{"id":7349,"date":"2014-02-21T13:05:30","date_gmt":"2014-02-21T18:05:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/?page_id=7349"},"modified":"2018-12-24T23:41:58","modified_gmt":"2018-12-25T04:41:58","slug":"volumes-40-through-present-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/volumes-40-through-present-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumes 40 to 49"},"content":{"rendered":"

Should you desire a piece that is not posted, please contact us to order a back issue.<\/a><\/p>\n

Vol. 48, No. 2, Spring 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cyberbulling and the Innocence Narrative<\/a><\/strong>
\nAndrew Gilden<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Abortion and Disgust<\/a><\/strong>
\nCourtney Megan Cahill<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Known Unknowns<\/a><\/strong>
\nJameel Jaffer<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The End to an Unspoken Bargain? National Security and Leaks in a Post-Pentagon Papers World<\/a><\/strong>
\nDavid McCraw and Stephen Gitkow<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
An Inquiry into the Dynamics of Government Secrecy<\/a><\/strong>
\nSteven Aftergood<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Migrant Workers’ Remittances, Citizenship, and the State: The Case of El Salvador<\/a><\/strong>
\nJoshua David Marcin<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 48, No. 1, Winter 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Beyond \u201cLife and Liberty\u201d: The Evolving Right to Counsel<\/a><\/strong>
\nJohn D. King<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Transgender People, Intimate Partner Abuse, and the Legal System<\/a> – <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\nLeigh Goodmark<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
American Gangsters: RICO, Criminal Syndicates, and Conspiracy Law as Market Control<\/a><\/strong>
\nBenjamin Levin<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plata v. Brown<\/em> and Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts, and Politics<\/a><\/strong>
\nMargo Schlanger<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Return of the Medical Model: Disease and the Meaning of Imprisonment from John Howard to Brown v. Plata<\/em><\/a><\/strong>
\nJonathan Simon<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Trauma of the Incarceration Experience<\/a><\/strong>
\nMika\u2019il DeVeaux<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Giving Casey<\/em> Its Bite Back: The Role of Rational Basis Review in Undue Burden Analysis<\/a><\/strong>
\nEmma Freeman<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Organizing for Structural Change: The Potential and Promise of Worker Centers<\/a><\/strong>
\nRebecca J. Livengood<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Editorial Board<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 47, No. 2, Spring 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Who Will Supervise the Supervisors? Establishing Liability for Failure to Train, Supervise, or Discipline Subordinates in a Post <\/a>Iqbal\/Connick<\/em> World
\n<\/a><\/strong>Rosalie Berger Levinson<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Passion and Reason in Labor<\/a><\/strong>
\nBrishen Rogers<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\nNimer Sultany<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The United States Supreme Court Adopts a Reasonable Juvenile Standard in J.D.B. v. North Carolina<\/em> for Purposes of the Miranda Custody Analysis: Can a More Reasoned Justice System for Juveniles Be Far Behind?<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\nMarsha Levick and Elizabeth-Ann Tierney<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Graham v. Florida<\/em> and a Juvenile’s Right to Age-Appropriate Sentencing<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\nMartin Guggenheim<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Legal Significance of Adolescent Development on the Right to Counsel: Establishing the Constitutional Right to Counsel for Teens in Child Welfare Matters and Assuring a Meaningful Right to Counsel in Delinquency Matters<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\nJennifer K. Pokempner, Riya Saha Shah, Mark F. Houldin, Michael J. Dale, and Robert G. Schwartz<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“All of the Mysticism of Police Expertise”: Legalizing Stop-and-Frisk in New York, 1961-1968<\/a><\/strong>
\nJosh Segal<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 47, No. 1, Winter 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Kathleen Morris<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity<\/a>\u00a0– <\/strong>Colloquium Page<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Michael Rebell<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Subprime: Why a Free and Democratic Society Needs Law<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Joseph Singer<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Property and Identity<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Nestor Davidson<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Role of Labor Law in Challenging English-Only Policies<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Lauren M. Weinstein<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Economic-Liberty Approach to the First Amendment: A Story of Pornography<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Victoria Baranetsky<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Case Comment, Michigan v. Bryant<\/em>, 131 S. Ct. 1143 (2011)<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/strong>Michael Noveck<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 46, No. 2, Summer 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Trafficking, Prostitution, and Inequality<\/strong> <\/a>
\nCatharine A. MacKinnon<\/p>\n

