{"id":227,"date":"2009-09-10T13:12:14","date_gmt":"2009-09-10T20:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/?page_id=227"},"modified":"2025-11-19T16:57:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-19T23:57:15","slug":"articles","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/articles\/","title":{"rendered":"Articles"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Check out articles from our most recent volumes below. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

You can view previous issues of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review in PDF form here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/h2>

Volume 30 Issue 2 (2024-25)<\/h2><\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
\u00a0A Centennial Birthday Wish: Remembering and Reigniting the Original Purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act<\/strong><\/a> Collin Williams & Imre Szalai<\/em><\/td>99<\/td><\/tr>
Self-Determination, Needs Satisfaction and Moral Growth \u2014 in Mediation and Negligence Law: A Paradigm Shift in Underlying Worldviews<\/a><\/strong> Robert A. Baruch Bush<\/em><\/td>113<\/td><\/tr>
Time-Pressured Negotiations <\/a><\/strong>Hal Abramson<\/em><\/td>139<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Volume 30 Issue 1 (2024-25)<\/h2><\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong> <\/td><\/tr>
Lawyers’ Client-Inclusive Negotiations: The “New Mediation”?<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Nancy A. Welsh & Donna Shestowsky<\/em>
<\/td>		1<\/td><\/tr>
Expanding the Shadow of the Law: Designing Efficient Judicial Dispute Resolution Systems in a Digital World \u2014<\/strong> An Empirical Investigation<\/strong><\/a> Kathrin Eidenm\u00fc<\/i>ller, Conor McLaughlin & Horst Eidenm\u00fcller<\/em><\/td>53<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

Volume 28 Issue 1 (Fall 2022)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

A Letter from the Editors-in-Chief<\/em><\/a>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td><\/tr>

