{"id":1367,"date":"2013-10-08T08:12:26","date_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:12:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=934"},"modified":"2013-10-08T08:12:26","modified_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:12:26","slug":"vols-13-19","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/vols-13-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Vols. 13-19"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

Volume 19 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 19 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 19 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 18 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 18 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 18 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 17 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 17 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 17 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 16 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 16 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 16 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 15 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 15 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 15 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 14 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 14 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 14 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 13 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 13 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 13 – Issue 1<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 19, Number 3<\/strong> Spring 1996<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Group Rights, Victim Status, and the Law<\/p>\n

The Eighth Annual Federalist Society Lawyers Convention<\/p>\n

Opening Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

How Should Society Handle Injustice? Alan L. Keyes <\/em> p. 645<\/p>\n

Panel I: Victimology, Regulation, and the Transformation of the Common Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

Using Common Law Principles in Regulatory Schemes (With a Note on Victimology) Cass R. Sunstein <\/em> p. 651<\/p>\n

Regulatory Rent-Seekers in the Media, Bar, and Bureaucracy C. Boyden Gray<\/em> p. 657<\/p>\n

Self-Correction Mechanisms in the Regulatory System David C. Vladeck<\/em> p. 661<\/p>\n

Hope for the Tort System: Congressional Proposals for Reform Christopher Cox<\/em> p. 667<\/p>\n

Addresses<\/strong><\/p>\n

Victims and Heroes in the Benevolent State Clarence Thomas<\/em> p. 671<\/p>\n

Welfare As a Moral Problem Gertrude Himmelfarb<\/em> p. 685<\/p>\n

Panel II: Accused as Victim\u2014the Case of Criminal Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

Victims and the Exclusionary Rule Daniel E. Lungren<\/em> p. 695<\/p>\n

Demystifying the Abuse Excuse: Is There One? Peter Arenella<\/em> p. 703<\/p>\n

Criminal Procedure: Moving from the Accused As Victim to the Accused Joseph D. Grano<\/em> p. 711<\/p>\n

Conservatives’ Selective Use of Race in the Law Randall L. Kennedy<\/em> p. 719<\/p>\n

Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

Address: Individualism before Multiculturalism Glenn C. Loury<\/em> p. 723<\/p>\n

Panel III: Feminism, Multiculturalism, and the Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

Women: An Uncertain Fit for the Multicultural Movement? Walter Berns<\/em> p. 733<\/p>\n

\u201cI Want You:\u201d Uncle Sam As Mr. Right Linda Chavez<\/em> p. 739<\/p>\n

From \u201cColorblind\u201d White Supremacy to American Multiculturalism Jamin B. Raskin<\/em> p. 743<\/p>\n

Restructuring Work and Family Entitlements around Family Values Joan C. Wililams<\/em> p. 753<\/p>\n

Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

The D.C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race, and Ethnic Bias: Political Correctness Rebuffed Laurence H. Silberman<\/em> p. 759<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Affirmative Action\u2014Moral Obligation and Practical Necessity, or the Road to Hell?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Real Problem Abigail Thernstrom<\/em> p. 767<\/p>\n

Affirmative Action Is No Civil Right Robert Woodson<\/em> p. 773<\/p>\n

Three Models of Affirmative Action Beneficiaries Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 779<\/p>\n

Closing Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

Improving Culture to End Racism: Closing Address Dinesh D’Souza<\/em> p. 785<\/p>\n

Article<\/strong><\/p>\n

How Do the Courts Really<\/em> Discover Unenumerated Fundamental Rights? Cataloguing the Methods of Judicial Alchemy David Crump<\/em> p . 795<\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

Utopia\u2019s Law, Politics\u2019 Constitution John C. Harrison<\/em> 917<\/p>\n

Recent Case<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Court of Appeals, 1995<\/p>\n

The Scope and Constitutionality of Judicial Review Under the Tunney Act: United States v. Microsoft Corp.<\/em>, 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995) 941<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 19, Number 2<\/strong> Winter 1996<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Originalism, Democracy, and the Constitution<\/p>\n

The Fourteenth Annual National Student Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Poilcy\u20141995<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Welcoming Remarks Robert W. Bennett <\/em> p. 237<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks Calabresi, Steven G. <\/em> p. 239<\/p>\n

Panel I: Originalism and the Dead Hand<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Daniel D. Polsby <\/em> p. 243<\/p>\n

Dead Hand of the Architect Daniel A. Farber<\/em> p. 245<\/p>\n

Original Constitution and Our Origins McGinnis, John O. <\/em> p. 251<\/p>\n

Dead Hand of Constitutional Tradition Michael S. Moore <\/em> p. 263<\/p>\n

Dead Hand and Constitutional Amendment Lawrence G. Sager<\/em> p. 275<\/p>\n

Panel II: Constitutionalism and Originalism<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Stephen Chapman p. 281<\/p>\n

Integrity and Impersonality of Originalism Lillian R. BeVier <\/em> p. 283<\/p>\n

