{"id":7345,"date":"2014-02-21T13:01:48","date_gmt":"2014-02-21T18:01:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?page_id=7345"},"modified":"2018-12-24T23:42:07","modified_gmt":"2018-12-25T04:42:07","slug":"volumes-20-to-29","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/volumes-20-to-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumes 20 to 29"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1994)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Symposium: Stonewall at 25<\/span><\/p>\n<p>INTRODUCTION: STONEWALL AT 25<br \/>\n<em>The Editors<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE GAY CIVIL RIGHTS DEBATE IN THE STATES: DECODING THE DISCOURSE OF EQUIVALENTS<br \/>\n<em>Jane S. Schacter<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FROM HAND-HOLDING TO SODOMY: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF HOMOSEXUAL (EXPRESSIVE) CONDUCT<br \/>\n<em>David Cole and William N. Eskridge, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>GAY MEN, AIDS, AND THE CODE OF THE CONDOM<br \/>\n<em>David L. Chambers<\/em><\/p>\n<p>HATE CRIMES, HOMOSEXUALS, AND THE CONSTITUTION<br \/>\n<em>Anthony S. Winer<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE DEMISE OF THE HOMOSEXUAL EXCLUSION: NEW POSSIBILITIES FOR GAY AND LESBIAN IMMIGRATION<br \/>\n<em>Robert Foss<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Notes<\/span><\/p>\n<p>TURF WARS: STREET GANGS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE BATTLE FOR PUBLIC SPACE<br \/>\n<em>Terence R. Boga<\/em><\/p>\n<p>AGAINST MARRIAGE<br \/>\n<em>Steven K. Homer<\/em><\/p>\n<p>WHERE DO MIXED BABIES BELONG? RACIAL CLASSIFICATION IN AMERICA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION<br \/>\n<em>Julie C. Lythcott-Haims<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>WINNING ARGUMENTS\/LOSING THEMSELVES: THE (DYS) FUNCTIONAL APPROACH IN THOMAS S. v. ROBIN Y.<br \/>\n<em>Brad Sears<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CIVIL RIGHTS AND SPECIAL WRONGS\u2013THE AMENDMENT 2 LITIGATION<br \/>\n<em>Pamela Coukos<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publication<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CATHARINE A. MACKINNON, <em>ONLY WORDS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Elizabeth Matthews<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1994)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF RACE: SOME OBSERVATIONS ON ILLUSION, FABRICATION, AND CHOICE<br \/>\n<em>Ian F. Haney Lopez<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>WASHINGTON v. DAVIS<\/em> AND THE OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACTS<br \/>\n<em>Todd Rakoff<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE WAR ON DRUGS: THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION FALLS VICTIM TO STATE TAXATION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES<br \/>\n<em>Ann L. Iijima<\/em><\/p>\n<p>IN THE DEFENSE OF FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE<br \/>\n<em>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/p>\n<p>AN ACLU TRADITIONALIST REPLIES<br \/>\n<em>David Goldberger<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FIRST AMENDMENT FORMALISM IS GIVING WAY TO FIRST AMENDMENT LEGAL REALISM<br \/>\n<em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Notes<\/span><\/p>\n<p>NOT EVEN HIS NAME: IS THE DENIGRATION OF CRAZY HORSE CUSTER\u2019S FINAL REVENGE?<br \/>\n<em>Jessica R. Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE MERCY OF SCALIA: STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION AND THE RULE OF LENITY<br \/>\n<em>Sarah Newland<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Development<\/span><\/p>\n<p>WHITE LINES, BLACK DISTRICTS\u2013<em>SHAW v. RENO<\/em> AND THE DILUTION OF THE ANTI-DILUTION PRINCIPLE<br \/>\n<em>Anthony Q. Fletcher<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>WILLIAM B. RUBENSTEIN, <em>LESBIANS, GAY MEN, AND THE LAW<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Brad Sears<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ALICE VACHSS, <em>SEX CRIMES: TEN YEARS ON THE FRONT LINES PROSECUTING RAPISTS AND CONFRONTING THEIR COLLABORATORS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Stephanie Bunting<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"28\" name=\"28\"><\/a>28 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1993)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Symposium: In Your Midst: Contributions of Women of Color in the Law<br \/>\nINTRODUCTION<\/p>\n<p>ON BEING A GORILLA IN YOUR MIDST, OR, THE LIFE OF ONE BLACK WOMAN IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY<br \/>\n<em>Jennifer M. Russell<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>STEALING AWAY: BLACK WOMEN, OUTLAW CULTURE AND THE RHETORIC OF RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Monica J. Evans<\/em><\/p>\n<p>NEGLECTED STORIES AND THE LAWFULNESS OF <em>ROE V. WADE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Peggy Cooper Davis<\/em><\/p>\n<p>STRUCTURES OF SUBORDINATION: WOMEN OF COLOR AT THE INTERSECTION OF TITLE VII AND THE NLRA. NOT!