 <\/td>Follow the Science: Proven Strategies for Reducing Unconscious Bias<\/a> <\/strong>David Hoffman & Helen Winter<\/i><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>BOTH: The Legal Profession\u2019s Struggle to Leverage Stability and Change<\/a> <\/strong>Betsy A. Miller<\/em><\/td>65<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Can Theory-Building in the Negotiation Field Contribute to Developments in Dispute Resolution Practice?<\/a> <\/strong>Lawrence Susskind<\/i><\/td>87
<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 27 Issue 2 (Spring 2022)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Fixing a Power Struggle in America\u2019s Civil Justice System<\/a><\/strong> Imre S. Szalai<\/i><\/td>209<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Med-Arb and Arb-Med: A Law and Economic Analysis<\/a><\/strong> <\/i><\/i>Yijia Lu<\/i><\/td>253<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Dispute Process Choices Among Chinese Companies in the United States: Some Preliminary Data and Analyses<\/a> <\/strong>Ji Li & Carrie Menkel-Meadow<\/i><\/td>295<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 27 Issue 1 (Fall 2021)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Initial Mediation Session: An Empirical Examination<\/a><\/strong> Roselle L. Wissler & Art Hinshaw<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Rethinking the Structure of Construction Arbitration: A Dispute Systems Design Approach to the Position of Experts<\/a><\/strong> Juan Pablo Labb\u00e9 Arocca<\/i><\/td>43<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Perceptions of Settlement<\/a> <\/strong> Jessica Bregant, Jennifer K. Robbennolt, & Verity Winship<\/em><\/td>93<\/td><\/tr>
NOTE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Imagine: Could Mediation Systems Fix Songwriter Split Disputes?<\/a> <\/strong> Daniel Abowd<\/em><\/td>169<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 26 Issue 2 (Spring 2021)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Accountability for Crimes against the Rohingya: Strategic Litigation in the International Court of Justice<\/b><\/a> Michael Ramsden<\/em><\/td>153<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Reconciliation System Design: A Systematic Approach to Collective Healing in Post-Conflict Societies<\/b><\/a> Daniel L. Shapiro<\/i><\/td>193<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Arbitration, Mediation, and Mixed Modes: Seeking Workable Solutions and Common Grounds on Med-Arb, Arb-Med, and Settlement-Oriented Activities by Arbitrators<\/a> <\/strong>Thomas J. Stipanowich<\/em><\/td>265<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 26 Issue 1 (Fall 2020)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td> In Pursuit of Fairness: Re-negotiating Embedded Norms & Re-imagining Interest-Based Negotiation<\/a><\/strong> Ariel Eckblad<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>A New and Controversial Approach to Dispute Resolution Under the U.S.- China Trade Agreement of 2020<\/a><\/strong> Daniel C.K. Chow<\/i><\/td>31<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>When Mandatory Mediation Meets the Adversarial Legal Culture of Lawyers: An Empirical Study in Italy<\/a> <\/strong> Vittorio Indovina<\/em><\/td>69<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Systemic Issue Resolution in Two Dimensions: A Reflection Based on a Ten-Year Review of the Australian Financial Ombudsman Service<\/a> <\/strong> Nuannuan Lin & Weijun Hu<\/em><\/td>113<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 25 Issue 2 (Spring 2020)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td> Implicit Bias in Mediation<\/a><\/strong> Audrey J. Lee<\/em><\/td>167<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Overcoming the Loss Aversion Obstacle in Negotiation<\/a><\/strong> Yair Livneh<\/i><\/td>187<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>COVID-19 and Conflicts: The Health of Peace Processes During a Pandemic<\/a> <\/strong> Lisa K. Dicker & C. Danae Paterson<\/em><\/td>213<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 25 Issue 1 (Fall 2019)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Supreme Court’s Lamps Plus<\/em> Arbitration Decision: A Fading Light for Class Actions<\/a> <\/strong> Imre S. Szalai<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Snap Disputes<\/strong><\/a> Jennifer W. Reynolds<\/em><\/td>37<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution<\/a><\/strong> Darcy W. E. Allen, Aaron M. Lane, & Marta Poblet<\/i><\/td>75<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Facilitating Change: Addressing the Underutilization of Mediation in Professional Sports<\/a><\/strong> Robert Pannullo<\/i><\/td>103<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 24 Issue 2 (Spring 2019)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Bargaining in the (Murky) Shadow of Arbitration<\/a> <\/strong>Jill I. Gross<\/em><\/td>185<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Role of Secretariats in International Negotiations: The Case of Climate Change <\/strong><\/a> Christopher Mirasola<\/em><\/td>213<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Sizing Up Settlement: How Much Do The Merits of a Dispute Really Matter? <\/a> <\/strong>Tim A. Baker<\/i><\/td>253<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 24 Issue 1 (Fall 2018)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Designing Equality in the Legal Profession: A Nudging Approach.<\/a> <\/strong>Paola Cecchi-Dimeglio<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/strong><\/td>If We Build It, They Might<\/em> Come: Bridging the Implementation Gap Between ADR Services and Separating and Divorcing Families.<\/strong><\/a> Andrew Schepard, Marsha Kline Pruett, & Rebecca Love Kourlis<\/em><\/td>25<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Judges as Gatekeepers and the Dismaying Shadow of the Law: Courtroom Observations of Judicial Settlement Practices.<\/a> <\/strong>Ayelet Sela, Nourit Zimerman, & Michal Alberstein<\/i><\/td>83<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Failure of Legal Ethics to Address the Abuses of Forced Arbitration.<\/b><\/a> Imre S. Szalai<\/em><\/td>127<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 23 Issue 2 (Spring 2018)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>A Modern-Day Pentagon Paper in a Post-Pentagon Papers<\/em> World: A Case Study of Negotiations Between The Washington Post<\/em> and the U.S. Government Regarding Publication of the 2009 Afghanistan Assessment<\/em><\/a>. <\/strong>Jonathan G. Odom<\/em><\/td>215<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/strong><\/td>How Should the Courts Know Whether a Dispute is Ready and Suitable for Mediation? An Empirical Analysis of the Singapore Courts’ Referral of Civil Disputes of Mediation<\/a>.<\/strong> Dorcas Quek Anderson, Eunice Chua, & Ngo Tra <\/em>My<\/em><\/td>265<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Fashioning an Effective Negotiation Style: Choosing Between Good Practices, Tactics, and Tricks<\/a>. <\/strong>Hal Abramson<\/i><\/td>319<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Sanctity of Party Autonomy and the Powers of Arbitrators to Determine the Applicable Law: The Quest for an Arbitral Equilibrium<\/a>.<\/strong> Yeshnah D. Rampall & Ron\u00e1n Feehily<\/em><\/td>345<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>A New Agreement to Mediate: Guidelines for Ethical Practice in the Digital Space<\/a>. <\/strong>Amanda First<\/em><\/td>405<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 23 Issue 1 (Fall 2017)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Toward a More Modern Application of the \u201cNexus to the Workplace\u201d Test: Arbitral Considerations in Off-Duty Employee Misconduct Cases<\/a><\/strong>. <\/strong>Daniel V. Johns<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/strong><\/td>The Centrist Case for Enforcing Adhesive Arbitration Agreements<\/a>. <\/strong>Stephen J. Ware<\/em><\/td>29<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Canine-Assisted Mediation<\/a><\/strong>. David A. Paul, Q.C.<\/em><\/td>123<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Irony of Mediator as Problem Maker: Mediator Misconduct Setting Aside Mediated Agreements<\/a><\/strong>. Fran L. Tetunic<\/em><\/td>177<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 22 Issue 2 (Spring 2017)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 \n

