{"id":229,"date":"2009-09-10T13:13:31","date_gmt":"2009-09-10T20:13:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/?page_id=229"},"modified":"2016-04-19T12:07:45","modified_gmt":"2016-04-19T19:07:45","slug":"archive","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/articles\/archive\/","title":{"rendered":"Archive"},"content":{"rendered":"

You can view previous issues of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review in PDF form here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

VOL. 20 CONTENTS Spring 2015<\/h2>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nFederal Arbitration Act Preemption of State Public-Policy-Based Employment Arbitration Doctrine: An Autopsy and an Argument for Federal Agency Oversight.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>E. Gary Spitko<\/em><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nStandards of Legitimacy in Criminal\u00a0Negotiations.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Wesley MacNeil Oliver and Rishi Batra<\/em><\/td>\n61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/a><\/td>\nMindfulness in the Heat of Conflict: Taking STOCK.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Leonard L. Riskin and Rachel Wohl<\/em><\/td>\n121<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMed-Arb and the Legalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Brian A. Pappas, Ph.D.<\/em><\/td>\n157<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCalling for Clarity: How Uncertainty Undermines the Legitimacy of the Dispute Resolution System Under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Bernadette Maheandiran<\/em><\/td>\n205<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBargaining in the Shadow of the \u201cLaw?\u201d \u2014The Case of Same-Sex Divorce.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Jeremy Feigenbaum<\/em><\/td>\n245<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Peculiar Case of the ARA Libertad<\/i>: Provisional Measures and Prejudice to the Arbitral Tribunal\u2019s Final Result.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Thomas E. Robins<\/em><\/td>\n265<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

VOL. 19 CONTENTS Spring 2014<\/h2>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLiving with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Management in\u00a0Fortune 1000 Corporations.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Thomas J. Stipanowich and J. Ryan Lamare<\/em><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBargaining with Consequences: Leverage and Coercion in Negotiation<\/a>.<\/strong>\u00a0Paul F. Kirgis<\/em><\/td>\n69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/a><\/td>\nYeah, But Did You See the Gorilla? Creating and Protecting an Informed Consumer in Cross-Border Online Dispute Resolution<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong>Anjanette H. Raymond<\/em><\/td>\n129<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMediation v. Case Settlement: The Unsettling Relations Between Courts and Mediation – A Case Study.<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>Mordehai Mironi<\/em><\/td>\n173<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nClass Action in the Age of Twitter: A Dispute Systems Approach.<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0Jeremy R. McClane<\/em><\/td>\n213<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPreserving Negotiation Whilst Promoting Global Order: Should We Bargain with Salt-Water Devils?<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0Lucas V.M. Bento<\/em><\/td>\n285<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nResolving Cultural Property Disputes in the Shadow of the Law.<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0Grant Strother<\/em><\/td>\n335<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

VOL. 18 CONTENTS Spring 2013<\/h2>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nManaging Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems<\/a>.<\/strong> \u00a0Leonard L. Riskin<\/em><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Thoughtful Integration of Mediation into Bilateral Treaty Arbitration<\/a>.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>Nancy A. Welsh and Andrea Kupfer Schneider<\/em><\/td>\n71<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRethinking the Tension Between Peace and Justice: The International Criminal Prosecutor as Diplomat<\/a>.<\/strong>\u00a0Robert H. Mnookin<\/em>
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		145<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGlocalization of Arbitration: Transnational Standards Struggling with Local Norms Through the Lens of Arbitration Transplantation in China<\/em><\/a>.<\/strong> Fan Kun<\/em><\/td>\n175<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNot What They Bargained For: Directing the Arbitration of Statutory Antidiscrimination Rights<\/a>.<\/strong> Stuart M. Boyarsky<\/em><\/td>\n221<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRenovating the Multi-Door Courthouse: Designing Trial Court Dispute Resolution Systems to Improve Results and Control Costs<\/a>.<\/strong> Barry Edwards, Esq.<\/em><\/td>\n281<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 17 CONTENTS Spring 2012<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Impact of A Grievant\u2019s Offer of Apology and the Decision-Making Process of Labor Arbitrators: A Case Analysis<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong> Daniel J. Kaspar and Lamont E. Stallworth<\/em><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMediation: The \u201cNew Arbitration\u201d<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong> Jacqueline Nolan-Haley<\/em><\/td>\n61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAn Empirical Study of Settlement Conference Nuts and Bolts: Settlement Judges Facilitating Communication, Compromise and Fear<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong> Peter Robinson<\/em><\/td>\n97<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTechnology and the Future of Dispute Systems Design<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong> Orna Rabinovich-Einy and Ethan Katsh<\/em><\/td>\n151<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDoes Class Arbitration \u201cChange the Nature\u201d of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen, AT&T, and a Return to First Principles<\/a>.