{"id":7341,"date":"2014-02-21T13:00:38","date_gmt":"2014-02-21T18:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?page_id=7341"},"modified":"2019-01-01T21:30:29","modified_gmt":"2019-01-02T02:30:29","slug":"volumes-1-to-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/volumes-1-to-9\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumes 1 to 9"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1974)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Francis Biddle Memorial Lecture<\/p>\n

THE BIDDLE LECTURE: A BRIEF FOREWORD
\nAlbert M. Sacks<\/em><\/p>\n

FRANCIS BIDDLE
\nJames Rowe<\/em><\/p>\n

FRANCIS BIDDLE
\nAdrian S. Fisher<\/em><\/p>\n

THE FRANCIS BIDDLE LECTURES
\nHerbert Wechsler<\/em><\/p>\n

FREE SPEECH: CONTRASTING CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES
\nWilliam H. Hastie<\/em><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

NOTICE AND THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF OLD FRIENDS
\nStephen N. Subrin and A. Richard Dykstra<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

ACCESS TO VOTER REGISTRATION
\nJames R. Steilen<\/em><\/p>\n

FEDERAL DECLARATORY RELIEF FROM UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE STATUTES: THE IMPLICATIONS OF STEFFEL v. THOMPSON<\/em>
\nNorman M. Monhait<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

TWELVE GOOD PERSONS AND TRUE: HEALY v. EDWARDS<\/em> AND TAYLOR v. LOUISIANA<\/em>
\nKimberly Homan Clark<\/em><\/p>\n

THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN THE GRAND JURY SETTING: UNITED STATES v. CALANDRA<\/em>
\nCynthia C. Cannady<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

CHALLENGING THE DEATH PENALTY (MICHAEL MELTSNER, CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: THE SUPREME COURT AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT<\/em>)
\nHugo Adam Bedau<\/em><\/p>\n

SHELTERING THE CITY (JON PYNOOS, ROBERT SCHAFER, AND CHESTER W. HARTMAN, EDS., HOUSING URBAN AMERICA<\/em>)
\nAllen Jay Zerkin<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1974)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AN INTEGRATED EDUCATION: VOLUNTARILY REGIONAL INTEGRATED SCHOOLS\u2013A PARTIAL REMEDY FOR DE FACTO SEGREGATION
\nHugh Calkins and Jeffrey Gordon<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

PUNISHMENT OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL OUTSIDE THE UCMJ: A STATUTORY AND EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS OF MILITARY DISCHARGE CERTIFICATES
\nAndrew S. Effron<\/em><\/p>\n

IMPLYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES
\nMichael J. Goldberg<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

CURBING THE PROSECUTOR\u2019S DISCRETION: UNITED STATES v. FALK<\/em>
\nDennis J. White<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

A QUESTION YET TO BE ANSWERED (WHITNEY NORTH SEYMOUR, JR., WHY JUSTICE FAILS<\/em>)
\nErwin N. Griswold<\/em><\/p>\n

ANOTHER DEMOCRACY\u2019S QUEST FOR RACIAL EQUALITY (ANTHONY LESTER AND GEOFFREY BINDMAN, RACE AND LAW IN GREAT BRITAIN<\/em>)
\nNathan Glazer<\/em><\/p>\n

HARNESSING THE COMPUTER (SECRETARY\u2019S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON AUTOMATED DATA SYSTEMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARERECORDS, COMPUTERS, AND THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS<\/em>)
\nJonathan Brant<\/em><\/p>\n

\n


\n<\/a>9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1974)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE AND THE EVOLUTION OF FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION
\nMark C. Rutzick<\/em><\/p>\n

JUDICIAL PARTICIPATION IN PLEA BARGAINING: A SEARCH FOR NEW STANDARDS
\nKathleen Gallagher<\/em><\/p>\n

BREAKING THE LANGUAGE BARRIER: THE RIGHT TO BILINGUAL EDUCATION
\nErica Black Grubb<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

PICKETEERS AT THE DOORSTEP
\nDaniel M. Taubman<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

KEYES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1<\/em>: UNLOCKING THE NORTHERN SCHOOLHOUSE DOOR
\nJohn W. Hanley, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

DISSECTION OF A DREAM (BORIS I. BITTKER, THE CASE FOR BLACK REPARATIONS<\/em>)
\nDerrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1973)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