It’s Not Constitutionalism, It’s Judicial Activism Lino A. Graglia <\/em> p. 293<\/p>\n

Originalism As an “Ism” Jonathan R. Macey <\/em> p. 301<\/p>\n

Five Theses on Originalism Cass R. Sunstein <\/em> p. 311<\/p>\n

Panel III: What Is Originalism?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: A View for the Legislative Branch David M. McIntosh <\/em> p. 317<\/p>\n

Originalism, Or Who Is Fred? Larry Alexander<\/em> p. 321<\/p>\n

A Text Is Just a Text Paul F. Campos <\/em> p. 327<\/p>\n

\u201cOriginalist\u201d Values and Constitutional Interpretation Richard S. Kay<\/em> p. 325<\/p>\n

Defining Originalism Frederick Schauer<\/em> p. 343<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Is Originalism Possible? Normative Indeterminacy and the Judicial Role<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Edwin Meese III <\/em> p. 347<\/p>\n

Nonoriginalist Perspective on the Lessons of History Michael C. Dorf<\/em> p. 351<\/p>\n

Some Doubts on Constitutional Indeterminacy Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 363<\/p>\n

Normative Indeterminacy and the Problem of Judicial Role Michael J. Perry<\/em> p. 375<\/p>\n

Writing of the Constitution and the Writing on the Wall Steven D. Smith<\/em> p. 391<\/p>\n

Panel V: Is Originalism Possible? Historical Indeterminacy<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Stephen B. Presser<\/em> p. 401<\/p>\n

The Relevance of the Framers’ Intent Randy E. Barnett<\/em> p. 403<\/p>\n

Legal Indeterminacy: Its Cause and Cure Gary Lawson<\/em> p. 411<\/p>\n

Originalism and Indeterminacy Thomas B. McCaffee<\/em> p. 429<\/p>\n

The Indeterminacy of Historical Evidence Suzanna Sherry<\/em> p. 437<\/p>\n

Panel VI: The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Did the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights Against States? Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 443<\/p>\n

A Minimalist Approach to the Fourteenth Amendment Earl M. Maltz<\/em> p. 451<\/p>\n

The Originalist Case for Brown v. Board of Education Michael W. McConnell<\/em> p. 457<\/p>\n

Conservatives v. Originalism Jeffrey Rosen<\/em> p. 465<\/p>\n

Panel VII: Alternatives to Originalism<\/strong> Introduction John Fund<\/em> p. 475<\/p>\n

Alternatives to Originalism? Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 479<\/p>\n

Political Function of Originalist Ambiguity Richard H. Fallon Jr. <\/em> p. 487<\/p>\n

The Limited Relevance of Originalism in the Actual Performance of Legal Roles Sanford Levinson<\/em> p. 495<\/p>\n

Bork v. Burke Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 509<\/p>\n

Interpretivism and the Judicial Role in a Constitutional Democracy: Seeking an Alternative to Originalism Martin H. Redish<\/em> p. 525<\/p>\n

Article<\/strong><\/p>\n

Truman, Korea, and the Constitution: Debunking the Imperial President Myth Robert F. Turner<\/em> p. 533<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of the United States, 1994 Term<\/p>\n

Tearing Down the Wall: Rosenberger v. Rector of the University of Virginia<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 2510 (1995) p. 587<\/p>\n

Protecting Private Religious Speech in the Public Forum: Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 2440 (1995) p. 608<\/p>\n

The Precarious Position of Commercial Speech: Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co., 115 S. Ct. 1585 (1995) p. 612<\/p>\n

Recent Cases<\/strong> The United States Court of Appeals, 1995<\/p>\n

Good Friday Vacation as an Establishment of Religion: Metzl v. Leininger<\/em>, 57 F.3d 618 (7th Cir. 1995) p. 627<\/p>\n

Speaking in Tongues: Whose Rights at Stake? Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English<\/em>, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995) (en banc) p. 634<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 19, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 1995<\/h3>\n

Volume Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction to Volume Nineteen The Hon. Alex Kozinski<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Interpreting the Constitution: Is the Intent of the Framers Controlling? If Not, What Is? Boris I. Bittker<\/em> p. 9<\/p>\n

Construction Union Use of Environmental Regulation to Win Jobs: Cases, Impact, and Legal Challenges Herbert R. Northrup & Augustus T. White<\/em> p. 55<\/p>\n

The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution of 1937 on the Dormant Commerce Clause: A Case Study in the Decline of State Autonomy Earl M. Maltz<\/em> p. 121<\/p>\n

At Last, the Supreme Court Solves the Takings Puzzle Douglas W. Kmiec<\/em> p. 147<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of the United States, 1994 Term<\/p>\n

The Reemergence of the Commerce Clause as a Limit of Federal Power: United States v. Lopez<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995) p. 161<\/p>\n

Federal Preculsion of State-Imposed Congressional Term Limits: U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 1842 (1995) p. 174<\/p>\n