<\/strong> S.I. Strong<\/em><\/td>\n201<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPower Before Interests in Dispute System Design<\/a>.<\/strong> Adam B. Kinon<\/em><\/td>\n273<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STUDENT NOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nManaging the Exit: Negotiating an Employment Termination<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong> David P. Zins<\/em><\/td>\n289<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n

VOL. 16 CONTENTS SPRING 2011<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nUnderstanding Discovery In International Commercial Arbitration Through Behavioral Law and Economics: A Journey Inside the Minds of Parties and Arbitrators<\/strong><\/a>
\nGiacomo Rojas Elgueta
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTherapeutic Victim-Offender Mediation Within the Criminal Justice Process – Sharpening the Evaluation of Personal Potential For Rehabilitation While Righting Wrongs Under the ADR Philosophy<\/strong><\/a>
\nGabriel Hallevy<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Morality of Conciliation: An Empirical Examination of Arbitrator “Role Moralities” In East Asia and the West<\/strong><\/a>
\nShahla F. Ali
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDoing the Right Thing: An Empirical Study of Attorney Negotiation Ethics<\/strong><\/a>
\nArt Hinshaw, Jess K. Alberts<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nClubhouse Controversy: A Study of Dispute Resolution Processes Between Teammates In Major League Baseball<\/strong><\/a>
\nJosh Chetwynd
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCan Mediation Enable the Empowerment of Disadvantaged Groups? A Narrative Analysis of Consensus-Building in Israel<\/strong><\/a>
\nRonit Zamir
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STUDENT NOTE
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nFormalizing Legal Reputation Markets<\/strong><\/a>
\nJamison Davies
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SYMPOSIUM 2010: THE NEGOTIATION WITHIN
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Wave\/Particle Tension In Negotiation
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Ran Kuttner
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPreface: The Negotiation Within
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Robert Dawes<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMediation, Multiple Minds, and Managing the Negotiation Within
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David A. Hoffman
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLie Direction and the Negotiation Within
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Clark Freshman<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 15 CONTENTS SPRING 2010
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTort Litigation Between Spouses: Let’s Meet Somewhere In The Middle<\/strong><\/a>
\nBenjamin Shmueli
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPublic Protests, Private Contracts: Confidentiality In ICSID Arbitration and the Cochabamba Water War<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmanda L. Norris, Katina E. Metzidakis
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLegislating In The Light: Considering Empirical Data In Crafting Arbitration Reforms<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmy J. Schmitz<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDeibiasing and Bidirectional Bias: Cognitive Failure In Mandatory Employment Arbitration<\/strong><\/a>
\nDaniel B. Klaff
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAsset Specificity and Transaction Structures: A Case Study of @Home Corporation<\/strong><\/a>
\nBrain J.M. Quinn<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STUDENT NOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCollectively Bargained Employment Arbitration: 14 Penn Plaza LLC V. Pyett<\/strong><\/a>
\nE.E. Keenan
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 14 CONTENTS WINTER 2009<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Intersection of Dispute Systems Design and Transitional Justice<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrea Kupfer Schneider
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Democratic Party Primary Process: Can Dispute System Design Principles Provide Hope For Reform?<\/strong><\/a>
\nShannon Delahaye
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSystems For Dealing With Conflict and Learning From Conflict – Options For Complaint-Handling: An Illustrative Case<\/strong><\/a>
\nBrian Bloch, David Miller, Mary Rowe<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSecond Generation Organizational Conflict Management Systems Design: A Practitioner’s Perspective On Emerging Issues<\/strong><\/a>
\nCathy A. Constantino
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPolitics and the 2005 Gaza and North West Bank Compensation and Assistance Facility<\/strong><\/a>
\nEhud Eiran<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nOrganizational Systems For Dealing With Conflict & Learning From Conflict: Introduction<\/strong><\/a>
\nMary Rowe, for the Bloch, Miller, and Rowe Articles; Chart; and Case
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nManaging Cultural Differences In an International Organization Conflict Management System<\/strong><\/a>
\nDavid Miller
