{"id":7343,"date":"2014-02-21T13:01:15","date_gmt":"2014-02-21T18:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?page_id=7343"},"modified":"2018-12-24T23:42:08","modified_gmt":"2018-12-25T04:42:08","slug":"volumes-10-to-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/volumes-10-to-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumes 10 to 19"},"content":{"rendered":"

19 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1984)<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Tribute to Clarence Clyde Ferguson, Jr.<\/p>\n

A TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY OF CLARENCE CLYDE FERGUSON, JR. (1924-1983)<\/p>\n

A TRAGEDY OF TIMING
\nDerrick Bell<\/em><\/p>\n

IN MEMORIAM TURN BACK NOW?
\nJean Camper Cahn<\/em><\/p>\n

RECOLLECTIONS OF C. CLYDE FERGUSON, JR.
\nClarence Mitchell<\/em><\/p>\n

CROSSING THE LONESOME VALLEY
\nWalter J. Leonard<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

TURNING BACK THE CLOCK: THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS
\nDrew S. Days, III<\/em><\/p>\n

BALANCING GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY AND THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN EXECUTIVE BRANCH \u201cHOUSEKEEPING\u201d REGULATIONS AND CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS\u2019 RIGHTS TO A CONSTITUTIONALLY FAIR TRIAL
\nJames F. Ponsoldt<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT TO APPOINTED COUNSEL IN QUASI-CRIMINAL CASES: TOWARDS AN EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL STANDARD
\nRobert S. Catz and Nancy Lee Firak<\/em><\/p>\n

Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n

WHAT HAPPENS TO A DREAM DEFERRED: AN ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE 1963 MARCH ON WASHINGTON
\nDamon J. Keith<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

BURDENS ON GAY LITIGANTS AND BIAS IN THE COURT SYSTEM: HOMOSEXUAL PANIC, CHILD CUSTODY, AND ANONYMOUS PARTIES
\nRobert G. Bagnall, Patrick C. Gallagher, and Joni L. Goldstein<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

POLITICS OVER LAW IN WARTIME: THE JAPANESE EXCLUSION CASES (PETER IRONS, JUSTICE AT WAR: THE STORY OF THE JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT CASES<\/em>)
\nHoward Ball<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

19 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1984)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n

KLAUS BARBIE AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
\nArthur J. Goldberg<\/em><\/p>\n

TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, REGARDING H.J. RES. 1: THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
\nLaurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

PUBLIC PSYCHIATRY AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TREATMENT: TOWARD AN EFFECTIVE DAMAGE REMEDY
\nBarry R. Furrow<\/em><\/p>\n

AGE RESTRICTIONS IN HOUSING: THE DENIAL OF THE FAMILY\u2019S RIGHT TO ITS INTEGRITY
\nRichard C. Stanley<\/em><\/p>\n

THE COST OF PRESERVING RIGHTS: ATTORNEYS\u2019 FEE AWARDS AND INTERVENORS IN CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION
\nBrian Zenkichi Tamanaha<\/em><\/p>\n

SECTION 2 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE 1982 AMENDMENT
\nRoy A. McKenzie and Ronald A. Krauss<\/em><\/p>\n

PARSING PUBLIC FROM PRIVATE: THE FAILURE OF DIFFERENTIAL STATE ACTION ANALYSIS
\nJody Young Jakosa<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

TOWARD A COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (DAVID PANNICK, JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DEATH PENALTY<\/em>)
\nHugo Adam Bedau<\/em><\/p>\n

THE ONGOING DEBATE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH (RAOUL BERGER, DEATH PENALTIES: THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S OBSTACLE COURSE<\/em>)
\nTimothy J. Foley<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n

FRANCES FOX PIVEN AND RICHARD A. CLOWARD, THE NEW CLASS WAR: REAGAN\u2019S ATTACK ON THE WELFARE STATE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES<\/em>
\nJosie Foehrenbach<\/em><\/p>\n

ITHIEL DE SOLA POOL, TECHNOLOGIES OF FREEDOM<\/em>
\nCraig S. Tyle<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>18 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1983)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE EXCLUSION OF WOMEN FROM INFLUENTIAL MEN\u2019S CLUBS: THE INNER SANCTUM AND THE MYTH OF FULL EQUALITY
\nMichael M. Burns<\/em><\/p>\n

CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THE POWER TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO PRISONS: AN HISTORICAL RE-EXAMINATION
\nLeonard G. Leverson<\/em><\/p>\n