<br \/>\n<em>Elizabeth M. Iglesias<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Notes<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FALSE HOPE OR A REALIZABLE RIGHT? THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO SHELTER UNDER THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS\u2019 PROPOSED BILL OF RIGHTS FOR SOUTH AFRICA<br \/>\n<em>Kim Robinson<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>HAGUE v. CIO<\/em> AND THE ROOTS OF PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: TRANSLATING LIMITS OF POWERS INTO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Richard T. Pfohl<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A DUBIOUS VICTORY FOR THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH\u2013<em>SIMON &amp; SCHUSTER, INC. v. MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Tanya Herrera<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FEDERAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAW\u2019S SCIENTER REQUIREMENT\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. X-CITEMENT VIDEO, INC.<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Robert F. Schwartz<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>28 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1993)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ROSIE O\u2019NEILL GOES TO LAW SCHOOL: THE CLINICAL EDUCATION OF THE SENSITIVE NEW AGE PUBLIC DEFENDER<br \/>\n<em>Abbe Smith<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RIGHTS HELD HOSTAGE: RACE, IDEOLOGY AND THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE<br \/>\n<em>Kenneth B. Nunn<\/em><\/p>\n<p>HARBORING, SANCTUARY AND THE CRIME OF CHARITY UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW<br \/>\n<em>Gregory A. Loken and Lisa R. Babino<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE PUBLIC HARM OF PRIVATE VIOLENCE: RAPE, SEX DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP<br \/>\n<em>Brande Stellings<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Development<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ANOTHER SKIRMISH IN THE EQUAL EDUCATION BATTLE\u2013<em>FREEMAN v. PITTS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Lisa A. Stewart<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>GERALD P. LOPEZ, <em>REBELLIOUS LAWYERING: ONE CHICANO\u2019S VISION OF PROGRESSIVE LEGAL PRACTICE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Mitchell A. Kamin<\/em><\/p>\n<p>DERRICK A. BELL, JR., <em>FACES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL: THE PERMANENCE OF RACISM<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Stephanie Goodman<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ARCHIE EPPS, <em>MALCOLM X: SPEECHES AT HARVARD<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Christopher J. Arias-Piranio<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"27\" name=\"27\"><\/a>27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1992)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Symposium: The State of Civil Liberties: Where Do We Go From Here?<br \/>\nA Tribute to Norman Dorsen<\/p>\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN<br \/>\n<em>William J. Brennan, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>NORMAN DORSEN: A TRIBUTE<br \/>\n<em>James L. Oakes<\/em><\/p>\n<p>TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND WHITE PAPER<br \/>\n<em>Stephen Gillers<\/em><\/p>\n<p>TRIBUTE TO NORMAN DORSEN, ACLU LEADER<br \/>\n<em>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/p>\n<p>WRITINGS AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF NORMAN DORSEN<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>UNIVERSITIES, RACIST SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA: AN ESSAY FOR THE ACLU<br \/>\n<em>Frank Michelman<\/em><\/p>\n<p>GHOSTS IN THE ATTIC: IDEALIZED PLURALISM, COMMUNITY AND HATE SPEECH<br \/>\n<em>Burt Neuborne<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ENVISIONING A FUTURE FOR REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY: STRATEGIES FOR MAKING THE RIGHTS REAL<br \/>\n<em>Rachael N. Pine and Sylvia A. Law<\/em><\/p>\n<p>POLICE ABUSE: CAN THE VIOLENCE BE CONTAINED?