{"id":1391,"date":"2015-01-06T08:57:42","date_gmt":"2015-01-06T13:57:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/?p=1391"},"modified":"2020-06-23T16:04:03","modified_gmt":"2020-06-23T20:04:03","slug":"godless-gods-the-peshawar-school-attack-and-the-formidable-adversary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/2015\/01\/godless-gods-the-peshawar-school-attack-and-the-formidable-adversary\/","title":{"rendered":"Godless gods \u2013 The Peshawar School Attack and the Formidable Adversary"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Ayesha Malik, Contributing Editor of “islawmix.”<\/strong><\/em>[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0Click to access PDF Version of this article<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

It was a day that memorialised the 43rd<\/sup> anniversary of the Instrument of Surrender \u2013 a written agreement whereby West Pakistan\u2019s forces surrendered during the revolutionary independence war of 1971 that created the Republic of Bangladesh \u2013 marking the fall of Dhaka from East Pakistan.[2]<\/a> Juxtaposed against this lingering melancholy, the 16th<\/sup> of December 2014 also marked one of the blackest days in the lives of more than a hundred mothers in Peshawar. Around 10:00 am, six armed men disguised as soldiers stormed the Army Public School in the capital city of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP), indiscriminately firing on school children as they raided classroom after classroom.[3]<\/a><\/p>\n

Terrorist attacks have claimed thousands of innocent lives in Pakistan over the last several years, but the school children\u2019s massacre is the bloodiest in the Nation\u2019s recent history.[4]<\/a> It has also sparked unparalleled shock across the country and abroad \u2013 as people disbelievingly grieve the loss of young children attending an otherwise normal day in school.[5]<\/a><\/p>\n

The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), who took responsibility for the attack, claimed that it was undertaken as revenge for the ongoing military operation in Pakistan\u2019s tribal areas since summer 2014, which has killed almost a 1,000 militants and left tens of thousands people displaced.[6]<\/a> The brutality of this incident lends crucial insights into the perils of negotiating with radical elements. The Pakistani Government\u2019s policy to root out terrorists has been two-pronged and polarized \u2013 the government has sought to either negotiate with the TTP in the hope of salvaging peace through a deal \u2013 or when such peace deals have failed, the army has launched military operations to exterminate the Taliban, as was the case with the Swat operation in 2009 when the Malakand Accord broke down.[7]<\/a> The Malakand Accord, which was struck between the Pakistani Government and the TTP in February 2009, and involved making concessions to the militants including, inter alia<\/em>, the imposition of a radical form of Sharia<\/em> in the Malakand Division \u2013 a large region in the restive KP province \u2013 has already exposed the dangers of brokering a peace deal with the Taliban.[8]<\/a> The brazenness of the Peshawar school massacre also reveals how the alternative to a negotiated agreement \u2013 a military offensive \u2013 can be equally treacherous in fanning militants to retaliate.<\/p>\n

The difficulty is layered and involves a clash of ideologies \u2013 one that subscribes to an abrasive and virulent version of Islam and the other that is less of a religious ideology but tends to use religion as a political tool to further partisan agendas. Both ideologies are thereby fractured and insincere and spell deadlock from the onset. Both also suffer from the \u201cI Really Am Right\u201d problem outlined by Stone, Patton and Heen, Professors of Law at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Negotiation Project, in their seminal work, \u201cDifficult Conversations.\u201d[9]<\/a> The authors\u2019 write,<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s an old story of two clerics arguing about how to do God\u2019s work. In the spirit of conciliation, one finally says to the other, \u2018You and I see things differently, and that\u2019s okay. We don\u2019t need to agree. You can do God\u2019s work your way, and I\u2019ll do God\u2019s work His way.\u2019\u201d[10]<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The story epitomises the stubborn dogmatism adhered to by the Taliban in their ideological and theological outlook and underscores the perilous terrain that would shape the contours of engaging in discourse with them. It begs the question whether constructive dialogue is even a plausible reality where the adversary conforms to extremist views that remain impregnable to reason. Imran Khan, leader of Pakistan\u2019s Tehreek-e-Insaf party that won the KP province in 2013\u2019s general election, has been persistent in his calls to speak to the Taliban.[11]<\/a> Such calls not only reveal the cricketer-turned-politician\u2019s soft stance towards militant groups but must also be reassessed from the perspective of whether a meaningful exchange with such antagonists is even a remote possibility.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the dangers inherent in a military operation against the TTP have also manifested themselves through the grotesque horror of suicide attacks and blasts that have plagued the country; Pakistan saw a 48% rise in deaths in terrorists attacks in 2009[12]<\/a> following the launch of the army offensive in Swat and Waziristan provoking a backlash from the Taliban \u2013 with terror attacks having claimed 70,000 lives in the past 13 years.[13]<\/a> With those numbers in place, Pakistan\u2019s watershed moment is not readily decipherable, but the macabre scene that unfolded in December 2014 in Peshawar is being termed the strongest contender. And thus, more than ever today, the failure of these approaches to eradicate the TTP and other militant groups demands the adoption of a more feasible strategy that could work towards driving out extremists, addressing both the physical and ideological extermination of terrorists. However, the challenge remains: what form<\/em> would such a strategy take?<\/p>\n