IMAGERY OF COMMUNITY, IDEOLOGY OF AUTHORITY: THE MORAL REASONING OF CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER
\nRobert Douglas Chesler<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND THE WAIVER OF SENTENCE REVIEW
\nTim Kaine<\/em><\/p>\n

FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF UNION OFFICIALS UNDER THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT
\nJames Gray Pope<\/em><\/p>\n

BANNING WORDS: A COMMENT ON \u201cWORDS THAT WOUND\u201d
\nMarjorie Heins<\/em><\/p>\n

PROFESSOR DELGADO REPLIES
\nRichard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

CALABRESI ON THE PROBLEM OF STATUTORY MIDDLE-AGE: JUDICIAL CURE OR POLITICAL PRESCRIPTION? (GUIDO CALABRESI, A COMMON LAW FOR THE AGE OF STATUTES<\/em>)
\nShannon C. Stimson<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n

JEROLD S. AUERBACH, THE NEW DEAL LAWYERS<\/em>
\nWilliam F. Treanor<\/em><\/p>\n

JUSTICE WITHOUT LAW? RESOLVING DISPUTES WITHOUT LAWYERS
\nBarbara Fischbein<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

18 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1983)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

ENFORCEMENT OF TITLE VI COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS BY THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
\nArthur R. Block<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED TO A PUBLIC DEFENSE
\nMax D. Stern<\/em><\/p>\n

CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON PROSECUTORIAL DISCOVERY
\nEric D. Blumenson<\/em><\/p>\n

DEFINING PROPERTY RIGHTS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROTECTING TENANTS FROM CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION
\nVictoria A. Judson<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

PASSING THE BUCKS: PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS UNDER FEDERAL BLOCK GRANTS
\nJanet Varon<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

REFLECTIONS OF RICHARD POSNER (RICHARD POSNER, THE ECONOMICS OF JUSTICE<\/em>)
\nBradley Honoroff<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n

ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, THE BEST DEFENSE<\/em>
\nPaul J. Kiernan and Leslie M. Berger<\/em><\/p>\n

MTRON FARBER, \u201cSOMEBODY IS LYING\u201d: THE STORY OF DR. X<\/em>
\nMeryl S. Justin<\/em><\/p>\n

BARRY R. CHISWICK, ED., THE GATEWAY: U.S. IMMIGRATION ISSUES AND POLICIES<\/em>
\nCynthia Boyce<\/em><\/p>\n

ROBERT M. O\u2019NEIL, CLASSROOMS IN THE CROSSFIRE: THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF STUDENTS, PARENTS, TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS, LIBRARIANS AND THE COMMUNITY<\/em>
\nPatrick Carome<\/em><\/p>\n

WILLIAM RYAN, EQUALITY<\/em>
\nNancy-Ann Min<\/em><\/p>\n

ROBERT JOHNSON, CONDEMNED TO DIE: LIFE UNDER SENTENCE OF DEATH<\/em>
\nCheryl Poinsette<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>17 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1982)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO KNOW WHY
\nMartha I. Morgan<\/em><\/p>\n

PRIVACY OF ASSOCIATION: A BURGEONING PRIVILEGE IN CIVIL DISCOVERY
\nJoan Steinman<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIFFING OF BROWN: DE-INTEGRATING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACULTIES
\nScott J. Davidson, Stuart W. Davidson, and Judith Hall Howard<\/em><\/p>\n

THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: A JURISPRUDENTIAL\/LEGAL CRITIQUE
\nMyrl L. Duncan<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

DESEGREGATION AND THE MEANING OF EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
\nTracy Miller<\/em><\/p>\n


\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

17 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1982)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n

ADVOCATING CIVIL LIBERTIES: A YOUNG LAWYER BEFORE THE OLD COURT
\nLouis H. Pollak<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

TWO CATEGORIES OF DISCRIMINATORY INTENT
\nEric Schnapper<\/em><\/p>\n

GENERALIZING THE TRIAL MODEL OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS: A NEW BASIS FOR THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT
\nEdward L. Rubin<\/em><\/p>\n

WORDS THAT WOUND: A TORT ACTION FOR RACIAL INSULTS, EPITHETS, AND NAME- CALLING
\nRichard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n

THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND THE DIES COMMITTEE, 1938-1940
\nJerold Simmons<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

PAST CLAIMANT AS FUTURE VICTIM: COMMERCIAL RETALIATION AND THE EROSION OF COURT ACCESS
\nDavid Abromowitz<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