 <\/p>\n<\/td>

When Ignorance Is Not Bliss: An Empirical Study of Litigants’ Awareness of Court-Sponsored Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs.<\/a> <\/b>Donna Shestowsky<\/em><\/td>189<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/strong><\/td>Opening the Red Door to Chinese Arbitrations: An Empirical Analysis of CIETAC Cases 1990-2000.<\/a> <\/b>Pat K. Chew<\/em><\/td>241<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>Confidentiality and Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration: Finding the Right Balance.<\/a> <\/b>Avinash Poorooye & Ron\u00e1n Feehily<\/em><\/td>275<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Do Professional Ethics Make Negotiators Unethical? An Empirical Study with Scenarios of Divorce Settlement.<\/a> <\/b>Hiroharu Saito<\/em><\/td>325<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 22 Issue 1 (Fall 2016)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Mandatory ADR Notice Requirements: Gender Themes and Intentionality in Policy Discourse.<\/a><\/strong> Becky L. Jacobs<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/strong><\/td>The Continuing Voice of Dissent: Justice Thomas and the Federal Arbitration Act.<\/a><\/strong> Brian Farkas<\/em><\/td>33<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>Deflategate’s Labor Legacy: The Centrality of Grievance Procedures in Collective Bargaining Negotiations.<\/a><\/strong> Heather Scheiwe Kulp & Mario Cuttone<\/em><\/td>77<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Understanding Actavis<\/em>: How Courts Misinterpret FTC v. Actavis,<\/em> Inc.<\/em>, and How to Get It Right.<\/a> <\/strong>Bryan Gant<\/em><\/td>111<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Modeling an International Investment Court After the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body.<\/a> <\/strong>Rebecca Lee Katz<\/em><\/td>163<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 21 Issue 2 (Spring 2016)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Regulating Mediators.<\/a> <\/strong>Art Hinshaw<\/em>
<\/em><\/td>		163<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Expanding Judicial Discretion: Between Legal and Conflict Considerations.<\/a> <\/strong>Yuval Sinai & Michal Albertstein<\/em><\/td>221<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>Getting Deals Done: Enhancing Negotiation Theory and Practice Through a Therapeutic Jurisprudence\/Comprehensive Law Mindset.<\/a> <\/strong>Carol L. Zeiner<\/em><\/td>279<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 21 Issue 1 (Fall 2015)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Improving Lawyers’ Judgment: Is Mediation Training De-Biasing?<\/a> <\/strong>Douglas N. Frenkel & James H. Stark
<\/em><\/td>		1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Mediation and Access to Justice in Africa: Perspectives from Ghana.<\/a> <\/strong>Jaqueline Nolan-Haley
<\/em><\/td>		59<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>User Protections in Online Dispute Resolution.<\/a> <\/strong>Suzanne Van Arsdale<\/em><\/td>107<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Strategizing the Two-Level Negotiation: How a Level I Negotiator Deals With a Level II Agitator.<\/a> <\/strong>Shivan Sarin
<\/em><\/td>		143<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 20 (Spring 2015)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Federal Arbitration Act Preemption of State Public-Policy-Based Employment Arbitration Doctrine: An Autopsy and an Argument for Federal Agency Oversight.<\/a> <\/strong>E. Gary Spitko<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Standards of Legitimacy in Criminal Negotiations.<\/a> <\/strong>Wesley MacNeil Oliver and Rishi Batra<\/em><\/td>61<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>Mindfulness in the Heat of Conflict: Taking STOCK.<\/a> <\/strong>Leonard L. Riskin and Rachel Wohl<\/em><\/td>121<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Med-Arb and the Legalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution.<\/a> <\/strong>Brian A. Pappas, Ph.D.<\/em><\/td>157<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Calling for Clarity: How Uncertainty Undermines the Legitimacy of the Dispute Resolution System Under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.<\/a> <\/strong>Bernadette Maheandiran<\/em><\/td>205<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Bargaining in the Shadow of the \u201cLaw?\u201d \u2014The Case of Same-Sex Divorce.<\/a> <\/strong>Jeremy Feigenbaum<\/em><\/td>245<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>The Peculiar Case of the ARA Libertad<\/i>: Provisional Measures and Prejudice to the Arbitral Tribunal\u2019s Final Result.<\/a> <\/strong>Thomas E. Robins<\/em><\/td>265<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Volume 19 (Spring 2014)<\/h2>\n<\/td><\/tr>

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Management in Fortune 1000 Corporations.<\/a> <\/strong>Thomas J. Stipanowich and J. Ryan Lamare<\/em><\/td>1<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Bargaining with Consequences: Leverage and Coercion in Negotiation<\/a>.<\/strong> Paul F. Kirgis<\/em><\/td>69<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/a><\/td>Yeah, But Did You See the Gorilla? Creating and Protecting an Informed Consumer in Cross-Border Online Dispute Resolution<\/a>. <\/strong>Anjanette H. Raymond<\/em><\/td>129<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Mediation v. Case Settlement: The Unsettling Relations Between Courts and Mediation – A Case Study.<\/a> <\/strong>Mordehai Mironi<\/em><\/td>173<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Class Action in the Age of Twitter: A Dispute Systems Approach.<\/a><\/strong> Jeremy R. McClane<\/em><\/td>213<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Preserving Negotiation Whilst Promoting Global Order: Should We Bargain with Salt-Water Devils?<\/a><\/strong> Lucas V.M. Bento<\/em><\/td>285<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Resolving Cultural Property Disputes in the Shadow of the Law.<\/a><\/strong> Grant Strother<\/em><\/td>335<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Check out articles from our most recent volume\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-227","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSkE-3F","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}