<br \/>\n<em>David Rudovsky<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE POLITICS OF RELIGION AND THE SYMBOLS OF GOVERNMENT<br \/>\n<em>Kenneth L. Karst<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LIFE AFTER <em>HARDWICK<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Nan D. Hunter<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS LITIGATION BEFORE A HOSTILE FEDERAL JUDICIARY: EXTRACTING BENEFIT FROM PERIL<br \/>\n<em>Thomas B. Stoddard<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CALCULATING INJUSTICE: THE FIXATION ON PUNISHMENT AS CRIME CONTROL<br \/>\n<em>Michele H. Kalstein, Kirstie A. McCornock, Seth A. Rosenthal, Katherine M. Nicholson, John Raphling, and Brande Stellings<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>BURDENS HARD TO BEAR: A THEOLOGY OF CIVIL RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Rachel Mariner<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publication<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Martin Luther King, Jr., <em>THE PAPERS OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., VOLUME I: CALLED TO SERVE (JANUARY 1929-JUNE 1951)<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Peter M. Cicchino<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>27 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1992)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">A Tribute to Justice Thurgood Marshall<\/span><\/p>\n<p>PRINCIPLED JUSTICE: A PERSONAL REFLECTION ON JUSTICE MARSHALL<br \/>\n<em>Virginia Whitner Hoptman<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>RE-COGNIZING INEQUALITY: REBELLION, REDEMPTION AND THE STRUGGLE FOR TRANSCENDENCE IN THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW<br \/>\n<em>Robert L. Hayman, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIT\u2019S THE THIRD WORLD DOWN THERE!\u201d: THE COLONIALIST VOCATION AND AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE<br \/>\n<em>James M. Doyle<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE SUPREME COURT AND THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION<br \/>\n<em>Martin H. Malin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CREATING SPACE FOR RACIAL DIFFERENCE: THE CASE FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN SCHOOLS<br \/>\n<em>Christopher Steskal<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DEFENDANTS\u2019 WRONGS AND VICTIMS\u2019 RIGHTS\u2013<em>PAYNE v. TENNESSEE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Catherine Bendor<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A JUDICIAL BLOW TO THE MILITARY\u2019S ANTI-GAY POLICIES\u2013<em>PRUITT v. CHENEY<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Chad S. Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A TRUNK FULL OF TROUBLE\u2013<em>HARMELIN v. MICHIGAN<\/em><br \/>\n<em>G. David Hackney<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DRUCILLA CORNELL, <em>BEYOND ACCOMMODATION: ETHICAL FEMINISM, DECONSTRUCTION, AND THE LAW<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Edward H. Mills, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>STEPHEN L. CARTER, <em>REFLECTIONS OF AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BABY<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Eric Spooner<\/em><\/p>\n<p>MARY ANN GLENDON, <em>RIGHTS TALK: THE IMPOVERISHMENT OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Joan T. Brown<\/em><\/p>\n<p>PAUL CHERIGNY, <em>GIGS: JAZZ AND THE CABARET LAWS IN NEW YORK CITY<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Michelle Quash<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"26\" name=\"26\"><\/a>26 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1991)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CONFESSIONS, CRIMINALS AND COMMUNITY<br \/>\n<em>Sheri Lynn Johnson<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS OF A SECO. 1 (Winter 1991)<\/p>\n<p>A Tribute to Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.<\/p>\n<p>A TRIBUTE TO MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN<br \/>\n<em>Harry A. Blackmun<\/em><\/p>\n<p>MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN-AN APPRECIATION<br \/>\n<em>Richard S. Arnold<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u201cRATHER THAN THE FREE\u201d: FREE BLACKS IN COLONIAL AND ANTEBELLUM VIRGINIA<br \/>\n<em>A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr. and Greer C. Bosworth<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE POWER OF LANGUAGE BEYOND WORDS: LAW AS INVITATION<br \/>\n<em>Emily Fowler Hartigan<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE INTERCONNECTED EPIDEMICS OF DRUG DEPENDENCY AND AIDS<br \/>\n<em>Larry Gostin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CHILD ABUSE TRIALS AND THE CONFRONTATION OF TRAUMATIZED WITNESSES: DEFINING \u201cCONFRONTATION\u201d TO PROTECT BOTH CHILDREN AND DEFENDANTS<br \/>\n<em>Brian L. Schwalb<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ANONYMOUS TIPS, INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INARTICULATE HUNCHES\u2013<em>ALABAMA v. WHITE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Joe Metcalfe<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY\u2013<em>DOE v. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AND THE FLORIDA BAR<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Wendy J. Thurm<\/em><\/p>\n<p>BRINGING HATE CRIME INTO FOCUS\u2013THE HATE CRIME STATISTICS ACT OF 1990<br \/>\n<em>Joseph M. Fernandez<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ROBERT A WILLIAMS, JR., <em>THE AMERICAN INDIAN IN WESTERN LEGAL THOUGHT: THE DISCOURSES OF CONQUEST<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Richard T. Pfohl<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FRANK R. PARKER, <em>BLACK VOTES COUNT: POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT IN MISSISSIPPI AFTER 1965<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Mary L. Clark<\/em><\/p>\n<p>SHELBY STEELE, <em>THE CONTENT OF OUR CHARACTER<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Cassandra Q. Butts<\/em><\/p>\n<p>STEVEN SHIFFRIN, <em>THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DEMOCRACY, AND ROMANCE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Jean McLoughlin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"25\" name=\"25\"><\/a>25 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1990)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Developing New Approaches to Civil Rights for the 1990\u2032s<\/span><\/p>\n<p>WHERE WE\u2019VE BEEN, WHERE WE\u2019RE GOING: A VISION OF RACIAL JUSTICE IN THE 1990\u2032S<br \/>\n<em>Julian Bond<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LEGISLATIVE RESPONSES TO HATE-MOTIVATED VIOLENCE: THE MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE AND BEYOND<br \/>\n<em>Virginia Nia Lee and Joseph M. Fernandez<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>EFFICIENCY\u2019S THREAT TO THE VALUE OF ACCESSIBLE COURTS FOR MINORITIES<br \/>\n<em>Eric K. Yamamoto<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CONTRACT PERFORMANCE: PATTERSON AND A STATE LAW ALTERNATIVE<br \/>\n<em>Steven J. Burton<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>RECONSTRUCTION, DECONSTRUCTION AND LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE: THE 1988 SUPREME COURT TERM AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1990<br \/>\n<em>Sondra Hemeryck, Cassandra Butts, Laura Jehl, Adrienne Koch, and Matthew Sloan<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>WAIVING RIGHTS AND BURNING FLAGS: THE SEARCH FOR A VALID STATE INTEREST IN FLAG PROTECTION<br \/>\n<em>Gregory Herbert<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Laurence H. Tribe, <em>ABORTION: THE CLASH OF ABSOLUTES<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Vada Berger<\/em><\/p>\n<p>GUY CARAWAN AND CANDIE CARAWAN, EDS., <em>SING FOR FREEDOM: THE STORY OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT THROUGH ITS SONGS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Angela Dorn and Gretchen C. von Helms<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>25 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1990)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>SEXIST SPEECH IN THE WORKPLACE<br \/>\n<em>Marcy Strauss<\/em><\/p>\n<p>JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AMNESTY DENIALS: MUST ALIENS BET THEIR LIVES TO GET INTO COURT?<br \/>\n<em>Daniel Kanstroom<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RETHINKING MINORITY BUSINESS STRATEGIES<br \/>\n<em>Robert E. Suggs<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>AN ACT RELATIVE TO CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW<br \/>\n<em>Ian Fidencio Haney Lopez<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE COURT DECLINES IN FAIRNESS\u2013<em>TEAGUE v. LANE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Eliot F. Krieger<\/em><\/p>\n<p>REDEFINING THE FAMILY\u2013<em>BRASCHI v. STAHL ASSOCIATES<\/em><br \/>\n<em>James D. Esseks<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FORFEITING THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. MONSANTO<\/em> AND <em>CAPLIN &amp; DRYSDALE, CHARTERED v. UNITED STATES<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Steve Dettelbach<\/em><\/p>\n<p>FIRST AMENDMENT OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE\u2013<em>MASSACHUSETTS v. OAKES<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Tim Moran<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DOROTHY NELKIN AND LAURENCE TANCREDI, <em>DANGEROUS DIAGNOSTICS: THE SOCIAL POWER OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Jennifer DuFault<\/em><\/p>\n<p>BUD SCHULTZ AND RUTH SCHULTZ, <em>IT DID HAPPEN HERE: RECOLLECTIONS OF POLITICAL REPRESSION IN AMERICA<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Steven R. Peikin<\/em><\/p>\n<p>KENNETH L. KARST, <em>BELONGING TO AMERICA<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Deborah Hellman<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"24\" name=\"24\"><\/a>24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1989)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DECLARING