TOWARD A THEORY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT (FRANKLYN S. HAIMAN, SPEECH AND LAW IN A FREE SOCIETY<\/em>)
\nSteven Stark<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n

LAURENCE D. HOULGATE, THE CHILD AND THE STATE: A NORMATIVE THEORY OF JUVENILE RIGHTS<\/em>
\nThomas Tupitza<\/em><\/p>\n

ELLSWORTH A. FERSCH, PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY IN COURTS AND CORRECTIONS: CONTROVERSY AND CHANGE<\/em>
\nSylvia Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n

ELIZABETH H. WOLGAST, EQUALITY AND THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN<\/em>
\nKathleen Beggs<\/em><\/p>\n

YALE KAMISAR, POLICE INTERROGATION AND CONFESSIONS: ESSAYS IN LAW AND POLICY<\/em>
\nJeremy Henderson<\/em><\/p>\n

MICHAEL STEVEN HINDUS, PRISON AND PLANTATIONS: CRIME, JUSTICE AND AUTHORITY IN MASSACHUSETTS AND SOUTH CAROLINA, 1767 \u2013 1868<\/em>
\nRobert Chesler<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Winter 1982)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dedication<\/span><\/p>\n

DEDICATED TO ROGER N. BALDWIN<\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

IN DEFENSE OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS RELITIGATION
\nGary Peller<\/em><\/p>\n

HOW DESEGREGATION ORDERS MAY IMPROVE MINORITY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
\nRobert L. Crain and Rita E. Mahard<\/em><\/p>\n

LEGAL ASPECTS OF PRISON RIOTS
\nIra P. Robbins<\/em><\/p>\n

ULYSSES AND THE PSYCHIATRISTS:<\/em> A LEGAL AND POLICY ANALYSIS OF THE VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT CONTRACT
\nRebecca S. Dresser<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

PREFERENTIAL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (DANIEL C. MAGUIRE, A NEW AMERICAN JUSTICE<\/em>)
\nDerrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

REPRESENTATIVE EGOS (H. N. HIRSCH, THE ENIGMA OF FELIX FRANKFURTER<\/em>; JAMES F. SIMON, INDEPENDENT JOURNEY<\/em>)
\nGeorge Kannar<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Fall 1981)<\/strong><\/p>\n

First Amendment Symposium<\/span><\/p>\n

FOREWORD: IS THE PENDULUM SWINGING AWAY FROM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION?
\nEdward M. Kennedy<\/em><\/p>\n

JOURNALISTIC SILENCE AND GOVERNMENTAL SPEECH: CAN INSTITUTIONS HAVE RIGHTS?
\nRobert Meister<\/em><\/p>\n

AN EGALITARIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
\nJohn H. F. Shattuck and Fritz Byers<\/em><\/p>\n

THE IMAGE OF JUSTICE: CHANDLER v. FLORIDA
\nCharles R. Nesson and Andrew D. Koblenz<\/em><\/p>\n

ACCESS TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: TO RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS AND BEYOND
\nG. Michael Fenner and James L. Koley<\/em><\/p>\n

CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR PRIVATE PAPERS
\nCraig M. Bradley<\/em><\/p>\n

GOVERNMENT HOUSEKEEPING AUTHORITY: BUREAUCRATIC PRIVILEGES WITHOUT A BUREAUCRATIC PRIVILEGE
\nDon Lively<\/em><\/p>\n

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL EXPRESSION: A PROBLEM IN FIRST AMENDMENT THEORY
\nJames R. Ferguson<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

TRUSTEES OF SELF-INTEREST? (JOHN LOFTON, THE PRESS AS GUARDIAN OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT<\/em>)
\nPnina Lahav<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

16 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Summer 1981)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY: FOURTH AMENDMENT LEGITIMACY THROUGH STATE LAW
\nRichard S. Walinski and Thomas J. Tucker<\/em><\/p>\n

INCARCERATING STATUS OFFENDERS: ATTEMPTS TO CIRCUMVENT THE JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT
\nJan C. Costello and Nancy L. Worthington<\/em><\/p>\n

COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING CASES
\nRobert G. Schwemm<\/em><\/p>\n

Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n

JURISDICTIONAL GERRYMANDERING: ZONING DISFAVORED RIGHTS OUT OF THE FEDERAL COURTS
\nLaurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF GUILTY PLEAS IN THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
\nPriscilla Budeiri<\/em><\/p>\n

SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS LIMITS ON THE DURATION OF CIVIL COMMITMENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS
\nDavid W. Burgett<\/em><\/p>\n

PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION AND THE PRIVACY OF MEDICAL RECORDS
\nWendy E. Parmet<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Winter 1980)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE LEGALITY OF MINIMUM COMPETENCY TEST PROGRAMS UNDER TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
\nJohn Benjes, Jay Heubert, and Michael O\u2019Brien<\/em><\/p>\n

EQUAL RIGHTS TO TRIAL FOR WOMEN: SEX BIAS IN THE LAW OF SELF-DEFENSE
\nElizabeth Schneider<\/em><\/p>\n

PRIVATE SECURITY AND THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
\nSteven Euller<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

THE CHILLING EFFECT IN PRESS CASES: JUDICIAL THUMB ON THE SCALES
\nTamara Jacobs<\/em><\/p>\n

CASES THAT SHOCK CONSCIENCE: REFLECTIONS ON CRITICISM OF THE BURGER COURT
\nJeffrey Blum, William Greaney, Patrick Hanifin, and Angela Sousa<\/em><\/p>\n

PEN REGISTERS AFTER SMITH v. MARYLAND<\/em>
\nJohn Applegate and Amy Grossman<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

CHOOSING HEROES CAREFULLY (JOHN HART ELY, DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST<\/em>)
\nIra C. Lupu<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Fall 1980)<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Tribute to Justice Brennan<\/span><\/p>\n

FOREWORD
\nAlbert Sacks<\/em><\/p>\n

TESTIMONIAL TO MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN
\nPotter Stewart<\/em><\/p>\n

A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR.
\nDavid Bazelon<\/em><\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN\u2013THE EARLIER YEARS
\nFrederick Hall<\/em><\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN
\nMilton Katz<\/em><\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN: A PROPERTY TEACHER\u2019S APPRECIATION
\nFrank Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE MANIPULATION OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A FIRST AMENDMENT CRITIQUE OF SCHOOLING
\nStephen Arons and Charles Lawrence III<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT TO REFUSE PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS
\nNancy Rhoden<\/em><\/p>\n

BEYOND DAVIS<\/em>: EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION FOR DISABLED STUDENTS UNDER THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
\nTimothy Cook and Frank Laski<\/em><\/p>\n

EQUAL PAY FOR COMPARABLE WORK
\nJane von Frank<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

THE MCCARTHY ERA: HISTORY AS A SNAPSHOT (DAVID CAUTE, THE GREAT FEAR: THE ANTI-COMMUNIST PURGE UNDER TRUMAN AND EISENHOWER<\/em>)
\nMichael Tigar<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

15 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1980)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE
\nJ. Skelly Wright<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW\u2013SECTION 1981
\nJack Aguilar, Jack Balkin, Ronald Baugh, Gregory Beattie, Richard Claman, Martin Himeles, Jr., Charles Johnson, Robert Kipnees, Jacob Lewis, Caryn May, Elizabeth Merritt, Cheryl Noble, Michael Stewart, Kathleen Sullivan, Mary Wilke, and James Witkin<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1979)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Commentaries<\/span><\/p>\n

THE JURISPRUDENCE OF BROWN<\/em> AND THE DILEMMAS OF LIBERALISM
\nMorton J. Horwitz<\/em><\/p>\n

REEXAMINING BROWN<\/em> TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER: LOOKING BACKWARDS INTO THE FUTURE
\nRobert L. Carter<\/em><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

THE JUDICIAL STRUGGLE AGAINST EXCLUSIONARY ZONING: THE NEW JERSEY PARADIGM
\nHarold A. McDougall<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: THE CIA IN THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS
\nCaroline Heck<\/em><\/p>\n

SENIORITY SYSTEMS AND THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION: UNION LIABILITY IN THE TEAMSTERS<\/em> CONTEXT
\nKenneth Kleinman<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

MISGOVERNMENT BY JUDICIARY? (PHILIP B. KURLAND. WATERGATE AND THE CONSTITUTION<\/em>)
\nPaul L. Murphy<\/em><\/p>\n

THE LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE (CHARLES E. SILBERMAN, CRIMINAL VIOLENCE, CRIMINAL JUSTICE<\/em>; HYMAN GROSS, A THEORY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE<\/em>)
\nEdwin M. Schur<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1979)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF PRESS
\nThomas I. Emerson<\/em><\/p>\n

