{"id":12033,"date":"2019-12-02T17:57:04","date_gmt":"2019-12-02T22:57:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=12033"},"modified":"2019-12-02T17:58:34","modified_gmt":"2019-12-02T22:58:34","slug":"this-week-in-civil-rights-and-civil-liberties-december-2-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/this-week-in-civil-rights-and-civil-liberties-december-2-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"This Week in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties: December 2, 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome to <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/category\/weekly-news-roundup\/\">This Week in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This week, the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s Office of the Inspector General released a report on their investigation of the family separation policy, the Oregon Supreme Court limited the ability of police to turn traffic stops into fishing expeditions, and the city of Montgomery, Alabama honored women who fought for the desegregation of Montgomery buses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>A new report from the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s Office of the Inspector General<\/b> <b>revealed disturbing new information about the Trump Administration\u2019s family separation practice. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The report found that \u201cprior to policy implementation, DHS did not address deficiencies recognized and documented in 2017 that could potentially hamper the ability to track separated families.\u201d\u00a0 The report also revealed that Customs and Border Protection projected the separation of more than 26,000 children. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/11\/27\/783513721\/new-report-says-u-s-lacked-technology-to-account-for-separated-families\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The four-part documentary series \u201cCollege Behind Bars\u201d premiered on PBS this week. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The documentary follows students of the Bard Prison Initiative, a program that allows people incarcerated at six prisons in New York to enroll in a full-time liberal arts program to earn a Bard College degree. Executive Producer Ken Burns <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bpi.bard.edu\/press-clip\/incarcerated-people-can-do-more-than-beat-harvard-in-a-debate\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">explained<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> in an interview with Rolling Stone, \u201c<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ninety-five percent of people who are incarcerated will eventually get out, and the question is, do we want them as contributing members of society, or do we want them having used prison as a different kind of school to hone criminal skills? If you\u2019re spending $100 billion a year to maintain our prison system and it has a 75 percent recidivism rate, something is broken.\u201d (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/kenburns\/college-behind-bars\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">PBS<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The Oregon Supreme Court has banned a controversial police tactic used during traffic stops.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The ruling instructs officers to ask only questions that are \u201creasonably related\u201d to the reason that the driver was pulled over. Prior to its enactment, police were allowed to ask motorists probing questions unrelated to the reason for a stop as long as it didn&#8217;t cause significant delay, which allowed officers to turn even a routine traffic stop into a fishing expedition for arrestable offenses. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.usnews.com\/news\/best-states\/oregon\/articles\/2019-11-23\/court-bans-random-questions-by-officers-during-traffic-stops\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">U.S. News<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>A number of national, state, and local groups filed amicus briefs this week, in support of Gavin Grimm\u2019s lawsuit against the Gloucester County School Board. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The lawsuit brings both Fourteenth Amendment and Title IX claims against a Gloucester County School Board policy that prohibited Grimm, a trans student, from using the boys\u2019 bathroom and required him to use a separate, one stall bathroom that no other students were required to use.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The briefs were filed by a variety of groups, including school administrators from 29 states and Washington, D.C., attorneys general from 22 states and Washington, D.C., The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, The Trevor Project, as well as a number of other groups. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/acluva.org\/en\/press-releases\/national-state-and-local-groups-filed-amicus-briefs-support-gavin-grimms-case\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">ACLU)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>On Sunday, the city of Montgomery, Alabama unveiled<\/b> <b>memorials in honor of Rosa Parks, and four other women involved in the desegregation of Montgomery buses<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. The unveiling occurred on the 64th anniversary of Parks\u2019s arrest. Historic markers were presented for the four plaintiffs in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Browder v. Gayle,<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> the case that deemed Montgomery\u2019s bus segregation unconstitutional. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.montgomeryadvertiser.com\/story\/news\/2019\/12\/01\/rosa-parks-statue-unveiled-montgomery-court-square-bus-boycott-anniversary\/4299064002\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Montgomery Advertiser<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Alfred Chestnut, Ransom Watkins and Andrew Stewart were released from prison after serving 36 years for a 1983 murder that they did not commit. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A unit of the Baltimore prosecutor\u2019s office, tasked with reviewing questionable old cases, found a number of prosecutorial errors in the original investigation of the case. Chestnut, Watkins, and Stewart were all sixteen-years-old at the time of the incident: a shooting at a junior high school. Exculpatory evidence was only uncovered when Chestnut submitted a public records request for the case file. The three men were exonerated on November 25 by a Baltimore Circuit Court judge, at the request of the state\u2019s attorney. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/11\/25\/us\/baltimore-men-exonerated-murder.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">NY Times<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Tensions are rising between Google and employees who are engaging in protests and walkouts.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This week, Google announced the firing of four employees for alleged violations of the company\u2019s data-security policy. Among those fired is Rebecca Rivers, who is suggesting that she was fired in retaliation for her activism at the company, including her involvement in a Customs and Border Petition and other social media posts. Reports are unclear on whether Rivers has been fired, or placed on administrative leave, but Rivers<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Tri_Becca90\/status\/1199066929429762048\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> tweeted<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> that she has been fired. A rally was held on Friday at Google\u2019s San Francisco office, calling for the reinstatement of Rivers and another employee.\u00a0 (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2019\/11\/25\/google-fires-software-engineer-center-san-francisco-worker-rally\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Washington Post<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino, released a<\/b> <b>new report showing the rise and escalation of hate crimes in the United States under the Trump Administration<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. The report found that person-directed hate crimes have steadily increased over the last four years, and as of 2018 are at a 16-year high, whereas property destruction and vandalism rates have declined. The study\u2019s co-author, Brian Levin, attributes the shift to social and political factors, especially the scapegoating of minority groups by political figures like Donald Trump, and the echoing of their rhetoric in the right-wing media. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/stories\/2019\/11\/28\/1901855\/-Hate-crimes-in-the-age-of-Trump-Not-just-more-numerous-but-more-personal-more-violent\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">DailyKos<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>More than 100 members of Congress have<\/b> <b>called for the firing of White House senior adviser Stephen Miller,<\/b> <b>after leaked emails have raised more questions about his ties to white nationalism.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The Southern Poverty Law Center uncovered hundreds of emails Miller wrote to a reporter at Breitbart News prior to his time at the White House. The SPLC released a batch of these emails last week, which include Miller recommending articles from white nationalist websites AmRen and VDARE. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/11\/26\/783047584\/leaked-emails-fuel-calls-for-stephen-miller-to-leave-white-house\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Rhode Island Superior Court judge Melissa Darigan dismissed a case challenging the federal and state constitutionality of a state bill, the Reproductive Privacy Act, that codified Roe v. Wade abortion rights into state law. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The bill was initiated amid concerns that Roe v. Wade will be overturned, and was signed into law in June. The plaintiff, Catholics for Life, indicated that it plans to appeal the ruling to the Rhode Island Supreme Court. (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.providencejournal.com\/news\/20191130\/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-opposing-ris-abortion-rights-law\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Providence Journal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">)<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to This Week in Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. This week, the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s Office of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":101909,"featured_media":12034,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,768],"tags":[],"coauthors":[1550],"class_list":["post-12033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-amicus","category-weekly-news-roundup"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/80\/2019\/12\/AdobeStock_211410516-1-e1575327354107.jpeg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-385","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101909"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12033\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12033"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=12033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}