN PERCENT PLAN<br><em>Danielle Holley and Delia Spencer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Development<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TWO STEPS FORWARD, ONE STEP BACK: THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S TREATMENT OF TEACHER-STUDENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN <em>GEBSTER V. LAGO VISTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT<\/em><br><em>Amy Busa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>WE THE PEOPLE:<\/em> <em>TRANSFORMATIONS<\/em> BY BRUCE ACKERMAN<br><em>Maria Seferian<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"33\" name=\"33\"><\/a>33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1998)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: Reason, Passion &amp; the Progress of Law: Remembering and Advancing the Constitutional Vision of William J. Brennan<br>Symposium Addresses:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PREFACE<br><em>Garry W. Jenkins and Amy E. McManus<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WELCOME ADDRESS<br><em>Frank I. Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DINNER ADDRESS<br><em>Bill Lann Lee<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KEYNOTE ADDRESS<br><em>Abner J. Mikva<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE WAY OUT: A LEGAL STANDARD FOR IMPOSING ALTERNATIVE ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AS VOTING RIGHTS REMEDIES<br><em>Steven J. Mulroy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE AND THE COMPELLING INTEREST TEST<br><em>Goodwin Liu<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SPEECH AND THE SELF-REALIZATION VALUE<br><em>Brian C. Murchison<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NEUTRALITY AND THE RELIGIOUS CAUSES<br><em>Dhananjai Shivakumar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE WAGING OF WELFARE: ALL WORK AND NO PAY?<br><em>Craig L. Briskin and Kimberly A. Thomas<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WELFARE REFORM, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, AND THE SOCIAL WAGE: DISMANTLING FAMILY SUPPORT UNDER WISCONSIN\u2019S W-2 WORKFARE PLAN<br><em>Brendan P. Lynch<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>33 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1998)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES AND FREE SPEECH<br><em>C. Edwin Baker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EFFICIENCY WAGES, TOURNAMENTS, AND DISCRIMINATION: A THEORY OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW FOR \u201cHIGH LEVEL\u201d JOBS<br><em>David Charny and G. Mitu Gulati<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IT IS LAWYERS WE ARE FUNDING: A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE 1996 RESTRICTIONS ON THE LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION<br><em>Jessica A. Roth<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Forum<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DON\u2019T GIVE ME YOUR TIRED, YOUR POOR: CONFLICTED IMMIGRANT STORIES AND WELFARE REFORM<br><em>Bill Ong Hing<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ON THE GUARDING OF BORDERS<br><em>Lucie White<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUBLIC FUNDING FOR DISABILITY ACCOMMODATIONS: A RATIONAL SOLUTION TO RATIONAL DISCRIMINATION AND THE DISABILITIES OF THE ADA<br><em>Scott A. Moss and Daniel A. Malin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND SIMULACRA: EXPLORING CONCEPTIONS OF EQUALITY<br><em>Heather Lauren Hughes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REINING IN THE NATIONAL DRUG TESTING EPIDEMIC\u2013<em>CHANDLER v. MILLER<\/em><br><em>Nathan A. Brown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TYING THE HANDS OF CONGRESS\u2013<em>CITY OF BOERNE v. FLORES<\/em><br><em>Rachel Toker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"32\" name=\"32\"><\/a>32 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1997)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium Address<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>BOWERS<\/em> + TEN: LITIGATION, LEGISLATION, AND COMMUNITY ACTIVISM<br><em>Barney Frank<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RODRIGO\u2019S FOURTEENTH CHRONICLE: AMERICAN APOCALYPSE<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SCHOOLS WITHOUT RULES? CHARTER SCHOOLS, FEDERAL DISABILITY LAW, AND THE PARADOXES OF DEREGULATION<br><em>Jay P. Heubert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IS ACTUARIALLY FAIR INSURANCE PRICING ACTUALLY FAIR?: A CASE STUDY IN INSURING BATTERED WOMEN<br><em>Deborah S. Hellman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO \u201cCONSERVATIVE\u201d REVOLUTION<br><em>David C. Williams<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CELEBRITY PRIVACY RIGHTS AND FREE SPEECH: RECALIBRATING TORT REMEDIES FOR \u201cOUTED\u201d CELEBRITIES<br><em>Hilary E. Ware<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AT WHAT COST?: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST MANDATORY AZT TREATMENT OF HIV-POSITIVE PREGNANT WOMEN<br><em>Samantha Catherine Halem<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cSPECIAL NEEDS\u201d AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: AN EXCEPTION POISED TO SWALLOW THE WARRANT PREFERENCE RULE<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Jennifer Y. Buffaloe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LAURA KALMON, <em>THE STRANGE CAREER OF LEGAL LIBERALISM<\/em><br><em>Alexandra Lahav<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>32 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1997)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ELLICKSON ON \u201cCHRONIC MISCONDUCT\u201d IN URBAN SPACES: OF PANHANDLERS, BENCH SQUATTERS, AND DAY LABORERS<br><em>Stephen R. Munzer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CONSTRUCTION OF O.J. SIMPSON AS A RACIAL VICTIM<br><em>Devon W. Carbado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FALSE CONFESSIONS AND THE CONSTITUTION: SAFEGUARDS AGAINST UNWORTHY CONFESSIONS<br><em>Welsh S. White<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REINVIGORATING AUTONOMY: FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY IN THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE<br><em>Christina E. Wells<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FINAL FREEDOM: MAINTAINING AUTONOMY AND VALUING LIFE IN PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDES\u2013<em>QUILL v. VACCO, COMPASSION IN DYING v. WASHINGTON, LEE v. OREGON<\/em><br><em>Rachel D. Kleinberg and Toshiro M. Mochizuki<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL PROTECTION AND ANTI-GAY LEGISLATION: DISMANTLING THE LEGACY OF <em>BOWERS v. HARDWICK\u2013ROMER v. EVANS<\/em><br><em>Courtney G. Joslin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN APPEAL BY ANY OTHER NAME: CONGRESS\u2019S EMPTY VICTORY OVER HABEAS RIGHTS\u2013<em>FELKER v. TURPIN<\/em><br><em>Scott Moss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"31\" name=\"31\"><\/a><strong>31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1996)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: Political Lawyering: Conversations on Progressive Social Change<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POLITICAL LAWYERING: AN INTRODUCTION<br><em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Response Essays<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STEADY WORK: A PRACTITIONER\u2019S REFLECTIONS ON POLITICAL LAWYERING<br><em>Gary Bellow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TO BE A POLITICAL LAWYER<br><em>Peter M. Cicchino<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN AVERSION TO CLIENTS: LOVING HUMANITY AND HATING HUMAN BEINGS<br><em>Gerald P. Lopez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MITIGATION, MERCY, AND DELAY: THE MORAL POLITICS OF DEATH PENALTY ABOLITIONISTS<br><em>Anthony V. Alfieri<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NARRATIVE STRATEGY AND DEATH PENALTY ADVOCACY<br><em>Austin Sarat<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(DIS)ASSEMBLING RIGHTS OF WOMEN WORKERS ALONG THE GLOBAL ASSEMBLY LINE: HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE GARMENT INDUSTRY<br><em>Laura Ho, Catherine Powell, and Leti Volpp<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EMBEDDED PRACTICES: LAWYERS, CLIENTS, AND SOCIAL CHANGE<br><em>Louise G. Trubek<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AM I MY CLIENT?: THE ROLE CONFUSION OF A LAWYER ACTIVIST<br><em>Nancy D. Polikoff<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEVELOPING MICROBUSINESSES IN PUBLIC HOUSING; NOTES FROM THE FIELD<br><em>Margaret Beebe Held<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AFTER THE FEDERALIZATION BINGE: A CIVIL LIBERTIES HANGOVER<br><em>Greg Hollon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENGLISH-ONLY LAWS, INFORMATIONAL INTERESTS, AND THE MENAING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY\u2013<em>YNIGUEZ V. ARIZONIANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH<\/em><br><em>Martina Stewart<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SAME-SEX INTIMATE AND EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: THE <em>PICKERING<\/em> BALANCING TEST OR STRICT SCRUTINY?\u2013<em>SHAHAR V. BOWERS<\/em><br><em>Scott D. Wiener<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LUCY E. SALYER, <em>LAWS HARSH AS TIGERS: CHINESE IMMIGRANTS AND THE SHAPING OF MODERN IMMIGRATION LAW<\/em><br><em>Nina Wang<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1996)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NEGATIVE ACTION AGAINST ASIAN AMERICANS: THE INTERNAL INSTABILITY OF DWORKIN\u2019S DEFENSE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br><em>Jerry Kang<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DESTRUCTURING DISABILITY: RATIONING OF HEALTH CARE AND UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE SICK<br><em>David Orentlicher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE JACOB WETTERLING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN AND SEXUALLY VIOLENT OFFENDER REGISTRATION ACT: AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS<br><em>Caroline Louise Lewis<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GEOGRAPHICALLY SEXUAL?: ADVANCING LESBIAN AND GAY INTERESTS THROUGH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION<br><em>Darren Rosenblum<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FIGHTING SECTION 8 DISCRIMINATION: THE FAIR HOUSING ACT\u2019S NEW FRONTIER<br><em>Paula Beck<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POPULAR JUSTICE: STATE JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS<br><em>Scott D. Wiener<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUSTICE O\u2019CONNOR\u2019S BLIND RATIONALIZATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION JURISPRUDENCE\u2013<em>ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA,<\/em> 115 S. CT. 2097 (1995)<br><em>Sameer M. Ashar and Lisa F. Opoku<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LIMITING FEDERAL COURT POWER TO IMPOSE SCHOOL DESEGREGATION REMEDIES\u2013<em>MISSOURI v. JENKINS,<\/em> 115 S. Ct. 2097 (1995)<br><em>Carter M. Stewart and S. Felicita Torres<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A JEFFERSONIAN NIGHTMARE: THE SUPREME COURT LAUNCHES A CONFUSED ATTACK ON THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE\u2013<em>ROSENBERGER v. RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA,<\/em> 115 S. Ct. 2510 (1995)<br><em>Ben Brown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JAMES F. SIMON, <em>THE CENTER HOLDS: THE POWER STRUGGLE INSIDE THE REHNQUIST COURT<\/em><br><em>Colin Meeder<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"30\" name=\"30\"><\/a>30 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1995)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: Economic Justice in America\u2019s Cities: Visions and Revisions of a Movement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTRODUCTION: THIRTY YEARS IN AMERICA\u2019S CITIES: LOTS OF MOVEMENT, NOT MUCH JUSTICE<br><em>Lucie E. White<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ROUNDING OUT THE TABLE: OPENING AN IMPOVERISHED POVERTY DISCOURSE TO COMMUNITY VOICES<br><em>Brad Sears<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WELFARE REFORM AT THE LIMIT: THE FUTILITY OF \u201cENDING WELFARE AS WE KNOW IT\u201d<br><em>Larry Cata Backer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WE MAKE THE ROAD BY WALKING: IMMIGRANT WORKERS, THE WORKPLACE PROJECT, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR SOCIAL CHANGE<br><em>Jennifer Gordon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRANSFORMING SECTION 8: USING FEDERAL HOUSING SUBSIDIES TO PROMOTE INDIVIDUAL HOUSING CHOICE AND DESEGREGATION<br><em>Philip D. Tegler, Michael L. Hanley, and Judith Liben<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BRINGING SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT TO URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS<br><em>Robert E. Suggs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LISTEN TO THE CHILDREN: THE DECISION TO TRANSFER JUVENILES TO ADULT COURT<br><em>Catherine R. Guttman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EASING THE FEAR OF TOO MUCH JUSTICE: A COMPROMISE PROPOSAL TO REVISE THE RACIAL JUSTICE ACT<br><em>Paul Schoeman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Development<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FOURTH AMENDMENT\u2019S FORCING OF FLAWED CHOICES: GIVING CONTENT TO FREEDOM FOR RESIDENTS OF PUBLIC HOUSING\u2013<em>PRATT v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY<\/em><br><em>Erika R. George<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>30 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1995)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thirtieth Anniversary Issue Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LIBERATING THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT<br><em>Douglas L. Colbert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE COLOR OF TRADITION: CRITICAL RACE THEORY AND POSTMODERN CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONALISM<br><em>Robert L. Hayman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SELLING THE INTEGRITY OF THE SYSTEM OF PRECEDENT: SELECTIVE PUBLICATION, DEPUBLICATION, AND VACATUR<br><em>Howard Slavitt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PORNOGRAPHY LEFT AND RIGHT (RICHARD A. POSNER, <em>SEX AND REASON<\/em>; EDWARD DE GRAZIA, <em>GIRLS LEAN BACK EVERYWHERE: THE LAW OF OBSCENITY AND THE ASSAULT ON GENIUS<\/em><br><em>Catharine A. MacKinnon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SAFE ENOUGH TO LEARN: PLACING AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY OF PROTECTION ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS UNDER 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983<br><em>Deborah Austern Colson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FALLING THROUGH THE CRACKS: VOTING RIGHTS AND THE CENSUS\u2013<em>CITY OF NEW YORK V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE<\/em><br><em>Nathan Judish and Julia E. Judish<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SEPARATIST RELIGIOUS GROUPS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE\u2013<em>BOARD OF EDUCATION OF KIRYAS JOEL VILLAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT v. GRUMET<\/em><br><em>Alison Wheeler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE SEARCH FOR CITIZEN-SOLDIERS: FEMALE CADETS AND THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA<\/em><br><em>Juliette Kayyem<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MICHAEL NAVA AND ROBERT DAWIDOFF, <em>CREATED EQUAL: WHY GAY RIGHTS MATTER TO AMERICA<\/em><br><em>Scott D. Wiener<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KARIN AGUILAR-SAN JUAN, ED., <em>THE STATE OF ASIAN AMERICA: ACTIVISM AND RESISTANCE IN THE 1990S<\/em><br><em>Perry S. Chen and Kenly Kiya Kato<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"29\" name=\"29\"><\/a>29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1994)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: Stonewall at 25<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTRODUCTION: STONEWALL AT 25<br><em>The Editors<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE GAY CIVIL RIGHTS DEBATE IN THE STATES: DECODING THE DISCOURSE OF EQUIVALENTS<br><em>Jane S. Schacter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FROM HAND-HOLDING TO SODOMY: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF HOMOSEXUAL (EXPRESSIVE) CONDUCT<br><em>David Cole and William N. Eskridge, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GAY MEN, AIDS, AND THE CODE OF THE CONDOM<br><em>David L. Chambers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HATE CRIMES, HOMOSEXUALS, AND THE CONSTITUTION<br><em>Anthony S. Winer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE DEMISE OF THE HOMOSEXUAL EXCLUSION: NEW POSSIBILITIES FOR GAY AND LESBIAN IMMIGRATION<br><em>Robert Foss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TURF WARS: STREET GANGS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE BATTLE FOR PUBLIC SPACE<br><em>Terence R. Boga<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AGAINST MARRIAGE<br><em>Steven K. Homer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHERE DO MIXED BABIES BELONG? RACIAL CLASSIFICATION IN AMERICA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION<br><em>Julie C. Lythcott-Haims<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WINNING ARGUMENTS\/LOSING THEMSELVES: THE (DYS) FUNCTIONAL APPROACH IN THOMAS S. v. ROBIN Y.