A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate<\/strong><\/a>
\nYochai Benkler<\/p>\n

Litigation and Democracy: Restoring a Realistic Prospect of Trial\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>
\nStephen B. Burbank & Stephen N. Subrin<\/p>\n

The Costs of Reproduction: History and the Legal Construction of Sex Equality<\/strong><\/a>
\nDeborah Dinner<\/p>\n

The Exclusion of Non-English-Speaking Jurors: Remedying a Century of Denial of the Sixth Amendment in the Federal Courts of Puerto Rico<\/strong><\/a>
\nJasmine B. Gonzales Rose<\/p>\n

Emotions in the Mobilization of Rights<\/strong> <\/a>
\nKathryn Abrams<\/p>\n

Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions: Dimension I: Habeas Corpus as a Common Law Writ<\/strong><\/a>
\nEric M. Freedman<\/p>\n

NOTES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Distributive Consequences of the Medical Model<\/strong><\/a>
\nJonathan L. Koenig<\/p>\n

Borderline Constitutionalism: Reconstructing and Deconstructing Judicial Justifications for Constitutional Distortion in the Border Region<\/strong><\/a>
\nPhilip Mayor<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 46, No. 1, Winter 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rethinking the Fourth Amendment: Race, Citizenship, and the Equality Principle<\/strong> <\/a>
\nBennett Capers<\/p>\n

Sexual Judgments: Full Faith and Credit and the Relational Character of Legal Sex<\/strong><\/a>
\nDavid B. Cruz<\/p>\n

Searching for Harm: Same-Sex Marriage and the Well-Being of Children<\/strong><\/a>
\nCourtney G. Joslin<\/p>\n

Willing Suspects and Docile Defendants: The Contradictory Role of Consent in Criminal Procedure<\/strong><\/a>
\nNirej Sekhon<\/p>\n

Equality by Other Means: The Substantive Foundations of the Vagueness Doctrine<\/strong><\/a>
\nTammy W. Sun<\/p>\n

A Sunny Deposition: How the In Forma Pauperis Statute Provides an Avenue for Indigent Prisoners to Seek Depositions Without Accompanying Fees<\/strong><\/a>
\nShon R. Hopwood<\/p>\n

The \u201cMost Deserving\u201d of Death: The Narrowing Requirement and the Proliferation of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing Statutes<\/strong> <\/a>
\nChelsea Creo Sharon<\/p>\n

Dangerous Deference: The Supreme Court of Canada in Canada v. Khadr<\/em><\/strong> <\/a>
\nDavid Rangaviz<\/p>\n

AMICUS<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kicked to the Curb: Ugly Law Then and Now<\/strong><\/a>
\nSusan Schweik<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 45, No. 2, Summer 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law<\/strong> <\/a>
\nDavid S. Ardia<\/p>\n

Introduction to the Symposium: The Jena Six, the Prosecutorial Conscience, and the Dead Hand of History<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrew E. Taslitz and Carol Steiker<\/p>\n

Body and Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, and the Unitary Right to Abortion<\/strong><\/a>
\nJennifer S. Hendricks<\/p>\n

Discretionary Pricing, Mortgage Discrimination, and the Fair Housing Act<\/strong><\/a>
\nRobert G. Schwemm and Jeffrey L. Taren<\/p>\n

The Emerging Criminal War on Sex Offenders<\/strong><\/a>
\nCorey Rayburn Yung<\/p>\n

Following the Bright Line of Michigan v. Summer<\/em>s: A Cause for Concern for Advocates of Bright-Line Fourth Amendment Rules<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmir Hatem Ali<\/p>\n

Discriminatory Intent Reconsidered: Folk Concepts of Intentionality and Equal Protection Jurisprudence<\/strong><\/a>
\nJulia Kobick<\/p>\n