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDispute Systems Design, Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Scale<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmy J. Cohen
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDispute System Design: The United Nations Compensation Commission<\/strong><\/a>
\nFrancis E. McGovern
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDispute System Design and Justice in Employment Dispute Resolution: Mediation at the Workplace<\/strong><\/a>
\nLisa Blomgren Bingham, Cynthia J. Hallberlin, Denise A. Walker, Won-Tae Chung<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCreating A Faith-Based Conflict Management System<\/strong><\/a>
\nBrian Bloch
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAre There Systemic Ethics Issues In Dispute System Design? And What We Should [Not] Do About It: Lessons From International and Domestic Fronts<\/strong><\/a>
\nCarrie Menkel-Meadow<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAn Organizational Ombuds Office In a System For Dealing With Conflict, Or “Conflict Management System”<\/strong><\/a>
\nMary Rowe
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAn Analytic Framework For Dispute Systems Design<\/strong><\/a>
\nStephanie Smith, Janet Martinez
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 13-2 CONTENTS SPRING 2008<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nInternet Characteristics and Online Alternative Dispute Resolution<\/a><\/strong>
\nHaitham A. Haloush & Bashar H. Malkawi<\/em><\/td>\n		327<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAttorneys, Apologies, and Settlement Negotiation<\/a><\/strong>
\nJennifer K. Robbennolt <\/em><\/td>\n		349<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAggregate Dispute Resolution: Class and Labor Arbitration<\/a><\/strong>
\nImre S. Szalai <\/em><\/td>\n		399<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STUDENT NOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDesigning the Forum to Fit the Fuss: Dispute System Design for the State Trial Courts<\/a><\/strong>
\nHallie A. Fader <\/em><\/td>\n		481<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 13-1 CONTENTS WINTER 2008<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDisabilities Accommodations, Transaction Costs, and Mediation: Evidence from the EEOC\u2019s Mediation Program<\/strong><\/a>
\nSeth D. Harris<\/em><\/td>\n		1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Soldier and the Sheik: Lessons from Negotiating in Iraq<\/strong><\/a>
\nDavid M. Tressler<\/em><\/td>\n		67<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Oxymoron of Measuring the Immeasurable: Potential and Challenges of Determining Mediation Developments in the U.S<\/strong>.<\/a>
\nMatthias Prause<\/em><\/td>\n		131<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nHappily Never After: When Final and Binding Arbitration Has No
\nFairy Tale Ending<\/strong><\/a>
\nMichael H. Leroy & Peter Feuille<\/em><\/td>\n		167<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Negotiation Counsel Model: An Empathetic Model for Settling Catastrophic Personal Injury Cases<\/strong><\/a>
\nJim Golden, H. Abigail Moy, & Adam Lyons<\/em><\/td>\n		211<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe One Minute Manager Prepares for Mediation: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Negotiation Preparation<\/strong><\/a>
\nDonald R. Philbin, Jr<\/em><\/td>\n		249<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STUDENT NOTE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nExperienced Intellectual Property Mediators: Increasingly Attractive in Times of \u201cPatent\u201d Unpredictability<\/strong><\/a>
\nSarah Tran<\/em><\/td>\n		313<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 12 CONTENTS WINTER 2007
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nUpdating Our Understanding of the Role of Lawyers: Lessons From Mastercard<\/strong><\/a>
\nScott R. Peppet
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Mastercard IPO: Protecting the Priceless Brand<\/strong><\/a>
\nVictor Fleischer
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe “Branding Effect” of Contracts<\/strong><\/a>
\nD. Gordon Smith<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRegulating Post-Bid Embedded Defenses: Lessons From Oracle Versus PeopleSoft<\/strong><\/a>
\nJennifer Arlen
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nOracle V. Peoplesoft: A Case Study<\/strong><\/a>
\nDavid Millstone, Guhan Subramanian
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMetabranding and Intermediation: A Response to Professor Fleischer<\/strong><\/a>
\nLaura A. Heymann<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMastercard’s Single Entity Strategy<\/strong><\/a>
\nJoshua D. Wright
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCoolhunting the Law<\/strong><\/a>
\nMark Fenster<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBetween Wilmington and Washington: Lessons from Oracle-PeopleSoft<\/strong><\/a>
\nDavid Millstone
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBargaining in the Shadow of PeopleSoft’s (Defective) Poison Pill<\/strong><\/a>
\nGuhan Subramanian
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCase Study: Selling Neiman Marcus<\/strong><\/a>
\nBryce Klempner, Dharini Mathus, Lerato Molefe, Jen Reynolds, Tony Uccellini
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
HOSTILE INTENT
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBackground and Sources<\/strong><\/a>
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nOpen Society Foundations: Hostile Intent Research Project
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 11 CONTENTS SPRING 2006
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTechnology’s Impact: The Quest For a New Paradigm For Accountability in Mediation<\/strong><\/a>
\nOrna Rabinovich-Einy