<br><em>Brad Sears<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CIVIL RIGHTS AND SPECIAL WRONGS\u2013THE AMENDMENT 2 LITIGATION<br><em>Pamela Coukos<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CATHARINE A. MACKINNON, <em>ONLY WORDS<\/em><br><em>Elizabeth Matthews<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1994)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF RACE: SOME OBSERVATIONS ON ILLUSION, FABRICATION, AND CHOICE<br><em>Ian F. Haney Lopez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>WASHINGTON v. DAVIS<\/em> AND THE OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACTS<br><em>Todd Rakoff<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE WAR ON DRUGS: THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION FALLS VICTIM TO STATE TAXATION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES<br><em>Ann L. Iijima<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN THE DEFENSE OF FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE<br><em>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN ACLU TRADITIONALIST REPLIES<br><em>David Goldberger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FIRST AMENDMENT FORMALISM IS GIVING WAY TO FIRST AMENDMENT LEGAL REALISM<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NOT EVEN HIS NAME: IS THE DENIGRATION OF CRAZY HORSE CUSTER\u2019S FINAL REVENGE?<br><em>Jessica R. Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE MERCY OF SCALIA: STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION AND THE RULE OF LENITY<br><em>Sarah Newland<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Development<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHITE LINES, BLACK DISTRICTS\u2013<em>SHAW v. RENO<\/em> AND THE DILUTION OF THE ANTI-DILUTION PRINCIPLE<br><em>Anthony Q. Fletcher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WILLIAM B. RUBENSTEIN, <em>LESBIANS, GAY MEN, AND THE LAW<\/em><br><em>Brad Sears<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ALICE VACHSS, <em>SEX CRIMES: TEN YEARS ON THE FRONT LINES PROSECUTING RAPISTS AND CONFRONTING THEIR COLLABORATORS<\/em><br><em>Stephanie Bunting<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"28\" name=\"28\"><\/a>28 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1993)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: In Your Midst: Contributions of Women of Color in the Law<br>INTRODUCTION<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ON BEING A GORILLA IN YOUR MIDST, OR, THE LIFE OF ONE BLACK WOMAN IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY<br><em>Jennifer M. Russell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STEALING AWAY: BLACK WOMEN, OUTLAW CULTURE AND THE RHETORIC OF RIGHTS<br><em>Monica J. Evans<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NEGLECTED STORIES AND THE LAWFULNESS OF <em>ROE V. WADE<\/em><br><em>Peggy Cooper Davis<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STRUCTURES OF SUBORDINATION: WOMEN OF COLOR AT THE INTERSECTION OF TITLE VII AND THE NLRA. NOT!<br><em>Elizabeth M. Iglesias<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FALSE HOPE OR A REALIZABLE RIGHT? THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO SHELTER UNDER THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS\u2019 PROPOSED BILL OF RIGHTS FOR SOUTH AFRICA<br><em>Kim Robinson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>HAGUE v. CIO<\/em> AND THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: TRANSLATING LIMITS OF POWERS INTO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS<br><em>Richard T. Pfohl<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A DUBIOUS VICTORY FOR THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH\u2013<em>SIMON &amp; SCHUSTER, INC. v. MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD<\/em><br><em>Tanya Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAW\u2019S SCIENTER REQUIREMENT\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. X-CITEMENT VIDEO, INC.<\/em><br><em>Robert F. Schwartz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>28 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1993)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ROSIE O\u2019NEILL GOES TO LAW SCHOOL: THE CLINICAL EDUCATION OF THE SENSITIVE NEW AGE PUBLIC DEFENDER<br><em>Abbe Smith<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RIGHTS HELD HOSTAGE: RACE, IDEOLOGY AND THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE<br><em>Kenneth B. Nunn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HARBORING, SANCTUARY AND THE CRIME OF CHARITY UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW<br><em>Gregory A. Loken and Lisa R. Babino<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE PUBLIC HARM OF PRIVATE VIOLENCE: RAPE, SEX DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP<br><em>Brande Stellings<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Development<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ANOTHER SKIRMISH IN THE EQUAL EDUCATION BATTLE\u2013<em>FREEMAN v. PITTS<\/em><br><em>Lisa A. Stewart<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GERALD P. LOPEZ, <em>REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO\u2019S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LEGAL PRACTICE<\/em><br><em>Mitchell A. Kamin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DERRICK A. BELL, JR., <em>FACES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL: THE PERMANENCE OF RACISM<\/em><br><em>Stephanie Goodman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ARCHIE EPPS, <em>MALCOLM X: SPEECHES AT HARVARD<\/em><br><em>Christopher J. Arias-Piranio<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"27\" name=\"27\"><\/a>27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1992)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium: The State of Civil Liberties: Where Do We Go From Here?<br>A Tribute to Norman Dorsen<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN<br><em>William J. Brennan, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NORMAN DORSEN: A TRIBUTE<br><em>James L. Oakes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND WHITE PAPER<br><em>Stephen Gillers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN, ACLU LEADER<br><em>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WRITINGS AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF NORMAN DORSEN<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNIVERSITIES, RACIST SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA: AN ESSAY FOR THE ACLU<br><em>Frank Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GHOSTS IN THE ATTIC: IDEALIZED PLURALISM, COMMUNITY AND HATE SPEECH<br><em>Burt Neuborne<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENVISIONING A FUTURE FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY: STRATEGIES FOR MAKING THE RIGHTS REAL<br><em>Rachael N. Pine and Sylvia A. Law<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POLICE ABUSE: CAN THE VIOLENCE BE CONTAINED?<br><em>David Rudovsky<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE POLITICS OF RELIGION AND THE SYMBOLS OF GOVERNMENT<br><em>Kenneth L. Karst<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LIFE AFTER <em>HARDWICK<\/em><br><em>Nan D. Hunter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS LITIGATION BEFORE A HOSTILE FEDERAL JUDICIARY: EXTRACTING BENEFIT FROM PERIL<br><em>Thomas B. Stoddard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CALCULATING INJUSTICE: THE FIXATION ON PUNISHMENT AS CRIME CONTROL<br><em>Michele H. Kalstein, Kirstie A. McCornock, Seth A. Rosenthal, Katherine M. Nicholson, John Raphling, and Brande Stellings<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BURDENS HARD TO BEAR: A THEOLOGY OF CIVIL RIGHTS<br><em>Rachel Mariner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Martin Luther King, Jr., <em>THE PAPERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., VOLUME I: CALLED TO SERVE (JANUARY 1929-JUNE 1951)<\/em><br><em>Peter M. Cicchino<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1992)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRINCIPLED JUSTICE: A PERSONAL REFLECTION ON JUSTICE MARSHALL<br><em>Virginia Whitner Hoptman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RE-COGNIZING INEQUALITY: REBELLION, REDEMPTION AND THE STRUGGLE FOR TRANSCENDENCE IN THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW<br><em>Robert L. Hayman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIT\u2019S THE THIRD WORLD DOWN THERE!\u201d: THE COLONIALIST VOCATION AND AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br><em>James M. Doyle<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE SUPREME COURT AND THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION<br><em>Martin H. Malin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CREATING SPACE FOR RACIAL DIFFERENCE: THE CASE FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN SCHOOLS<br><em>Christopher Steskal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEFENDANTS\u2019 WRONGS AND VICTIMS\u2019 RIGHTS\u2013<em>PAYNE v. TENNESSEE<\/em><br><em>Catherine Bendor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A JUDICIAL BLOW TO THE MILITARY\u2019S ANTI-GAY POLICIES\u2013<em>PRUITT v. CHENEY<\/em><br><em>Chad S. Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRUNK FULL OF TROUBLE\u2013<em>HARMELIN v. MICHIGAN<\/em><br><em>G. David Hackney<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DRUCILLA CORNELL, <em>BEYOND ACCOMMODATION: ETHICAL FEMINISM, DECONSTRUCTION, AND THE LAW<\/em><br><em>Edward H. Mills, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STEPHEN L. CARTER, <em>REFLECTIONS OF AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BABY<\/em><br><em>Eric Spooner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARY ANN GLENDON, <em>RIGHTS TALK: THE IMPOVERISHMENT OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE<\/em><br><em>Joan T. Brown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PAUL CHERIGNY, <em>GIGS: JAZZ AND THE CABARET LAWS IN NEW YORK CITY<\/em><br><em>Michelle Quash<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"26\" name=\"26\"><\/a>26 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1991)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONFESSIONS, CRIMINALS AND COMMUNITY<br><em>Sheri Lynn Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS OF A SECO. 1 (Winter 1991)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Tribute to Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN<br><em>Harry A. Blackmun<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN-AN APPRECIATION<br><em>Richard S. Arnold<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cRATHER THAN THE FREE\u201d: FREE BLACKS IN COLONIAL AND ANTEBELLUM VIRGINIA<br><em>A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr. and Greer C. Bosworth<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE POWER OF LANGUAGE BEYOND WORDS: LAW AS INVITATION<br><em>Emily Fowler Hartigan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE INTERCONNECTED EPIDEMICS OF DRUG DEPENDENCY AND AIDS<br><em>Larry Gostin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHILD ABUSE TRIALS AND THE CONFRONTATION OF TRAUMATIZED WITNESSES: DEFINING \u201cCONFRONTATION\u201d TO PROTECT BOTH CHILDREN AND DEFENDANTS<br><em>Brian L. Schwalb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ANONYMOUS TIPS, INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INARTICULATE HUNCHES\u2013<em>ALABAMA v. WHITE<\/em><br><em>Joe Metcalfe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY\u2013<em>DOE v. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AND THE FLORIDA BAR<\/em><br><em>Wendy J. Thurm<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BRINGING HATE CRIME INTO FOCUS\u2013THE HATE CRIME STATISTICS ACT OF 1990<br><em>Joseph M. Fernandez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ROBERT A WILLIAMS, JR., <em>THE AMERICAN INDIAN IN WESTERN LEGAL THOUGHT: THE DISCOURSES OF CONQUEST<\/em><br><em>Richard T. Pfohl<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FRANK R. PARKER, <em>BLACK VOTES COUNT: POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT IN MISSISSIPPI AFTER 1965<\/em><br><em>Mary L. Clark<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SHELBY STEELE, <em>THE CONTENT OF OUR CHARACTER<\/em><br><em>Cassandra Q. Butts<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STEVEN SHIFFRIN, <em>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DEMOCRACY, AND ROMANCE<\/em><br><em>Jean McLoughlin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"25\" name=\"25\"><\/a>25 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1990)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Developing New Approaches to Civil Rights for the 1990\u2032s<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHERE WE\u2019VE BEEN, WHERE WE\u2019RE GOING: A VISION OF RACIAL JUSTICE IN THE 1990\u2032S<br><em>Julian Bond<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO HATE-MOTIVATED VIOLENCE: THE MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE AND BEYOND<br><em>Virginia Nia Lee and Joseph M. Fernandez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EFFICIENCY\u2019S THREAT TO THE VALUE OF ACCESSIBLE COURTS FOR MINORITIES<br><em>Eric K. Yamamoto<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CONTRACT PERFORMANCE: PATTERSON AND A STATE LAW ALTERNATIVE<br><em>Steven J. Burton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RECONSTRUCTION, DECONSTRUCTION AND LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE: THE 1988 SUPREME COURT TERM AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1990<br><em>Sondra Hemeryck, Cassandra Butts, Laura Jehl, Adrienne Koch, and Matthew Sloan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WAIVING RIGHTS AND BURNING FLAGS: THE SEARCH FOR A VALID STATE INTEREST IN FLAG PROTECTION<br><em>Gregory Herbert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Laurence H. Tribe, <em>ABORTION: THE CLASH OF ABSOLUTES<\/em><br><em>Vada Berger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GUY CARAWAN AND CANDIE CARAWAN, EDS., <em>SING FOR FREEDOM: THE STORY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT THROUGH ITS SONGS<\/em><br><em>Angela Dorn and Gretchen C. von Helms<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>25 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1990)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SEXIST SPEECH IN THE WORKPLACE<br><em>Marcy Strauss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AMNESTY DENIALS: MUST ALIENS BET THEIR LIVES TO GET INTO COURT?<br><em>Daniel Kanstroom<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RETHINKING MINORITY BUSINESS STRATEGIES<br><em>Robert E. Suggs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN ACT RELATIVE TO CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW<br><em>Ian Fidencio Haney Lopez<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE COURT DECLINES IN FAIRNESS\u2013<em>TEAGUE v. LANE<\/em><br><em>Eliot F. Krieger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REDEFINING THE FAMILY\u2013<em>BRASCHI v. STAHL ASSOCIATES<\/em><br><em>James D. Esseks<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FORFEITING THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. MONSANTO<\/em> AND <em>CAPLIN &amp; DRYSDALE, CHARTERED v. UNITED STATES<\/em><br><em>Steve Dettelbach<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FIRST AMENDMENT OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE\u2013<em>MASSACHUSETTS v. OAKES<\/em><br><em>Tim Moran<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DOROTHY NELKIN AND LAURENCE TANCREDI, <em>DANGEROUS DIAGNOSTICS: THE SOCIAL POWER OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION<\/em><br><em>Jennifer DuFault<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BUD SCHULTZ AND RUTH SCHULTZ, <em>IT DID HAPPEN HERE: RECOLLECTIONS OF POLITICAL REPRESSION IN AMERICA<\/em><br><em>Steven R. Peikin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KENNETH L. KARST, <em>BELONGING TO AMERICA<\/em><br><em>Deborah Hellman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"24\" name=\"24\"><\/a>24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1989)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DECLARING ENGLISH THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE: PREJUDICE SPOKEN HERE<br><em>Antonio J. Califa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MINORITY LAW PROFESSORS\u2019 LIVES: THE BELL-DELGADO SURVEY<br><em>Richard Delgado and Derrick Bell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KEEPING THE FAITH: BLACK VOTERS IN THE POST-REAGAN ERA<br><em>Lani Guinier<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOO MUCH JUSTICE: A LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO <em>MCCLESKEY v. KEMP<\/em><br><em>Vada Berger, Nicole Walthour, Angela Dorn, Dan Lindsey, Pamela Thompson, and Gretchen von Helms<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>ARIZONA v. YOUNGBLOOD<\/em><br><em>Trish Peyser Perlmutter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL CARTE BLANCHE FOR QUASI-PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS?\u2013<em>NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. TARKANIAN<\/em><br><em>Jose Luis Patino<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RESTRICTING MINORITY OCCUPANCY TO MAINTAIN HOUSING INTEGRATION\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. STARRETT CITY ASSOCIATES<\/em><br><em>Ankur Goel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STUDENT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS\u2013<em>BURCH v. BARKER<\/em><br><em>Sylvia Quast<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARJORIE HEINS, <em>CUTTING THE MUSTARD: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE NATURE OF EXCELLENCE<\/em><br><em>Thomas K. Higley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SUNG-HEE SUH, <em>SANCTUARY: A STORY OF AMERICAN CONSCIENCE AND LAW IN COLLISION<\/em><br><em>Sung-Hee Suh<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RICHARD D. MOHR, <em>GAYS\/JUSTICE: A STUDY OF ETHICS, SOCIETY, AND LAW<\/em><br><em>Jonathan Handel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1989)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Voices of Experience: New Response to Gender Discourse<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTRODUCTION: FINDING OUR PARADOXES, AFFIRMING OUR BEYOND<br><em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BLACK WOMEN AND THE CONSTITUTION: FINDING OUR PLACE; ASSERTING OUR RIGHTS<br><em>Judy Scales-Trent<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cGIRLS CAN\u2019T BE PLUMBERS\u201d\u2013AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION: BEYOND GOALS AND QUOTAS<br><em>Sylvia A. Law<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WORK AND FAMILY: THE GENDER PARADOX AND THE LIMITATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION ANALYSIS IN RESTRUCTURING THE WORKPLACE<br><em>Nancy E. Dowd<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MAPS AND MISREADINGS: THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHIC COMPACTNESS IN RACIAL VOTE DILUTION LITIGATION<br><em>Pamela S. Karlan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Developments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1988<br><em>Keith Aoki<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TITLE VII: APPLICATION OF IMPACT ANALYSIS TO SUBJECTIVE EMPLOYMENT CRITERIA\u2013<em>WATSON v. FORT WORTH BANK AND TRUST<\/em><br><em>Karen Halverson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NORMAN DORSEN, ED., <em>THE EVOLVING CONSTITUTION: ESSAYS ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT<\/em><br><em>Christopher Armeniades<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JILL NORGREN AND SERENA NANDA, <em>AMERICAN CULTURAL PLURALISM AND LAW<\/em><br><em>Adrienne Koch<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"23\" name=\"23\"><\/a>23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1988)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Responses to the Minority Critiques of the Critical Legal Studies Movement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACISM, RIGHTS AND THE QUEST FOR EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY: A CRITICAL LEGAL ESSAY<br><em>Alan Freeman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RIGHTS<br><em>Morton J. Horwitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND THE REALITIES OF RACE\u2013DOES THE FUNDAMENTAL CONTRADICTION HAVE A COROLLARY?<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BLACK NEIGHBORHOODS BECOMING BLACK CITIES: GROUP EMPOWERMENT, LOCAL CONTROL AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DARKER THAN <em>BROWN<\/em><br><em>Ankur J. Goel, Willie J. Lovett, Jr., Robert Patten, and Robert L. Wilkins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE PURGING OF EMPOWERMENT: VOTER PURGE LAWS AND THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT<br><em>Steve Barber, Jim Halpert, Mimi Wright, and Frank Litwin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GIDEON\u2019S SHELTER: THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE A RIGHT TO COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS IN EVICTION PROCEEDINGS<br><em>Andrew Scherer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IT\u2019S NOT THAT SIMPLE: AN UNNECESSARY ELIMINATION OF STRICT LIABILITY AND PRESUMED DAMAGES IN LIBEL LAW<br><em>Alfred C. Yen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CATHARINE A. MACKINNON, <em>FEMINISM UNMODIFIED<\/em><br><em>Dan Danielsen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KRISTIN BUMILLER, <em>THE CIVIL RIGHTS SOCIETY: THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF VICTIMS<\/em><br><em>Robert Salcido<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1988)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Workplace<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION AND THE LAW: PERSPECTIVES FROM YEAR TWO OF THE LAWS PROJECT<br><em>Steven M. Fetter and Joy K. Reynolds<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COOPERATION vs. COMPETITION AT EASTERN AIR LINES<br><em>Beverly Smaby<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION DEBATE: A WORKPLACE DEMOCRACY PERSPECTIVE<br><em>Karl E. Klare<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LIE DETECTORS IN EMPLOYMENT<br><em>Michael Tiner and Daniel J. O\u2019Grady<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFLECTIONS ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFTER PARADISE AND JOHNSON<br><em>Robert Belton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AIDS AND THE COERCIVE POWER OF THE STATE<br><em>Kathleen M. Sullivan and Martha A. Field<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNSAFE HAVENS: THE CASE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF FOSTER CHILDREN FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT<br><em>Michael B. Mushlin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JO ANN GIBSON ROBINSON, <em>THE MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT AND THE WOMEN WHO STARTED IT: THE MEMOIR OF JO ANN GIBSON ROBINSON<\/em><br><em>Wilhelmina M. Wright<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DERRICK BELL, <em>AND WE ARE NOT SAVED: THE ELUSIVE QUEST FOR RACIAL JUSTICE<\/em><br><em>Peter M. Yu<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a id=\"22\" name=\"22\"><\/a>22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1987)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Minority Critique of the Critical Legal Studies Movement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FOREWORD<br><em>Jose A. Bracamonte<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ETHEREAL SCHOLAR: DOES CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES HAVE WHAT MINORITIES WANT?<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LOOKING TO THE BOTTOM: CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND REPARATIONS<br><em>Mari J. Matsuda<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ALCHEMICAL NOTES: RECONSTRUCTING IDEALS FROM DECONSTRUCTED RIGHTS<br><em>Patricia J. Williams<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CLOUDED PRISM<br><em>Harlon L. Dalton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RISE AND FALL OF THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS<br><em>Jocelyn C. Frye Robert S. Gerber, Robert H. Pees and Arthur W. Richardson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD CONSENT AND COOPERATION: RECONSIDERING THE POLITICAL STATUS OF INDIAN NATIONS<br><em>Rachel San Kronowitz, Joanne Lichtman, Steven Paul McSloy, and Matthew G. Olsen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FROM LITIGATION TO LEGISLATION IN EXCLUSIONARY ZONING LAW<br><em>Harold A. McDougall<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review Essay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MCCARTHYISM AND CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES (ELLEN W. SCHRECKER, <em>NO IVORY TOWER: MCCARTHYISM AND THE UNIVERSITIES<\/em>)<br><em>Jerry Frug<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEE C. BOLLINGER, <em>THE TOLERANT SOCIETY: FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXTREMIST SPEECH IN AMERICA<\/em><br><em>Michael Linfield<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1987)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Symposium on Poverty and the Law<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE SOUTH BRONX: PAST DESTRUCTION AND THE REBUILDING PROCESS<br><em>Dean Brackley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARDS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT ECONOMY: PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES FOR ACQUISITION AND USE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY<br><em>Staughton Lynd<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MIGRANT FARM WORKER ADVOCACY: EMPOWERING THE INVISIBLE LABORER<br><em>Viviana Patino<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ADEQUATE EDUCATION FOR ALL: A RIGHT, AN ACHIEVABLE GOAL<br><em>Julius Chambers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMMENTARY<br><em>Sylvia Law<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LITIGATING ON BEHALF OF SHELTER FOR THE POOR<br><em>Robert Hayes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONTRASTING CONSTITUTIONAL VISIONS: OF REAL AND UNREAL DIFFERENCES<br><em>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHEN DIFFERENCE HAS ITS HOME: GROUP HOMES FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED, EQUAL PROTECTION AND LEGAL TREATMENT OF DIFFERENCE<br><em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REVEREND MOON AND THE BLACK HEBREWS: CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF A DEFENDANT\u2019S RELIGION IN CRIMINAL CASES<br><em>Charles J. Ogletree<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMING UP SHORT: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LITTLE PEOPLE<br><em>Paul Steven Miller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MICHAEL KENT CURTIS, <em>NO STATE SHALL ABRIDGE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS<\/em><br><em>Dana Chasin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHARLES M. HAAR AND DANIEL WM. FESSLER, <em>THE WRONG SIDE OF THE TRACKS<\/em><br><em>Laura J. Eisenstadt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DONALD L. SMITH, <em>ZECHARIAH CHAFEE, JR., DEFENDER OF LIBERTY AND LAW<\/em><br><em>Crawford Moorefield III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BERNARD SCHWARTZ, <em>SWANN\u2019S WAY: THE SCHOOL BUSING CASE AND THE SUPREME COURT<\/em><br><em>James A. Thomson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"21\" name=\"21\"><\/a>21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1986)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project on National Security and Secrecy<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Commentary<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CURTISS-WRIGHT COMES HOME: EXECUTIVE POWER AND NATIONAL SECURITY SECRECY<br><em>Harold Edgar and Benno C. Schmidt, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Comment<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A NATION LESS SECURE: DIMINISHED PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION<br><em>James A. Goldston, Jennifer M. Granholm, and Robert J. Robinson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project on the Sanctuary Movement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Comment<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECUMENICAL, MUNICIPAL AND LEGAL CHALLENGES TO UNITED STATES REFUGEE POLICY<br><em>Deborah Cohan, Rachel Sankronowitz, Clara Amanda Pope, and Gloria Valencia-Weber<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AS TIME GOES BY: THE ELIMINATION OF CONTEMPORANEITY AND BREVITY AS FACTORS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE CASES<br><em>Edwin Butterfoss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S 1984-85 CHURCH-STATE DECISIONS: JUDICIAL PATHS OF LEAST RESISTANCE<br><em>Ruti G. Teitel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN ARGUMENT FOR FEDERAL PROTECTION AGAINST RACIALLY MOTIVATED CRIMES: 18 U.S.C. sec. 241 AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT<br><em>Charles H. Jones, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EDWIN P. ROME AND WILLIAM H. ROBERTS, <em>CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL FREE SPEECH: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF EXPRESSION IN BUSINESS<\/em><br><em>Joel A. Rabinovitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PETER SINGER AND DEANE WELLS, <em>MAKING BABIES: THE NEW SCIENCE AND ETHICS OF CONCEPTION<\/em><br><em>John J. Coughlin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PETER H. SCHUCK AND ROGERS M. SMITH, <em>CITIZENSHIP WITHOUT CONSENT: ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THE AMERICAN POLICY<\/em><br><em>Janet Wong<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1986)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS<br><em>Norman Dorsen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cCIVIL RIGHTS\u201d ORDINANCES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL\u2019S COMMISSION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN PORNOGRAPHY REGULATION<br><em>Barry W. Lynn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RHETORIC<br><em>Judith Olans Brown, Phyllis Tropper Baumann, and Elaine Millar Melnick<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL CHALLENGES TO ALL-FEMALE ORGANIZATIONS<br><em>Chai R. Feldblum, Nancy Fredman Krent, and Virginia G. Watkin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS<br><em>Brent J. Gurney<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE UNITIES OF THE CONSTITUTION (LAURENCE TRIBE, <em>CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICES<\/em>)<br><em>Mark V. Tushnet<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DIAGNOSING LAW AND PSYCHIATRY (ALAN A. STONE, <em>LAW, PSYCHIATRY, AND MORALITY: ESSAYS AND ANALYSIS<\/em>)<br><em>Henry A. Beyer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HOLDING AMERICA TOGETHER (RICHARD JOHN NEUHAS, <em>THE NAKED PUBLIC SQUARE: RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA<\/em>)<br><em>David S. Douglas<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"20\" name=\"20\"><\/a>20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1985)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEPRIVING WESTMINSTER OF ITS MORAL CONSTRAINTS: A SURVEY OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA<br><em>J. D. van der Vyver<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COURT-ORDERED HIRING QUOTAS AFTER STOTTS: A NARRATIVE ON THE ROLE OF THE MORALITIES OF THE WEB AND THE LADDER IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE<br><em>Paul J. Spiegelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RX FOR THE ELDERLY: LEGAL RIGHTS (AND WRONGS) WITHIN THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM David S. Douglas<br><em>David Feinberg, Robin Jacobsohn, and Alice B. Stock<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREE SPEECH AND UNION NEWSPAPERS: INTERNAL DEMOCRACY AND TITLE I RIGHTS<br><em>Judith Gallen Edersheim<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE INSANITY DEFENSE AND THE CIVIL LIBERTARIAN (LINCOLN CAPLAN, <em>THE INSANITY DEFENSE AND THE TRIAL OF JOHN W. HINCKLEY, JR.