The Internet and Press Freedom<\/strong><\/a>
\nJonathan Zittrain<\/p>\n

In Defense of Dignity<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrew Friedman and Deborah Axt<\/p>\n

Pulling Teeth: The State of Mandatory Immigration Detention<\/strong><\/a>
\nGeoffrey Heeren<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s Deliberate Indifference: Providing Attention Without Providing Treatment to Prisoners with Serious Medical Needs<\/strong><\/a>
\nJoel H. Thompson<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 45, No. 1, Winter 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n

Immigration as Invasion: Sovereignty, Security, and the Origins of the Federal Immigration Power<\/strong><\/a>
\nMatthew J. Lindsay<\/p>\n

Intragroup Discrimination in the Workplace: The Case for \u201cRace Plus\u201d<\/strong><\/a>
\nEnrique Schaerer<\/p>\n

NOTE<\/strong><\/span>
\n The Evolution and Limits of Title IX Doctrine on Peer Sexual Assault<\/strong><\/a>
\nGrayson Sang Walker<\/p>\n

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/span>
\nNorthwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder<\/strong><\/a><\/em>
\nRandall T. Adams<\/p>\n

Ricci v. DeStefano <\/strong><\/em><\/a>
\nLuke Appling<\/p>\n

Forest Grove School District v. T.A. <\/strong><\/em><\/a>
\nEmily Blumberg<\/p>\n

SPECIAL PROJECTS<\/strong><\/span>
\nNo One Leaves: Community Mobilization as a Response to the Foreclosure Crisis in Massachusetts<\/strong><\/a>
\nNicholas Hartigan<\/p>\n

Working With Clients to Develop Compatible Visions of What It Means to \u201cWin\u201d a Case: Reflections on Schroer v. Billington<\/em><\/strong><\/a>
\nSharon M. McGowan<\/p>\n