RIGHT TO TREATMENT FOR THE MENTALLY DISABLED: THE NEED FOR REALISTIC STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVE CRITERIA
\nRalph K. Schwitzgebel<\/em><\/p>\n

THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ARTHUR GOLDBERG: A COMMENTARY
\nDonald Roper<\/em><\/p>\n

THE TERRIFYING REMEDY: A RESPONSE TO V. N. CHALDIZE\u2019S THE RIGHT OF A CONVICTED CITIZEN TO LEAVE HIS COUNTRY<\/em>
\nWilliam J. Bennett<\/em><\/p>\n

PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE IN A POST-SERRANO<\/em> WORLD
\nW. Norton Grubb and Stephan Michelson<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

THE HEIRS OF BODDIE<\/em>: COURT ACCESS FOR INDIGENTS AFTER KRAS<\/em> AND ORTWEIN<\/em>
\nPhilip L. Spector<\/em><\/p>\n

INTRASTATE RESIDENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR WELFARE AND THE RIGHT TO INTERSTATE TRAVEL
\nMary Candace Fowler<\/em><\/p>\n

MONETARY CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 1983: THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY
\nRobert J. Brookhiser<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

BLACK v. STATE BAR<\/em>: THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN DISBARMENT PROCEEDINGS
\nJon C. Bensick<\/em><\/p>\n

HAYES v. UNITED STATES<\/em>: PRIVATE INTERFERENCE WITH SCHOOL DESEGREGATION
\nDavid M. Jones<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL CHANGE (JONATHAN D. CASPAR, LAWYERS BEFORE THE WARREN COURT: CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS<\/em>; ANN FAGAN GINGER, THE RELEVANT LAWYERS: CONVERSATIONS OUT OF COURT ON THEIR CLIENTS, THEIR PRACTICE, THEIR POLITICS, THEIR LIFE STYLE<\/em>)
\nJohn A. Robertson<\/em><\/p>\n

MILITARY JUSTICE (ROBERT RIVKIN, RIGHTS OF SERVICEMEN: THE BASIC ACLU GUIDE TO MILITARY JUSTICE<\/em>)
\nJoseph Remcho<\/em><\/p>\n

SOCIAL CLASS AND MARRIAGE (JESSIE BERNARD, THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE<\/em>)
\nLinda K. Champlin<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1973)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

STATE BAR DISCIPLINE AND THE ACTIVIST LAWYER
\nChristopher S. Lyman<\/em><\/p>\n

Project Report<\/span><\/p>\n

TOWARD AN ACTIVIST ROLE FOR STATE BILLS OF RIGHTS
\nDavid J. Fine, Elias N. Matsakis, and Phillip L. Spector<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

PROVISION OF FREE MEDICAL SERVICES BY HILL-BURTRON HOSPITALS
\nLawrence A. Schneider<\/em><\/p>\n

EXCLUSIONARY USE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR JUDICIAL SCRUTINY
\nJay C. Shaffer and Kenneth E. Meiser<\/em><\/p>\n

CURBING ABUSE IN THE DECISION TO GRANT OR DENY PAROLE
\nAndrew P. Hier<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

EQUAL BUT INADEQUATE PROTECTION: A LOOK AT MOSLEY<\/em> AND GRAYNED<\/em>
\nRoy A. Black<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

FREE SPEECH IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (PAUL L. MURPHY, THE MEANING OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH: FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS FROM WILSON TO FDR<\/em>)
\nJerold S. Auerbach<\/em><\/p>\n

PRSIONERS\u2019 RIGHTS AND WARDENS\u2019 PARANOIA (SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE EMERGING RIGHTS OF THE CONFINED<\/em>)
\nDavid M. Shelton<\/em><\/p>\n

ECONOMIC PROGRESS FOR THE POOR (JOHN C. WEISTART, COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<\/em>)
\nBurt W. Griffin<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

8 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1973)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT OF A CONVICTED CITIZEN TO LEAVE HIS COUNTRY
\nValery Chalidze<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT OF CONVICTED CITIZENS TO EMIGRATE: A COMMENT ON THE ESSAY BY V. N. CHALDIZE
\nHarold J. Berman<\/em><\/p>\n

WELFARE CLASS ACTIONS IN FEDERAL COURT: A PROCEDURAL ANALYSIS
\nStephen N. Subrin and John Sutton<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