<\/em>)<br><em>Alan A. Stone<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMBATING HOUSING DISCRIMINATION IN THE 1980\u2032S (JAMES A. KUSHNER, <em>FAIR HOUSING<\/em>)<br><em>Daniel R. Mandelker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHARLES VERT WILLIE, <em>SCHOOL DESEGREGATION PLANS THAT WORK<\/em><br><em>James Edward Johnson<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1985)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentaries<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PORNOGRAPHY, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND SPEECH<br><em>Catharine A. MacKinnon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KLAUS BARBIE AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT: A REPLY TO MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG<br><em>Allan A. Ryan, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES FOR UNDERINCLUSIVE STATUTES: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF HECKLER v. MATHEWS<br><em>Bruce K. Miller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ASPIRATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL INTERESTS OF SOCIAL REFORM ORGANIZATIONS: A NEW ROLE FOR THE IDEOLOGICAL PLAINTIFF<br><em>William Burnham<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Note<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STRATEGIES FOR THE ELIMINATION OF SEX DISCRIMINATION IN PRIVATE INSURANCE<br><em>Anne C. Cicero<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE POLITICS OF LAWYERING (ARTHUR KINOY, <em>RIGHTS ON TRIAL: THE ODYSSEY OF A PEOPLE\u2019S LAWYER<\/em>)<br><em>David Hoffman<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"19\" name=\"19\"><\/a>19 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1984)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Tribute to Clarence Clyde Ferguson, Jr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY OF CLARENCE CLYDE FERGUSON, JR. (1924-1983)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRAGEDY OF TIMING<br><em>Derrick Bell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN MEMORIAM TURN BACK NOW?<br><em>Jean Camper Cahn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RECOLLECTIONS OF C. CLYDE FERGUSON, JR.<br><em>Clarence Mitchell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CROSSING THE LONESOME VALLEY<br><em>Walter J. Leonard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TURNING BACK THE CLOCK: THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS<br><em>Drew S. Days, III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BALANCING GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY AND THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN EXECUTIVE BRANCH \u201cHOUSEKEEPING\u201d REGULATIONS AND CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS\u2019 RIGHTS TO A CONSTITUTIONALLY FAIR TRIAL<br><em>James F. Ponsoldt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO APPOINTED COUNSEL IN QUASI-CRIMINAL CASES: TOWARDS AN EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL STANDARD<br><em>Robert S. Catz and Nancy Lee Firak<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHAT HAPPENS TO A DREAM DEFERRED: AN ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE 1963 MARCH ON WASHINGTON<br><em>Damon J. Keith<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BURDENS ON GAY LITIGANTS AND BIAS IN THE COURT SYSTEM: HOMOSEXUAL PANIC, CHILD CUSTODY, AND ANONYMOUS PARTIES<br><em>Robert G. Bagnall, Patrick C. Gallagher, and Joni L. Goldstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POLITICS OVER LAW IN WARTIME: THE JAPANESE EXCLUSION CASES (PETER IRONS, <em>JUSTICE AT WAR: THE STORY OF THE JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT CASES<\/em>)<br><em>Howard Ball<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>19 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1984)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KLAUS BARBIE AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT<br><em>Arthur J. Goldberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, REGARDING H.J. RES. 1: THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT<br><em>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUBLIC PSYCHIATRY AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT: TOWARD AN EFFECTIVE DAMAGE REMEDY<br><em>Barry R. Furrow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AGE RESTRICTIONS IN HOUSING: THE DENIAL OF THE FAMILY\u2019S RIGHT TO ITS INTEGRITY<br><em>Richard C. Stanley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE COST OF PRESERVING RIGHTS: ATTORNEYS\u2019 FEE AWARDS AND INTERVENORS IN CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION<br><em>Brian Zenkichi Tamanaha<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SECTION 2 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE 1982 AMENDMENT<br><em>Roy A. McKenzie and Ronald A. Krauss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PARSING PUBLIC FROM PRIVATE: THE FAILURE OF DIFFERENTIAL STATE ACTION ANALYSIS<br><em>Jody Young Jakosa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD A COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (DAVID PANNICK, <em>JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DEATH PENALTY<\/em>)<br><em>Hugo Adam Bedau<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ONGOING DEBATE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH (RAOUL BERGER, <em>DEATH PENALTIES: THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S OBSTACLE COURSE<\/em>)<br><em>Timothy J. Foley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FRANCES FOX PIVEN AND RICHARD A. CLOWARD, <em>THE NEW CLASS WAR: REAGAN\u2019S ATTACK ON THE WELFARE STATE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES<\/em><br><em>Josie Foehrenbach<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ITHIEL DE SOLA POOL, <em>TECHNOLOGIES OF FREEDOM<\/em><br><em>Craig S. Tyle<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"18\" name=\"18\"><\/a>18 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1983)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE EXCLUSION OF WOMEN FROM INFLUENTIAL MEN\u2019S CLUBS: THE INNER SANCTUM AND THE MYTH OF FULL EQUALITY<br><em>Michael M. Burns<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THE POWER TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO PRISONS: AN HISTORICAL RE-EXAMINATION<br><em>Leonard G. Leverson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IMAGERY OF COMMUNITY, IDEOLOGY OF AUTHORITY: THE MORAL REASONING OF CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER<br><em>Robert Douglas Chesler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND THE WAIVER OF SENTENCE REVIEW<br><em>Tim Kaine<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF UNION OFFICIALS UNDER THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT<br><em>James Gray Pope<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BANNING WORDS: A COMMENT ON \u201cWORDS THAT WOUND\u201d<br><em>Marjorie Heins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROFESSOR DELGADO REPLIES<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CALABRESI ON THE PROBLEM OF STATUTORY MIDDLE-AGE: JUDICIAL CURE OR POLITICAL PRESCRIPTION? (GUIDO CALABRESI, <em>A COMMON LAW FOR THE AGE OF STATUTES<\/em>)<br><em>Shannon C. Stimson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JEROLD S. AUERBACH, <em>THE NEW DEAL LAWYERS<\/em><br><em>William F. Treanor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUSTICE WITHOUT LAW? RESOLVING DISPUTES WITHOUT LAWYERS<br><em>Barbara Fischbein<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>18 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1983)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENFORCEMENT OF TITLE VI COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS BY THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES<br><em>Arthur R. Block<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED TO A PUBLIC DEFENSE<br><em>Max D. Stern<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON PROSECUTORIAL DISCOVERY<br><em>Eric D. Blumenson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEFINING PROPERTY RIGHTS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROTECTING TENANTS FROM CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION<br><em>Victoria A. Judson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PASSING THE BUCKS: PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS UNDER FEDERAL BLOCK GRANTS<br><em>Janet Varon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFLECTIONS OF RICHARD POSNER (RICHARD POSNER, <em>THE ECONOMICS OF JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>Bradley Honoroff<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, <em>THE BEST DEFENSE<\/em><br><em>Paul J. Kiernan and Leslie M. Berger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MTRON FARBER, <em>\u201cSOMEBODY IS LYING\u201d: THE STORY OF DR. X<\/em><br><em>Meryl S. Justin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BARRY R. CHISWICK, ED., <em>THE GATEWAY: U.S. IMMIGRATION ISSUES AND POLICIES<\/em><br><em>Cynthia Boyce<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ROBERT M. O\u2019NEIL, <em>CLASSROOMS IN THE CROSSFIRE: THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF STUDENTS, PARENTS, TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS, LIBRARIANS AND THE COMMUNITY<\/em><br><em>Patrick Carome<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WILLIAM RYAN, <em>EQUALITY<\/em><br><em>Nancy-Ann Min<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ROBERT JOHNSON, <em>CONDEMNED TO DIE: LIFE UNDER SENTENCE OF DEATH<\/em><br><em>Cheryl Poinsette<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"17\" name=\"17\"><\/a>17 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1982)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO KNOW WHY<br><em>Martha I. Morgan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRIVACY OF ASSOCIATION: A BURGEONING PRIVILEGE IN CIVIL DISCOVERY<br><em>Joan Steinman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIFFING OF BROWN: DE-INTEGRATING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACULTIES<br><em>Scott J. Davidson, Stuart W. Davidson, and Judith Hall Howard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: A JURISPRUDENTIAL\/LEGAL CRITIQUE<br><em>Myrl L. Duncan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DESEGREGATION AND THE MEANING OF EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION<br><em>Tracy Miller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>17 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1982)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ADVOCATING CIVIL LIBERTIES: A YOUNG LAWYER BEFORE THE OLD COURT<br><em>Louis H. Pollak<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TWO CATEGORIES OF DISCRIMINATORY INTENT<br><em>Eric Schnapper<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GENERALIZING THE TRIAL MODEL OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS: A NEW BASIS FOR THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT<br><em>Edward L. Rubin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WORDS THAT WOUND: A TORT ACTION FOR RACIAL INSULTS, EPITHETS, AND NAME- CALLING<br><em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND THE DIES COMMITTEE, 1938-1940<br><em>Jerold Simmons<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PAST CLAIMANT AS FUTURE VICTIM: COMMERCIAL RETALIATION AND THE EROSION OF COURT ACCESS<br><em>David Abromowitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD A THEORY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT (FRANKLYN S. HAIMAN, <em>SPEECH AND LAW IN A FREE SOCIETY<\/em>)<br><em>Steven Stark<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Publications<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LAURENCE D. HOULGATE, <em>THE CHILD AND THE STATE: A NORMATIVE THEORY OF JUVENILE RIGHTS<\/em><br><em>Thomas Tupitza<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ELLSWORTH A. FERSCH, <em>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY IN COURTS AND CORRECTIONS: CONTROVERSY AND CHANGE<\/em><br><em>Sylvia Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ELIZABETH H. WOLGAST, <em>EQUALITY AND THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN<\/em><br><em>Kathleen Beggs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>YALE KAMISAR, <em>POLICE INTERROGATION AND CONFESSIONS: ESSAYS IN LAW AND POLICY<\/em><br><em>Jeremy Henderson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MICHAEL STEVEN HINDUS, <em>PRISON AND PLANTATIONS: CRIME, JUSTICE AND AUTHORITY IN MASSACHUSETTS AND SOUTH CAROLINA, 1767 \u2013 1868<\/em><br><em>Robert Chesler<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"16\" name=\"16\"><\/a>16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Winter 1982)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dedication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEDICATED TO ROGER N. BALDWIN<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN DEFENSE OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS RELITIGATION<br><em>Gary Peller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HOW DESEGREGATION ORDERS MAY IMPROVE MINORITY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT<br><em>Robert L. Crain and Rita E. Mahard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL ASPECTS OF PRISON RIOTS<br><em>Ira P. Robbins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>ULYSSES AND THE PSYCHIATRISTS:<\/em> A LEGAL AND POLICY ANALYSIS OF THE VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT CONTRACT<br><em>Rebecca S. Dresser<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PREFERENTIAL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (DANIEL C. MAGUIRE, <em>A NEW AMERICAN JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>Derrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REPRESENTATIVE EGOS (H. N. HIRSCH, <em>THE ENIGMA OF FELIX FRANKFURTER<\/em>; JAMES F. SIMON, <em>INDEPENDENT JOURNEY<\/em>)<br><em>George Kannar<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Fall 1981)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First Amendment Symposium<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FOREWORD: IS THE PENDULUM SWINGING AWAY FROM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION?<br><em>Edward M. Kennedy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JOURNALISTIC SILENCE AND GOVERNMENTAL SPEECH: CAN INSTITUTIONS HAVE RIGHTS?<br><em>Robert Meister<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN EGALITARIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT<br><em>John H. F. Shattuck and Fritz Byers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE IMAGE OF JUSTICE: CHANDLER v. FLORIDA<br><em>Charles R. Nesson and Andrew D. Koblenz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACCESS TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: TO RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS AND BEYOND<br><em>G. Michael Fenner and James L. Koley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR PRIVATE PAPERS<br><em>Craig M. Bradley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GOVERNMENT HOUSEKEEPING AUTHORITY: BUREAUCRATIC PRIVILEGES WITHOUT A BUREAUCRATIC PRIVILEGE<br><em>Don Lively<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL EXPRESSION: A PROBLEM IN FIRST AMENDMENT THEORY<br><em>James R. Ferguson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRUSTEES OF SELF-INTEREST? (JOHN LOFTON, <em>THE PRESS AS GUARDIAN OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT<\/em>)<br><em>Pnina Lahav<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Summer 1981)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY: FOURTH AMENDMENT LEGITIMACY THROUGH STATE LAW<br><em>Richard S. Walinski and Thomas J. Tucker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INCARCERATING STATUS OFFENDERS: ATTEMPTS TO CIRCUMVENT THE JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT<br><em>Jan C. Costello and Nancy L. Worthington<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING CASES<br><em>Robert G. Schwemm<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JURISDICTIONAL GERRYMANDERING: ZONING DISFAVORED RIGHTS OUT OF THE FEDERAL COURTS<br><em>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF GUILTY PLEAS IN THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM<br><em>Priscilla Budeiri<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS LIMITS ON THE DURATION OF CIVIL COMMITMENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS<br><em>David W. Burgett<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION AND THE PRIVACY OF MEDICAL RECORDS<br><em>Wendy E. Parmet<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"15\" name=\"15\"><\/a>15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Winter 1980)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE LEGALITY OF MINIMUM COMPETENCY TEST PROGRAMS UNDER TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964<br><em>John Benjes, Jay Heubert, and Michael O\u2019Brien<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL RIGHTS TO TRIAL FOR WOMEN: SEX BIAS IN THE LAW OF SELF-DEFENSE<br><em>Elizabeth Schneider<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRIVATE SECURITY AND THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE<br><em>Steven Euller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CHILLING EFFECT IN PRESS CASES: JUDICIAL THUMB ON THE SCALES<br><em>Tamara Jacobs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CASES THAT SHOCK CONSCIENCE: REFLECTIONS ON CRITICISM OF THE BURGER COURT<br><em>Jeffrey Blum, William Greaney, Patrick Hanifin, and Angela Sousa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PEN REGISTERS AFTER <em>SMITH v. MARYLAND<\/em><br><em>John Applegate and Amy Grossman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHOOSING HEROES CAREFULLY (JOHN HART ELY, <em>DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST<\/em>)<br><em>Ira C. Lupu<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Fall 1980)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Tribute to Justice Brennan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FOREWORD<br><em>Albert Sacks<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TESTIMONIAL TO MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN<br><em>Potter Stewart<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR.<br><em>David Bazelon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN\u2013THE EARLIER YEARS<br><em>Frederick Hall<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN<br><em>Milton Katz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN: A PROPERTY TEACHER\u2019S APPRECIATION<br><em>Frank Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE MANIPULATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A FIRST AMENDMENT CRITIQUE OF SCHOOLING<br><em>Stephen Arons and Charles Lawrence III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO REFUSE PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS<br><em>Nancy Rhoden<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BEYOND <em>DAVIS<\/em>: EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION FOR DISABLED STUDENTS UNDER THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973<br><em>Timothy Cook and Frank Laski<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL PAY FOR COMPARABLE WORK<br><em>Jane von Frank<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE MCCARTHY ERA: HISTORY AS A SNAPSHOT (DAVID CAUTE, <em>THE GREAT FEAR: THE ANTI-COMMUNIST PURGE UNDER TRUMAN AND EISENHOWER<\/em>)<br><em>Michael Tigar<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1980)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE<br><em>J. Skelly Wright<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW\u2013SECTION 1981<br><em>Jack Aguilar, Jack Balkin, Ronald Baugh, Gregory Beattie, Richard Claman, Martin Himeles, Jr., Charles Johnson, Robert Kipnees, Jacob Lewis, Caryn May, Elizabeth Merritt, Cheryl Noble, Michael Stewart, Kathleen Sullivan, Mary Wilke, and James Witkin<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"14\" name=\"14\"><\/a>14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1979)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentaries<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE JURISPRUDENCE OF <em>BROWN<\/em> AND THE DILEMMAS OF LIBERALISM<br><em>Morton J. Horwitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REEXAMINING <em>BROWN<\/em> TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER: LOOKING BACKWARDS INTO THE FUTURE<br><em>Robert L. Carter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE JUDICIAL STRUGGLE AGAINST EXCLUSIONARY ZONING: THE NEW JERSEY PARADIGM<br><em>Harold A. McDougall<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: THE CIA IN THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS<br><em>Caroline Heck<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SENIORITY SYSTEMS AND THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION: UNION LIABILITY IN THE <em>TEAMSTERS<\/em> CONTEXT<br><em>Kenneth Kleinman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MISGOVERNMENT BY JUDICIARY? (PHILIP B. KURLAND. <em>WATERGATE AND THE CONSTITUTION<\/em>)<br><em>Paul L. Murphy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE (CHARLES E. SILBERMAN, <em>CRIMINAL VIOLENCE, CRIMINAL JUSTICE<\/em>; HYMAN GROSS, <em>A THEORY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>Edwin M. Schur<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1979)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF PRESS<br><em>Thomas I. Emerson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARDS AN AUTONOMY-BASED THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY: BEYOND THE IDEOLOGY OF FAMILIAL PRIVACY<br><em>June Aline Eichbaum<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE NEW COMMERCIAL SPEECH DOCTRINE AND BROADCAST ADVERTISING<br><em>Laurence Field<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHALLENGING IDEOLOGICAL EXCLUSION OF CURRICULUM MATERIAL: RIGHTS OF STUDENTS AND PARENTS<br><em>Nat Stern<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS: CONTRASTING METHODS OF REVIEW UNDER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE<br><em>James A. Hughes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EMPLOYEE RIGHTS OR ORGANIZATIONAL RIGHTS? (DAVID W. EWING, <em>FREEDOM INSIDE THE ORGANIZATION<\/em>)<br><em>Roberta Fitzsimmons<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1979)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Bakke<\/em> Symposium: Civil Rights Perspectives<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTRODUCTION: AWAKENING AFTER <em>BAKKE<\/em><br><em>Derrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE <em>BAKKE<\/em> OPINIONS AND EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE<br><em>Kenneth L. Karst and Harold W. Horowitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LITIGATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION: THE NEED FOR INTERVENTION TO AFFIRM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br><em>Emma Coleman Jones<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CULTURALLY BIASED TESTING AND PREDICTIVE INVALIDITY: PUTTING THEM ON THE RECORD<br><em>David M. White<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BEYOND <em>BAKKE<\/em>: THE CONSTITUTION AND REDRESSING THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF RACISM<br><em>Robert A. Sedler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>BAKKE<\/em> ON AFFIRMITIVE ACTION FOR WOMEN: PEDESTAL OR CAGE?<br><em>Nancy Gertner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACE CONSCIOUSNESS IN EMPLOYMENT AFTER <em>BAKKE<\/em><br><em>E. Richard Larson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHO NEEDS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION<br><em>Ann Fagan Ginger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FROM <em>BROWN<\/em> TO <em>BAKKE<\/em>: THE LONG ROAD TO EQUALITY<br><em>Constance Baker Motley<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"13\" name=\"13\"><\/a>13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1978)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS<br><em>Louis Henkin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REMEDIES FOR DISCRIMINATION IN SUPERVISORIAL AND MANAGERIAL JOBS<br><em>Robert Newman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NON-INVESTIGATORY POLICE ENCOUNTERS<br><em>John H. Burkoff<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF PREGNANCY IN EMPLOYMENT: THE IMPACT OF <em>GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. GILBERT<\/em> AND <em>NASHVILLE GAS CO. v. SATTY<\/em><br><em>Ellen T. Taylor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cMIND CONTROL\u201d OR INTENSITY OF FAITH: THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS<br><em>Robert N. Shapiro<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FUTURE OF PRISONERS\u2019 UNIONS: <em>JONES v. NORTH CAROLINA PRISONERS\u2019 LABOR UNION<\/em><br><em>Regina Montoya and Paul Coggins<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1978)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dedication to Justice Thurgood Marshall<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEDICATION TO JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL<br><em>Warren E. Burger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THURGOOD MARSHALL\u2013THE LAWYER<br><em>Spottswood W. Robinson III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I REMEMBER THE TUMULTUOUS YEARS AND THURGOOD MARSHALL<br><em>Constance Baker Motley<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL<br><em>Louis H. Pollak<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A VISION OF THE CONSTITUTION<br><em>Owen M. Fiss<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNION DEMOCRACY AND THE LMRDA: AUTOCRACY AND INSURGENCY IN NATIONAL UNION ELECTIONS<br><em>Edgar N. James<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE DOCTRINE OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY: ACCOMMODATING TRIBAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL INTERESTS<br><em>Robert G. McCoy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION UNDER TITLE IX<br><em>Patty Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MINOR POLITICAL PARTIES AND CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE LAWS<br><em>Michael D. Esch<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HABEAS CORPUS AFTER <em>STONE v. POWELL<\/em>: THE \u201cOPPORTUNITY FOR FULL AND FAIR LITIGATION\u201d STANDARD<br><em>James Turner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE COURTS AND SOCIAL POLICY (DONALD L. HOROWITZ, <em>THE COURTS AND SOCIAL POLICY<\/em>)<br><em>Thomas A. Balmer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THINKING ABOUT JAIL (MICHAEL FOCAULT, <em>DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH: THE BIRTH OF THE PRISON<\/em>)<br><em>George Kannar<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1978)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A <em>SWANN<\/em> SONG FOR REMEDIES: EQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE BURGER COURT<br><em>Robert D. Goldstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RESOLVING THE SENIORITY\/MINORITY LAYOFFS CONFLICT: AN EMPLOYER-TARGETED APPROACH<br><em>Iris A. Burke and Oscar G. Chase<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Commentary<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CONSTITUTION GOES TO HARVARD<br><em>Henry P. Monagham<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CULTURAL PLURALISM<br><em>Kevin M. Fong<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION IN TITLE VII CLASS ACTIONS: <em>EAST TEXAS MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. v. RODRIGUEZ<\/em><br><em>Michael Fischl<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TAKING DWORKIN SERIOUSLY (RONALD DWORKIN, <em>TAKING RIGHTS SERIOUSLY<\/em>)<br><em>Kenneth I. Winston<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE UNGRAND JURY (MARVIN E. FRANKEL AND GARY P. NAFTALIS, <em>THE GRAND JURY: AN INSTITUTION ON TRIAL<\/em>)<br><em>Sam Pizzigati<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"12\" name=\"12\"><\/a>12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1977)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE DOCTRINE OF PRIOR RESTRAINT<br><em>Thomas R. Litwack<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF POLICYMAKING PUBLIC EMPLOYEES<br><em>Mark Coven<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>PLESSY<\/em> REVIVED: THE SEPARATE BUT EQUAL DOCTRINE AND SEX-SEGREGATED EDUCATION<br><em>Cynthia Lewis<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HOUSING REMEDIES IN SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CASES: THE VIEW FROM <em>INDIANAPOLIS<\/em><br><em>Marjorie Heins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MINORITY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS<br><em>Dominic L. Ozanne<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROOF OF RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY PURPOSE UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: <em>WASHINGTON v. DAVIS, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, MT. HEALTHY, AND WILLIAMSBURGH<\/em><br><em>Barry A. Miller<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BLACK WORKERS IN WHITE UNIONS (WILLIAM B. GOULD, <em>BLACK WORKERS IN WHITE UNIONS: JOB DISCRIMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES<\/em>)<br><em>Staughton Lynd<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1977)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REDEFINING PRIVACY<br><em>Tom Gerety<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A NEW DEAL FOR THE PROTECTION OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS: CHALLENGING THE DOCTRINAL BASES OF THE <em>CIVIL RIGHTS CASES<\/em> AND STATE ACTION THEORY<br><em>Ira Nerken<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONFRONTING THE CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT: AN EXPANDED ROLE FOR COURTS IN PRISON REFORM<br><em>Michael S. Feldberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TWO VIEWS OF A PRISONER\u2019S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS: <em>MEACHUM v. FANO<\/em><br><em>Thomas O. Sargentich<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE WELFARE AND UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR STRIKERS<br><em>W. Joseph Hetherington<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE NEW CHILD SAVERS (KENNETH WOODEN, <em>WEEPING IN THE PLAYTIME OF OTHERS: AMERICA\u2019S INCARCERATED CHILDREN<\/em>; THOMAS J. COTTLE, <em>BARRED FROM SCHOOL: 2 MILLION CHILDREN!<\/em>)<br><em>Stanley Herr<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TECHNICAL DUE PROCESS: ? (THE COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION, THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, AND THE YALE LAW REVIEW, <em>A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION<\/em>)<br><em>Alan Strasser<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1977)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN INDEPENDENT RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION<br><em>Reena Raggi<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD A RIGHT TO UNION MEMBERSHIP<br><em>Jonathan Lang<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROTECTING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN STATE COURTS: FITTING A STATE PEG TO A FEDERAL HOLE<br><em>Andre R. Jaglom<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUALITY OF ALLOCATION BY LOT<br><em>Hank Greely<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO DEFAME EMPLOYEES AND CREDIT APPLICANTS<br><em>Charles D. Tiefner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ARAB BOYCOTT AND TITLE VII<br><em>Robert H. Lande<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNEQUAL JUSTICE (JEROLD S. AUERBACH, <em>UNEQUAL JUSTICE: LAWYERS AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN MODERN AMERICA<\/em>)<br><em>Jonathan Prude<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUSTICE ACCUSED (ROBERT M. COVER, <em>JUSTICE ACCUSED: ANTISLAVERY AND THE JUDICIAL PROCESS<\/em>)<br><em>Richard S. Key<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"11\" name=\"11\"><\/a>11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1976)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN MEMORY OF WILLIAM H. HASTIE<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FRANCIS BIDDLE MEMORIAL LECTURE: FELIX FRANKFURTER: CIVIL LIBERTARIAN<br><em>Joseph L. Rauh, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ALEXANDER BICKEL AND THE POST-REALIST CONSTITUTION<br><em>Edward A. Purcell<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SEPARATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR CHILDREN: PROTECTING THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF MINORS IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS<br><em>James Kenneth Genden<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT\u2019S PRIVACY EXEMPTION AND THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974<br><em>Frank A. Rosenfeld<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CLAIMING ILLEGAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF 18 U.S.C. sec. 3504(a)(1)<br><em>Margaret V. Sachs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COST AND QUALITY CONTROL IN THE MEDICARE\/MEDICAID PROGRAM: CONCURRENT REVIEW<br><em>Cedric C. Chao<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE CLEAN AIR AMENDMENTS OF 1970: CAN CONGRESS COMPEL STATE COOPERATION IN ACHIEVING NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS?<br><em>Vaughan Finn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MINORITY GROUPS AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT STANDARD OF CERTITUDE: <em>UNITED STATES v. ORTIZ<\/em> AND <em>UNITED STATES v. BRIGNONI-PONCE<\/em><br><em>Robert L. Hickok<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL ETHICS (MONROE H. FREEDMAN, <em>LAWYERS\u2019 ETHICS IN AN ADVERSARY SYSTEM<\/em>)<br><em>Norman Dorsen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AFFIRMATIVE DISCRIMINATION (NATHAN GLAZER, <em>AFFIRMATIVE DISCRIMINATION: ETHNIC INEQUALITY AND POLICY<\/em>; ROBERT M. O\u2019NEIL, <em>DISCRIMINATING AGAINST DISCRIMINATION: PREFERENTIAL ADMISSIONS AND THE DEFUNNIS CASE<\/em>; RONALD DWORKIN, <em>THE RIGHT TO GO TO LAW SCHOOL\u2013THE DEFUNNIS CASE<\/em>)<br><em>Allen Graubard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1976)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dedication<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN HONOR OF MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS<br><em>Charles E. Ares<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EVEN-HANDED JUSTICE<br><em>Vern Countryman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS<br><em>Steven Duke<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Case Against HUAC<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE STAMLER LITIGATION<br><em>Thomas P. Sullivan, Chester M. Kamin, and Arthur M. Sussman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE EVIDENCE: A CONTEXT ANALYSIS OF THE HUAC RECORD<br><em>Hans Zeisel and Rose Stamler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT AND THE EMERGENCE OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW: A NEW PRIORITY IN FEDERAL LABOR POLICY<br><em>Herbert Hill<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEADLY FORCE TO ARREST: TRIGGERING CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW<br><em>Floyd R. Finch, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNBURDENING THE CRIMINAL DEFENDANT: <em>MULLANEY v. WILBUR<\/em> AND THE REASONABLE DOUBT STANDARD<br><em>Anthony M. Doniger<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL CIVILIAN COURT INTERPRETATION IN PENDING COURTS-MARTIAL AND THE PROPER SCOPE OF MILITARY JURISDICTION OVER CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS: <em>SCHLESINGER v. COUNCILMAN<\/em> AND <em>MCLUCAS v. DECHAMPLAIN<\/em><br><em>Jeffrey S. Facter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SIMPLE JUSTICE (RICHARD KLUGER, <em>SIMPLE JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>E. Richard Larson<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1976)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BEYOND URLTA: A PROGRAM FOR ACHIEVING REAL TENANT GOALS<br><em>Richard L. Blumberg and Brian Quinn Robbins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LIMITS OF THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM<br><em>Leonard S. Rubenstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STATE ACTION ANALYSIS OF TAX EXPENDITURES<br><em>Robert Clarke Brown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>APPLYING THE TITLE VII PRIMA FACIE CASE TO TITLE VIII LITIGATION<br><em>Elliot M. Mincberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL CREDIT: PROMISE OR REALITY?<br><em>Laurie D. Zelon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ATTICA: A TIME TO DIE (TOM WICKER, <em>A TIME TO DIE<\/em>)<br><em>Michael G. Ignatieff<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"10\" name=\"10\"><\/a>10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Summer 1975)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WELFARE CASES AND THE \u201cNEW MAJORITY\u201d: CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND PRACTICE<br><em>Kenneth M. Davidson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FARMWORKER LITIGATION UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT: ESTABLISHING JOINT EMPLOYER LIABILITY AND RELATED PROBLEMS<br><em>Howard S. Scher and Robert S. Catz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GAGGING THE PRESS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS<br><em>Andrew M. Schatz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HOSPITALS, TAX EXEMPTION, AND THE POOR<br><em>Russell L. Richeda<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CURBING EXPLOITATION IN SEGREGATED HOUSING MARKETS: <em>CLARK v. UNIVERSAL BUILDERS, INC.<\/em><br><em>Theodore V. Wells, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO A LEGALLY TRAINED JUDGE: <em>GORDON v. JUSTICE COURT<\/em><br><em>Gary L. Rosenthal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL SERVICES (EARL JOHNSON, JR., <em>JUSTICE AND REFORM: THE FORMATIVE YEARS OF THE OEO LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM<\/em>)<br><em>Valerie Vanaman<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1975)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STRUCTURAL DUE PROCESS<br><em>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: THE FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES<br><em>Charles F. Abernathy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POLICING PLUTONIUM: THE CIVIL LIBERTIES FALLOUT<br><em>Russell W. Ayres<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MEDICAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FETAL SURVIVAL UNDER <em>ROE<\/em> AND <em>DOE<\/em><br><em>Benjamin B. Sendor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEAR OF FIRING: <em>ARNETT v. KENNEDY<\/em> AND THE PROTECTION OF FEDERAL CAREER EMPLOYEES<br><em>Philip A. Byler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SECRECY AND GOVERNMENT (NORMAN DORSEN AND STEPHEN GILLERS, EDS., <em>NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS: SECRECY IN AMERICA<\/em>; THOMAS M. FRANCK AND EDWARD WEISBAND, EDS., <em>SECRECY AND FOREIGN POLICY<\/em>)<br><em>Robert F. Drinan<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1975)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>UNITED STATES v. LOVETT<\/em>: LITIGATING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS<br><em>John Hart Ely<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE \u201cUNREVIEWABLE\u201d COURT-MARTIAL CONVICTION: SUPERVISORY RELIEF UNDER THE ALL WRITS ACT FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS<br><em>Daniel J. Wacker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE IMPACT OF REVENUE SHARING ON MINORITIES AND THE POOR<br><em>Morton H. Sklar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENFORCING THE OBLIGATION TO PRESENT CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES: THE FORGOTTEN HALF OF THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE<br><em>Richard A. Kurnit<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRETRIAL DIVERSION: THE THREAT OF EXPANDING SOCIAL CONTROL<br><em>Jamie S. Gorelick<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ARMY DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAMS AND THE DOCTRINE OF MILITARY NECESSITY: <em>COMMITTEE FOR G.I. RIGHTS v. CALLAWAY<\/em> AND <em>UNITED STATES v. RUIZ<\/em><br><em>William J. (Zak) Taylor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WOMEN AND THE LAW (LEO KANOWITZ, <em>SEX ROLES IN LAW AND SOCIETY: CASES AND MATERIALS<\/em>; KENNETH M. DAVIDSON, <em>SEX-BASED DISCRIMINATION: TEXT, CASES AND MATERIALS<\/em>)<br><em>Aleta Wallach<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"9\" name=\"9\"><\/a>9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1974)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Francis Biddle Memorial Lecture<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE BIDDLE LECTURE: A BRIEF FOREWORD<br><em>Albert M. Sacks<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FRANCIS BIDDLE<br><em>James Rowe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FRANCIS BIDDLE<br><em>Adrian S. Fisher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FRANCIS BIDDLE LECTURES<br><em>Herbert Wechsler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREE SPEECH: CONTRASTING CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES<br><em>William H. Hastie<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NOTICE AND THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF OLD FRIENDS<br><em>Stephen N. Subrin and A. Richard Dykstra<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACCESS TO VOTER REGISTRATION<br><em>James R. Steilen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL DECLARATORY RELIEF FROM UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE STATUTES: THE IMPLICATIONS OF <em>STEFFEL v. THOMPSON<\/em><br><em>Norman M. Monhait<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TWELVE GOOD PERSONS AND TRUE: <em>HEALY v. EDWARDS<\/em> AND <em>TAYLOR v. LOUISIANA<\/em><br><em>Kimberly Homan Clark<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN THE GRAND JURY SETTING: <em>UNITED STATES v. CALANDRA<\/em><br><em>Cynthia C. Cannady<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHALLENGING THE DEATH PENALTY (MICHAEL MELTSNER, <em>CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: THE SUPREME COURT AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT<\/em>)<br><em>Hugo Adam Bedau<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SHELTERING THE CITY (JON PYNOOS, ROBERT SCHAFER, AND CHESTER W. HARTMAN, EDS., <em>HOUSING URBAN AMERICA<\/em>)<br><em>Allen Jay Zerkin<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1974)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AN INTEGRATED EDUCATION: VOLUNTARILY REGIONAL INTEGRATED SCHOOLS\u2013A PARTIAL REMEDY FOR DE FACTO SEGREGATION<br><em>Hugh Calkins and Jeffrey Gordon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUNISHMENT OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL OUTSIDE THE UCMJ: A STATUTORY AND EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS OF MILITARY DISCHARGE CERTIFICATES<br><em>Andrew S. Effron<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IMPLYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES<br><em>Michael J. Goldberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CURBING THE PROSECUTOR\u2019S DISCRETION: <em>UNITED STATES v. FALK<\/em><br><em>Dennis J. White<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A QUESTION YET TO BE ANSWERED (WHITNEY NORTH SEYMOUR, JR., <em>WHY JUSTICE FAILS<\/em>)<br><em>Erwin N. Griswold<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ANOTHER DEMOCRACY\u2019S QUEST FOR RACIAL EQUALITY (ANTHONY LESTER AND GEOFFREY BINDMAN, <em>RACE AND LAW IN GREAT BRITAIN<\/em>)<br><em>Nathan Glazer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HARNESSING THE COMPUTER (SECRETARY\u2019S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON AUTOMATED DATA SYSTEMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE<em>RECORDS, COMPUTERS, AND THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS<\/em>)<br><em>Jonathan Brant<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1974)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE AND THE EVOLUTION OF FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION<br><em>Mark C. Rutzick<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUDICIAL PARTICIPATION IN PLEA BARGAINING: A SEARCH FOR NEW STANDARDS<br><em>Kathleen Gallagher<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BREAKING THE LANGUAGE BARRIER: THE RIGHT TO BILINGUAL EDUCATION<br><em>Erica Black Grubb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PICKETEERS AT THE DOORSTEP<br><em>Daniel M. Taubman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>KEYES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1<\/em>: UNLOCKING THE NORTHERN SCHOOLHOUSE DOOR<br><em>John W. Hanley, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DISSECTION OF A DREAM (BORIS I. BITTKER, <em>THE CASE FOR BLACK REPARATIONS<\/em>)<br><em>Derrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"8\" name=\"8\"><\/a>8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1973)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RIGHT TO TREATMENT FOR THE MENTALLY DISABLED: THE NEED FOR REALISTIC STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVE CRITERIA<br><em>Ralph K. Schwitzgebel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ARTHUR GOLDBERG: A COMMENTARY<br><em>Donald Roper<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE TERRIFYING REMEDY: A RESPONSE TO V. N. CHALDIZE\u2019S <em>THE RIGHT OF A CONVICTED CITIZEN TO LEAVE HIS COUNTRY<\/em><br><em>William J. Bennett<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE IN A POST-<em>SERRANO<\/em> WORLD<br><em>W. Norton Grubb and Stephan Michelson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE HEIRS OF <em>BODDIE<\/em>: COURT ACCESS FOR INDIGENTS AFTER <em>KRAS<\/em> AND <em>ORTWEIN<\/em><br><em>Philip L. Spector<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTRASTATE RESIDENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR WELFARE AND THE RIGHT TO INTERSTATE TRAVEL<br><em>Mary Candace Fowler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MONETARY CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 1983: THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY<br><em>Robert J. Brookhiser<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>BLACK v. STATE BAR<\/em>: THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN DISBARMENT PROCEEDINGS<br><em>Jon C. Bensick<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>HAYES v. UNITED STATES<\/em>: PRIVATE INTERFERENCE WITH SCHOOL DESEGREGATION<br><em>David M. Jones<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL CHANGE (JONATHAN D. CASPAR, <em>LAWYERS BEFORE THE WARREN COURT: CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS<\/em>; ANN FAGAN GINGER, <em>THE RELEVANT LAWYERS: CONVERSATIONS OUT OF COURT ON THEIR CLIENTS, THEIR PRACTICE, THEIR POLITICS, THEIR LIFE STYLE<\/em>)<br><em>John A. Robertson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MILITARY JUSTICE (ROBERT RIVKIN, <em>RIGHTS OF SERVICEMEN: THE BASIC ACLU GUIDE TO MILITARY JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>Joseph Remcho<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SOCIAL CLASS AND MARRIAGE (JESSIE BERNARD, <em>THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE<\/em>)<br><em>Linda K. Champlin<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1973)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STATE BAR DISCIPLINE AND THE ACTIVIST LAWYER<br><em>Christopher S. Lyman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project Report<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD AN ACTIVIST ROLE FOR STATE BILLS OF RIGHTS<br><em>David J. Fine, Elias N. Matsakis, and Phillip L. Spector<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROVISION OF FREE MEDICAL SERVICES BY HILL-BURTRON HOSPITALS<br><em>Lawrence A. Schneider<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EXCLUSIONARY USE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR JUDICIAL SCRUTINY<br><em>Jay C. Shaffer and Kenneth E. Meiser<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CURBING ABUSE IN THE DECISION TO GRANT OR DENY PAROLE<br><em>Andrew P. Hier<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EQUAL BUT INADEQUATE PROTECTION: A LOOK AT <em>MOSLEY<\/em> AND <em>GRAYNED<\/em><br><em>Roy A. Black<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREE SPEECH IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (PAUL L. MURPHY, <em>THE MEANING OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH: FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS FROM WILSON TO FDR<\/em>)<br><em>Jerold S. Auerbach<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRSIONERS\u2019 RIGHTS AND WARDENS\u2019 PARANOIA (SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, <em>THE EMERGING RIGHTS OF THE CONFINED<\/em>)<br><em>David M. Shelton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECONOMIC PROGRESS FOR THE POOR (JOHN C. WEISTART, <em>COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<\/em>)<br><em>Burt W. Griffin<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1973)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT OF A CONVICTED CITIZEN TO LEAVE HIS COUNTRY<br><em>Valery Chalidze<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT OF CONVICTED CITIZENS TO EMIGRATE: A COMMENT ON THE ESSAY BY V. N. CHALDIZE<br><em>Harold J. Berman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WELFARE CLASS ACTIONS IN FEDERAL COURT: A PROCEDURAL ANALYSIS<br><em>Stephen N. Subrin and John Sutton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SOLICITATION BY THE SECOND OLDEST PROFESSION: ATTORNEYS AND ADVERTISING<br><em>James H. Burnley IV<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONALS AND UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE<br><em>Joaquin G. Avila<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACE QUOTAS<br><em>Steven Nisenbaum<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HAS <em>BRANZBURG<\/em> BURIED THE UNDERGROUND PRESS?