TOWARDS AN AUTONOMY-BASED THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY: BEYOND THE IDEOLOGY OF FAMILIAL PRIVACY
\nJune Aline Eichbaum<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

THE NEW COMMERCIAL SPEECH DOCTRINE AND BROADCAST ADVERTISING
\nLaurence Field<\/em><\/p>\n

CHALLENGING IDEOLOGICAL EXCLUSION OF CURRICULUM MATERIAL: RIGHTS OF STUDENTS AND PARENTS
\nNat Stern<\/em><\/p>\n

EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS: CONTRASTING METHODS OF REVIEW UNDER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE
\nJames A. Hughes<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

EMPLOYEE RIGHTS OR ORGANIZATIONAL RIGHTS? (DAVID W. EWING, FREEDOM INSIDE THE ORGANIZATION<\/em>)
\nRoberta Fitzsimmons<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

14 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1979)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bakke<\/em> Symposium: Civil Rights Perspectives<\/span><\/p>\n

INTRODUCTION: AWAKENING AFTER BAKKE<\/em>
\nDerrick A. Bell, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

THE BAKKE<\/em> OPINIONS AND EQUAL PROTECTION DOCTRINE
\nKenneth L. Karst and Harold W. Horowitz<\/em><\/p>\n

LITIGATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION: THE NEED FOR INTERVENTION TO AFFIRM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
\nEmma Coleman Jones<\/em><\/p>\n

CULTURALLY BIASED TESTING AND PREDICTIVE INVALIDITY: PUTTING THEM ON THE RECORD
\nDavid M. White<\/em><\/p>\n

BEYOND BAKKE<\/em>: THE CONSTITUTION AND REDRESSING THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF RACISM
\nRobert A. Sedler<\/em><\/p>\n

BAKKE<\/em> ON AFFIRMITIVE ACTION FOR WOMEN: PEDESTAL OR CAGE?
\nNancy Gertner<\/em><\/p>\n

RACE CONSCIOUSNESS IN EMPLOYMENT AFTER BAKKE<\/em>
\nE. Richard Larson<\/em><\/p>\n

WHO NEEDS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
\nAnn Fagan Ginger<\/em><\/p>\n

FROM BROWN<\/em> TO BAKKE<\/em>: THE LONG ROAD TO EQUALITY
\nConstance Baker Motley<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1978)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
\nLouis Henkin<\/em><\/p>\n

REMEDIES FOR DISCRIMINATION IN SUPERVISORIAL AND MANAGERIAL JOBS
\nRobert Newman<\/em><\/p>\n

NON-INVESTIGATORY POLICE ENCOUNTERS
\nJohn H. Burkoff<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF PREGNANCY IN EMPLOYMENT: THE IMPACT OF GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. GILBERT<\/em> AND NASHVILLE GAS CO. v. SATTY<\/em>
\nEllen T. Taylor<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cMIND CONTROL\u201d OR INTENSITY OF FAITH: THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
\nRobert N. Shapiro<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

THE FUTURE OF PRISONERS\u2019 UNIONS: JONES v. NORTH CAROLINA PRISONERS\u2019 LABOR UNION<\/em>
\nRegina Montoya and Paul Coggins<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1978)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dedication to Justice Thurgood Marshall<\/span><\/p>\n

DEDICATION TO JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL<\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL
\nWarren E. Burger<\/em><\/p>\n

THURGOOD MARSHALL\u2013THE LAWYER
\nSpottswood W. Robinson III<\/em><\/p>\n

I REMEMBER THE TUMULTUOUS YEARS AND THURGOOD MARSHALL
\nConstance Baker Motley<\/em><\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL
\nLouis H. Pollak<\/em><\/p>\n

A VISION OF THE CONSTITUTION
\nOwen M. Fiss<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

UNION DEMOCRACY AND THE LMRDA: AUTOCRACY AND INSURGENCY IN NATIONAL UNION ELECTIONS
\nEdgar N. James<\/em><\/p>\n

THE DOCTRINE OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY: ACCOMMODATING TRIBAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL INTERESTS
\nRobert G. McCoy<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION UNDER TITLE IX
\nPatty Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n

MINOR POLITICAL PARTIES AND CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE LAWS
\nMichael D. Esch<\/em><\/p>\n

HABEAS CORPUS AFTER STONE v. POWELL<\/em>: THE \u201cOPPORTUNITY FOR FULL AND FAIR LITIGATION\u201d STANDARD
\nJames Turner<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