SOLICITATION BY THE SECOND OLDEST PROFESSION: ATTORNEYS AND ADVERTISING
\nJames H. Burnley IV<\/em><\/p>\n

LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONALS AND UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE
\nJoaquin G. Avila<\/em><\/p>\n

RACE QUOTAS
\nSteven Nisenbaum<\/em><\/p>\n

HAS BRANZBURG<\/em> BURIED THE UNDERGROUND PRESS?
\nWilliam S. Hurst<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

MACGUIRE v. AMOS<\/em>: APPLICATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT TO POLITICAL PARTIES
\nKirke M. Hassan<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

LEARNING BY DOING: THE NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION TAKES ON THE NEW YORK CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (IRA GLASSER AND ALAN LEVINE, STUDENT RIGHTS PROJECT: REPORT ON THE FIRST TWO YEARS<\/em>)
\nRichard L. Mandel<\/em><\/p>\n

THE ANISHINABE LIBERATION MOVEMENT (JAY DAVID, ED., THE AMERICAN INDIAN, THE FIRST VICTIM<\/em>; ALVIN JOSEPHY, JR., RED POWER, THE AMERICAN INDIANS\u2019 FIGHT FOR FREEDOM<\/em>)
\nJack B. Forbes<\/em><\/p>\n

A FORM BOOK FOR ENJOINING UNDECLARED WARS (LEON FRIEDMAN AND BURT NEUBORNE, UNQUESTIONING OBEDIENCE TO THE PRESIDENT: THE ACLU CASE AGAINST THE LEGALITY OF THE WAR IN VIET NAM<\/em>)
\nDavid Rosenberg<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1972)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE POOR\u2013MEETING THE ETHICAL COMMITMENT
\nPeter S. Smith and John E. Kratz, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHT OF ACTION\u2013A SUGGESTED STATUTE AND COMMENTARY
\nJeffrey P. Zucker<\/em><\/p>\n

ABORTION AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY CLAUSES
\nJoseph S. Oteri, Mitchell Benjoya, and Jonathan Z. Souweine<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

CLASS ACTIONS FOR CONSUMER PROTECTION
\nMark L. Rosenberg<\/em><\/p>\n

CASH DEPOSITS\u2013BURDENS AND BARRIERS IN ACCESS TO UTILITY SERVICES
\nJohn B. Kirkwood<\/em><\/p>\n

CRIMINAL TRIALS, CIVIL STANDARDS: LEGO v. TWOMEY<\/em>
\nAndrew M. Higgins<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

PRIVACY AND COMPUTERS: AN UNDEFINED PROGRAM (ARTHUR R. MILLER, THE ASSAULT ON PRIVACY: COMPUTERS, DATA BANKS, AND DOSIERS<\/em>)
\nJohn F. Beatty<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1972)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Project Report<\/span><\/p>\n

DE JURE SEGREGATION OF CHICANOS IN TEXAS SCHOOLS
\nJorge C. Rangel and Carlos M. Alcala<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

ALL<\/em> IN THE \u201cFAMILY\u201d: LEGAL PROBLEMS OF COMMUNES
\nJonathan Shor<\/em><\/p>\n

FEDERAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION OF POLITICAL DISSIDENTS
\nDavid J. Fine<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

MORE LEARNED THAN WITTY (MARVIN SCHICK, LEARNED HAND\u2019S COURT<\/em>)
\nArchibald Cox<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

7 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (January 1972)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

SCHOOL SEGREGATION IN THE NORTH: THERE IS BUT ONE CONSTITUTION
\nPaul R. Diamond<\/em><\/p>\n

THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECTION 1981 AS A REMEDY FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT
\nE. Richard Larson<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

THE EVOLUTION OF EQUAL PROTECTION: EDUCATION, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AND WEALTH
\nRobert L. Graham and Jason H. Krauitt<\/em><\/p>\n

FREE SPEECH IMPLICATIONS OF CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILINGS
\nH. Leonard Court and Charles E. Harris<\/em><\/p>\n

LOVE\u2019S LABORS LOST: NEW CONCEPTIONS OF MATERNITY LEAVES
\nErica B. Grubb and Margarita C. McCoy<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

MISLED BY EDUCATION (IVAN ILLICH, DESCHOOLING SOCIETY<\/em>)
\nEdgar Z. Friedenberg<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>6 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1971)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

BEYOND THE WRONG SIDE OF THE TRACKS: MUNICIPAL SERVICES IN THE INTERSTICES OF PROCEDURE
\nDaniel Wm. Fessler and Charles M. Haar<\/em><\/p>\n

