{"id":4820,"date":"2020-09-09T13:46:15","date_gmt":"2020-09-09T17:46:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/?p=4820"},"modified":"2025-02-27T21:50:24","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T02:50:24","slug":"another-bite-at-the-apple-chinas-trade-reform-shows-sincerity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/another-bite-at-the-apple-chinas-trade-reform-shows-sincerity\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Bite at the Apple: China’s Trade Reform Shows Sincerity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Foreign investment in China has always been wrought with contention, accented by the latest trade disputes between the United States and China. In March, the People\u2019s Congress of China took active steps to create change and to ease anxiety foreign investors face when it passed the Foreign Investment Law (\u201cFIL\u201d).1<\/a><\/sup>(\u4e2d\u534e\u4eba\u6c11\u5171\u548c\u56fd\u5916\u5546\u6295\u8d44\u6cd5) [Foreign Investment Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China] (promulgated Mar. 15, 2019, effective Jan. 1, 2020), P.R.C. Laws, 41. English translation: http:\/\/www.fdi.gov.cn\/1800000121_39_4872_0_7.html.<\/span>\u00a0The new law replaces three existing laws that have governed foreign investment since the 1980s.<\/p>\n

The law is expected to create a positive shift for those investing in Chinese markets by promoting trade, streamlining efficiency, and protecting foreign investors. The law will go into effect on January 1, 2020, but will have few immediate short-term effects.2<\/a><\/sup>Lucy Hornby, China passes law in bid to ease overseas investor concerns, Financial Times (Mar. 14, 2019), https:\/\/www.ft.com\/content\/7e796b92-46bf-11e9-b168-96a37d002cd3.<\/span><\/p>\n

The long-term forecast, however, is more promising, with projections of $1.5tn of inbound investment into China within ten years.3<\/a><\/sup>Id.<\/span>\u00a0Nonetheless, such sweeping changes will bring new legal challenges. Lawyers will be operating with little guidance until regulators weigh in on implementation concerns.<\/p>\n

The double-edged nature of the FIL is its overly broad policies, which allow for flexibility. Critics find the law fails to outline changes that will yield improvements to the investment scheme.4<\/a><\/sup>See generally Evelyn Cheng, EU Chamber says China\u2019s new foreign investment law is \u2018surprisingly accommodating\u2019, CNBC (Oct. 21, 2019), https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2019\/10\/21\/eu-chamber-chinas-foreign-investment-law-is-surprisingly-accommodating.html.<\/span>\u00a0However, the FIL shows China\u2019s willingness to adapt. Through the process of trial and error, regulators will create guidelines to implement the ideals outlined in the FIL. Until then, foreign investors should consider balancing these concerns and weighing the risks of moving new ventures into China.<\/p>\n

More specific changes in the FIL include clarification of what qualifies as a foreign investment enterprise (\u201cFIE\u201d).5<\/a><\/sup>See [Foreign Investment Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China] art 2. English translation: http:\/\/www.fdi.gov.cn\/1800000121_39_4872_0_7.html.<\/span>\u00a0While better than its predecessors, which lacked clear categories and focused mostly on foreign direct investments, the FIL definition expands the scope of what qualifies as an FIE. However, ambiguity remains for foreign investors. Additionally, it remains unclear if Chinese investors can invest in FIEs.<\/p>\n

Some of the provisions formally adopt existing policies, such as the Negative List for foreign investments and the pre-establishment national treatment.6<\/a><\/sup>See [Foreign Investment Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China] art 4, 28. English translation: http:\/\/www.fdi.gov.cn\/1800000121_39_4872_0_7.html.<\/span>\u00a0Expanded nationwide in 2018, the Negative List opens all sectors not listed to foreign investors.7<\/a><\/sup>Z. Alex Zhang & Vivian Tsoi, China adopts New Foreign Investment Law, White & Case (Mar. 29, 2019), https:\/\/www.whitecase.com\/publications\/alert\/china-adopts-new-foreign-investment-law.<\/span>\u00a0The pre-establishment national treatment grants these foreign investors and their investments equitable market access with domestic investors and investments.<\/p>\n

Another change is the formal switch to the registration system, where foreign investors register instead of the previous system, which required approval by the Minister of Commerce for each decision. However, the FIL also created new reporting obligations that are not described in detail.8<\/a><\/sup>See [Foreign Investment Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China] art 34. English translation: http:\/\/www.fdi.gov.cn\/1800000121_39_4872_0_7.html.<\/span>\u00a0These additional reporting requirements leave many unsure of the burden on foreign investors.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the most substantial legal challenge moving forward for foreign investors is the requirement for FIEs to modify their governance structure to comply with PRC Company Law. Those FIEs which currently exist under the current laws have a five-year grace period to revisit their corporate structures and become compliant with the unified corporate regime. The old FIL provided for a specific corporate framework between foreign and Chinese investors. Previously, the board of directors was the decision-making body, and laws required unanimous approval on certain issues to protect minority shareholders.9<\/a><\/sup>Zhang, supra note 7.<\/span>\u00a0Now, shareholders will become the decision-making authority with two-thirds approval required. Companies may want to renegotiate the terms of joint ventures they entered before this change was enacted.<\/p>\n