One might ask whether Pakistan is in need of a revolution, and while the answer may be a resounding \u2018yes\u2019 \u2013 a revolution styled along the lines of the Arab Spring will prove to be an abject failure. It will do no more than reinforce the status quo and entrench what has become a mockery of an Islamic State. Indeed, Islam is seen smoldering in every corner in Pakistan \u2013 its spirit and letter having been defiled to the core. Pakistan\u2019s extremists have become the self-appointed warders of religion and have emptied the Divine from divinity and stand antithetical to everything that God stands for. If religion is to be adulterated both at the hands of extremists and at the hands of political forces as a contrivance, then Pakistan may be better off with an Ataturk-style revolution[14]<\/a>, transforming the country from a pseudo-religious Islamic State into a secular one. The worrying fact is that even if Pakistan does manage to alleviate the TTP internally, as the Peshawar shooting has shown (some of the attackers who spoke Arabic were foreigners[15]<\/a>), forces are joining their ranks from militant groups abroad. The ruthlessness of these \u201cGodless gods\u201d have led Pakistan into its nuclear winter and far from a Pakistani Spring being the antidote, an upheaval of great proportions may be required to counter this growing threat to the country\u2019s survival.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Ayesha Malik is a Contributing Editor of \u201cislawmix\u201d \u2013 a project incubated at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University and aimed at bringing clarity to Islamic law in the news. She is also the Sub-Editor of the Review of Religions Magazine, a journal focusing on comparative religion since 1902. Her writings have appeared in the Oxford Human Rights Hub Blog and the Cambridge Review of International Affairs Blog. She holds an LLB (Hons) from the University of London and an LLM from Harvard Law School.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> Zahoor Ahmad Rather, Victory Day in Golden Letters \u2013 War of Liberation, <\/em>2 Global J. Research Analysis 218, 218\u201321 (2013).<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> See e.g., Pakistan Taliban: Peshawar School Attack Leaves 141 Dead<\/em>, BBC News Asia (Dec. 16, 2014), http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-asia-30491435.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Id.<\/em><\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Id.<\/em><\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Jon Boone & Ewen MacAskill, Pakistan Responds to Peshawar School Massacre with strikes on Taliban<\/em>, The Guardian (Dec. 16, 2014), http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2014\/dec\/16\/pakistan-taliban-peshawar-massacre-attack.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> Dexter Filkins, Pakistan Pounds Taliban, Swelling Tide of Refugees<\/em>, The New York Times (May 8, 2009), http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/05\/09\/world\/asia\/09pstan.html?ref=global-home&_r=1&.<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> See e.g.<\/em> Bill Roggio, Pakistan to end military operation and implement sharia in<\/em> Malakand Division<\/em>, The Long War Journal, (Feb. 15, 2009), http:\/\/www.longwarjournal.org\/archives\/2009\/02\/pakistan_to_end_mili.php.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, & Sheila Heen, Difficult Conversations (2000).<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> Id<\/em>. at 41.<\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> See e.g.<\/em> Omar Waraich, Imran Khan: \u2018We need to talk to the Taliban. War is no solution,\u2019<\/em> The Independent (Feb. 14, 2014), http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/asia\/imran-khan-we-need-to-talk-to-the-taliban-war-is-no-solution-9129536.html.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> Declan Walsh, Pakistan suffers record number of deaths due to militant violence<\/em>, The Guardian (Jan. 11, 2010), http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2010\/jan\/11\/pakistan-militant-violence-death-toll.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> Aamer Ahmed Khan, Peshawar school massacre: Pakistan\u2019s watershed Taliban moment?<\/em>, BBC News Asia (Dec. 18, 2014), http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-asia-30532846.<\/p>\n

[14]<\/a> Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was a Turkish nationalist leader and founder and first president of the Republic of Turkey. He initiated a series of social and political reforms in the 1920s to modernize Turkey following the fall of the Ottoman Sultanate.<\/p>\n

[15]<\/a> See<\/em> Attackers were speaking Arabic, says witness<\/em>, Dunya News (Dec. 16, 2014), http:\/\/dunyanews.tv\/index.php\/en\/Pakistan\/250263-Attackers-were-speaking-Arabic-says-witness-.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Ayesha Malik, Contributing Editor of “islawmix.”[1] \u00a0Click to access PDF Version of this article It was a day that memorialised the 43rd anniversary of the Instrument of Surrender \u2013 a written agreement whereby West Pakistan\u2019s forces surrendered during the revolutionary independence war of 1971 that created the Republic of Bangladesh \u2013 marking the fall […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":101946,"featured_media":1338,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-online-journal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/83\/2014\/07\/HHRJLOGO1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101946"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1391"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1391\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/hrj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}