ENGLISH THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE: PREJUDICE SPOKEN HERE<br \/>\n<em>Antonio J. Califa<\/em><\/p>\n<p>MINORITY LAW PROFESSORS\u2019 LIVES: THE BELL-DELGADO SURVEY<br \/>\n<em>Richard Delgado and Derrick Bell<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n<p>KEEPING THE FAITH: BLACK VOTERS IN THE POST-REAGAN ERA<br \/>\n<em>Lani Guinier<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>TOO MUCH JUSTICE: A LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO <em>MCCLESKEY v. KEMP<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Vada Berger, Nicole Walthour, Angela Dorn, Dan Lindsey, Pamela Thompson, and Gretchen von Helms<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>ARIZONA v. YOUNGBLOOD<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Trish Peyser Perlmutter<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL CARTE BLANCHE FOR QUASI-PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS?\u2013<em>NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. TARKANIAN<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Jose Luis Patino<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RESTRICTING MINORITY OCCUPANCY TO MAINTAIN HOUSING INTEGRATION\u2013<em>UNITED STATES v. STARRETT CITY ASSOCIATES<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Ankur Goel<\/em><\/p>\n<p>STUDENT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS\u2013<em>BURCH v. BARKER<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Sylvia Quast<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>MARJORIE HEINS, <em>CUTTING THE MUSTARD: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND THE NATURE OF EXCELLENCE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Thomas K. Higley<\/em><\/p>\n<p>SUNG-HEE SUH, <em>SANCTUARY: A STORY OF AMERICAN CONSCIENCE AND LAW IN COLLISION<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Sung-Hee Suh<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RICHARD D. MOHR, <em>GAYS\/JUSTICE: A STUDY OF ETHICS, SOCIETY, AND LAW<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Jonathan Handel<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>24 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1989)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Voices of Experience: New Response to Gender Discourse<\/span><\/p>\n<p>INTRODUCTION: FINDING OUR PARADOXES, AFFIRMING OUR BEYOND<br \/>\n<em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n<p>BLACK WOMEN AND THE CONSTITUTION: FINDING OUR PLACE; ASSERTING OUR RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Judy Scales-Trent<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cGIRLS CAN\u2019T BE PLUMBERS\u201d\u2013AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION: BEYOND GOALS AND QUOTAS<br \/>\n<em>Sylvia A. Law<\/em><\/p>\n<p>WORK AND FAMILY: THE GENDER PARADOX AND THE LIMITATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION ANALYSIS IN RESTRUCTURING THE WORKPLACE<br \/>\n<em>Nancy E. Dowd<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>MAPS AND MISREADINGS: THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHIC COMPACTNESS IN RACIAL VOTE DILUTION LITIGATION<br \/>\n<em>Pamela S. Karlan<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Developments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1988<br \/>\n<em>Keith Aoki<\/em><\/p>\n<p>TITLE VII: APPLICATION OF IMPACT ANALYSIS TO SUBJECTIVE EMPLOYMENT CRITERIA\u2013<em>WATSON v. FORT WORTH BANK AND TRUST<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Karen Halverson<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>NORMAN DORSEN, ED., <em>THE EVOLVING CONSTITUTION: ESSAYS ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Christopher Armeniades<\/em><\/p>\n<p>JILL NORGREN AND SERENA NANDA, <em>AMERICAN CULTURAL PLURALISM AND LAW<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Adrienne Koch<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"23\" name=\"23\"><\/a>23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1988)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Responses to the Minority Critiques of the Critical Legal Studies Movement<\/span><\/p>\n<p>RACISM, RIGHTS AND THE QUEST FOR EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY: A CRITICAL LEGAL ESSAY<br \/>\n<em>Alan Freeman<\/em><\/p>\n<p>RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Morton J. Horwitz<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND THE REALITIES OF RACE\u2013DOES THE FUNDAMENTAL CONTRADICTION HAVE A COROLLARY?