The Measure of a Society: The Treatment\u00a0of Unaccompanied Refugee and Immigrant Children in the United States<\/strong><\/a>
\nWendy Young & Megan McKenna<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 44, No. 2, Summer 2009 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nINTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nIntroduction to the Symposium: The Jena Six, the Prosecutorial Conscience, and the Dead Hand of History<\/a><\/strong>
\nAndrew E. Taslitz & Carol Steiker <\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Law of the Noose: A History of Latino Lynching<\/a><\/strong>
\nRichard Delgado<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBurning Shoes and the Spirit World: The Charade of Neutrality<\/a><\/strong>
\nFrank H. Wu<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Hangman\u2019s Noose and the Lynch Mob: Hate Speech and the Jena Six<\/a><\/strong>
\nJeannine Bell<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Jena Six and the History of Racially Compromised Justice in Louisiana<\/a><\/strong>
\nGabriel J. Chin<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nJudging Jena\u2019s D.A.: The Prosecutor and Racial Esteem<\/a><\/strong>
\nAndrew E. Taslitz<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRace-ing Prosecutors\u2019 Ethics Codes<\/a><\/strong>
\nEllen S. Podgor<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Jena Six, Mass Incarceration, and the Remoralization of Civil Rights<\/a><\/strong>
\nJoseph E. Kennedy<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nYou\u2019ve Come a Long Way, Baby: Two Waves of Juvenile Justice Reforms as Seen from Jena, Louisiana<\/a><\/strong>
\nSara Sun Beale <\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nESSAYS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRestorative Justice in Schools: Learning from Jena High School<\/a><\/strong>
\nCara Suvall<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSYMPOSIUM RESPONSES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nConfronting Racial Disparity: Legislative Responses to the School-to-Prison Pipeline<\/a><\/strong>
\nTona M. Boyd<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSeparate and Unequal: The Disparate Impact of School-Based Referrals to Juvenile Court<\/a><\/strong>
\nHeather Cobb<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nOn Responsible Prosecutorial Discretion <\/a><\/strong>
\nKerala Thie Cowart<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 44, No. 1, Winter 2009 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nVoter Fraud or Voter Defrauded? Highlighting an Inconsistent Consideration of Election Fraud <\/a>
\nJocelyn Friedrichs Benson<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nPolicing, Race, and Place <\/a>
\nI. Bennett Capers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
79<\/td>\nChurches as First Amendment Institutions: Of Sovereignty and Spheres<\/a>
\nPaul Horwitz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
133<\/td>\nFrom Madness to Method: The Americans with Disabilities Act Meets the Internet<\/a>
\nAli Abrar & Kerry J. Dingle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nESSAY<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
173<\/td>\nExporting Miranda: Protecting the Right Against Self-Incrimination when U.S. Officers Perform Custodial Interrogations Abroad <\/a>
\nFred Medick<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRECENT DEVELOPMENT<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
197<\/td>\nBoumediene v. Bush<\/em>: Legal Realism and the War on Terror<\/a>
\nMegan Gaffney<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
213<\/td>\nCruel and Unusual? The Bifurcation of Eighth Amendment Inquiries After Baze v. Rees<\/em><\/a>
\nMark B. Samburg<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSPECIAL PROJECTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
231<\/td>\nA House Divided: The Invisibility of the Multiracial Family <\/a>
\nAngela Onwuachi-Willig & Jacob Willig-Onwuachi<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
255<\/td>\nNetworks and Norms: Social Justice Lawyering and Social Capital in Post-Katrina New Orleans<\/a>
\nJohn N. Tye & Morgan W. Williams<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vol. 43, No. 2, Summer 2008 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
289<\/td>\nStraddling the Civil-Criminal Divide: A Bifurcated Approach to Understanding the Nature of Immigration Removal Proceedings<\/a>
\nPeter L. Markowitz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
353<\/td>\nInsular Individualism: Employment Discrimination Law After Ledbetter v. Goodyear<\/em><\/a>
\nTristin K. Green<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
385<\/td>\nThe Congressional Record Underlying the 2006 Voting Rights Act: How Much Discrimination Can the Constitution Tolerate?<\/a>
\nKristen Clarke<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
435<\/td>\nGovernment Data Mining: The Need for a Legal Framework<\/a>
\nFred H. Cate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
491<\/td>\nRace at the Pivot Point: The Future of Race-Based Policies to Remedy De Jure Segregation After Parents Involved in Community Schools<\/a>
\nJonathan Fischbach, Will Rhee, and Robert Cacace<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNOTES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
539<\/td>\nThe Collateral Consequences of Seeking Order Through Disorder: New York\u2019s Narcotics Eviction Program<\/a>
\nScott Duffield Levy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
581<\/td>\nEqual Before the Law: Toward a Restoration of Gideon\u2019s Promise<\/a>
\nDavid A. Simon<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRADICAL PROPOSALS TO REFORM LEGAL PEDAGOGY<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
595<\/td>\nRethinking Legal Education<\/a>
\nErwin Chemerinsky<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
599<\/td>\nTeach Justice<\/a>
\nSteve Sheppard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
605<\/td>\nLegal Learning for Life: Legal Immersion Fluency Education (LIFE)<\/a>
\nBeth D. Cohen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
611<\/td>\nStep Away from the Case Book: A Call for Balance and Integration in Law School Pedagogy<\/a>
\nKathryn M. Stanchi<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
615<\/td>\nActually Begin to Satisfy ABA Standards 211(a) and 212(a): Eliminate Race and Sex Bias in Legal Education<\/a>
\nMorrison Torrey<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
619<\/td>\nSlay the Three-Headed Demon!<\/a>
\nPeggy Cooper Davis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
625<\/td>\n\u201cMajors\u201d in Law? A Dissenting View<\/a>
\nMichael A. Olivas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
629<\/td>\nEighteen or Thirty, But Not Twenty-Two<\/a>
\nJohn Henry Schlegel<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
633<\/td>\nWho\u2019s Learning What? Toward a participatory legal pedagogy<\/a>
\nE. Tammy Kim<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
639<\/td>\nThe Joy of Judging<\/a>
\nHon. LaDoris H. Cordell (Ret.)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
645<\/td>\nReform at the Micro Level: Planning for a Life in the Law<\/a>
\nJennifer Gerarda Brown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n