THE COURTS AND SOCIAL POLICY (DONALD L. HOROWITZ, THE COURTS AND SOCIAL POLICY<\/em>)
\nThomas A. Balmer<\/em><\/p>\n

THINKING ABOUT JAIL (MICHAEL FOCAULT, DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH: THE BIRTH OF THE PRISON<\/em>)
\nGeorge Kannar<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

13 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1978)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

A SWANN<\/em> SONG FOR REMEDIES: EQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE BURGER COURT
\nRobert D. Goldstein<\/em><\/p>\n

RESOLVING THE SENIORITY\/MINORITY LAYOFFS CONFLICT: AN EMPLOYER-TARGETED APPROACH
\nIris A. Burke and Oscar G. Chase<\/em><\/p>\n

Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n

THE CONSTITUTION GOES TO HARVARD
\nHenry P. Monagham<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

CULTURAL PLURALISM
\nKevin M. Fong<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION IN TITLE VII CLASS ACTIONS: EAST TEXAS MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. v. RODRIGUEZ<\/em>
\nMichael Fischl<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

TAKING DWORKIN SERIOUSLY (RONALD DWORKIN, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOUSLY<\/em>)
\nKenneth I. Winston<\/em><\/p>\n

THE UNGRAND JURY (MARVIN E. FRANKEL AND GARY P. NAFTALIS, THE GRAND JURY: AN INSTITUTION ON TRIAL<\/em>)
\nSam Pizzigati<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1977)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

THE DOCTRINE OF PRIOR RESTRAINT
\nThomas R. Litwack<\/em><\/p>\n

THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF POLICYMAKING PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
\nMark Coven<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

PLESSY<\/em> REVIVED: THE SEPARATE BUT EQUAL DOCTRINE AND SEX-SEGREGATED EDUCATION
\nCynthia Lewis<\/em><\/p>\n

HOUSING REMEDIES IN SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CASES: THE VIEW FROM INDIANAPOLIS<\/em>
\nMarjorie Heins<\/em><\/p>\n

MINORITY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS
\nDominic L. Ozanne<\/em><\/p>\n

PROOF OF RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY PURPOSE UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: WASHINGTON v. DAVIS, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, MT. HEALTHY, AND WILLIAMSBURGH<\/em>
\nBarry A. Miller<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

BLACK WORKERS IN WHITE UNIONS (WILLIAM B. GOULD, BLACK WORKERS IN WHITE UNIONS: JOB DISCRIMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES<\/em>)
\nStaughton Lynd<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1977)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

REDEFINING PRIVACY
\nTom Gerety<\/em><\/p>\n

A NEW DEAL FOR THE PROTECTION OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS: CHALLENGING THE DOCTRINAL BASES OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES<\/em> AND STATE ACTION THEORY
\nIra Nerken<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

CONFRONTING THE CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT: AN EXPANDED ROLE FOR COURTS IN PRISON REFORM
\nMichael S. Feldberg<\/em><\/p>\n

TWO VIEWS OF A PRISONER\u2019S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS: MEACHUM v. FANO<\/em>
\nThomas O. Sargentich<\/em><\/p>\n

FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE WELFARE AND UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FOR STRIKERS
\nW. Joseph Hetherington<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

THE NEW CHILD SAVERS (KENNETH WOODEN, WEEPING IN THE PLAYTIME OF OTHERS: AMERICA\u2019S INCARCERATED CHILDREN<\/em>; THOMAS J. COTTLE, BARRED FROM SCHOOL: 2 MILLION CHILDREN!<\/em>)
\nStanley Herr<\/em><\/p>\n

TECHNICAL DUE PROCESS: ? (THE COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION, THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, AND THE YALE LAW REVIEW, A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION<\/em>)
\nAlan Strasser<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

12 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1977)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

AN INDEPENDENT RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION
\nReena Raggi<\/em><\/p>\n

TOWARD A RIGHT TO UNION MEMBERSHIP
\nJonathan Lang<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

PROTECTING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN STATE COURTS: FITTING A STATE PEG TO A FEDERAL HOLE
\nAndre R. Jaglom<\/em><\/p>\n

EQUALITY OF ALLOCATION BY LOT
\nHank Greely<\/em><\/p>\n

QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO DEFAME EMPLOYEES AND CREDIT APPLICANTS
\nCharles D. Tiefner<\/em><\/p>\n

THE ARAB BOYCOTT AND TITLE VII
\nRobert H. Lande<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