Constitutional Limits on Racial Redistricting: Miller v. Johnson<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 2475 (1995) p. 200<\/p>\n

Suspicionless Drug Testing and the Fourth Amendment: Vermonia School District 47J v. Acton<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 2386 (1995) p. 209<\/p>\n

Recent Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Court of Appeals, 1994-95<\/p>\n

Bank Holding Companies and \u201cThe Business of Insurance:\u201d Interpretations of McCarran-Ferguson in Owensboro National Bank v. Stephens<\/em>, 44 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1994), and Barnett Bank v. Gallagher<\/em>, 43 F.3d 631 (11th Cir. 1995) p. 271<\/p>\n

Tilting the Table: Collective Bargaining After National Basketball Ass\u2019n v. Williams<\/em>, 45 F.3d 684 (2d Cir. 1995) p. 228<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 18, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1995<\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Access Demands to Pyament Systems Joint Ventures David A. Balto<\/em> p. 623<\/p>\n

The Politics of Corporate Governance Stephen M. Bainbridge<\/em> p. 671<\/p>\n

Harnessing the Free Market: Reinsurance Models for FDIC Deposit Insurance Pricing Anna Kuzmik Walker<\/em> p. 735<\/p>\n

Games Civil Contemnors Play Linda S. Beres<\/em> p. 795<\/p>\n

Stranded Costs William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak<\/em> p. 835<\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Lawyer Lectures a Judge Raoul Berger<\/em> p. 851<\/p>\n

Comment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Forbidden Favortism in the Government Accommodation of Religion: Grumet<\/em> and the Case for Overturning Aguilar<\/em><\/p>\n

Basilios E. Tsingos<\/em> p. 867<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of the United States 1993 & 1994 Terms<\/p>\n

The Ever More Complicated \u201cActual Innocence\u201d Gateway to Habeas Review: Schlup v. Delo<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 851 (1995) p. 889<\/p>\n

Federal Preemption of State Consumer fraud Regulation, American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 817 (1995) p. 903<\/p>\n

The First Amendment and Cable Television: Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC<\/em>, 114 S. Ct. 2445 (1995) p. 916<\/p>\n

The Increased Need for Stronger Anti-Child Pornography Statutes in the Wake of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.<\/em>, 115 S. Ct. 464 (1994) p. 929<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 18, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1995<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Feminism, Sexual Distinctions, and the Law<\/p>\n

The Thirteenth Annual National Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Policy\u20141994<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and the Role of Interdisciplinary Studies Robert E. Scott<\/em> p. 321<\/p>\n

Panel I: What Is Feminist Legal Theory?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Feminist Legal Theories Gary Lawson<\/em> p. 325<\/p>\n

Two Challenges for Feminist Thought Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 331<\/p>\n

Feminist Theory and Law Martha L. A. Fineman<\/em> p. 349<\/p>\n

Of Richard Epstein and Other Radical Feminists Mary Anne Case<\/em> p. 369<\/p>\n

Ideas Have Consequences Rosalie Silberman<\/em> p. 409<\/p>\n

Panel II: The Constitution on Sex<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gender Discrimination and the Original Understanding Earl M. Maltz<\/em> p. 415<\/p>\n

The Proposed Equal Protection Fix for Abortion Law:<\/p>\n

Reflections on Citizenship, Gender, and the Constitution Anita L. Allen<\/em> p. 419<\/p>\n

Thoughts from a \u201cReal\u201d Woman Lillian R. BeVier<\/em> p. 457<\/p>\n

Women and the Constitution Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 465<\/p>\n

Panel III: Among Friends and Colleagues: Harassment, Sex Discrimination, and Rape<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Promise and Problems of Sexual Harassment Litigation J. Harvie Wilkinson III<\/em> p. 475<\/p>\n

Unfree Speech Michael P. McDonald<\/em> p. 479<\/p>\n

Sexual Harassment: Ideology or Law? George Rutherglen<\/em> p. 487<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Feminism, Children and the Family<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Laurence Silberman<\/em> p. 501<\/p>\n

Feminism, Children and the Family Elizabeth Fox-Genovese<\/em> p. 503<\/p>\n

The Housewife as Pariah F. Carolyn Graglia<\/em> p. 509<\/p>\n

Feminism and the Family Daniel R. Ortiz<\/em> p. 523<\/p>\n

Ozzie and Harriet Had it Right Daniel D. Polsby<\/em> p. 531<\/p>\n

Panel V: Women, Rational Choice, and Sexual Strategies<\/strong><\/p>\n

Evolution and Human Mating David M. Buss<\/em> p. 537<\/p>\n

Bargaining and Gender Carol M. Rose<\/em> p. 547<\/p>\n

Beyond \u201cHaving it All\u201d Jennifer Roback Morse<\/em> p. 565<\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

