{"id":11561,"date":"1967-10-01T21:25:21","date_gmt":"1967-10-02T01:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=11561"},"modified":"2020-07-03T17:27:06","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T21:27:06","slug":"vol-3-no-1-fall-1967","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/vol-3-no-1-fall-1967\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 3, No. 1, Fall 1967"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>3 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1967)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE RIGHT TO EXEMPTION FROM MILITARY SERVICE OF A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO A PARTICULAR WAR<br \/>\n<em>Theodore Hochstadt<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ENJOINING STATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS WHICH ABRIDGE FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS<br \/>\n<em>D\u2019Army Bailey<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ADDICTION, INSANITY, AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAPACITY DEFENSE<br \/>\n<em>Roger Lowenstein<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Recent Cases<\/span><\/p>\n<p>EACH LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM NOT ALREADY UNDER COURT ORDER TO DESEGREGATE SHALL INSTITUTE A PLAN CONFORMING TO ACCOMPANYING DECREE, UNDER STATEWIDE ORDER FOR SCHOOL DESEGREGATION TO BE IMPLEMENTED BY DEFENDANT STATE SCHOOL OFFICIALS\u2013THE 1965 ALABAMA TUITION-GRANT STATUTE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS A LAW DESIGNED TO PERPETUATE A SEGREGATED STATE SCHOOL SYSTEM. <em>LEE v. MACON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION<\/em>, 267 F. Supp. 458 (M.D. Ala. 1967)<br \/>\n<em>Lee Carl Bromberg<\/em><\/p>\n<p>QUESTION OF AMERICAN POLICY IN VIETNAM PERMITTED ON LOCAL ELECTION BALLOT. <em>FARLEY v. HEALEY<\/em>, 431 P.2d 650 (Cal. 1967); <em>CARR v. HARTNETT<\/em>, No. 289487, Superior Court of Middlesex County, Mass. (Nov. 6, 1967)<br \/>\n<em>Richard Turbin<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RETALIATORY EVICTIONS. <em>EDWARDS v. HABIB<\/em>, 227 A.2d 388 (D.C. Mun. Ct. App. 1967)<br \/>\n<em>Robert C. Goodman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>PROBABLE CAUSE HOUSING INSPECTIONS REQUIRE WARRANT OR CONSENT. <em>CAMARA v. MUNICIPAL COURT<\/em>, 387 U.S. 523 (1967)<br \/>\n<em>Donald J. Boyd<\/em><\/p>\n<p>MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY AND ITS DIRECTOR HELD NOT ENJOINABLE UNDER 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. <em>RANDELL v. NEWARK HOUSING Authority<\/em>, 266 F. Supp. 171 (D.N.J. 1967)<br \/>\n<em>Walter P. DeForest<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>3 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1967) Articles THE RIGHT TO EXEMPTION FROM MILITARY SERVICE OF A CONSCIENTIOUS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10129,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[924],"class_list":["post-11561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-30t","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10129"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11561"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}