UNEQUAL JUSTICE (JEROLD S. AUERBACH, UNEQUAL JUSTICE: LAWYERS AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN MODERN AMERICA<\/em>)
\nJonathan Prude<\/em><\/p>\n

JUSTICE ACCUSED (ROBERT M. COVER, JUSTICE ACCUSED: ANTISLAVERY AND THE JUDICIAL PROCESS<\/em>)
\nRichard S. Key<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Fall 1976)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

IN MEMORY OF WILLIAM H. HASTIE<\/p>\n

THE FRANCIS BIDDLE MEMORIAL LECTURE: FELIX FRANKFURTER: CIVIL LIBERTARIAN
\nJoseph L. Rauh, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

ALEXANDER BICKEL AND THE POST-REALIST CONSTITUTION
\nEdward A. Purcell<\/em><\/p>\n

SEPARATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR CHILDREN: PROTECTING THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF MINORS IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
\nJames Kenneth Genden<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT\u2019S PRIVACY EXEMPTION AND THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
\nFrank A. Rosenfeld<\/em><\/p>\n

CLAIMING ILLEGAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF 18 U.S.C. sec. 3504(a)(1)
\nMargaret V. Sachs<\/em><\/p>\n

COST AND QUALITY CONTROL IN THE MEDICARE\/MEDICAID PROGRAM: CONCURRENT REVIEW
\nCedric C. Chao<\/em><\/p>\n

THE CLEAN AIR AMENDMENTS OF 1970: CAN CONGRESS COMPEL STATE COOPERATION IN ACHIEVING NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS?
\nVaughan Finn<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

MINORITY GROUPS AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT STANDARD OF CERTITUDE: UNITED STATES v. ORTIZ<\/em> AND UNITED STATES v. BRIGNONI-PONCE<\/em>
\nRobert L. Hickok<\/em><\/p>\n

Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n

LEGAL ETHICS (MONROE H. FREEDMAN, LAWYERS\u2019 ETHICS IN AN ADVERSARY SYSTEM<\/em>)
\nNorman Dorsen<\/em><\/p>\n

AFFIRMATIVE DISCRIMINATION (NATHAN GLAZER, AFFIRMATIVE DISCRIMINATION: ETHNIC INEQUALITY AND POLICY<\/em>; ROBERT M. O\u2019NEIL, DISCRIMINATING AGAINST DISCRIMINATION: PREFERENTIAL ADMISSIONS AND THE DEFUNNIS CASE<\/em>; RONALD DWORKIN, THE RIGHT TO GO TO LAW SCHOOL\u2013THE DEFUNNIS CASE<\/em>)
\nAllen Graubard<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1976)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dedication<\/p>\n

IN HONOR OF MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS<\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS
\nCharles E. Ares<\/em><\/p>\n

EVEN-HANDED JUSTICE
\nVern Countryman<\/em><\/p>\n

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS
\nSteven Duke<\/em><\/p>\n

The Case Against HUAC<\/p>\n

THE STAMLER LITIGATION
\nThomas P. Sullivan, Chester M. Kamin, and Arthur M. Sussman<\/em><\/p>\n

THE EVIDENCE: A CONTEXT ANALYSIS OF THE HUAC RECORD
\nHans Zeisel and Rose Stamler<\/em><\/p>\n

Article<\/span><\/p>\n

THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT AND THE EMERGENCE OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW: A NEW PRIORITY IN FEDERAL LABOR POLICY
\nHerbert Hill<\/em><\/p>\n

Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

DEADLY FORCE TO ARREST: TRIGGERING CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW
\nFloyd R. Finch, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

UNBURDENING THE CRIMINAL DEFENDANT: MULLANEY v. WILBUR<\/em> AND THE REASONABLE DOUBT STANDARD
\nAnthony M. Doniger<\/em><\/p>\n

FEDERAL CIVILIAN COURT INTERPRETATION IN PENDING COURTS-MARTIAL AND THE PROPER SCOPE OF MILITARY JURISDICTION OVER CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS: SCHLESINGER v. COUNCILMAN<\/em> AND MCLUCAS v. DECHAMPLAIN<\/em>
\nJeffrey S. Facter<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

SIMPLE JUSTICE (RICHARD KLUGER, SIMPLE JUSTICE<\/em>)
\nE. Richard Larson<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Spring 1976)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

BEYOND URLTA: A PROGRAM FOR ACHIEVING REAL TENANT GOALS
\nRichard L. Blumberg and Brian Quinn Robbins<\/em><\/p>\n

PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LIMITS OF THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM
\nLeonard S. Rubenstein<\/em><\/p>\n

