{"id":5127,"date":"2024-04-25T13:02:07","date_gmt":"2024-04-25T17:02:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/?page_id=5127"},"modified":"2025-08-19T12:52:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-19T16:52:14","slug":"volume-14-2023-2024","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/volume-14-2023-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 14 (2023\u20132024)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
CORPORATE LAW & GOVERNANCE<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

THE FALLACY OF COMPLETE CORPORATE SEPARATENESS<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Mariana Pargendler1<\/a><\/sup>Full Professor of Law, Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Getulio Vargas School of Law in S\u00e3o Paulo; Global Professor of Law, New York University School of Law. I am grateful to Henrique Arake, George Georgiev, Carlos Portugal Gouv\u00eaa, Burt Neuborne, Elizabeth Pollman, Mario Schapiro, Richard Squire, Robert Thompson, and participants in the workshop on \u201cHidden Fallacies in Corporate Law and Financial Regulation,\u201d the Bocconi-Oxford Junior Scholars Workshop on Corporate Law and Finance, the Droit & Croissance Workshop, and the Wharton Legal Studies Seminar for helpful comments and suggestions.<\/span><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Legal discourse about business entities has displayed a logical fallacy regarding the consequences of corporate separateness. A fallacy of equivocation occurs when a term is used with one meaning in the premise and with another meaning in the conclusion. Legal personality undoubtedly provides a separate\u2014in the sense of distinct\u2014nexus for the imputation of legal rights and duties. This, however, does not mean that corporations are or should be treated as legally separate\u2014in the sense of insulated\u2014from shareholders in all contexts. Moreover, legal insulation between corporations and shareholders for some purposes (e.g., limited liability) does not necessarily entail insulation for other purposes (e.g., the application of a contractual or regulatory scheme). In effect, there is significant, if varying, permeability between the legal spheres of corporations and shareholders across different areas of law, including corporate law. Rather than a nonconductor that always isolates the legal spheres of the corporation and related parties, legal personality operates as a semi-permeable membrane. Nevertheless, the recurrent fallacy of complete corporate separateness has obscured and hampered the development of legal doctrine in several contexts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CORPORATE LAW & GOVERNANCE THE FALLACY OF COMPLETE CORPORATE SEPARATENESS Mariana Pargendler Legal discourse about business entities has displayed a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5127","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PgKEUK-1kH","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5347,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/volume-15-issue-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":0},"title":"Volume 15, Issue 1","author":"wgu","date":"March 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"SECURITIES & FINANCIAL REGULATION CAN SECTION 11 BE SAVED?: \u201cTRACING\u201d A PATH TO ITS SURVIVAL John C. Coffee, Jr. & Joshua Mitts Last term, a unanimous Supreme Court held in Slack Techs. v Pirani that purchasers of securities must \u201ctrace\u201d their shares to the registration statement that contains the alleged\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5258,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/corporate-law-governance\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":1},"title":"Corporate Law & Governance","author":"wgu","date":"February 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"VOLUME 15 \u2022 COLUMNS THE DUAL CLASS DILEMMA AND THE SUNSET-CLAUSE SOLUTION\u00a0 Adrian Brown The desirability of dual-class stock has been a source of substantial controversy. Some scholars, commentators, and industry participants are wholly in favor of such arrangements. Others are wholly opposed. While neither of these diametrically opposed views\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/organization\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":2},"title":"Organization","author":"wpengine","date":"September 9, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"The Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR) is a student organization of Harvard Law School that publishes a print volume entitled the Harvard Business Law Review, currently lead by Editors in Chief: Gabriella Mestre and Olivia Schwartz for its Volume XVI edition. The print volume appears in two issues per academic\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4740,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/volume-8-issue-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":3},"title":"Volume 8, Issue 2 (2018)","author":"wgu","date":"November 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"SECURITIES & FINANCIAL REGULATION INVESTOR-DRIVEN FINANCIAL INNOVATION Kathryn Judge Financial regulations often encourage or require market participants to hold particular types of financial assets. One unintended consequence of this form of regulation is that it can spur innovation to increase the effective supply of favored assets. This Article examines when\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5500,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/volume-16-editors-in-chief\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":4},"title":"Volume 16 Editors-in-Chief","author":"Olivia Schwartz","date":"May 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Gabriella A. Mestre & Olivia Casey Schwartz Gabriella A. Mestre and Olivia Casey Schwartz served as the Editors-in-Chief of the Harvard Business Law Review from 2025 - 2026. Their tenure marks the first time in HBLR history that two women served as Editors-in-Chief. Gabriella A. Mestre earned her J.D. from\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2026\/05\/IMG_7894-edited.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2026\/05\/IMG_7894-edited.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2026\/05\/IMG_7894-edited.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2026\/05\/IMG_7894-edited.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2026\/05\/IMG_7894-edited.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5399,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/volume-11-editors-in-chief\/","url_meta":{"origin":5127,"position":5},"title":"Volume 11 Editors-in-Chief","author":"wgu","date":"September 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Saba Sadri & Autumn Simpson [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Saba Sadri and Autumn Simpson served as the editors-in-chief of the Harvard Business Law Review from 2020 to 2021. Saba Sadri received his J.D. from Harvard Law School; his M.A.L.D. from the Fletcher School at Tufts University; and his B.A. from the University of\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}