{"id":11563,"date":"1968-10-01T21:26:55","date_gmt":"1968-10-02T01:26:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=11563"},"modified":"2020-07-03T17:27:37","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T21:27:37","slug":"vol-4-no-1-fall-1968","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/vol-4-no-1-fall-1968\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 4, No. 1, Fall 1968"},"content":{"rendered":"

4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1968)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

INTER-NEIGHBORHOOD DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES
\nGershon M. Ratner<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION BY OUT-OF-STATE ATTORNEYS IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES
\nEdward F. Sherman<\/em><\/p>\n

REGULATION OF STREET DEMONSTRATIONS BY INJUNCTION: CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THE COLLATERAL BAR RULE IN PROSECUTIONS FOR CONTEMPT
\nJoel L. Selig<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Cases<\/span><\/p>\n

STANDING TO CHALLENGE STATE WELFARE PRACTICES ON THE GROUNDS THAT THEY VIOLATE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. KING v. SMITH<\/em>, 392 U.S. 309 (1968)
\nBrian Meltzer<\/em><\/p>\n

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN URBAN RENEWAL RELOCATION PROGRAM. NORWALK C.O.R.E. v. NORWALK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY<\/em>, 395 F.2d 920 (2d Cir. 1968)
\nMark J. Green<\/em><\/p>\n

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL IS AN APPROPRIATE PLACE FOR EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH. WOLIN v. PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY<\/em>, 392 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1968)
\nHarold H. Green<\/em><\/p>\n

DUE PROCESS PROHIBITS EVICTION FROM PUBLIC HOUSING WITHOUT A REASON. VINSON v. GREENBURGH HOUSING AUTHORITY<\/em>, 288 N.Y.S.2d 159 (2d Dept. 1968)
\nWilliam B. Bernard, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

LANDLORD HAS NO RIGHT TO EVICT TENANT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT WHERE LEASE WAS MADE IN VIOLATION OF HOUSING CODE. BROWN v. SOUTHALL REALTY CO.<\/em>, 237 A.2d 834 (D.C. App. 1968)
\nColink Kaufman<\/em><\/p>\n

COMMITMENT FOLLOWING ACQUITTAL BY REASON OF INSANITY MUST COMPLY WITH STANDARDS OF CIVIL COMMITMENT STATUTE. BOLTON v. HARRIS<\/em>, 395 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
\nJohn R. Evans<\/em><\/p>\n

A PLAINTIFF SHOULD ORDINARILY RECOVER ATTORNEY\u2019S FEES UNDER TITLE II OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT (PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION SECTION). NEWMAN v. PIGGIE PARK ENTERPRISES, INC.<\/em>, 390 U.S. 400 (1968)
\nBruce Wasserstein<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Fall 1968) Articles INTER-NEIGHBORHOOD DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION IN THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10129,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[924],"class_list":["post-11563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-30v","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10129"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11563"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}