<br \/>\n<em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>BLACK NEIGHBORHOODS BECOMING BLACK CITIES: GROUP EMPOWERMENT, LOCAL CONTROL AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DARKER THAN <em>BROWN<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Ankur J. Goel, Willie J. Lovett, Jr., Robert Patten, and Robert L. Wilkins<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE PURGING OF EMPOWERMENT: VOTER PURGE LAWS AND THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT<br \/>\n<em>Steve Barber, Jim Halpert, Mimi Wright, and Frank Litwin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article<\/span><\/p>\n<p>GIDEON\u2019S SHELTER: THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE A RIGHT TO COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS IN EVICTION PROCEEDINGS<br \/>\n<em>Andrew Scherer<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Review Essay<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IT\u2019S NOT THAT SIMPLE: AN UNNECESSARY ELIMINATION OF STRICT LIABILITY AND PRESUMED DAMAGES IN LIBEL LAW<br \/>\n<em>Alfred C. Yen<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CATHARINE A. MACKINNON, <em>FEMINISM UNMODIFIED<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Dan Danielsen<\/em><\/p>\n<p>KRISTIN BUMILLER, <em>THE CIVIL RIGHTS SOCIETY: THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF VICTIMS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Robert Salcido<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1988)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Symposium on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Workplace<\/p>\n<p>LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION AND THE LAW: PERSPECTIVES FROM YEAR TWO OF THE LAWS PROJECT<br \/>\n<em>Steven M. Fetter and Joy K. Reynolds<\/em><\/p>\n<p>COOPERATION vs. COMPETITION AT EASTERN AIR LINES<br \/>\n<em>Beverly Smaby<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION DEBATE: A WORKPLACE DEMOCRACY PERSPECTIVE<br \/>\n<em>Karl E. Klare<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LIE DETECTORS IN EMPLOYMENT<br \/>\n<em>Michael Tiner and Daniel J. O\u2019Grady<\/em><\/p>\n<p>REFLECTIONS ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFTER PARADISE AND JOHNSON<br \/>\n<em>Robert Belton<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>AIDS AND THE COERCIVE POWER OF THE STATE<br \/>\n<em>Kathleen M. Sullivan and Martha A. Field<\/em><\/p>\n<p>UNSAFE HAVENS: THE CASE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF FOSTER CHILDREN FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT<br \/>\n<em>Michael B. Mushlin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>JO ANN GIBSON ROBINSON, <em>THE MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT AND THE WOMEN WHO STARTED IT: THE MEMOIR OF JO ANN GIBSON ROBINSON<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Wilhelmina M. Wright<\/em><\/p>\n<p>DERRICK BELL, <em>AND WE ARE NOT SAVED: THE ELUSIVE QUEST FOR RACIAL JUSTICE<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Peter M. Yu<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"22\" name=\"22\"><\/a>22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Spring 1987)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Minority Critique of the Critical Legal Studies Movement<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FOREWORD<br \/>\n<em>Jose A. Bracamonte<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE ETHEREAL SCHOLAR: DOES CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES HAVE WHAT MINORITIES WANT?<br \/>\n<em>Richard Delgado<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LOOKING TO THE BOTTOM: CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND REPARATIONS<br \/>\n<em>Mari J. Matsuda<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ALCHEMICAL NOTES: RECONSTRUCTING IDEALS FROM DECONSTRUCTED RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Patricia J. Williams<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE CLOUDED PRISM<br \/>\n<em>Harlon L. Dalton<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comments<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE RISE AND FALL OF THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Jocelyn C. Frye Robert S. Gerber, Robert H. Pees and Arthur W. Richardson<\/em><\/p>\n<p>TOWARD CONSENT AND COOPERATION: RECONSIDERING THE POLITICAL STATUS OF INDIAN NATIONS<br \/>\n<em>Rachel San Kronowitz, Joanne Lichtman, Steven Paul McSloy, and Matthew G. Olsen<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FROM LITIGATION TO LEGISLATION IN EXCLUSIONARY ZONING LAW<br \/>\n<em>Harold A. McDougall<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Review Essay<\/span><\/p>\n<p>MCCARTHYISM AND CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES (ELLEN W. SCHRECKER, <em>NO IVORY TOWER: MCCARTHYISM AND THE UNIVERSITIES<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>Jerry Frug<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>LEE C. BOLLINGER, <em>THE TOLERANT SOCIETY: FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXTREMIST SPEECH IN AMERICA<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Michael