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nReinventing the Enterprise Wheel: Court Review of Punitive Awards in Labor and Employment Arbitrations<\/strong><\/a>
\nMichael H. LeRoy, Peter Feuille
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMatching Cases and Dispute Resolution Procedures: Detailed Analysis Leading to a Mediation-Centered Approach<\/strong><\/a>
\nFrank E. A. Sander, Lukasz Rozdeiczer<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDisputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation About Mediation<\/strong><\/a>
\nJames R. Cohen, Peter N. Thompson
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDebating the Globalization of U.S. Mediation: Politics, Power, and Practice in Nepal<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmy J. Cohen<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAppreciating Mediation’s Global Role in Promoting Good Governace<\/strong><\/a>
\nNancy D. Erbe
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Developmental Approach To Turning Points: “Irony” as an Ethics For Negotiating Pragmatics<\/strong><\/a>
\nSara Cobb
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nComics Media in Conflict Resolution Programs: Are They Effective in Promoting and Sustaining Peace?<\/strong><\/a>
\nEllen Yamshon, Daniel Yamshon
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMediation’s Boundaries: In Re Licensure of Penny V. State Ex Rel. Wyoming<\/strong><\/a>
\nThomas Tso
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nFrom Protection to Favoritism? The Federal Policy Toward Arbitration Vis-a-vis Competing State Policies<\/strong><\/a>
\nJane VanLare
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 10 CONTENTS SPRING 2005
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\nForeward<\/strong><\/a>
\nRobert H. Mnookin, Frank E.A. Sander
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: An Effective Administrative Response to National Tragedy<\/strong><\/a>
\nRobert M. Ackerman
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Discourse Beneath: Emotional Epistemology in Legal Deliberation and Negotiation<\/strong><\/a>
\nErin Ryan
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSchmediation and the Dimensions of Definition <\/strong><\/a>
\nMichael L. Moffitt<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nProblem-Solving Advocacy in Mediations: A Model of Client Representation<\/strong><\/a>
\nHarold Abramson
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDeveloping an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model <\/strong><\/a>
\nArno R. Lodder, John Zeleznikow<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDemocracy and Dispute Resolution: Systems Design and the New Workplace <\/strong><\/a>
\nRichard C. Reuben
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nUnconscionable Mediation Clauses: Garrett V. Hooters-Toledo<\/strong><\/a>
\nJennifer M. Ralph
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDyads: Encouraging “Dynamic Adaptive Dispute Systems” In the Organized Workpalce<\/strong><\/a>
\nPeter Robinson, Arthur Pearlstein, Bernard Mayer
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 9 CONTENTS SPRING 2004
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nWorkplace Meditation: The First-Phase, Private Caucus In Individual Discrimination Disputes<\/strong><\/a>
\nEmily M. Calhoun
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nUsing Insights About Perception and Judgment From the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument as an Aid to Mediation<\/strong><\/a>
\nR. Lisle Baker
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRefreshing Contractual Analysis of ADR Agreements by Curing Bipolar Avoidance of Modern Common Law<\/strong><\/a>
\nAmy J. Schmitz<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nRapport in Legal Negotiation: How Small Talk Can Facilitate E-Mail Dealmaking<\/strong><\/a>
\nJanice Nadler
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNegotiating Death: ADR and End of Life Decision-Making<\/strong><\/a>
\nI. Glenn Cohen<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDeveloping Countries and the WTO: The Need For More Mediation in the DSU<\/strong><\/a>
\nHansel T. Pham
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n“What’s Going On” in Mediation: An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of a Mediator’s Style on Party Satisfaction and Monetary Benefit<\/strong><\/a>
\nE. Patrick McDermott, Ruth Obar<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nSubstance, Process, and the Future of Class Arbitration<\/strong><\/a>
\nPeter J. Kreher, Pat D. Robertson III
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCulture as Context, Culture as Communication: Considerations For Humanitarian Negotiators<\/strong><\/a>
\nKevin Avruch
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 8 CONTENTS SPRING 2003
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTen Ways to Get Sued: A Guide for Mediators<\/strong><\/a>
\nMichael Moffitt
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDesigning Institutions to Manage Conflict: Principles for the Problem Solving Organization<\/strong><\/a>
\nKhalil Z. Shariff
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nContractually Expanded Review of Arbitration Awards<\/strong><\/a>
\nLee Goldman<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nConfidentiality’s Constitutionality: The Incursion on Judicial Powers to Regulate Party Conduct in Court-Connected Mediation<\/strong><\/a>
\nMaureen A. Weston
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAccountability In Special Education Mediation: Many a Slip Twixt Vision and Practice?<\/strong><\/a>
\nGrace E. D’Alo<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nStrategic Barriers to Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of Bilateral and Multilateral Negotiations<\/strong><\/a>
\nRobert H. Mnookin