Defending the Wall: Maintaining Church\/State Separation in America Arlen Specter<\/em> p. 575<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of the United States, 1993 Term Dolan<\/em> and the \u201cRough Proportionality\u201d Standard: Taking its Toll on Loretto\u2019s Bright Line: Dolan v. City of Tigard<\/em>, 114 S. Ct. 2309 (1994) p. 591<\/p>\n

Implied Liability Under \u00a7 10(b) of the Securities Act of 1934: Central Bank v. First Interstate Bank<\/em>, 114 S. Ct. 1439 (1994) p. 603<\/p>\n

Community Aesthetics and Speech Regulation: City of Ladue v. Gilleo<\/em>, 114 S. Ct. 2038 (1994) p. 612<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 18, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 1994<\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Are Congressional Term Limits Constitutional? Daniel Hays Lowenstein<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

The \u201cPresumption of Constitutionality\u201d Doctrine and the Rehnquist Court: A Lethal Combination for Individual Liberty David M. Burke<\/em> p. 73<\/p>\n

Etiquette Tips: Some Implications of \u201cProcess Federalism\u201d Calvin R. Massey<\/em> p. 175<\/p>\n

The Case for Public Single-Sex Education Kristin S. Caplice<\/em> p. 227<\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Partial Constitution or the Sunstein Constitution? David B. Rivkin, Jr.<\/em> p. 293<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 17, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1994<\/h3>\n

Symposium on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof<\/strong><\/p>\n

Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue<\/p>\n

Foreword: The Power of Presumptions Randy E. Barnett<\/em> p. 613<\/p>\n

How Presumptions Should Be Allocated<\/strong><\/p>\n

Burdens of Proof, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Modern Legal Discourse Ronald J. Allen<\/em> p. 627<\/p>\n

Civility and the Burden of Proof Dale A. Nance<\/em> p. 647<\/p>\n

Presumptions and Transcendentalism<\/strong><\/p>\n

You Prove It! Why Should I? Lawrence B. Solum<\/em> p. 691<\/p>\n

Defrocking the Courts: Resolving \u201cCases or Controversies,\u201d Not Announcing Transcendental Truths Mark D. Rosen<\/em> p. 715<\/p>\n

The Enlightenment of Dialectics: Strategies Involved in Burdens of Proof Gregory M. Klass & Gustavo Faigenbaum<\/em> p. 735<\/p>\n

Presumptive Reasoning Applied to Legal Doctrine<\/strong><\/p>\n

Presumptions and Burdens of Proof as Tools for Legal Stability and Change Tamar Frankel<\/em> p. 759<\/p>\n

Default Presumptions in Legislation: Implementing Children;\u2019s Services Richard H. Gaskins<\/em> p. 779<\/p>\n

Article<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Persistence of Local Legal Culture: Twenty Years of Evidence From the Federal Bankruptcy Courts Teresa A. Sullivan, Elizabeth Warren & Jay Lawrence Westbrook<\/em> p. 801<\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

Unleashing RICO Matthew C. Blickensderfer<\/em> p. 867<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Refining the Revlon Doctrine\u2019s Applicability to Changes of Control: Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc.<\/em>, 637 A.3d 34 (Del. 1993) p. 895<\/p>\n

Gestational Surrogacy and the Meaning of \u201cMother\u201d: Johnson v. Calvert<\/em>, 852 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1993) p. 907<\/p>\n

The Graham Doctrine as a Weapon Against Substantive Due Process: Albright v. Oliver<\/em>, 114 S. C.t 807 (1994) p. 918<\/p>\n

The Lack of a Judicial Policy Addressing Maternal Drug Abuse Cases: Commonwealth v. Welch<\/em>, 864 S.W.2d 280 (Ky. 1993) p. 929<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 17, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1994<\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Antitrust Immunity: State Action and Federalism, Petitioning and the First Amendment David McGowan & Mark A. Lemley<\/em> p. 293<\/p>\n

\u201cPlain Meaning\u201d: Justice Scalia\u2019s Jurisprudence of Strict Statutory Construction Bradley C. Karkkainen<\/em> p. 401<\/p>\n

Qualified Immunity or Absolute Immunity? The Moral Hazards of Extending Qualified Immunity to Lower-Level Public Officials Evan J. Mandery<\/em> p. 479<\/p>\n

One Person, One Vote Revisited: Choosing A Population Basis to Form Political Districts Scot A. Reader<\/em> p. 521<\/p>\n

Comment<\/strong><\/p>\n

After Gillette<\/em>: An Analysis of Premium Product Markets Under the 1992 Merger Guidelines<\/em><\/p>\n

David J. Dadoun & Diana L. Dietrich<\/em> P. 567<\/p>\n

Annual I.H.S.-Eberhard Student Writing Competition Winner<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Contractual Approach to Data Privacy Steven A. Bibas<\/em> p. 591<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 17, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 1994<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Decision-Making: The Role of Text, Precedent, and the Rule of Law<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Decisionmaking and the Growth of the Law Robert C. Clark<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