Joerg Wuttke, European Union Chamber of Commerce in China president, believes the FIL addresses the concerns of foreign investors.10<\/a><\/sup>Cheng, supra note 4.<\/span>\u00a0The additional protections for trade secrets and valuable technology foreign companies bring to China have long been sought by both the U.S. and the EU. Wuttke also believes when the FIL is fully implemented, it will address significant business complaints brought by both the EU and the U.S. but is also concerned about its lack of clarity.<\/p>\n

While there are many more provisions and changes encompassed in the FIL, the sentiment remains that this is the first step toward fair trading for foreign investors in China. Although much must happen before investors see a tangible benefit, China has now come to the bargaining table with sincerity.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Foreign investment in China has always been wrought with contention, accented by the latest trade disputes between the United States […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[382],"class_list":["post-4820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-home"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgKEUK-1fK","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4493,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/sidestepping-the-rat-holes-investment-risk-and-securities-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":0},"title":"Sidestepping the Rat Holes: Investment Risk and Securities Law","author":"ehansen","date":"April 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Download PDF This Article presents a novel understanding of the purpose of federal securities laws as the management of investment risk. Those laws should be treated as a whole. When two rules, even under different statutes, address the same risk, they should be applied concomitantly. For example, broker-dealer regulation under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4460,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/bullish-on-blockchain-examining-delawares-approach-to-distributed-ledger-technology-in-corporate-governance-law-and-beyond\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":1},"title":"Bullish on Blockchain: Examining Delaware\u2019s Approach to Distributed Ledger Technology in Corporate Governance Law and Beyond","author":"ehansen","date":"January 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Download PDF I. Introduction The buzz around blockchain is getting ever louder. Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) activity in the blockchain technology sector rose 33.3% between Q2 2016 and Q2 2017, and approximately 80% of respondents to Bain & Company\u2019s 2017 survey of financial institution executives expect their organizations to begin\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2018\/01\/Song-Figure-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2018\/01\/Song-Figure-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2018\/01\/Song-Figure-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2018\/01\/Song-Figure-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4477,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/how-do-i-sell-my-crowdfunded-shares-developing-exchanges-and-markets-to-trade-securities-issued-by-start-ups-and-small-companies\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":2},"title":"How Do I Sell My Crowdfunded Shares? Developing Exchanges and Markets to Trade Securities Issued by Start-ups and Small Companies","author":"ehansen","date":"January 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Download PDF Governments worldwide are increasingly recognizing that assisting the development of start-ups and small to medium enterprises may be critical to fostering job creation and economic growth. As such, there is a concerted effort to rework securities regulation to encourage the funding of these businesses through innovative approaches such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4364,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/trading-in-substitute-securities-liability-under-rule-10b-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":3},"title":"Trading in Substitute Securities: Liability Under Rule 10b-5","author":"ehansen","date":"May 16, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Download PDF Cody Donald I. Introduction A trade in a substitute security occurs when a trader with inside information, typically an employee, trades\u2014not in the securities of the company that is the subject and source of the information\u2014but in the securities of another company whose stock would be affected if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4657,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/an-introduction-to-californias-consumer-privacy-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":4},"title":"An Introduction to California\u2019s Consumer Privacy Act","author":"Harvard Law Development","date":"March 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In June of 2018, the California legislature passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, establishing a new system of privacy regulation that has never before been seen in the United States.\u00a0 Specifically, the provisions of the CCPA allow consumers five rights: (1) the right to know what personal information\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3971,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/fatally-foreign-extraterritorial-recovery-of-avoidable-transfers-and-principals-of-comity-in-the-madoff-securities-sipa-liquidation-proceeding\/","url_meta":{"origin":4820,"position":5},"title":"Fatally Foreign: Extraterritorial Recovery of Avoidable Transfers and Principles of Comity in the Madoff Securities SIPA Liquidation Proceeding","author":"Juan Palacio Moreno","date":"March 8, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Extraterritorial application of the Bankruptcy Code and international comity require courts to examine congressional intent while balancing the competing interests of different jurisdictions. Absent contrary intent within the statute, debtors and trustees in cases under both SIPA and the Bankruptcy Code likely face an uphill battle in overcoming the presumption\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bankruptcy"","block_context":{"text":"Bankruptcy","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/us-business-law\/bankruptcy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"authors":[{"term_id":382,"user_id":0,"is_guest":1,"slug":"ama-doyal","display_name":"Ama Doyal","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=blank&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4820"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=4820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}