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nArbitration, Consent and Contractual Theory: The Implications of EEOC V. Waffle House<\/strong><\/a>
\nJaime Dodge Byrnes, Elizabeth Pollman
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNegotiating and Drafting the Agreement to Arbitrate in 2003: Insuring Against a Failure of Professional Responsibility<\/strong><\/a>
\nRonald J. Offenkrantz
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 7 CONTENTS SPRING 2002
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nZoning, Taking, and Dealing: The Problems and Promise of Bargaining in Land Use Planning Conficts<\/strong><\/a>
\nErin Ryan
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nShattering Negotiation Myths: Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrea Kupfer Schneider
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLawyers, Non-Lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly From a Problem-Solving Perspective<\/strong><\/a>
\nJacqueline M. Nolan-Haley<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nIs Legal Mediation a Process of Repair – Or Separation? An Empirical Study, and Its Implications<\/strong><\/a>
\nDwight Golann
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENT
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMajor League Baseball Players Association V. Garvey: Revisiting the Standard for Arbitral Review<\/strong><\/a>
\nJaime Dodge Byrnes, Allison Berkowitz Prout
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDivided Court Crosses Wires Over Circuit City Decision: Holding Casts Doubt on Ninth Circuit’s Duffield Decision<\/strong><\/a>
\nKeith A. Becker, Dianne R. LaRocca
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MINDFULLNESS IN THE LAW AND ADR
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nWhat’s Special About Meditation? Contemplative Practice for American Lawyers <\/strong><\/a>
\nWilliam S. Blatt
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Contemplative Lawyer: On the Potential Contributions of Mindfullness Meditation to Law Students, Lawyers, and Their Clients<\/strong><\/a>
\nLeonard L. Riskin
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nReflections on the Potential Growth of Mindfullness Meditation in the Law<\/strong><\/a>
\nDouglas A. Codiga<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPracticing From the Inside Out<\/strong><\/a>
\nSteven W. Keeva
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nCan Saints Negotiate? A Brief Introduction to the Problem of Perfect Ethics in Bargaining<\/strong><\/a>
\nScott R. Peppet<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAdapting Meditation to Promote Negotiation Success: A Guide to Varieties and Scientific Support<\/strong><\/a>
\nClark Freshman, Adele M. Hayes, Greg C. Feldman
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 6 CONTENTS SPRING 2001
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nWhat Should We Teach in ADR Courses?: Concepts and Skills For Lawyers Representing Clients in Meditation<\/strong><\/a>
\nSuzanne J. Schmitz
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Price of Institutionalization<\/strong><\/a>
\nNancy A. Welsh
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Rise of a Trade Association: Group Interactions Within the International Swaps and Derivatives Association<\/strong><\/a>
\nSean M. Flanagan<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Lawyer’s Philosophical Map and the Disputant’s Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering<\/strong><\/a>
\nChris Guthrie
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMediating University Sexual Assault Cases<\/strong><\/a>
\nRajib Chanda<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAha? Is Creativity Possible in Legal Problem Solving and Teachable in Legal Education<\/strong><\/a>
\nCarrie Menkel-Meadow
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BOOK REVIEW<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Review of Beyond Winning<\/strong><\/a>
\nStephen B. Goldberg
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

VOL. 5 CONTENTS SPRING 2000
\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nWhen David Meets Goliath: Dealing With Power Differentials in Negotiations<\/strong><\/a>
\nRobert S. Adler, Elliot M. Silverstein
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nProceeding to a Constitution: A Multi-Party Negotiation Analysis of the Constitution Convention of 1787<\/strong><\/a>
\nDana Lansky
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGetting the Faith: Why Business Lawyers and Executives Believe in Mediation<\/strong><\/a>
\nJohn Lande<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBuilding A Pedagogy of Problem-Solving: Learning to Choose Among ADR Processes<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrea Kuper Schneider
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAn Evaluation of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination Alternative Dispute Resolution Program<\/strong><\/a>
\nThomas A. Kochan, Brenda A. Lautsch & Corinne Bendersky<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENT
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Meditation Privilege and Its Limits<\/strong><\/a>
\nChristopher DeMayo
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BOOK REVIEW
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Review of Bargaining for Advantage<\/strong><\/a>
\nJohn Richardson
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
INTERNATIONAL CORNER
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nImplementing ADR in Transitioning States: Lessons Learned From Practice<\/strong><\/a>
\nAnthony Wanis-St. John
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

VOL. 4 CONTENTS SPRING 1999<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPsychological Principles in Negotiating Civil Settlements
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Richard Birke and Craige R. Fox
