{"id":832,"date":"2011-01-18T12:00:11","date_gmt":"2011-01-18T17:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/?p=832"},"modified":"2016-07-04T21:55:15","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T01:55:15","slug":"the-coconundrum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/the-coconundrum\/","title":{"rendered":"The Coconundrum"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download PDF<\/a><\/p>\n

Frederick Ryan Castillo*<\/a><\/p>\n

Digging deeper into their analytical toolbox, policymakers, academics, and regulators are increasingly exploring whether, and to what extent, a system of contingent capital can strengthen the resilience of the banking sector. The global financial crisis unearthed fragile and troubled banks, riddled with excessive leverage, poor quality capital buffers, and liquidity problems. Because these institutions were deemed \u201ctoo big to fail,\u201d governments were forced to intervene and prop them up by way of costly, taxpayer-funded bailouts. With the benefit of hindsight, regulators are now looking at contingent capital as a potentially speedy and less costly alternative for recapitalizing banks in periods of financial distress.[1]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

But is contingent capital a desirable, feasible and sustainable proposition, or is it an overly-simplified theoretical concept fraught with practical difficulties and unrealistic expectations?<\/p>\n

Contingent capital\u2014also known as \u201ccontingent convertibles\u201d or \u201cCoCos,\u201d[2]<\/span><\/a> \u201cregulatory hybrid securities,\u201d[3]<\/span><\/a> \u201ccontingent capital certificates,\u201d[4]<\/span><\/a> or \u201cembedded contingent capital\u201d[5]<\/span><\/a>\u2014refers to debt instruments which mandatorily convert into equity upon the happening of one or more pre-defined events or triggers.[6]<\/span><\/a> Regulators have tinkered with the idea of requiring systemically important banks to issue these instruments as integral components of their capital structures. When a bank encounters a liquidity or capital crisis, the CoCos will be converted into equity, thus increasing the bank\u2019s capital buffers and avoiding the need to seek governmental intervention.<\/p>\n

Proponents of contingent capital, who include Mark Flannery[7]<\/span><\/a>, Robert McDonald[8]<\/span><\/a>, the Squam Lake Working Group[9]<\/span><\/a>, and John Coffee, Jr.[10]<\/span><\/a>, view it as a desirable and workable mechanism. Contingent capital, it is argued, will ease financial distress, reduce bank leverage, minimize incidents of bank insolvency, avoid costly public bailouts, set up a speedy bank resolution regime, internalize bank failure costs, and insulate the rest of the financial system from possible systemic spillover effects.[11]<\/span><\/a> The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) also observes that the use of contingent capital would lessen moral hazard by increasing private sector involvement in the resolution of future banking crises.[12]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

In contrast, critics such as Anat Admati, Peter DeMarzo, Martin Hellwig and Paul Pfleiderer point out that contingent capital and related \u201cbail-in\u201d mechanisms are too complicated to design, pose difficult implementation concerns, and are less effective than the straightforward approach of requiring banks to have more equity capital.[13]<\/span><\/a>The Association of British Insurers has also voiced its concerns as to how the instruments would work in practice, noting that investors in CoCos would be made to absorb \u201chaircuts\u201d or losses when conversion takes place.[14]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

However, it may be said that on the balance, the reservations critics have with respect to contingent capital focus largely on the practical difficulties likely to be encountered once these instruments are put into use, and not on the desirability of contingent capital as a potential tool for stabilizing banks. As Coffee points out, contingent capital is not an \u201cabstract academic idea,\u201d but \u201cits optimal design remains open to legitimate and necessary debate.\u201d[15]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Taking the debate a point further, it appears that the feasibility and sustainability of CoCos ultimately turns on a careful consideration and resolution of four key areas.<\/p>\n

