{"id":1528,"date":"2011-03-11T09:25:05","date_gmt":"2011-03-11T14:25:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=1528"},"modified":"2016-11-17T08:15:25","modified_gmt":"2016-11-17T13:15:25","slug":"immunity-of-government-officials-should-not-shield-human-rights-violations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/immunity-of-government-officials-should-not-shield-human-rights-violations\/","title":{"rendered":"Immunity of Government Officials Is Not A License to Ignore the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court head argument on March 2 in the case of <a title=\"SCOTUSblog\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/ashcroft-v-al-kidd\/\" target=\"_blank\">Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd<\/a>, questioning whether John Ashcroft is entitled to immunity from charges that Abdullah Al-Kidd was held under the act allowing detention of material witnesses, but was treated as a suspect and was in fact never intended to be a witness in any trial. \u00a0After September 11th, 2001, Mr. Ashcroft asked Congress for the authority to detain suspects without probably cause of to suspect wrongdoing. \u00a0<a title=\"NYTimes OpEd\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/03\/11\/opinion\/11fri1.html?_r=1&amp;hp\" target=\"_blank\">He was denied<\/a>, and this action is an end-run around the Constitution and expressed intentions of Congress.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Wikipedia\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Ashcroft v. Iqbal<\/em><\/a> did enough to undermine the ability of those wrongfully detained by an overzealous government to challenge their detentions, and now Ashcroft asks the court to go even further. \u00a0The government in this case does not claim that Al-Kidd&#8217;s allegations are <a title=\"SCOTUSblog\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/?p=114618\" target=\"_blank\">implausible<\/a>, which would get them dismissed under the <em>Iqbal <\/em>standard. \u00a0The government claims that Ashcroft&#8217;s actions were lawful, and to the extent that they weren&#8217;t he should be granted absolute prosecutorial immunity.<\/p>\n<p>The 9th Circuit decided for Al-Kidd and rejected this use of the material witness statute as an unlawful detention, and rejected Ashcroft&#8217;s claims of immunity. \u00a0Hopefully, the Supreme Court will be brave enough to do the same. Allowing the government to ignore constitutional and statutory requirements when detaining suspects makes those requirements null and void. \u00a0The Constitution exists exactly to protect the wrongfully accused from overreaching government actions such as these, and granting immunity would eviscerate critical constitutional protections. \u00a0The Court needs to take a strong stance that waving the flag of fighting terrorism is not a license to ignore the democratic freedoms government officials claim to be protecting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court head argument on March 2 in the case of Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd, questioning whether John Ashcroft is entitled to immunity from charges that Abdullah Al-Kidd was held under the act allowing detention of material witnesses, but was treated as a suspect and was in fact never intended to be a witness in any trial.  Ashcroft v. Iqbal did enough to undermine the ability of those wrongfully detained by an overzealous government to challenge their detentions, and now Ashcroft asks the court to go even further.  The Court needs to take a strong stance that waving the flag of fighting terrorism is not a license to ignore the democratic freedoms government officials claim to be protecting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,44,45,49],"tags":[56,81,862,306,532,544],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-amicus","category-courts","category-criminal-justice","category-human-rights","tag-9th-circuit","tag-ashcroft","tag-criminal-justice","tag-iqbal","tag-supreme-court","tag-terrorism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-oE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}