Linfield<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1987)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Symposium on Poverty and the Law<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE SOUTH BRONX: PAST DESTRUCTION AND THE REBUILDING PROCESS<br \/>\n<em>Dean Brackley<\/em><\/p>\n<p>TOWARDS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT ECONOMY: PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES FOR ACQUISITION AND USE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY<br \/>\n<em>Staughton Lynd<\/em><\/p>\n<p>MIGRANT FARM WORKER ADVOCACY: EMPOWERING THE INVISIBLE LABORER<br \/>\n<em>Viviana Patino<\/em><\/p>\n<p>ADEQUATE EDUCATION FOR ALL: A RIGHT, AN ACHIEVABLE GOAL<br \/>\n<em>Julius Chambers<\/em><\/p>\n<p>COMMENTARY<br \/>\n<em>Sylvia Law<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LITIGATING ON BEHALF OF SHELTER FOR THE POOR<br \/>\n<em>Robert Hayes<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CONTRASTING CONSTITUTIONAL VISIONS: OF REAL AND UNREAL DIFFERENCES<br \/>\n<em>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/p>\n<p>WHEN DIFFERENCE HAS ITS HOME: GROUP HOMES FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED, EQUAL PROTECTION AND LEGAL TREATMENT OF DIFFERENCE<br \/>\n<em>Martha Minow<\/em><\/p>\n<p>REVEREND MOON AND THE BLACK HEBREWS: CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF A DEFENDANT\u2019S RELIGION IN CRIMINAL CASES<br \/>\n<em>Charles J. Ogletree<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>COMING UP SHORT: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LITTLE PEOPLE<br \/>\n<em>Paul Steven Miller<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>MICHAEL KENT CURTIS, <em>NO STATE SHALL ABRIDGE: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Dana Chasin<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CHARLES M. HAAR AND DANIEL WM. FESSLER, <em>THE WRONG SIDE OF THE TRACKS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Laura J. Eisenstadt<\/em><\/p>\n<p>DONALD L. SMITH, <em>ZECHARIAH CHAFEE, JR., DEFENDER OF LIBERTY AND LAW<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Crawford Moorefield III<\/em><\/p>\n<p>BERNARD SCHWARTZ, <em>SWANN\u2019S WAY: THE SCHOOL BUSING CASE AND THE SUPREME COURT<\/em><br \/>\n<em>James A. Thomson<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><a id=\"21\" name=\"21\"><\/a><strong>21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1986)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Project on National Security and Secrecy<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>Commentary<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CURTISS-WRIGHT COMES HOME: EXECUTIVE POWER AND NATIONAL SECURITY SECRECY<br \/>\n<em>Harold Edgar and Benno C. Schmidt, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Comment<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A NATION LESS SECURE: DIMINISHED PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION<br \/>\n<em>James A. Goldston, Jennifer M. Granholm, and Robert J. Robinson<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Project on the Sanctuary Movement<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ECUMENICAL, MUNICIPAL AND LEGAL CHALLENGES TO UNITED STATES REFUGEE POLICY<br \/>\n<em>Deborah Cohan, Rachel Sankronowitz, Clara Amanda Pope, and Gloria Valencia-Weber<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>AS TIME GOES BY: THE ELIMINATION OF CONTEMPORANEITY AND BREVITY AS FACTORS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE CASES<br \/>\n<em>Edwin Butterfoss<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S 1984-85 CHURCH-STATE DECISIONS: JUDICIAL PATHS OF LEAST RESISTANCE<br \/>\n<em>Ruti G. Teitel<\/em><\/p>\n<p>AN ARGUMENT FOR FEDERAL PROTECTION AGAINST RACIALLY MOTIVATED CRIMES: 18 U.S.C. sec. 241 AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT<br \/>\n<em>Charles H. Jones, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publications<\/span><\/p>\n<p>EDWIN P. ROME AND WILLIAM H. ROBERTS, <em>CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL FREE SPEECH: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF EXPRESSION IN BUSINESS<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Joel A. Rabinovitz<\/em><\/p>\n<p>PETER SINGER AND DEANE WELLS, <em>MAKING BABIES: THE NEW SCIENCE AND ETHICS OF CONCEPTION<\/em><br \/>\n<em>John J. Coughlin<\/em><\/p>\n<p>PETER H. SCHUCK AND ROGERS M. SMITH, <em>CITIZENSHIP WITHOUT CONSENT: ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THE AMERICAN POLICY<\/em><br \/>\n<em>Janet Wong<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1986)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS<br \/>\n<em>Norman Dorsen<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Articles<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u201cCIVIL