First, consensus with respect to the appropriate trigger (i.e. the point at which conversion of debt into equity takes place) needs to be reached. At present, there is a wide spectrum of proposals on this issue, with some advocating that the trigger be determined by a country\u2019s regulatory authority, while others are arguing that a more objective measure, such as a reference to a market index or a specified capital ratio, be used.[16]<\/span><\/a> For instance, in August, the BCBS issued a proposal that would allow capital instruments to be written off or converted to common shares at the discretion of the relevant authority if: (a) the bank was judged to be non-viable by the relevant authority or (b) the bank had received a public sector capital injection without which it would have become non-viable.[17]<\/span><\/a> The Squam Lake Working Group suggests a double trigger: regulators must declare the existence of a systemic crisis, and the bank must fall below a given capital ratio.[18]<\/span><\/a> In contrast, Flannery argues that the trigger should not depend on the state of the financial system, but rather on the contemporaneous market value of the firm\u2019s outstanding common equity.[19]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Second, regulators must facilitate the market\u2019s acceptance of CoCos by clarifying their essential investment features and, where appropriate, engaging in meaningful discourse with leading industry groups. For instance, a particular concern among investors is whether credit rating agencies are willing and able to adequately assess the risk features of CoCos.[20]<\/span><\/a> In this regard, Fitch Ratings\u2019 early November statement that it expects to be able to rate these new-generation bank hybrid securities may stimulate renewed interest in CoCos.[21]<\/span><\/a> News last October that Swiss authorities are open to the use of CoCos to fund the capital requirements of UBS and Credit Suisse is also a welcome development.[22]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Third, the appropriate tax treatment of CoCos needs to be settled. The primary issue here is whether tax authorities would be willing to recognize contingent capital as debt (thereby allowing tax-deductible interest expenses) despite the instrument\u2019s convertibility into equity.[23]<\/span><\/a> If so, banks will enjoy the benefits of debt financing and will gravitate toward the use of CoCos in their capital structures.<\/p>\n

Lastly, differences in the legal treatment of CoCos across relevant jurisdictions need to be sufficiently understood. Interestingly, the BCBS has already commenced this process by requesting feedback from market participants, including investors in bank capital instruments, on all aspects of its August proposal (on contingent capital and triggers), including \u201cany legal or operational obstacles to their implementation.\u201d[24]<\/span><\/a> The BCBS has even encouraged industry practitioners to work with regulators in drafting terms and conditions for contingent capital instruments while \u201crespecting relevant national constraints.\u201d[25]<\/span><\/a> Whether sufficient harmonization and acceptance of contingent capital across varying legal jurisdictions will be achieved, however, remains to be seen.<\/p>\n

The discussion on contingent capital will likely continue and escalate in the coming weeks, but the ultimate verdict on its feasibility and sustainability will not be immediate. The conundrum of contingent capital presents broad challenges to the financial sector and to the economy as a whole, as stakeholders seek new and innovative ways of stabilizing the banking sector and preventing another financial crisis.<\/p>\n

\n

*<\/a> LL.M. Candidate, 2011, Harvard Law School.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> See <\/em>Damian Paletta, \u2018Contingent Capital\u2019 Idea Gaining More Steam Within Fed<\/em>, Wall St. J.<\/span> (Oct. 13, 2009), http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2009\/10\/13\/contingent-capital-idea-gaining-more-steam-within-fed; Steve Slater & Clara Ferreira-Marques, Contingent Capital: Cure or Cost for Banks?<\/em>, Reuters <\/span>(Oct. 27, 2009), http:\/\/uk.reuters.com\/article\/idUKLNE59Q01K20091027; Giuseppe De Martino, Masimo Libertucci, Mario Marangoni, & Mario Quagliariello, A Proposal for Countercyclical Contingent Capital Instruments<\/em>, VOX (Oct. 30, 2010), http:\/\/www.voxeu.org\/index.php?q=node\/5728; BoE\u2019s Tucker-CoCos Could Transform Bank Landscape<\/em>, Reuters <\/span>(Nov. 16, 2009), http:\/\/blogs.reuters.com\/financial-regulatory-forum\/2009\/11\/16\/boes-tucker-cocos-could-transform-bank-landscape.\u00a0 See also<\/em> Press Release, Bank for International Settlements, Consultative Proposals to Strengthen the Resilience of the Banking Sector Announced by the Basel Committee (Dec. 17, 2009), http:\/\/www.bis.org\/press\/p091217.htm.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> See<\/em> CoCo Nuts<\/em>, The Economist <\/span>(Nov. 5, 2009), http:\/\/www.economist.com\/node\/ 14816673?story_id=14816673.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Squam Lake Working Group on Financial Regulation, An Expedited Resolution Mechanism for Distressed Financial Firms: Regulatory Hybrid Securities<\/em> (Council on Foreign Relations, Center for Geoeconomic Studies, Working Paper 2009) at 2.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Mark J. Flannery, Stabilizing Large Financial Institutions with Contingent Capital Certificates<\/em> (2009), available at http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1485689.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Julie Dickson, Superintendant, Financial Institutions Canada, Remarks at Financial Services Invitational Forum (May 6, 2010) at 4, http:\/\/www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca\/app\/DocRepository\/1\/eng\/speeches\/jdlh20100506_e.pdf.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> See <\/em>Flannery, supra <\/em>note 4.<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> See <\/em>Robert J. Mcdonald, Contingent Capital with a Dual Price Trigger<\/em> (2010), available at http:\/\/papers. ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553430.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> See <\/em>Squam Lake Working Group, supra<\/em> note 3.<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> See <\/em>John Coffee, Jr., Bail-Ins Versus Bail-Outs: Using Contingent Capital to Mitigate Systemic Risk<\/em> (2010), available at http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1675015.<\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> See<\/em> Flannery, supra <\/em>note 4, at 3; Coffee, supra <\/em>note 10, at 10, 33; McDonald, supra <\/em>note 8, at 2, 21.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> See <\/em>Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Proposal to Ensure the Loss Absorbency of Regulatory Capital at the Point of Non-Viability<\/em> (2010), available at http:\/\/www.bis.org\/publ\/bcbs174.pdf.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> See <\/em>R. Admati, Peter M. DeMarzo, Martin F. Helllwig, & Paul C. Pfleiderer, Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is not Expensive<\/em> (2010), http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/ sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669704.<\/p>\n

