{"id":11564,"date":"1969-04-01T21:27:37","date_gmt":"1969-04-02T02:27:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=11564"},"modified":"2020-07-03T17:27:56","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T21:27:56","slug":"vol-4-no-2-spring-1969","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/vol-4-no-2-spring-1969\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 4, No. 2, Spring 1969"},"content":{"rendered":"

4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1969)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Legitimate Scope of Police Discretion to Restrict Ordinary Activity<\/p>\n

THE LEGITIMATE SCOPE OF POLICE DISCRETION TO RESTRICT ORDINARY ACTIVITY?<\/p>\n

I. SOURCES OF PEDESTRIAN CIVIL LIBERTY
\nDaniel P. Sheehan<\/em><\/p>\n

II. FIELD INTERROGATION
\nBeverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

III. LOITERING AND RELATED OFFENSES
\nBeverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

IV. VAGRANCY AND RELATED OFFENSES
\nBeverly C. Moore, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

V. DISORDERLY CONDUCT
\nBrian Meltzer and David C. Trott<\/em><\/p>\n

VI. POLICE INFILTRATION OF POLITICAL GROUPS
\nPeter Buchsbaum<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: A STUDY IN MALFEASANCE
\nRobert C. Fellmeth<\/em><\/p>\n

MENTAL COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL
\nStuart E. Eizenstat<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

CONTINGENT FEES AND THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE POOR FOR GOVERNMENT FUNDED LEGAL SERVICES
\nRobert C. Goodman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Cases<\/span><\/p>\n

ANTI-INJUNCTION STATUTE DOES NOT PREVENT FEDERAL COURT FROM ENJOINING STATE PROCEEDINGS WHERE PETITIONERS ALLEGE DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER sec. 1983 OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. LANDRY v. DALEY<\/em>, 288 F. Supp. 200 (N.D. Ill. 1968)
\nDavid Shakow<\/em><\/p>\n

PROPERTY AND OTHER VOTING RESTRICTIONS IN LOCAL ELECTIONS. KRAMER v. UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15<\/em>, 282 F. Supp. 70 (E.D.N.Y. 1968); CIPRIANO v. CITY OF HOUMA<\/em>, 286 F. Supp. 823 (E.D. La. 1968)
\nArthur M. Kaplan<\/em><\/p>\n

DESEGREGATION: COLLEGE\u2019S DUTY TO TAKE ACTION TO INTEGRATE BEYOND THE INSTITUTION OF A NON-DISCRIMINATORY ADMISSIONS POLICY. ALABAMA STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SCHOOL AND COLLEGE AUTHORITY<\/em>, 289 F. Supp. 784 (M.D. Ala. 1968); SANDERS v. ELLINGTON<\/em>, 288 F. Supp. 937 (M.D. Tenn. 1968)
\nHarold B. Obstfeld<\/em><\/p>\n

JURY DENIED IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF INJUNCTION AGAINST STRIKE BY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. BOARD OF EDUCATION EX REL. RANKIN v. SHANKER<\/em>, 242 N.E.2d 802 (N.Y. 1968)
\nMark Peterson<\/em><\/p>\n

Book Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

PAUL CHEVIGNY, POLICE POWER: POLICE ABUSES IN NEW YORK CITY<\/em>
\nMichael E. Abram<\/em><\/p>\n

PAUL C. REARDON AND CLIFTON DANIEL, FAIR TRIAL AND FREE PRESS<\/em>
\nBRUCE WASSERSTEIN<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1969) The Legitimate Scope of Police Discretion to Restrict Ordinary Activity THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10129,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[924],"class_list":["post-11564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-30w","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10129"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11564\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11564"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}