<br><em>William S. Hurst<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>MACGUIRE v. AMOS<\/em>: APPLICATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT TO POLITICAL PARTIES<br><em>Kirke M. Hassan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEARNING BY DOING: THE NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION TAKES ON THE NEW YORK CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (IRA GLASSER AND ALAN LEVINE, <em>STUDENT RIGHTS PROJECT: REPORT ON THE FIRST TWO YEARS<\/em>)<br><em>Richard L. Mandel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ANISHINABE LIBERATION MOVEMENT (JAY DAVID, ED., <em>THE AMERICAN INDIAN, THE FIRST VICTIM<\/em>; ALVIN JOSEPHY, JR., <em>RED POWER, THE AMERICAN INDIANS\u2019 FIGHT FOR FREEDOM<\/em>)<br><em>Jack B. Forbes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A FORM BOOK FOR ENJOINING UNDECLARED WARS (LEON FRIEDMAN AND BURT NEUBORNE, <em>UNQUESTIONING OBEDIENCE TO THE PRESIDENT: THE ACLU CASE AGAINST THE LEGALITY OF THE WAR IN VIET NAM<\/em>)<br><em>David Rosenberg<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"7\" name=\"7\"><\/a>7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1972)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE POOR\u2013MEETING THE ETHICAL COMMITMENT<br><em>Peter S. Smith and John E. Kratz, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHT OF ACTION\u2013A SUGGESTED STATUTE AND COMMENTARY<br><em>Jeffrey P. Zucker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ABORTION AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY CLAUSES<br><em>Joseph S. Oteri, Mitchell Benjoya, and Jonathan Z. Souweine<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CLASS ACTIONS FOR CONSUMER PROTECTION<br><em>Mark L. Rosenberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CASH DEPOSITS\u2013BURDENS AND BARRIERS IN ACCESS TO UTILITY SERVICES<br><em>John B. Kirkwood<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CRIMINAL TRIALS, CIVIL STANDARDS: <em>LEGO v. TWOMEY<\/em><br><em>Andrew M. Higgins<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRIVACY AND COMPUTERS: AN UNDEFINED PROGRAM (ARTHUR R. MILLER, <em>THE ASSAULT ON PRIVACY: COMPUTERS, DATA BANKS, AND DOSIERS<\/em>)<br><em>John F. Beatty<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1972)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Project Report<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DE JURE SEGREGATION OF CHICANOS IN TEXAS SCHOOLS<br><em>Jorge C. Rangel and Carlos M. Alcala<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>ALL<\/em> IN THE \u201cFAMILY\u201d: LEGAL PROBLEMS OF COMMUNES<br><em>Jonathan Shor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION OF POLITICAL DISSIDENTS<br><em>David J. Fine<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MORE LEARNED THAN WITTY (MARVIN SCHICK, <em>LEARNED HAND\u2019S COURT<\/em>)<br><em>Archibald Cox<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1972)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SCHOOL SEGREGATION IN THE NORTH: THERE IS BUT ONE CONSTITUTION<br><em>Paul R. Diamond<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECTION 1981 AS A REMEDY FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT<br><em>E. Richard Larson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE EVOLUTION OF EQUAL PROTECTION: EDUCATION, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AND WEALTH<br><em>Robert L. Graham and Jason H. Krauitt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREE SPEECH IMPLICATIONS OF CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILINGS<br><em>H. Leonard Court and Charles E. Harris<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LOVE\u2019S LABORS LOST: NEW CONCEPTIONS OF MATERNITY LEAVES<br><em>Erica B. Grubb and Margarita C. McCoy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MISLED BY EDUCATION (IVAN ILLICH, <em>DESCHOOLING SOCIETY<\/em>)<br><em>Edgar Z. Friedenberg<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"6\" name=\"6\"><\/a>6 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1971)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BEYOND THE WRONG SIDE OF THE TRACKS: MUNICIPAL SERVICES IN THE INTERSTICES OF PROCEDURE<br><em>Daniel Wm. Fessler and Charles M. Haar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EDUCATION VOUCHERS<br><em>Judith Areen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cSWORDS INTO PLOWSHARES\u201d: ALTERNATIVE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS<br><em>John Knox Walkup<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MILITARY DISCIPLINE AND POLITICAL EXPRESSION: A NEW LOOK AT THE OLD BUGBEAR<br><em>William A. Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AN ANTITRUST CHALLENGE TO THE GGPRX MOVIE RATING SYSTEM<br><em>Gregory J. Howe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTERVENTION IN HEW WELFARE CONFORMITY PROCEEDINGS: <em>NATIONAL WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION v. FINCH<\/em><br><em>Vic Harris<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORPORAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: <em>MURPHY v. KERRIGAN<\/em><br><em>Peter S. Aron and Martin L. Katz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SILENCE ORDERS\u2013PRESERVING POLITICAL EXPRESSION BY DEFENDANTS AND THEIR LAWYERS: <em>KING v. JONES<\/em><br><em>Richard B. Hirst<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUVENILE JUSTICE (LOIS G. FORER, <em>NO ONE WILL LISTEN<\/em>)<br><em>Birch Bayh<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LAST OF THE HUMAN BEINGS (AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE, <em>UNCOMMON CONTROVERSY: FISHING RIGHTS OF THE MUCKLESHOOT, PUYALLUP, AND NISQUALLY INDIANS<\/em>; DEE BROWN, <em>BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE\u2013AN INDIAN HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN WEST<\/em>)<br><em>Peter B. Edelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHOSE PRIORITIES FOR EDUCATIONAL REFORM? (JOHN E. COONS, WILLIAM H. CLUNE, STEPHEN D. SUGARMAN, <em>PRIVATE WEALTH AND PUBLIC EDUCATION<\/em>)<br><em>David L. Kirp and Mark G. Yudof<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUSTICE IN LOWER CRIMINAL COURTS (STEPHEN R. BING AND S. STEPHEN ROSENFELD, <em>THE QUALITY OF JUSTICE IN JUSTICE IN THE LOWER CRIMINAL COURTS OF METROPOLITAN BOSTON<\/em>)<br><em>Daniel Klubock and Harvey A. Silverglate<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>6 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1971)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Equal Rights for Women: A Symposium on the Proposed Constitutional Amendment<br>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE NECESSITY OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT<br><em>Norman Dorsen and Susan Deller Ross<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN SUPPORT OF THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT<br><em>Thomas I. Emerson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT IS NOT THE WAY<br><em>Paul A. Freund<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: SOME PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTION<br><em>Philip B. Kurland<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE NEGRO WOMAN\u2019S STAKE IN THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT<br><em>Pauli Murray<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Comment<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cA LITTLE DEARER THAN HIS HORSE\u201d: LEGAL STEREOTYPES AND THE FEMININE PERSONALITY<br><em>Barbara Kirk Cavanaugh<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Preventive Detention: An Empirical Analysis<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FOREWORD: PREVENTIVE DETENTION\u2013A STEP BACKWARD FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br><em>Sam J. Ervin, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PART I. THE EMPIRICAL STUDY<br><em>Arthur R. Angel, Eric D. Green, Henry R. Kaufman, and Eric E. Van Loon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PART II. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EMPIRICAL FINDINGS<br><em>Arthur R. Angel, Eric D. Green, Henry R. Kaufman, and Eric E. Van Loon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STUDENT VOTING RIGHTS IN UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES<br><em>Paul R. Rentenbach<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SEWER SERVICE AND CONFESSED JUDGMENTS: NEW PROTECTION FOR LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS<br><em>James T. Ellis<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARIJUANA AND THE LAW (JOHN KAPLAN, <em>MARIJUANA\u2013THE NEW PROHIBITION<\/em>)<br><em>George F. Boney<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>6 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (December 1970)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER STATUTORILY-BASED WELFARE CLAIMS<br><em>David L. Herzer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION: NEW PRIORITIES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR BLACK EQUALITY<br><em>Robert H. Olson, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PORT NOISE COMPLAINT<br><em>R. Timothy Weston, Michael S. Alvshin, David E. Benor, Marc A. Grainer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR THE NEWSMAN\u2019S WORK PRODUCT<br><em>Jeffrey G. Sherman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OPENING THE FLOODGATES TO DISSIDENT ALIENS<br><em>James W. Mohr<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ARREST RECORDS AS A RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT CRITERION: <em>GREGORY v. LITTON SYSTEMS, INC.<\/em><br><em>John L. Sarratt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DENIAL OF TAX EXEMPT STATUS TO SOUTHERN SEGREGATION ACADEMIES: <em>GREEN v. KENNEDY<\/em><br><em>Mark I. Silberblatt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NEW POWER FOR TENANTS: THE LESSEE\u2019S RIGHT TO A LIVABLE DWELLING: <em>JAVINS V. FIRST NATIONAL REALTY CORP.<\/em><br><em>William J. Jefferson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JUSTICE, MILITARY STYLE (COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL RESEARCH ON THE DRAFT, <em>BASIC RESOURCE MATERIALS ON MILITARY LAW<\/em>; ROBERT S. RIVKIN, <em>GI RIGHTS AND ARMY JUSTICE: THE DRAFTEE\u2019S GUIDE TO MILITARY LIFE AND LAW<\/em>)<br><em>Laughlin McDonald<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"5\" name=\"5\"><\/a>5 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (April 1970)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ADVENT OF A RIGHT TO HOUSING: A CURRENT APPRAISAL<br><em>Frank I. Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PRISON DISCIPLINE AND INMATE RIGHTS<br><em>Bruce R. Jacob<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BEYOND <em>TINKER<\/em>: THE HIGH SCHOOL AS AN EDUCATIONAL PUBLIC FORUM<br><em>Sheldon H. Nahmod<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONTROLLING LAWYERS BY BAR ASSOCIATIONS AND COURTS<br><em>Marshall Beil<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I. BAR ASSOCIATIONS AND RADICAL LAWYERS: THE POLITICS OF ETHICS<br><em>Marshall Beil<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. THE BAR AS A TRADE ASSOCIATION: ECONOMICS&lt; ETHICS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT<br><em>Marshall Beil<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. THE CONTEMPT WEAPON AGAINST LAWYERS IN COURT<br><em>Marshall Beil<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FEDERAL RIOT ACT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT<br><em>Henry R. Kaufman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE AUTOMOBILE\u2013POLLUTION CASE: INTERVENTION IN CONSENT DECREE SETTLEMENT<br><em>Stephen R. Kroll<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEEDING THE HUNGRY<br><em>Patrick E. Clancy and Wendy L. Wyse<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ASSOCIATION PRIVACY AND THE PRIVATE CLUB: THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT<br><em>Marc Rohr<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SECURING EFFECTIVE VOTING STRENGTH BY THE USE OF PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN AT-LARGE DISTRICTS. <em>OWENS v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF BOSTON<\/em><br><em>Eric E. Van Loon<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACHIEVING INTEGRATION BY BUSSING ONLY BLACK AND PUERTO RICAN CHILDREN IS PROPER. <em>NORWALK CORE v. NORWALK BOARD OF EDUCATION.<\/em> ACHIEVING INTEGRATION BY BUSSING ONLY BLACK CHILDREN IS <em>NOT<\/em>PROPER. <em>BRICE v. LANDIS<\/em><br><em>Ronald Brown and Geraldine Reed<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FEDERAL COURTS MAY ENJOIN STATE COURT DECREES ALLEGED TO VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. <em>MACHESKY v. BIZZELL<\/em><br><em>David G. Eisenstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE ELECTRONIC ELECTIONS (JOE MCGINNISS, <em>THE SELLING OF THE PRESIDENT 1968<\/em>)<br><em>Joseph A. Califano, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RENAISSANCE? (ALEXANDER M. BICKEL, <em>THE SUPREME COURT AND THE IDEA OF PROGRESS<\/em>)<br><em>Leon E. Panetta<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>WE\u2019RE GOING TO HAVE A NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL (RICHARD HARRIS, <em>JUSTICE<\/em>)<br><em>John P. MacKenzie<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>5 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1970)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FREEDOM FROM INFORMATION: THE ACT AND THE AGENCIES<br><em>Ralph Nader<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BARGAINING FOR JUSTICE: THE LAW STUDENTS\u2019 CHALLENGE TO LAW FIRMS<br><em>Jerry Berman and Edgar Cahn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AIR AND WATER POLLUTION: WHAT TO DO WHILE WAITING FOR WASHINGTON<br><em>John C. Esposito<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD EXPANSION OF <em>WITHERSPOON<\/em>: CAPITAL SCRUPLES, JURY BIAS, AND THE USE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DATA TO RAISE LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS<br><em>Faye Goldberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CHILLING POLITICAL EXPRESSION BY USE OF POLICE INTELLIGENCE FILES: <em>ANDERSON v. SILLS<\/em><br><em>Mark A. Chertok and Stanley Marcus<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FROM THE FCC\u2019S FAIRNESS DOCTRINE TO <em>RED LION\u2019S<\/em> FIDUCIARY PRINCIPLE<br><em>John C. Barrett and Mary Louise Frampton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>USE OF sec. 1983 TO REMEDY UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICE CONDUCT: GUARDING THE GUARDS<br><em>David S. Gould<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Case Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COURT MAY PERMIT WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION NOT EXEMPTED FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. <em>CONSUMERS UNION OF UNITED STATES v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION<\/em><br><em>Jeffrey B. Albert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NECESSARY TO PRESERVE LIFE: A CONSTITUTIONALLY UNCERTAIN STANDARD. RIGHTS OF DOCTOR AND WOMAN VIOLATED. <em>PEOPLE v. BELOUS<\/em><br><em>R. Eldridge Hicks<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COURT ORDERS REVISION OF PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY\u2019S SITE SELECTION PROCEDURE, FOUND RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY FOR LOCATING ALL PROJECTS IN BLACK NEIGHBORHOODS. <em>GATREAUX v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY<\/em>; <em>HICKS v. WEAVER<\/em><br><em>Stanton Koppel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT AND EQUAL PROTECTION\u2013INVIDIOUS DISCRIMINATION OF A MULTI-MEMBER DISTRICTING SCHEME. <em>CHAVIS v. WHITCOMB<\/em><br><em>Ellen L. Kroll and Howard M. McCue III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL REPRESENTING INDIGENTS\u2013THE COURT\u2019S INHERENT POWER TO ORDER PAYMENTS BY THE STATE. <em>BEDFORD v. SALT LAKE COUNTY<\/em><br><em>Stuart Israelson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM. <em>ARRINGTON v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD<\/em><br><em>Michael L. Stern<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GOING AFTER THE F.T.C. (EDWARD F. COX, ROBERT C. FELLMETH, JOHN E. SCHULZ, <em>\u201cTHE NADER REPORT\u201d ON THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION<\/em>; <em>REPORT OF THE ABA COMMISSION TO STUDY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION<\/em>; <em>RESPONSES OF PHILIP ELMAN, MEMBER FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, TO SUBCOMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ENTITLED ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM: THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION<\/em>)<br><em>Louis Jaffe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POLITICAL JUSTICE (JESSICA MITFORD, <em>THE TRIAL OF DR. SPOCK<\/em>; PHILIP M. STERN, <em>THE OPPENHEIMER CASE: SECURITY ON TRIAL<\/em>; MELVIN RADER, <em>FALSE WITNESS<\/em>)<br><em>Leonard Boudin<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"4\" name=\"4\"><\/a>4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1969)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Legitimate Scope of Police Discretion to Restrict Ordinary Activity<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE LEGITIMATE SCOPE OF POLICE DISCRETION TO RESTRICT ORDINARY ACTIVITY?