[14]<\/a> Huw Jones, UK Insurers Say CoCo Capital Poorly Thought Out<\/em>, Reuters <\/span>(Nov. 9, 2010), http:\/\/www. reuters.com\/article\/idUSLDE6A812Z20101109.<\/p>\n

[15]<\/a> Coffee, supra <\/em>note 10, at 9.<\/p>\n

[16]<\/a> See <\/em>Coffee, supra<\/em> note 10, at 34\u201335.<\/p>\n

[17]<\/a> Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, supra <\/em>note 12; see also <\/em>Martin Dozier, Basel Committee Commences Consultation Regarding Contingent Capital Requirement<\/em>, Financial Markets Blog <\/span>(Aug. 19, 2010), http:\/\/www.alston.com\/financialmarketscrisisblog\/blog.aspx?entry=3922; Press Release, Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee Proposal to Ensure the Loss Absorbency of Regulatory Capital at the Point of Non-Viability (Aug. 19, 2010).<\/p>\n

[18]<\/a> Squam Lake Working Group, supra <\/em>note 3, at 4.<\/p>\n

[19]<\/a> Flannery, supra<\/em> note 4, at 11.<\/p>\n

[20]<\/a> See <\/em>Tracy Alloway, CoComplications<\/em>, Financial Times Alphaville <\/span>(Nov. 18, 2010), http:\/\/ftalphaville.ft. com\/blog\/2009\/11\/18\/83946\/cocomplications; see also<\/em> Tracy Alloway, Will Rate CoCo Bonds for Food, <\/em>Financial Times Alphaville <\/span>(Nov 9, 2010), http:\/\/ftalphaville.ft.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/09\/398811\/will-rate-coco-bonds-for-food; Tracy Alloway, Cuckoo for CoCos<\/em>, Financial Times <\/span>(Nov 11, 2010), http:\/\/ftalphaville.ft.com\/blog\/2009\/11\/11\/ 82756\/cuckoo-for-cocos.<\/p>\n

[21]<\/a> \u201cMark Brown, Fitch Statement on Bank Hybrid Securities Seen as Constructive<\/em>, Fox Business <\/span>(Nov. 8, 2010), http:\/\/www.foxbusiness.com\/markets\/2010\/11\/08\/fitch-statement-bank-hybrid-securities-seen-constructive\/#ixzz16QleaUzf.<\/p>\n

[22]<\/a> Jane Merriman, Swiss Give Fresh Momentum to Contingent Bonds<\/em>, Reuters <\/span>(Oct. 4, 2010), http:\/\/blogs.reuters.com\/financial-regulatory-forum\/2010\/10\/04\/snap-analysis-swiss-give-fresh-momentum-to-contingent-bonds.<\/p>\n

[23]<\/a> See<\/em> Coffee, supra <\/em>note 10, at 44; McDonald, supra <\/em>note 8, at 16; Humphreys & Pinedo, supra<\/em> note 2.<\/p>\n

[24]<\/a> Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, supra <\/em>note 12, at 3.<\/p>\n

[25]<\/a> Id.<\/em><\/p>\n

Preferred citation: Frederick Ryan Castillo, The Coconundrum<\/em>, 1 Harv. Bus. L. Rev. Online <\/span>29 (2010), https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/?p=832.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Frederick Ryan Castillo <\/p>\n