\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Vol. 43, No. 1, Winter 2008 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1<\/td>\nIs Acquisition Everything? Protecting the Rights of Occupants Under the Fair Housing Act<\/a>
\nRigel C. Oliveri<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
65<\/td>\nThe Tyranny of the Minority: Jim Crow and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty<\/a>
\nGabriel J. Chin & Randy Wagner<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
127<\/td>\nTrampling Whose Rights? Democratic Majority Rule and Racial Minorities: A Response to Chin and Wagner<\/a>
\nTaunya Lovell Banks<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
165<\/td>\nRereading the National Bank Act\u2019s \u201cAt Pleasure\u201d Provision: Preserving the Civil Rights of Thousands of Bank Employees<\/a>
\nMiriam Jacks Achtenberg<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
183<\/td>\nAging Out of Foster Care: Towards a Universal Safety Net for Former Foster Care Youth<\/a>
\nMelinda Atkinson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
213<\/td>\nHein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation<\/em>: Sitting This One Out \u2013 Denying Taxpayer Standing to Challenge Faith-Based Funding<\/a>
\nLauren S. Michaels<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
257<\/td>\nCorrelative Rights and the Boundaries of Freedom: Protecting the Civil Rights of Endangered Women<\/a>
\nDiane L. Rosenfeld<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
267<\/td>\nMaximal Safety, Minimal Intrusion: Monitoring Civil Protective Orders Without Implicating Privacy<\/a>
\nLeah Satine<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
271<\/td>\nA Racial Justice Perspective on Monitoring Domestic Violence Offenders Using GPS Systems<\/a>
\nAlanna Buchanan<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
277<\/td>\nDomestic Violence Defendants\u2019 Jury Trial Rights in GPS Monitoring<\/a>
\nFred Medick<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
281<\/td>\nApplying the Lessons of GPS Monitoring of Batterers to Sex Offenders<\/a>
\nPamela Foohey<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
285<\/td>\nGPS Monitoring and Constitutional Rights<\/a>
\nZoila Hinson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n


\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/a>Vol. 42, No. 2, Summer 2007<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
259<\/td>\nLatino Inter-Ethnic Employment Discrimination and the \u201cDiversity\u201d Defense<\/a>
\nTanya Kater\u00ed Hern\u00e1ndez<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
317<\/td>\nPluralism: A Principle for Children\u2019s Rights<\/a>
\nHolning Lau<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nESSAYS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
373<\/td>\nRoe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash<\/a>
\nRobert Post, Reva Siegel<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
435<\/td>\nBacklash\u2019s Travels<\/a>
\nCass R. Sunstein<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
451<\/td>\nTrademark Law and Free Speech: Protection for Scandalous and Disparaging Marks<\/a>
\nRegan Smith<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCONVERSATION: RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS ON SEX OFFENDERS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
483<\/td>\nNext-Generation Sex Offender Statutes: Constitutional Challenges to Residency, Work, and Loitering Restrictions<\/a>
\nChiraag Bains<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
501<\/td>\nMy Life Before and After HB 1059<\/a>
\nLori Sue Collins<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
513<\/td>\nChallenging the Banishment of Registered Sex Offenders from the State of Georgia: A Practitioner\u2019s Perspective<\/a>
\nSarah Geraghty<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
531<\/td>\nExile at Home: The Unintended Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Residency Restrictions<\/a>
\nRichard Tewksbury<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
541<\/td>\nJudicial Recognition of the Harms of Slavery: Consumer Fraud as an Alternative to Reparations Litigation<\/a>
\nTara Kolar Ramchandani<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
557<\/td>\nDoe v. Kamehameha<\/em>: Section 1981 and the Future of Racial Preferences in Private Schools<\/a>
\nChristopher W. Schmidt<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTHE HARVARD CR-CL PUBLIC INTEREST HONOREES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
569<\/td>\nThe Role of Community-Based Clinical Legal Education in Supporting Public Interest Lawyering<\/a>
\nRobert Greenwald<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
573<\/td>\nIndigent Defendants and Enemy Combatants: Developing Prototypes for National Security Cases<\/a>
\nJames Klein<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
577<\/td>\nIn Defense of Children<\/a>
\nPatricia Puritz<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n