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nIgnorance and Interests
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David E. Matz
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
INTERNATIONAL CORNER<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGurus and Guerrillas: Religious Fundamentalism and Dispute Resolution
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>C. Wiliam Thomas
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPerfect Arbitration = Arbitration > Litigation
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Di Jianf Schuerger
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGetting the Most Out of Meditation: Toward A Theory of Optimal Compensation for Mediators
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Andrew K Niebler<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Framework For Developing Mediator Certification Programs
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Stephanie A. Henning
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMandatory Arbitration of Discrimination Claims Under Collective Bargaining Agreements: The Effect of Wright
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jacob E. Tyler
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Negotiation Analysis of Mandatory Arbitration Contracts
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Miriam A. Cherry
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BOOK REVIEWS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNegotiation Through the Lens of a Social Psychologist
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Neil Shah
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDifficult Conversations Made Easier
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jonathan R. Cohen
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nWhen Sovereigns Negotiate In the Shadow of the Law: the 1998 Arizona-Pima Maricopa Gaming Compact
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Ron M. Resenberg
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PRACTIONER’S COURT
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nProblems Without a Process: Using an Action Dialogue to Manage Racial Tensions
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Robert Ricigliano, Theodore Johnson, and Andrea Chasen
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

VOL. 3 CONTENTS 1998<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nFailing Faith in Litigation? A Survey of Business Lawyers\u2019 and Executives\u2019 Opinions
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>John Lande<\/em><\/td>\n		1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin\u2019s Grid
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Kimberlee K. Kovach & Lela P. Love<\/em><\/td>\n		71<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nReasoning Along Different Lines: Some Varied Roles of Rationality in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jonathan R. Cohen<\/em><\/td>\n		111<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
INTERNATIONAL CORNER<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTransfer, Adaptation, and Success of the CRI Mediation Model in Post-Communist Russia
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Ellen Yamshon & Daniel Yamshon<\/em><\/td>\n		123<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNegotiation and Mediation in France: The Challenge of Skill-Based Learning and Interdisciplinary Research in Legal Education
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Alain Lempereur<\/em><\/td>\n		151<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nElectronic Online Dispute Resolution: A Systems Approach \u2013 Potential, Problems, and a Proposal
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Robert C. Bordone<\/em><\/td>\n		175<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPeer Mediation in Schools: Expectations and Evaluations
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>William S. Haft & Elaine R. Weiss<\/em><\/td>\n		213<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nMandatory Arbitration Clauses and Statutory Rights: The Legal Landscape After Nelson
\n<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/a>Tanya J. Axenson<\/em><\/td>\n		271<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nConfidentiality in Mediation
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jaime Alison Lee & Carl Giesler<\/em><\/td>\n		285<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BOOK REVIEWS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nA Case Study in Two-Track Diplomacy: The Lawyers Alliance for Nuclear Arms Control
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Timothy Kiefter<\/em><\/td>\n		299<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nProtocols for Employment Dispute Resolution
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Robert L. Rogers<\/em><\/td>\n		307<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDancing Together at Their Child\u2019s Wedding: Practical Advice for Negotiating Effective Settlements in Family Law
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Carl Giesler<\/em><\/td>\n		313<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

VOL. 2 CONTENTS 1997<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nIs Mediation a Fair Way to Resolve Special Education Disputes? First Empirical Findings
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Peter J. Kuriloff & Steven S. Goldberg<\/em><\/td>\n		35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGame Theory and Nonrefundable Retainers: A Response to Professors Croson and Mnookin
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Lester Brickman & Lawrence A. Cunningham<\/em><\/td>\n		69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPractitioner\u2019s Corner \u2013 Remodeling the Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jamie Henikoff & Michael Moffitt<\/em><\/td>\n		87<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nGetting to \u201cGuilty\u201d: Plea Bargaining as Negotiation