Panel I: The Enterprise of Judging<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Diversity of the Federalist Society Morris S. Arnold<\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n

Judicial Restraint: An Argument From Institutional Design Lillian R. BeVier<\/em> p. 7<\/p>\n

The Enterprise of Judging Russell K. Osgood<\/em> p. 13<\/p>\n

Panel II: Stare Decisis<\/em> and Constitutional Meaning<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Constitutional Case Against Precedent Gary Lawson<\/em> p. 23<\/p>\n

Reply to Lawson Charles Fried<\/em> p. 35<\/p>\n

On Lawson on Precedent Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 39<\/p>\n

Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms Frederick Schauer<\/em> p. 45<\/p>\n

Panel III: Text and History in Statutory Construction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Paul R. Michel<\/em> p. 57<\/p>\n

Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 61<\/p>\n

Dictionaries, Plain Meaning, and Context in Statutory Interpretation A. Raymond Randolph<\/em> p. 71<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Non-Legal Theory in Judicial Decisionmaking<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cLegal\u201d Versus \u201cNon-Legal\u201d Theory Stephen F. Williams<\/em> p. 79<\/p>\n

Non-Legal Theory in Judicial Decisionmaking Richard H. Fallon, Jr.<\/em> p. 87<\/p>\n

Moral Philosophy and the Glen Ridge Rape Case Linda R. Hirshman<\/em> p. 101<\/p>\n

The Persuasive Influence of Economic Analysis on Legal Decisionmaking Jonathan R. Macey<\/em> p. 107<\/p>\n

Roundtable: The Supreme Court as a Political Institution <\/strong><\/p>\n

Do Judges Have a Policy-Making Role in the American System of Government? Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 119<\/p>\n

The Judiciary: Conservatism\u2019s Last Branch William Kristol<\/em> p. 131<\/p>\n

A Modest Proposal for a Political Court Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 137<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court as a Partially Political Institution Stephen Reinhardt<\/em> p. 149<\/p>\n

Judges as Liars Martin Shapiro<\/em> p. 155<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Expediting Impeachment: Removing Article III Federal Judges After Criminal Conviction Michael J. Broyde<\/em> p. 157<\/p>\n

The Federal Government and the Problem of Chinese Rights in the Era of the Fourteenth Amendment Earl M. Maltz<\/em> p. 223<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court of the United States, 1992 Term<\/p>\n

Penalty Enhancement for Bias-Based Crimes: Wisconsin v. Mitchell<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 2194 (1993) p. 253<\/p>\n

Animal Sacrifice and Equal Protection Free Exercise: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 2217 (1993) p. 262<\/p>\n

Federal Preemption of State Health and Safety Regulations: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 1732 (1993) p. 273<\/p>\n

Equal Protection and Race Conscious Reapportionment: Shaw v. Reno<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 2816 (1993) p. 283<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 16, Number 3<\/strong> Autumn 1993<\/h3>\n

Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue<\/p>\n

Symposium on Legal Formalism, 1992<\/p>\n

Foreword: The Challenge of Legal Formalism Dennis M. Patteron<\/em> p. 579<\/p>\n

The Jurisprudence of Legal Formalism Ernest J. Weinrib<\/em> p. 583<\/p>\n

Professor Weinrib\u2019s Formalism\u201d The Not-So-Empty Sepulchre Stephen R. Perry<\/em> p. 597<\/p>\n

Legal Formalism from the Perspective of a Reasonable Law Professor Jean C. Love<\/em> p. 627<\/p>\n

Coherence and Formalism Ken Kress<\/em> p. 639<\/p>\n

Formalism and Practical Reason, or How to Avoid Seeing Ghosts in the Empty Sepulchre Ernest J. Weinrib<\/em> p. 683<\/p>\n

Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Constitutionality of the False Claims Act\u2019s Qui Tam Provision James T. Blanch<\/em> p. 701<\/p>\n

Encouraging Product Safety Testing by Applying the Privilege of Self-Critical Analysis When Punitive Damages are Sought Paul B. Taylor<\/em> p. 769<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Review of Impeachment Proceedings: Nixon v. United States<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 732 (1993) p. 809<\/p>\n

Reapportionment and the Dilution of Minority Voting Strength: Growe v. Emison<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 1075 (1993), and Voinovich v. Quilter<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 1149 (1993) p. 820<\/p>\n

Civil Forfeiture and the Innocent Owner Defense: United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave.<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 1126 (1993) p. 835<\/p>\n

Habeas Corpus and \u201cActual Innocence\u201d: Herrera v. Collins<\/em>, 113 S. Ct. 853 (1993) p. 848<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 16, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1993<\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThirty Pieces of Silver\u201d for the Rights of Your People: Irresistible Offers Reconsidered as a Matter of State Constitutional Law William Van Alstyne<\/em> p. 303<\/p>\n

Private Interbank Discipline David G. Oedel<\/em> p. 327<\/p>\n

Recent Misinterpretations of the Avoidable Consequences Rule: The \u201cDuty\u201d to Mitigate and Other Fictions Jeffrey K. Riffer & Elizabeth Barrowman<\/em> p. 411<\/p>\n