EDUCATION VOUCHERS
\nJudith Areen<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSWORDS INTO PLOWSHARES\u201d: ALTERNATIVE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS
\nJohn Knox Walkup<\/em><\/p>\n

MILITARY DISCIPLINE AND POLITICAL EXPRESSION: A NEW LOOK AT THE OLD BUGBEAR
\nWilliam A. Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n

AN ANTITRUST CHALLENGE TO THE GGPRX MOVIE RATING SYSTEM
\nGregory J. Howe<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

INTERVENTION IN HEW WELFARE CONFORMITY PROCEEDINGS: NATIONAL WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION v. FINCH<\/em>
\nVic Harris<\/em><\/p>\n

CORPORAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: MURPHY v. KERRIGAN<\/em>
\nPeter S. Aron and Martin L. Katz<\/em><\/p>\n

SILENCE ORDERS\u2013PRESERVING POLITICAL EXPRESSION BY DEFENDANTS AND THEIR LAWYERS: KING v. JONES<\/em>
\nRichard B. Hirst<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

JUVENILE JUSTICE (LOIS G. FORER, NO ONE WILL LISTEN<\/em>)
\nBirch Bayh<\/em><\/p>\n

LAST OF THE HUMAN BEINGS (AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE, UNCOMMON CONTROVERSY: FISHING RIGHTS OF THE MUCKLESHOOT, PUYALLUP, AND NISQUALLY INDIANS<\/em>; DEE BROWN, BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE\u2013AN INDIAN HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN WEST<\/em>)
\nPeter B. Edelman<\/em><\/p>\n

WHOSE PRIORITIES FOR EDUCATIONAL REFORM? (JOHN E. COONS, WILLIAM H. CLUNE, STEPHEN D. SUGARMAN, PRIVATE WEALTH AND PUBLIC EDUCATION<\/em>)
\nDavid L. Kirp and Mark G. Yudof<\/em><\/p>\n

JUSTICE IN LOWER CRIMINAL COURTS (STEPHEN R. BING AND S. STEPHEN ROSENFELD, THE QUALITY OF JUSTICE IN JUSTICE IN THE LOWER CRIMINAL COURTS OF METROPOLITAN BOSTON<\/em>)
\nDaniel Klubock and Harvey A. Silverglate<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

6 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (March 1971)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Equal Rights for Women: A Symposium on the Proposed Constitutional Amendment
\nArticles<\/p>\n

THE NECESSITY OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
\nNorman Dorsen and Susan Deller Ross<\/em><\/p>\n

IN SUPPORT OF THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
\nThomas I. Emerson<\/em><\/p>\n

THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT IS NOT THE WAY
\nPaul A. Freund<\/em><\/p>\n

THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: SOME PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTION
\nPhilip B. Kurland<\/em><\/p>\n

THE NEGRO WOMAN\u2019S STAKE IN THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
\nPauli Murray<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cA LITTLE DEARER THAN HIS HORSE\u201d: LEGAL STEREOTYPES AND THE FEMININE PERSONALITY
\nBarbara Kirk Cavanaugh<\/em><\/p>\n

Preventive Detention: An Empirical Analysis<\/p>\n

FOREWORD: PREVENTIVE DETENTION\u2013A STEP BACKWARD FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE
\nSam J. Ervin, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

PART I. THE EMPIRICAL STUDY
\nArthur R. Angel, Eric D. Green, Henry R. Kaufman, and Eric E. Van Loon<\/em><\/p>\n

PART II. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EMPIRICAL FINDINGS
\nArthur R. Angel, Eric D. Green, Henry R. Kaufman, and Eric E. Van Loon<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

STUDENT VOTING RIGHTS IN UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES
\nPaul R. Rentenbach<\/em><\/p>\n

SEWER SERVICE AND CONFESSED JUDGMENTS: NEW PROTECTION FOR LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS
\nJames T. Ellis<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

MARIJUANA AND THE LAW (JOHN KAPLAN, MARIJUANA\u2013THE NEW PROHIBITION<\/em>)
\nGeorge F. Boney<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

9 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (May 1974) The Francis Biddle Memorial Lecture THE BIDDLE LECTURE: A BRIEF FOREWORD […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":87,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[756],"class_list":["post-7341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-1Up","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/87"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7341\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7341"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}