STATE ACTION ANALYSIS OF TAX EXPENDITURES
\nRobert Clarke Brown<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

APPLYING THE TITLE VII PRIMA FACIE CASE TO TITLE VIII LITIGATION
\nElliot M. Mincberg<\/em><\/p>\n

EQUAL CREDIT: PROMISE OR REALITY?
\nLaurie D. Zelon<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

ATTICA: A TIME TO DIE (TOM WICKER, A TIME TO DIE<\/em>)
\nMichael G. Ignatieff<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 3 (Summer 1975)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

WELFARE CASES AND THE \u201cNEW MAJORITY\u201d: CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND PRACTICE
\nKenneth M. Davidson<\/em><\/p>\n

FARMWORKER LITIGATION UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT: ESTABLISHING JOINT EMPLOYER LIABILITY AND RELATED PROBLEMS
\nHoward S. Scher and Robert S. Catz<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

GAGGING THE PRESS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
\nAndrew M. Schatz<\/em><\/p>\n

HOSPITALS, TAX EXEMPTION, AND THE POOR
\nRussell L. Richeda<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

CURBING EXPLOITATION IN SEGREGATED HOUSING MARKETS: CLARK v. UNIVERSAL BUILDERS, INC.<\/em>
\nTheodore V. Wells, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

THE RIGHT TO A LEGALLY TRAINED JUDGE: GORDON v. JUSTICE COURT<\/em>
\nGary L. Rosenthal<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

LEGAL SERVICES (EARL JOHNSON, JR., JUSTICE AND REFORM: THE FORMATIVE YEARS OF THE OEO LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM<\/em>)
\nValerie Vanaman<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1975)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

STRUCTURAL DUE PROCESS
\nLaurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: THE FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES
\nCharles F. Abernathy<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

POLICING PLUTONIUM: THE CIVIL LIBERTIES FALLOUT
\nRussell W. Ayres<\/em><\/p>\n

MEDICAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FETAL SURVIVAL UNDER ROE<\/em> AND DOE<\/em>
\nBenjamin B. Sendor<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

FEAR OF FIRING: ARNETT v. KENNEDY<\/em> AND THE PROTECTION OF FEDERAL CAREER EMPLOYEES
\nPhilip A. Byler<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

SECRECY AND GOVERNMENT (NORMAN DORSEN AND STEPHEN GILLERS, EDS., NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS: SECRECY IN AMERICA<\/em>; THOMAS M. FRANCK AND EDWARD WEISBAND, EDS., SECRECY AND FOREIGN POLICY<\/em>)
\nRobert F. Drinan<\/em>
\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

10 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1975)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Articles<\/span><\/p>\n

UNITED STATES v. LOVETT<\/em>: LITIGATING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS
\nJohn Hart Ely<\/em><\/p>\n

THE \u201cUNREVIEWABLE\u201d COURT-MARTIAL CONVICTION: SUPERVISORY RELIEF UNDER THE ALL WRITS ACT FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS
\nDaniel J. Wacker<\/em><\/p>\n

THE IMPACT OF REVENUE SHARING ON MINORITIES AND THE POOR
\nMorton H. Sklar<\/em><\/p>\n

Comments<\/span><\/p>\n

ENFORCING THE OBLIGATION TO PRESENT CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES: THE FORGOTTEN HALF OF THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE
\nRichard A. Kurnit<\/em><\/p>\n

PRETRIAL DIVERSION: THE THREAT OF EXPANDING SOCIAL CONTROL
\nJamie S. Gorelick<\/em><\/p>\n

Case Comment<\/span><\/p>\n

ARMY DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAMS AND THE DOCTRINE OF MILITARY NECESSITY: COMMITTEE FOR G.I. RIGHTS v. CALLAWAY<\/em> AND UNITED STATES v. RUIZ<\/em>
\nWilliam J. (Zak) Taylor<\/em><\/p>\n

Review<\/span><\/p>\n

WOMEN AND THE LAW (LEO KANOWITZ, SEX ROLES IN LAW AND SOCIETY: CASES AND MATERIALS<\/em>; KENNETH M. DAVIDSON, SEX-BASED DISCRIMINATION: TEXT, CASES AND MATERIALS<\/em>)
\nAleta Wallach<\/em>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

19 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1984) A Tribute to Clarence Clyde Ferguson, Jr. A TRIBUTE TO THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[756],"class_list":["post-7343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-1Ur","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7343"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}