De-Federalizing American Indian Commerce: Toward a New Political Economy for Indian Country Raymond Cross<\/em> p. 445<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court and Coerced Confessions: Arizona v. Fulminate<\/em> in Perspective William Gangi<\/em> p. 493<\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

Manners Makyth Man: The Prose Style of Justice Scalia Charles Fried<\/em> p. 529<\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

The American Bar Association: An Appearance of Propriety David M. Leonard<\/em> p. 537<\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

Morton J. Horowitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy Steven C. Papkin<\/em> p. 565<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 16, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 1993<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Legacy of the Federalist Papers<\/p>\n

Foreword: Two Visions of the Nature of Man Steven G. Calabresi & Gary Lawson<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

Panel I: Philosophical Foundations of The Federalist: The Nature of Law and the Nature of Man<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Federalist Papers: The Framers Construct an Orrery Harold H. Bruff<\/em> p. 7<\/p>\n

The Federalist Papers: From Practical Politics to High Principle Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 13<\/p>\n

Philosophical Foundations of The Federalist Papers: Nature of Man and Nature of Law Mary Ann Glendon<\/em> p. 23<\/p>\n

Panel II: To Govern and Be Governed: The Federalist\u2019s Vision of Representative Democracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Federalist Vision of a Representative Democracy James L. Ryan<\/em> p. 33<\/p>\n

Thoughts on the Federalist Vision of Representative Democracy as Viewed at the End of the Twentieth Century: How Have We Used the Legacy of The Federalist Papers? Jesse H. Choper<\/em> p. 35<\/p>\n

Remarks on The Federalist Number 10 David Epstein<\/em> p. 43<\/p>\n

Representative Democracy Jonathan R. Macey<\/em> p. 49<\/p>\n

Panel III: Liberty and Constitutional Architecture<\/strong><\/p>\n

Liberty and Constitutional Architecture James L. Buckley<\/em> p. 55<\/p>\n

Constitutional Architecture John S. Baker, Jr.<\/em> p. 59<\/p>\n

Individual Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Founders\u2019 Prompt Correction of Their Own Mistake Douglas Laycock<\/em> p. 75<\/p>\n

Liberty and Constitutional Architecture: The Rights-Structure Paradigm Geoffrey P. Miller<\/em> p. 87<\/p>\n

Debate<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Federalist and the Contemporary Debate on Term Limits<\/p>\n

Term Limitations: Breaking Up the Iron Triangle William Kristol<\/em> p. 95<\/p>\n

Some Arguments Against Congressional Term Limitations Nelso W. Polsby<\/em> p. 101<\/p>\n

Panel IV:<\/strong> The Anti-Federalists after 200 Years: Pundits or Prophets?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction Edwin Meese III<\/em> p.109<\/p>\n

Anti-Federalists, The Federalist Papers, and the Big Argument for Union<\/p>\n

\u201cIndependent of Heaven Itself\u201d: Differing Federalist and Anti-Federalist Perspectives on the Centralizing Tendency of the Federal Judiciary Charles J. Cooper<\/em> p. 119<\/p>\n

From Federal Union to National Monolith: Mileposts in the Demise of American Federalism Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 129<\/p>\n

Epilogue<\/strong><\/p>\n

Federalism in the Twenty-First Century: Will States Exist? Pete du Pont<\/em> p. 137<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Easing the Pressure on Pressure Groups: Toward a Constitutional Right to Lobby Andrew P. Thomas<\/em> p. 149<\/p>\n

A Multi-disciplinary Analysis of the Structure of Persuasive Arguments Paul T. Wanergin<\/em> p. 195<\/p>\n

The Economic Analysis of the Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate Martin Zelder<\/em> p. 241<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Revealing the Inadequacy of the Public Forum Doctrine: International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 2701 (1992) p. 269<\/p>\n

Establishment of Religion and High School Graduation Ceremonies: Lee v. Weisman<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 2649 (1992) p. 279<\/p>\n

The Beginning of the End of Peremptory Challenges: Georgia v. McCollum<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 2348 (1992) p. 287<\/p>\n

The Dormant Commerce Clause and the Interstate Shipmen of Waste: Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 2019 (1992) p. 294<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 15, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1992<\/h3>\n

Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n

Symposium on Risks and Wrongs<\/p>\n

University of San Diego, School of Law 1992<\/p>\n

Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice Larry Alexander<\/em> p. 621<\/p>\n

Risks and Wrongs Jules L. Coleman<\/em> p. 637<\/p>\n

Rational Choice and the Law Jean Hampton<\/em> p. 649<\/p>\n

Jules and the Tortist David Gauthier<\/em> p. 683<\/p>\n

On the Domain and Market Rhetoric Margaret Jane Radin<\/em> p. 711<\/p>\n

The Relation Between Competition and Cooperation Steven Walt<\/em> p. 733<\/p>\n

Interpreting Torts, Explaining Contracts Alan Schwartz<\/em> p. 747<\/p>\n

The Primacy of Cooperation, Rational Bargaining, and an Economic Theory of Part of the Common Law Christopher T. Wonnell<\/em> p. 771<\/p>\n