Vol. 42, No. 1, Winter 2007<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1<\/td>\nLawrence v. Texas<\/em> and the Limits of the Criminal Law<\/a>
\nAdil Ahmad Haque<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nImpunity: Sexual Abuse in Women\u2019s Prisons<\/a>
\nKim Shayo Buchanan<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89<\/td>\n\u201cThis Is Happening in Our Country\u201d: Two Testimonials of Survivors of Prison Rape<\/a>
\nHope H., Brenda L.<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
99<\/td>\nThe Immigrant Rights Marches of 2006 and the Prospects for a New Civil Rights Movement<\/a>
\nKevin R. Johnson, Bill Ong Hing<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
139<\/td>\nVeritas, Not Vengeance: An Examination of the Evidentiary Rules for Military Commissions in the War Against Terrorism<\/a>
\nEun Young Choi<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
191<\/td>\nIf You Cannot Afford a Lawyer: Assessing the Constitutionality of Massachusetts\u2019s Reimbursement Statute<\/a>
\nKate Levine<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
223<\/td>\nSamson v. California<\/em>: Tearing Down a Pillar of Fourth Amendment Protections<\/a>
\nRobert Cacace<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
239<\/td>\nJones v. City of Los Angeles<\/em>: A Moral Response to One City\u2019s Attempt To Criminalize, Rather than Confront, Its Homelessness Crisis<\/a>
\nSarah Gerry<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
253<\/td>\nConfronting the Myth of Choice: Homelessness and Jones v. City of Los Angeles<\/em><\/a>
\nTanene Allison<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/a>Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 2006 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nSymposium: Pro Se Litigation Ten Years After AEDPA<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
289<\/td>\nForeword
\nBreaking the Silence: Legal Scholarship as Social Change<\/a>
\nJocelyn Simonson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
299<\/td>\nThe Great Unobtainable Writ: Indigent Pro Se Litigation After the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996<\/a>
\nThomas C. O\u2019Bryant<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
339<\/td>\nConfronting Mass Imprisonment and Restoring Fairness to Collateral Review of Criminal Cases<\/a>
\nBryan Stevenson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
369<\/td>\n\u201cThe Power of the Pen\u201d: Jailhouse Lawyers, Literacy, and Civic Engagement<\/a>
\nJessica Feierman<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
391<\/td>\nA Corrections Quandary: Mental Illness and Prison Rules<\/a>
\nJamie Fellner<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nArticles<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
413<\/td>\nThe Blame Frame: Justifying (Racial) Injustice in America<\/a>
\nJon Hanson & Kathleen Hanson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
481<\/td>\nReconstruction Redux: Rehnquist, Morrison<\/em>, and the Civil Rights Cases<\/em><\/a>
\nFrancisco M. Ugarte<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNote<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
509<\/td>\nMarital Status as Property: Toward a New Jurisprudence for Gay Rights<\/a>
\nGoutam U. Jois<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRecent Developments<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
553<\/td>\nComfort v. Lynn School Committee<\/em>: Illustrating the Untapped Potential of an Explicit Link Between Voluntary Desegregation and Local Constitutionalism<\/a>
\nRandall L. Jackson<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
581<\/td>\nKitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/em>: Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Schools<\/a>
\nBrenda Lee<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
591<\/td>\nBook Note<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Vol. 41, No. 1, Winter 2006<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nEssay<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nWeak-Form Judicial Review and \u201cCore\u201d Civil Liberties<\/a>
\nMark Tushnet<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nArticles<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nRodrigo\u2019s Roundelay: Hernandez v. Texas<\/em> and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma<\/a>
\nRichard Delgado<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
67<\/td>\nThe USA PATRIOT Act and the Submajoritarian Fourth Amendment<\/a>
\nSusan N. Herman<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNotes<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
133<\/td>\nDefusing the Threat of RFID: Protecting Consumer Privacy Through Technology-Specific Legislation at the State Level<\/a>
\nLaura Hildner<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
177<\/td>\nA Practical Jurisprudence of Values: Re-Writing Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB<\/em><\/a>
\nJoshua B. Shiffrin<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
219<\/td>\nConstitutional Conscience, Constitutional Capacity: The Role of Local Governments in Protecting Individual Rights<\/a>
\nSamuel P. Tepperman-Gelfant<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRecent Development<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
265<\/td>\nA \u201cShrink\u201d-ing Privilege: United States v. Romo<\/em> and the \u201cCourse of Diagnosis Requirement of the Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege<\/a>
\nNicholas Sydow<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Editorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Vol. 40, No. 2, Summer 2005<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nEssay<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
327<\/td>\nBalancing the Right to Protest in the Aftermath of September 11
\nChristopher Dunn<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nArticles<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
359<\/td>\nThe Future of Community Justice
\nAdriaan Lanni<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
407<\/td>\nState, Be Not Proud: A Retributivist Defense of the Commutation of Death Row and the Abolition of the Death Penalty
\nDan Markel<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNote<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
481<\/td>\nUnconscious Bias Theory in Employment Discrimination Litigation
\nAudrey J. Lee<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRecent Developments<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
505<\/td>\nClark v. Martinez<\/em>: Limited Statutory Construction Required by Constitutional Avoidance Offers Fragile Protection for Inadmissible Immigrants from Indefinite Detention
\nJose Javier Rodriguez<\/td>\n		 (PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
523<\/td>\nCuno v. DaimlerCrysler<\/em>: Dormant Commerce Clause Limits State Location Tax Incentives
\nVeena Iyer<\/td>\n		 (PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
539<\/td>\nUnited States v. Booker<\/em> and United States v. Fanfan<\/em>: The Tireless March of Apprendi<\/em> and the Intracourt Battle To Save Sentencing Reform
\nDouglas B. Bloom<\/td>\n		 (PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/a><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