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff<\/em><\/td>\n		115<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLawyers, Sex, and Marriage: Factors Empirically Correlated with the Decision to Settle
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>James Todd Kennard<\/em><\/td>\n		149<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBargaining in the Shadow of the Lawyers: Negotiated Settlement of Gender Discrimination Claims Arising from Termination of Employment
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Rachel H. Yarkon<\/em><\/td>\n		165<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPreserving Fairness in Arbitration Agreements: States\u2019 Options after Casarotto
\n<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/a> David Ling<\/em><\/td>\n		193<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDispute Resolution or Coercion: A Critique of the Six-Year Rule in Securities Arbitration
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Neil Steiner<\/em><\/td>\n		207<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nPublic Fuss in a Private Forum
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Margaret Ward<\/em><\/td>\n		217<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTools of the Trade: A Manual for the Settlement-Oriented Mediator
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David A. Hoffman<\/em><\/td>\n		229<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

VOL. 1 CONTENTS WINTER 1996<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\nPreface and Foreword<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nHow Would You Like to Pay for That? The Strategic Effects of Fee Arrangements on Settlement Terms
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Andrew T. Guzman<\/em><\/td>\n		53<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nScaling the Stonewall: Retaining Lawyers to Bolster Credibility
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David C. Croson & Robert H. Mnookin<\/em><\/td>\n		65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NOTES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nAlone in the Hallway: Challenges to Effective Self-Representation in Negotiation<\/strong><\/a>Erica L. Fox<\/td>\n85<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nDecision Analysis as a Mediator\u2019s Tool
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David P. Hoffer
\n<\/em><\/td>\n		113<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLawyers as Negotiators
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Gary Mendelsohn<\/em><\/td>\n		139<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CASE COMMENTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nFrom Procedural Law to Preemption: The Supreme Court\u2019s Transformation of the Federal Arbitration Act
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Megan P. Davis<\/em><\/td>\n		169<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nInstitutionalizing ADR: Wagshal v. Foster and Mediator Immunity
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Brian Dorini<\/em><\/td>\n		185<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Validity of Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Andrew C. Glass & Albert S. Lee<\/em><\/td>\n		193<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nLoyalty, Confidentiality and Attorney Mediators: Professional Responsibility in Cross-Profession Practice
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Michael Moffitt<\/em><\/td>\n		203<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nShopping for Legal Precedent Through Settlement-Related Vacatur
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Andrew S. Tulumello<\/em><\/td>\n		213<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Attorney Accountability Act: A Case Study of the Complexities of Incentive-Based Legal Reform
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jamie S. Henikoff & Scott R. Peppet<\/em><\/td>\n		223<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTo Enhance the Operation of Government: Reauthorizing the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>David Seibel<\/em><\/td>\n		239<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BOOK REVIEWS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nThe Nash Equilibrium Meets BATNA: Game Theory\u2019s Varied Uses in ADR Contexts
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Jeff Hawkins & Neil Steiner<\/em><\/td>\n		249<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nBreaking Down Barriers
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff<\/em><\/td>\n		257<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nIndustrial Relations Through a Negotiation Lens: A Model for Explaining Strategic Choice
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/a>Alissa Lee<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

You can view previous issues of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review in PDF form here. VOL. 20 CONTENTS Spring 2015 ARTICLES Federal Arbitration Act Preemption of State Public-Policy-Based Employment Arbitration Doctrine: An Autopsy and an Argument for Federal Agency Oversight.\u00a0E. Gary Spitko 1 Standards of Legitimacy in Criminal\u00a0Negotiations.\u00a0Wesley MacNeil Oliver and Rishi Batra 61 \u00a0 Mindfulness in the Heat of Conflict: Taking STOCK.\u00a0Leonard L. Riskin and Rachel Wohl 121 Med-Arb and the Legalization of Alternative […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":227,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-229","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSkE-3H","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/229\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hnlr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}