Rational Bargaining Theory and Contract: Default Rules, Hypothetical Consent, the Duty to Disclose, and Fraud Randy E. Barnett<\/em> p. 783<\/p>\n

Efficiency and Rational Bargaining in Contractual Settings Richard Craswell<\/em> p. 805<\/p>\n

Why is Corrective Justice Just? Emily Sherwin<\/em> p. 839<\/p>\n

Jules Coleman and Corrective Justice in Tort Law: A Critique and Reformulation Kenneth W. Simons<\/em> p. 849<\/p>\n

Rational Contractarianism, Corrective Justice, and Tort Law Richard J. Arneson<\/em> p. 889<\/p>\n

The Mixed Conception of Corrective Justice Stephen R. Perry<\/em> p. 917<\/p>\n

Tort Law as a Comparative Institution: Reply to Perry Claire Finkelstein<\/em> p. 939<\/p>\n

Article<\/strong><\/p>\n

Natural Rights and the Constitution: The Original \u201cOriginal Intent\u201d Terry Brennan<\/em> p. 965<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Limitations of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Presley v. Etowah County Commission<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 820 (1992) p. 1031<\/p>\n

The Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Statements by Child Victims of Sexual Abuse: White v. Illinois<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 736 (1992) p. 1040<\/p>\n

The Eighth Amendment in Section 1983 Cases: Hudson v. McMillian<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 995 (1992) p. 1050<\/p>\n

Criminal Anti-Profit Statutes and the First Amendment: Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. New York Crime Victims Bd.<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 501 (1991) p. 1060<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 15, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1992<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Free Market Environmentalism: The Role of the Market in Environmental Protection<\/p>\n

Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College–1991<\/p>\n

Free Market Versus Political Environmentalism Terry L. Anderson & Donald R. Leal<\/em> p. 297<\/p>\n

Debunking Wholesale Private Enforcement of Environmental Rights Edward Brunet<\/em> p. 311<\/p>\n

The Tragedy of the Commons, Part Two James E. Krier<\/em> p. 325<\/p>\n

Protecting the Environment from Orthodox Environmentalism James L. Huffman<\/em> p. 349<\/p>\n

The Fallacies of Free Market Environmentalism Michael C. Blumm<\/em> p. 371<\/p>\n

Behind Schedule and Over Budget: The Case of Markets, Water, and Environment Zach Willey<\/em> p. 391<\/p>\n

Property Rights, Environmental Resources, and the Future Richard L. Stroup & Sandra L. Goodman<\/em> p. 427<\/p>\n

A Property Rights Strategy for Protecting the Environment: A Comment on Stroup and Goodman Reuben C. Plantico<\/em> p. 455<\/p>\n

Bureaucratic Issues and Environmental Concerns: A Review of the History of Federal Land Ownership and Management Gary D. Libecap<\/em> p. 467<\/p>\n

Institutional Fantasylands: From Scientific Management to Free Market Environmentalism Peter S. Menell<\/em> p. 489<\/p>\n

Free Market Environmentalism: Wonder Drug or Snake Oil? William Funk<\/em> p. 511<\/p>\n

Escaping Environmental Feudalism Bruce Yandle<\/em> p. 517<\/p>\n

Article<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Worst Should Go First: Deferral Registries in Asbestos Litigation Peter H. Schuck<\/em> p. 541<\/p>\n

I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner<\/p>\n

Back to the Future: The Supreme Court\u2019s Retroactivity Jurisprudence Paul McGreal<\/em> p. 595<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 15, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 1992<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Bill of Rights After 200 Years<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Coexistence and Co-Dependence: Conservatism and Civil Liberties Ralph K. Winter<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

What is the Federalist Society? Owen M. Fiss<\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n

Panel I: Should the Bill of Rights Fully Protect Fundamental Freedoms?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Three Levels of Human Decisionmaking and the Protection of Fundamental Rights William P. Barr<\/em> p. 11<\/p>\n

The Untenable Case for an Unconditional Right to Shelter Robert C. Ellickson<\/em> p. 17<\/p>\n

The Indivisibility of Liberty Under the Bill of Rights Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 35<\/p>\n

What Constitutes Full Protection of Fundamental Freedoms? Nadine Strossen<\/em> p. 43<\/p>\n

Panel II: How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Freedom and Civil Liberties?<\/strong><\/p>\n

How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Individual Freedoms? Theodore B. Olson<\/em> p. 53<\/p>\n

The Effectiveness of Bills of Rights John S. Baker, Jr.<\/em> p. 55<\/p>\n

Bills of Rights and Regression to the Mean Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 71<\/p>\n

