Posted by Guo Cai \u2013 December 6, 2013 @ 10:42<\/p>\n
On November 14-16, the Asian Society of International Law held its 4th Biennial Conference encompassing a wide range of topics.\u00a0<\/a>The highlight of the conference, however, was the ongoing South China Sea dispute between the Philippines and China, a current case before the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (\u201cITLOS\u201d).<\/p>\n In a panel discussion entitled \u201cContemporary Issues in the Law of the Sea,\u201d Professor Harry Roque from the University of Philippines argued<\/a>\u00a0that the Philippines\u2019 claims against China concerned issues within the compulsory jurisdiction of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (\u201cUNCLOS\u201d)\u2014that is, not involving any reservations made by China. Professor Roque reports<\/a>\u00a0that his presentation was immediately rebutted by H.E. Judge Xue,<\/a>\u00a0China\u2019s member of the ICJ, who, in her personal capacity (not representing the view of China), opined that the UNCLOS dispute involved \u201cterritorial claims\u201d which fall outside UNCLOS jurisdiction. Judge Xue also referred to a code of conduct established between ASEAN States and China pertaining to the South China Sea,<\/a>\u00a0under which disputes must be resolved through negotiation and not through arbitration.<\/p>\n The South China Sea arbitral proceeding started on January 22 of this year, when the Republic of the Philippines served a Notification and Statement of Claims<\/a>\u00a0<\/b>to the People\u2019s Republic of China pursuant to Annex VII to the\u00a0UNCLOS. The Philippines made four claims: (1) China\u2019s nine-dashed line is invalid; (2) China occupied mere rocks on Scarborough Reef rather than significant features; (3) China\u2019s structures on submerged features are illegal; and (4) Chinese harassment of Philippine nationals at sea is illegal.<\/p>\n On February 19, China presented a Note Verbale to the Philippines<\/a>\u00a0in which it rejected and returned the Philippines\u2019 Notification. Despite China\u2019s refusal to participate in the ITLOS proceedings, ITLOS completed its appointment of a five-man tribunal to hear the case<\/a>\u00a0on April 24, 2013. On July 11, the Tribunal established rules of procedure and an initial timetable<\/a>\u00a0<\/b>for hearing the dispute, requiring the Philippines to file a memorial that fully addresses \u201call issues\u201d by March 30, 2014.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Posted by Guo Cai \u2013 December 6, 2013 @ 10:42 On November 14-16, the Asian Society of International Law held […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7170,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_FSMCFIC_featured_image_caption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_nocaption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_hide":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[125],"tags":[233,236,279,234,235,238,237],"class_list":["post-7164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digest","tag-asian-society-of-international-law","tag-china","tag-digest","tag-international-tribunal-on-the-law-of-the-sea","tag-philippines","tag-south-china-sea","tag-territorial-dispute"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/84\/2013\/12\/Cai_131206.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZu3S-1Ry","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/ilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}