RIGHTS\u201d ORDINANCES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL\u2019S COMMISSION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN PORNOGRAPHY REGULATION<br \/>\n<em>Barry W. Lynn<\/em><\/p>\n<p>THE RHETORIC<br \/>\n<em>Judith Olans Brown, Phyllis Tropper Baumann, and Elaine Millar Melnick<\/em><\/p>\n<p>LEGAL CHALLENGES TO ALL-FEMALE ORGANIZATIONS<br \/>\n<em>Chai R. Feldblum, Nancy Fredman Krent, and Virginia G. Watkin<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS<br \/>\n<em>Brent J. Gurney<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE UNITIES OF THE CONSTITUTION (LAURENCE TRIBE, <em>CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICES<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>Mark V. Tushnet<\/em><\/p>\n<p>DIAGNOSING LAW AND PSYCHIATRY (ALAN A. STONE, <em>LAW, PSYCHIATRY, AND MORALITY: ESSAYS AND ANALYSIS<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>Henry A. Beyer<\/em><\/p>\n<p>HOLDING AMERICA TOGETHER (RICHARD JOHN NEUHAS, <em>THE NAKED PUBLIC SQUARE: RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>David S. Douglas<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong><a id=\"20\" name=\"20\"><\/a>20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1985)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Commentary<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DEPRIVING WESTMINSTER OF ITS MORAL CONSTRAINTS: A SURVEY OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA<br \/>\n<em>J. D. van der Vyver<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article<\/span><\/p>\n<p>COURT-ORDERED HIRING QUOTAS AFTER STOTTS: A NARRATIVE ON THE ROLE OF THE MORALITIES OF THE WEB AND THE LADDER IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE<br \/>\n<em>Paul J. Spiegelman<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Comment<\/span><\/p>\n<p>RX FOR THE ELDERLY: LEGAL RIGHTS (AND WRONGS) WITHIN THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM David S. Douglas<br \/>\n<em>David Feinberg, Robin Jacobsohn, and Alice B. Stock<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>FREE SPEECH AND UNION NEWSPAPERS: INTERNAL DEMOCRACY AND TITLE I RIGHTS<br \/>\n<em>Judith Gallen Edersheim<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Reviews<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE INSANITY DEFENSE AND THE CIVIL LIBERTARIAN (LINCOLN CAPLAN, <em>THE INSANITY DEFENSE AND THE TRIAL OF JOHN W. HINCKLEY, JR.<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>Alan A. Stone<\/em><\/p>\n<p>COMBATING HOUSING DISCRIMINATION IN THE 1980\u2032S (JAMES A. KUSHNER, <em>FAIR HOUSING<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>Daniel R. Mandelker<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Recent Publication<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CHARLES VERT WILLIE, <em>SCHOOL DESEGREGATION PLANS THAT WORK<\/em><br \/>\n<em>James Edward Johnson<\/em><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<p><strong>20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 1 (Winter 1985)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Commentaries<\/span><\/p>\n<p>PORNOGRAPHY, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND SPEECH<br \/>\n<em>Catharine A. MacKinnon<\/em><\/p>\n<p>KLAUS BARBIE AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT: A REPLY TO MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG<br \/>\n<em>Allan A. Ryan, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES FOR UNDERINCLUSIVE STATUTES: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF HECKLER v. MATHEWS<br \/>\n<em>Bruce K. Miller<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ASPIRATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL INTERESTS OF SOCIAL REFORM ORGANIZATIONS: A NEW ROLE FOR THE IDEOLOGICAL PLAINTIFF<br \/>\n<em>William Burnham<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Note<\/span><\/p>\n<p>STRATEGIES FOR THE ELIMINATION OF SEX DISCRIMINATION IN PRIVATE INSURANCE<br \/>\n<em>Anne C. Cicero<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Review<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THE POLITICS OF LAWYERING (ARTHUR KINOY, <em>RIGHTS ON TRIAL: THE ODYSSEY OF A PEOPLE\u2019S LAWYER<\/em>)<br \/>\n<em>David Hoffman<\/em><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20101008003046\/https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/archive\/#top\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>29 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., No. 2 (Summer 1994) Symposium: Stonewall at 25 INTRODUCTION: STONEWALL AT 25 The Editors Articles [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[756],"class_list":["post-7345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-1Ut","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7345"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}