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I. SOURCES OF PEDESTRIAN CIVIL LIBERTY<br><em>Daniel P. Sheehan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>II. FIELD INTERROGATION<br><em>Beverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>III. LOITERING AND RELATED OFFENSES<br><em>Beverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IV. VAGRANCY AND RELATED OFFENSES<br><em>Beverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>V. DISORDERLY CONDUCT<br><em>Brian Meltzer and David C. Trott<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VI. POLICE INFILTRATION OF POLITICAL GROUPS<br><em>Peter Buchsbaum<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: A STUDY IN MALFEASANCE<br><em>Robert C. Fellmeth<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MENTAL COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL<br><em>Stuart E. Eizenstat<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONTINGENT FEES AND THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE POOR FOR GOVERNMENT FUNDED LEGAL SERVICES<br><em>Robert C. Goodman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ANTI-INJUNCTION STATUTE DOES NOT PREVENT FEDERAL COURT FROM ENJOINING STATE PROCEEDINGS WHERE PETITIONERS ALLEGE DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER sec. 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. <em>LANDRY v. DALEY<\/em>, 288 F. Supp. 200 (N.D. Ill. 1968)<br><em>David Shakow<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROPERTY AND OTHER VOTING RESTRICTIONS IN LOCAL ELECTIONS. <em>KRAMER v. UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15<\/em>, 282 F. Supp. 70 (E.D.N.Y. 1968); <em>CIPRIANO v. CITY OF HOUMA<\/em>, 286 F. Supp. 823 (E.D. La. 1968)<br><em>Arthur M. Kaplan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DESEGREGATION: COLLEGE\u2019S DUTY TO TAKE ACTION TO INTEGRATE BEYOND THE INSTITUTION OF A NON-DISCRIMINATORY ADMISSIONS POLICY. <em>ALABAMA STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SCHOOL AND COLLEGE AUTHORITY<\/em>, 289 F. Supp. 784 (M.D. Ala. 1968); <em>SANDERS v. ELLINGTON<\/em>, 288 F. Supp. 937 (M.D. Tenn. 1968)<br><em>Harold B. Obstfeld<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JURY DENIED IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF INJUNCTION AGAINST STRIKE BY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. <em>BOARD OF EDUCATION EX REL. RANKIN v. SHANKER<\/em>, 242 N.E.2d 802 (N.Y. 1968)<br><em>Mark Peterson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Book Reviews<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PAUL CHEVIGNY, <em>POLICE POWER: POLICE ABUSES IN NEW YORK CITY<\/em><br><em>Michael E. Abram<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PAUL C. REARDON AND CLIFTON DANIEL, <em>FAIR TRIAL AND FREE PRESS<\/em><br><em>BRUCE WASSERSTEIN<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1968)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>INTER-NEIGHBORHOOD DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES<br><em>Gershon M. Ratner<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION BY OUT-OF-STATE ATTORNEYS IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES<br><em>Edward F. Sherman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REGULATION OF STREET DEMONSTRATIONS BY INJUNCTION: CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THE COLLATERAL BAR RULE IN PROSECUTIONS FOR CONTEMPT<br><em>Joel L. Selig<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STANDING TO CHALLENGE STATE WELFARE PRACTICES ON THE GROUNDS THAT THEY VIOLATE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. <em>KING v. SMITH<\/em>, 392 U.S. 309 (1968)<br><em>Brian Meltzer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN URBAN RENEWAL RELOCATION PROGRAM. <em>NORWALK C.O.R.E. v. NORWALK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY<\/em>, 395 F.2d 920 (2d Cir. 1968)<br><em>Mark J. Green<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL IS AN APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH. <em>WOLIN v. PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY<\/em>, 392 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1968)<br><em>Harold H. Green<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DUE PROCESS PROHIBITS EVICTION FROM PUBLIC HOUSING WITHOUT A REASON. <em>VINSON v. GREENBURGH HOUSING AUTHORITY<\/em>, 288 N.Y.S.2d 159 (2d Dept. 1968)<br><em>William B. Bernard, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LANDLORD HAS NO RIGHT TO EVICT TENANT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT WHERE LEASE WAS MADE IN VIOLATION OF HOUSING CODE. <em>BROWN v. SOUTHALL REALTY CO.<\/em>, 237 A.2d 834 (D.C. App. 1968)<br><em>Colink Kaufman<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMMITMENT FOLLOWING ACQUITTAL BY REASON OF INSANITY MUST COMPLY WITH STANDARDS OF CIVIL COMMITMENT STATUTE. <em>BOLTON v. HARRIS<\/em>, 395 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1968)<br><em>John R. Evans<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A PLAINTIFF SHOULD ORDINARILY RECOVER ATTORNEY\u2019S FEES UNDER TITLE II OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT (PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION SECTION). <em>NEWMAN v. PIGGIE PARK ENTERPRISES, INC.<\/em>, 390 U.S. 400 (1968)<br><em>Bruce Wasserstein<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"3\" name=\"3\"><\/a>3 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1968)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RENEWAL IN THE GHETTO: A STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION IN BOSTON\u2019S WASHINGTON PARK<br><em>David R. Gergen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RECEIVERSHIP: A USEFUL TOOL FOR HELPING TO MEET THE HOUSING NEEDS OF LOW INCOME PEOPLE<br><em>Albert Rosen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965: AN EVALUATION<br><em>L. Thorne McCarty and Russell B. Stevenson, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DISCHARGE OF A POLICE OFFICER FOR INVOKING THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION. <em>GARDNER v. BRODERICK<\/em>, 29 N.E.2d 184 (N.Y. 1967)<br><em>Joseph Coyne<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FELON\u2019S CHALLENGE TO STATE LAW DISENFRANCHISING FELONS HELD NOT TO RAISE SUBSTANTIAL FEDERAL QUESTION. <em>GREEN v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK<\/em>, 380 F.2d 445 (2d Cir. 1967)<br><em>Stephen B. Moldof<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VAGRANCY LAWS INVALID AS TOO VAGUE AND AS IMPROPER EXERCISE OF POLICE POWER. <em>FENSTER v. LEARY<\/em>, 229 N.E.2d 426 (N.Y. 1967); <em>Alegata v. Commonwealth<\/em>, 231 N.E.2d 201 (Mass. 1967); <em>Baker v. Binder<\/em>, 274 F. Supp. 658 (W.D. Ky. 1967)<br><em>Mark Budnitz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR WELFARE BENEFITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. <em>THOMPSON v. SHAPIRO<\/em>, 270 F. Supp. 331 (D. Conn. 1967)<br><em>George J. Hayward<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FAILURE TO NOTIFY REGISTRANT OF TIME HIS CLASSIFICATION TO BE CONSIDERED AND TO ALLOW HIM TO BE PRESENT CONSTITUTED DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS SUFFICIENT TO ACQUIT HIM ON CHARGE OF FAILING TO REPORT FOR INDUCTION. <em>UNITED STATES v. THOMSON<\/em>, Criminal No. 66-309-W (D. Mass., Dec. 4, 1967)<br><em>Joseph Remcho<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>3 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1967)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE RIGHT TO EXEMPTION FROM MILITARY SERVICE OF A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO A PARTICULAR WAR<br><em>Theodore Hochstadt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ENJOINING STATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS WHICH ABRIDGE FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS<br><em>D\u2019Army Bailey<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ADDICTION, INSANITY, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAPACITY DEFENSE<br><em>Roger Lowenstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EACH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM NOT ALREADY UNDER COURT ORDER TO DESEGREGATE SHALL INSTITUTE A PLAN CONFORMING TO ACCOMPANYING DECREE, UNDER STATEWIDE ORDER FOR SCHOOL DESEGREGATION TO BE IMPLEMENTED BY DEFENDANT STATE SCHOOL OFFICIALS\u2013THE 1965 ALABAMA TUITION-GRANT STATUTE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS A LAW DESIGNED TO PERPETUATE A SEGREGATED STATE SCHOOL SYSTEM. <em>LEE v. MACON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION<\/em>, 267 F. Supp. 458 (M.D. Ala. 1967)<br><em>Lee Carl Bromberg<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>QUESTION OF AMERICAN POLICY IN VIETNAM PERMITTED ON LOCAL ELECTION BALLOT. <em>FARLEY v. HEALEY<\/em>, 431 P.2d 650 (Cal. 1967); <em>CARR v. HARTNETT<\/em>, No. 289487, Superior Court of Middlesex County, Mass. (Nov. 6, 1967)<br><em>Richard Turbin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RETALIATORY EVICTIONS. <em>EDWARDS v. HABIB<\/em>, 227 A.2d 388 (D.C. Mun. Ct. App. 1967)<br><em>Robert C. Goodman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROBABLE CAUSE HOUSING INSPECTIONS REQUIRE WARRANT OR CONSENT. <em>CAMARA v. MUNICIPAL COURT<\/em>, 387 U.S. 523 (1967)<br><em>Donald J. Boyd<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY AND ITS DIRECTOR HELD NOT ENJOINABLE UNDER 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. <em>RANDELL v. NEWARK HOUSING Authority<\/em>, 266 F. Supp. 171 (D.N.J. 1967)<br><em>Walter P. DeForest<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"2\" name=\"2\"><\/a>2 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1967)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mark DeWolfe Howe<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARK DEWOLFE HOWE<br><em>Louis L. Jaffe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARK HOWE \u201cIN REAL LIFE\u201d<br><em>Alvin J. Bronstein and Henry Schwarzschild<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MARK DEWOLFE HOWE<br><em>Samuel H. Thomas, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Slum Renewal through Landlord-Tenant Law<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SLUM RENEWAL THROUGH LANDLORD-TENANT LAW?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RENT WITHHOLDING: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE<br><em>Edward H. Flitton III<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TENANT INITIATED REPAIRS: NEW YORK\u2019S ARTICLE 7-A<br><em>Donald J. Stang<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RECEIVERSHIPS IN THE REHABILITATION OF URBAN HOUSING<br><em>Charles Pratt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TENANT UNIONS: AN EXPERIMENT IN PRIVATE LAW-MAKING<br><em>Gordon J. Davis and Michael W. Schwartz<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF DECISION MAKING IN THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: THE CDGM AFFAIR<br><em>Gordon J. Davis and Amanda Hawes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SOCIAL WELFARE REGULATION\u2013THE MAN-IN-THE-HOUSE RULE\u2013MORAL AND ECONOMIC RATIONALES\u2013DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION\u2013CONTRARY TO PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM<br><em>Susan Scholle Connor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONVICTION UNDER STATE TRESPASS STATUTE OF PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATORS ON COUNTY JAIL GROUNDS AFTER SHERIFF\u2019S DIRECTION TO LEAVE DOES NOT CONTRAVENE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE AND PETITION. <em>ADDERLY v. FLORIDA<\/em>, 87 S. Ct. 242 (1966)<br><em>Peter B. Sobol<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>IN THE ABSENCE OF EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, FREEDOM OF CHOICE SCHOOL DESEGREGATION PLANS SHOULD CONFORM TO APPENDED DECREE&lt; AND WILL BE EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF EFFECTIVENESS\u20131966 HEW GUIDELINES ARE CONSTITUTIONAL AND AUTHORIZED BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND DESERVE GREAT WEIGHT AS MINIMUM STANDARDS IN ASSESSING PLANS. <em>UNITED STATES v. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION<\/em>, No. 23345 (5th Cir., Dec. 29, 1966)<br><em>Martin S. Cooper<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JURY COMMISSIONERS MUST MAKE CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO OBTAIN A CROSS-SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY. <em>TABAT v. BENNETT<\/em>, 365 F.2d 698; <em>BROOKS v. BETTO<\/em>, 365 F.2d 1; <em>RABINOWITZ v. UNITED STATES<\/em>, 366 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1966)<br><em>Elmer Schaefer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>STOMACH PUMPING INCIDENT TO BORDER SEARCH FOR NARCOTICS IS NOT VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS NOR UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE. <em>BLEFARE v. UNITED STATES<\/em>, 362 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1966)<br><em>Ron Cloutier<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p>2 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1966)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2015\/07\/Brest.pdf\">THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT\u2019S POWER TO PROTECT NEGROES AND CIVIL RIGHTS WORKERS AGAINST PRIVATELY INFLICTED HARM, PART II<\/a><br><em>Paul Andrew Brest<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EXPATRIATION AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS<br><em>Douglas H. Walter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE H.E.W. SCHOOL DESEGREGATION GUIDELINES<br><em>Martin S. Cooper<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DETENTION OF MATERIAL WITNESSES IN CRIMINAL CASES<br><em>Roger A. Lowenstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PREFERENTIAL SENIORITY RIGHTS FOR NEGRO EMPLOYEES<br><em>Stephen Stander<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EXCLUSIONARY RULE WILL APPLY TO STATEMENTS STEMMING FROM QUESTIONING BY POLICE UNLESS SUSPECT IS WARNED OF RIGHTS TO SILENCE, TO CONSULT WITH AND HAVE COUNSEL PRESENT, AND IF INDIGENT TO HAVE AN APPOINTED LAWYER. <em>MIRANDA v. ARIZONA<\/em>, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)<br><em>David M. Brodsky<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ARIZONA ACT INFRINGES ON FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION. <em>ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL<\/em>, 384 U.S. 11 (1966)<br><em>Jethro K. Lieberman<\/em><br><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"1\" name=\"1\"><\/a>1 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1966)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT\u2019S POWER TO PROTECT NEGROES AND CIVIL RIGHTS WORKERS AGAINST PRIVATELY INFLICTED HARM<br><em>Paul A. Brest<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PROPOSITION 14 AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT\u2019S PROTECTION OF RACIAL GROUPS<br><em>Peter Gamer<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A SENSE OF IRONY IN SOUTHERN JUVENILE COURTS<br><em>James E. Starrs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DISORDERLY CONDUCT STATUTES<br><em>Sheila Mahony<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent Cases<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL SPENDING NOW GOVERN FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT SCHOOL DESEGREGATION. <em>SINGLETON v. JACKSON MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORDER TO ELIMINATE RACIAL IMBALANCE SET ASIDE WHEN SCHOOL COMMITTEE VOLUNTARILY HAS AGREED TO ACT. <em>SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL COMMITTEE v. BARKSDALE<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CITY PARK ESTABLISHED AS A RACIALLY RESTRICTED CHARITABLE TRUST MUST DESEGREGATE BECAUSE TRANSFER FROM MUNICIPAL TO PRIVATE TRUSTEE DOES NOT DIVEST IT OF \u201cPUBLIC CHARACTER.\u201d <em>EVANS v. NEWTON<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR EXCEPTION TO MILITARY SERVICE?\u2013SUPREME BEING BELIEF TEST EXPANDED TO INCLUDE UNORTHODOX ETHICO-RELIGIOUS VIEWS. <em>UNITED STATES v. SEEGER<\/em><br><em>Philip S. Snow<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PDF format requires Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free of charge. Should you desire a piece that is not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"right-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"coauthors":[699],"class_list":["post-4100","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZrWS-148","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}