Vol. 40, No. 1, Winter 2005<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nEssay<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nGoodridge<\/em> in Context
\nMary L. Bonauto<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nArticles<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
71<\/td>\nIntersex Surgery, Female Genital Cutting, and the Selective Condemnation of \u201cCultural Practices\u201d
\nNancy Ehrenreich with Mark Barr<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
141<\/td>\nThe Disabling Impact of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions
\nWendy F. Hensel<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNote<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
197<\/td>\nProtecting the Innocent: The Future of Mentally Disabled Tenants in Federally Subsidized Housing After HUD v. Rucker<\/em>
\nAnne C. Fleming<\/td>\n		(PDF)<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRecent Developments<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
223<\/td>\nCrawford v. Washington<\/em>: Confrontation Clause Forbids Admission of Testimonial Out-of-Court Statements Without Prior Opportunity to Cross-Examine
\nWon Shin<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
239<\/td>\nHamdi v. Rumsfeld<\/em>: Due Process Requires That Detainees Receive Notice and Opportunity To Contest Basis for Detention
\nAllison Elgart<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
251<\/td>\n Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court<\/em>: Stop and Identify Statutes Do Not Violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendments
\nShelli Calland<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
265<\/td>\nRasul v. Bush<\/em>: Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction over Habeas Challenges and Other Claims Brought by Gauntanamo Detainees
\nMeredith B. Osborn<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
277<\/td>\nSmith v. City of Salem<\/em>: Title VII Protects Contra-Gender Behavior
\nThomas Ling<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
289<\/td>\nSosa v. Alvarez-Machain<\/em>: United States Courts as Forums for Human Rights Cases and the New Incorporation Debate
\nBenjamin Berkowitz<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
301<\/td>\nTennessee v. Lane<\/em>: Relaxing the Requirements for Civil Rights Legislation
\nGarrett Yoni Rosenzweig<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
313<\/td>\nYarborough v. Alvarado<\/em>: Self-Incrimination Clause Does Not Require Consideration of Age and Inexperience in the Miranda<\/em> Custody Context
\nTara L. Curtis<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nEditorial Board<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Should you desire a piece that is not posted, please contact us to order a back issue. Vol. 48, No. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1492],"tags":[],"coauthors":[756],"class_list":["post-7349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volumes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZrWS-1Ux","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7349"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7349\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7349"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/crcl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}