{"id":2094,"date":"2011-03-30T09:44:32","date_gmt":"2011-03-30T13:44:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?p=2094"},"modified":"2016-11-17T08:14:58","modified_gmt":"2016-11-17T13:14:58","slug":"supreme-court-hears-wal-mart-sex-discrimination-case-certification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/supreme-court-hears-wal-mart-sex-discrimination-case-certification\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Hears Wal-Mart Sex Discrimination Case Certification"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday on a challenge to the certification of a class-action lawsuit on behalf of female employees against the giant retailer Wal-Mart. In the case <em>Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes<\/em>, Wal-Mart is challenging a 9th Circuit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2010\/04\/26\/04-16688.pdf\">certification of a class of all female employees<\/a>, arguing it violates due process and FRCP 23(b)(2) by creating an expansive class without cohesion whose claims are dissimilar and conflict with one another.<\/p>\n<p>During oral argument, justices <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationaljournal.com\/economy\/wal-mart-makes-case-to-supreme-court-to-derail-women-s-suit-20110329\">seemed to split along gender lines<\/a>, with Justices Ginsberg, Kagan, and Sotomayor questioning Wal-Mart&#8217;s counsel most closely, while Justices Scalia and Kennedy concentrated their questions on counsel representing the women employees.\u00a0The suit began in 2000, when Wal-Mart employee Betty Dukes sued the company for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiffs seek to represent a possible 1.5 million women who have worked for Wal-Mart since December 1998,\u00a0arguing Wal-Mart <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/money\/workplace\/2011-03-29-supreme-court-wal-mart_N.htm\">denied women promotions and higher pay<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday on a challenge to the certification of a class-action lawsuit on behalf of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3,44,41],"tags":[127,490,532,552,608],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-amicus","category-courts","category-sex-equality","tag-civil-rights","tag-sex-discrimination","tag-supreme-court","tag-title-vii","tag-womens-rights"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-xM","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2094"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}