Digging deeper into their analytical toolbox, policymakers, academics, and regulators are increasingly exploring whether, and to what extent, a system of contingent capital can strengthen the resilience of the banking sector. The global financial crisis unearthed fragile and troubled banks, riddled with excessive leverage, poor quality capital buffers, and liquidity problems. Because these institutions were deemed \u201ctoo big to fail,\u201d governments were forced to intervene and prop them up by way of costly, taxpayer-funded bailouts. With the benefit of hindsight, regulators are now looking at contingent capital as a potentially speedy and less costly alternative for recapitalizing banks in periods of financial distress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[22],"tags":[60,59,58],"ppma_author":[373],"class_list":["post-832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-home","tag-basel-committee-on-banking-supervision","tag-contingent-capital","tag-frederick-ryan-castillo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgKEUK-dq","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1162,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/contingent-convertible-bonds-and-banker-compensation-potential-conflicts-of-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":0},"title":"Contingent Convertible Bonds and Banker Compensation: Potential Conflicts of Interest?","author":"wpengine","date":"April 22, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Gaurav Toshniwal: Two issues related to financial regulation have received significant academic and regulatory attention since the financial crisis: Contingent Convertible Bonds (\u201cCoCos\u201d) and banker compensation. The discussion, however, has largely been silent on the interaction between the two. This brief note explores the potential conflicts that may exist in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1728,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/greene-symposium-dfa\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":1},"title":"Dodd-Frank and the Future of Financial Regulation","author":"wpengine","date":"October 11, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Edward F. Greene: Dodd-Frank represents the most sweeping changes to the financial regulatory environment in the United States since the Great Depression. While its enactment was important, the Act is seriously flawed...","rel":"","context":"In "Dodd-Frank Anniversary"","block_context":{"text":"Dodd-Frank Anniversary","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/dodd-frank-anniversary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4059,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/the-swaps-pushout-rule-much-ado-about-the-wrong-thing\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":2},"title":"The Swaps Pushout Rule: Much Ado About the Wrong Thing?","author":"ehansen","date":"December 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"John Crawford and Tim Karpoff: A notably bitter battle over financial reform in the wake of the crisis of 2008 has centered on the Swap Pushout Rule: a Dodd-Frank mandate that federally insured depository institutions\u2014i.e., banks\u2014refrain from entering into certain derivatives contracts. After several of the largest U.S. financial institutions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Derivatives Regulation"","block_context":{"text":"Derivatives Regulation","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/us-business-law\/derivatives-regulation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Figure 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2015\/12\/Figure-11.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2015\/12\/Figure-11.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2015\/12\/Figure-11.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2299,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/complexity-of-regulation\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":3},"title":"Complexity of Regulation","author":"wpengine","date":"June 16, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Chester S. Spatt: While our financial system is itself very complex, our financial regulators would benefit in many cases by designing simple and robust approaches\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Volume 3"","block_context":{"text":"Volume 3","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/volume-3\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/06\/Spatt-Complexity.jpg?fit=940%2C300&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/06\/Spatt-Complexity.jpg?fit=940%2C300&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/06\/Spatt-Complexity.jpg?fit=940%2C300&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/06\/Spatt-Complexity.jpg?fit=940%2C300&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2140,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/capturing-time-financial-statements\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":4},"title":"Capturing Time in Financial Statements","author":"wpengine","date":"March 13, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"George M. Williams Jr: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act applies a number of heightened standards to bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more...","rel":"","context":"In "Home"","block_context":{"text":"Home","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/home\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/03\/newbalancesheet.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/03\/newbalancesheet.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2012\/03\/newbalancesheet.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":3283,"url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/the-federal-reserves-supporting-role-behind-dodd-franks-clearinghouse-reforms\/","url_meta":{"origin":832,"position":5},"title":"The Federal Reserve’s Supporting Role Behind Dodd-Frank’s Clearinghouse Reforms","author":"wpengine","date":"April 20, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Colleen Baker: Although largely overlooked, failures in PCS systems both domestically and internationally exacerbated the financial crisis of 2008. The Federal Reserve\u2019s critical and significant role in responding to some of these disruptions has similarly been largely overlooked.","rel":"","context":"In "Derivatives Regulation"","block_context":{"text":"Derivatives Regulation","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/category\/us-business-law\/derivatives-regulation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"authors":[{"term_id":373,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"hlsmultitest","display_name":"wpengine","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d8770fe9625ca7c4601f13d9d0ab86565a6dac8cd6a77bfe2ada6d83c6837870?s=96&d=blank&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=832"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hblr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}