{"id":1715,"date":"2006-06-01T09:03:37","date_gmt":"2006-06-01T13:03:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/site\/?p=1715"},"modified":"2011-03-09T18:38:56","modified_gmt":"2011-03-09T22:38:56","slug":"issue_47-2_westbrook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/2006\/06\/issue_47-2_westbrook\/","title":{"rendered":"Theorizing the Diffusion of Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Excerpt from the Keynote Address:<\/strong><\/span>*<\/p>\n<p>Good  morning. I am, on the whole, delighted to be here, and I thank the  Harvard International Law Journal for inviting me. From their  invitation, the editors want a quick overview of the way law changes in  world history, incorporating the reams of scholarship produced by the  host of legal notables here assembled. I am happy to oblige, although I  must say that the task is a bit daunting.<\/p>\n<p>The certainty of my  failure, however, is not the only reason my delight in this invitation  is not completely unalloyed. After all, I am used to my reach exceeding  my grasp, frustrated ambitions, and the like, although I usually try to  keep that familiar sinking feeling to myself. My problem is that giving  the opening remarks to a symposium like this one forces me to admit  publicly that I am \u2014 \u201cmature\u201d would be euphemistic, there\u2019s no getting  around it \u2014 downright middle-aged. A responsible member of the  established order, rather than the fine young barbarian I still fancy  myself. Frankly, it\u2019s depressing.<\/p>\n<p>Seriously, I am delighted to be here. Thank you.<\/p>\n<p>I  have three objectives for my talk this morning. First, I want to  provide an idiosyncratic account of some of the ways the diffusion of  law, or more generally, social authority in an age of globalization, may  be rethought. While there is currently little consensus on such  matters, we will, no doubt, iron everything out in the course of the  day.<\/p>\n<p>Second, since this is a keynote, I feel some obligation to  be useful. I hope the theoretical account that I provide here will be  sturdy enough to aid more focused discussions in the panels.<\/p>\n<p>Third,  I want to say a little bit about those highfalutin\u2019 intellectual  practices referred to as theories. That is, I want to close on a  meta-meta note, and conclude by providing a theoretical comment on  theorizing. This is, after all, a weekend, and we should enjoy  ourselves.<\/p>\n<p>The phrase \u201cdiffusion of law\u201d sounds most naturally in  comparative law. Understanding what diffusion means and how it happens,  what changes and what stays the same, is perhaps the central problem in  the field. My commentators, and many other participants in this  symposium, are very eminent comparatists, franchise players in the  painfully erudite and often surprisingly heated debates that mark  comparative law. In such company, it would be redundant and downright  foolhardy of me to treat the diffusion of law as a question of  comparative law \u2014 I leave that to other knights.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of  plunging into the debates surrounding the diffusion of law as construed  by eminent comparatists, let me begin by considering the title of this  symposium; I think it is quite smart. Had the word globalization\u201d been  used instead, it would have prefigured and foreclosed too much of the  discussion. Yet globalization cannot be avoided because, as this  symposium\u2019s opening statement makes clear, the diffusion of law cannot  be separated from those social processes discussed under the rubric of  globalization. In a globalizing world, we might expect to find quite a  lot of diffusion, both of law and other things.<\/p>\n<p><em>* This excerpt does not include citations.  To read the entire article, including supporting notes, please download  the PDF.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have three objectives for my talk this morning. First, I want to provide an idiosyncratic account of some of the ways the diffusion of law, or more generally, social authority in an age of globalization, may be rethought. While there is currently little consensus on such matters, we will, no doubt, iron everything out in the course of the day.<\/p>\n<p>Second, since this is a keynote, I feel some obligation to be useful. I hope the theoretical account that I provide here will be sturdy enough to aid more focused discussions in the panels.<\/p>\n<p>Third, I want to say a little bit about those highfalutin\u2019 intellectual practices referred to as theories. That is, I want to close on a meta-meta note, and conclude by providing a theoretical comment on theorizing. This is, after all, a weekend, and we should enjoy ourselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_FSMCFIC_featured_image_caption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_nocaption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_hide":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[123],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-print-archives"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZu3S-rF","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}