The Role of Institutional Factors in Protecting Individual Liberties Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 85<\/p>\n

The Bill of Rights in America and Central East Europe Herman Schwartz<\/em> p. 93<\/p>\n

Panel III: The Bill of Rights and Governmental Structure: Republicanism and Mediating Institutions<\/strong><\/p>\n

Some Comments on \u201cThe Bill of Rights as a Constitution\u201d Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 99<\/p>\n

On Madison and Majoritarianism: A Response to Professor Amar Walter Berns<\/em> p. 113<\/p>\n

On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial p. 199<\/p>\n

The Role of Government Under the Bill of Rights Kate Smith<\/em> p. 129<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

Interpreting the Bill of Rights: A Dichotomy of Jurisprudential Approaches Edwin D. Williamson<\/em> p. 139<\/p>\n

Originalism and the Bill of Rights Stephen L. Carter<\/em> p. 141<\/p>\n

How Should Courts Interpret the Bill of Rights? Lino A Graglia<\/em> p. 149<\/p>\n

An Interpretivist Agenda Gary S. Lawson<\/em> p. 157<\/p>\n

Debate<\/strong><\/p>\n

Should Congress Pass Legislation Overruling the Supreme Court\u2019s Decision in the \u201cPeyote Case,\u201d Which Limits the Scope of the Free Exercise of Religion?<\/p>\n

Religious Exercise: How Free? Edwin Meese III<\/em> The Free Exercise Clause as a Rule About Rules John Harrison<\/em> p. 169<\/p>\n

Should Congress Pass Legislation Restoring the Broader Interpretation of Free Exercise of Religion? Michael W. McConnell<\/em> p. 181<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Microenterprise: Human Reconstruction in America\u2019s Inner Cities Lewis D. Solomon<\/em> p. 191<\/p>\n

The Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading: A Legal, Economic, and Ethical Analysis Steven R. Salbu<\/em> p. 223<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The U.S. Supreme Court, 1990 Term<\/p>\n

Inferring Actual Malice from Altered Quotations, Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 2419 (1991) p. 255<\/p>\n

Confidential Media Sources and the First Amendment: Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.,<\/em> 111 S. Ct. 2513 (1991) p. 266<\/p>\n

The Death Penalty and Victim Impact Evidence: Payne v. Tennessee<\/em>, 11 S. Ct. 2597 (1991) p. 275<\/p>\n

Proportionality and the Eight Amendment: Harmelin v. Michigan<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 2680 (1991) p. 284<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 14, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1991<\/h3>\n

Symposium on Law and Philosophy<\/strong> Sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies<\/p>\n

Foreword: Unenumerated Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Randy E. Barnett<\/em> p. 615<\/p>\n

Rules and the Rule of Law Frederick Schauer<\/em> p. 645<\/p>\n

The Gap Larry Alexander<\/em> p. 695<\/p>\n

Rules and Social Facts Jules L. Coleman<\/em> p. 703<\/p>\n

Comment: Legal Theory and the Role of Rules Ruth Gavison<\/em> p. 727<\/p>\n

Three Concepts of Rules Michael S. Moore<\/em> p. 771<\/p>\n

Positivism, I Presume? . . . Comments on Schauer\u2019s \u201cRules and Rule of Law\u201d Gerald J. Postema<\/em> p. 797<\/p>\n

Presumptive Positivism and Trivial Cases Margaret Jane Radin<\/em> p.823<\/p>\n

The Rules of Jurisprudence: A Reply Frederick Schauer<\/em> p. 839<\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

Footnote 6: Justice Scalia\u2019s Attempt to Impose a Rule of Law on Substantive Due Process Gregory C. Cook<\/em> p. 853<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Extension to the Right to Counsel: Minnick v. Mississippi<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990) p. 895<\/p>\n

Regulation of Racist Speech: In re Welfare of R.A.V.<\/em>, 464 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1991) p. 903<\/p>\n

Sanctioning Clients Under Rule 11: Business Guides Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 922 (1991) p. 913<\/p>\n

Section 1983 Claims Involving Commerce Clause Violations: Dennis v. Higgins<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 865 (1991) p. 924<\/p>\n

Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases: Cheek v. United States<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 604 (1991) p. 931<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 14, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1991<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

American Education: Legal and Policy Issues<\/p>\n

What\u2019s Wrong With Our Universities? Derek Bok<\/em> p. 305<\/p>\n

What\u2019s Wrong With Our Universities? An Additional View A. Kenneth Pye<\/em> p. 335<\/p>\n

Achieving Our National Education Goals: Overarching Strategies Lauro F. Cavazos<\/em> p. 355<\/p>\n

Becoming Preeminent in Education: America\u2019s Greatest Challenge Augustus F. Hawkins<\/em> p. 367<\/p>\n

The Value of Private Property in Education: Innovation, Production, and Employment Philip K. Porter & Michael L. Davis<\/em> p. 397<\/p>\n

What Is a Teacher\u2019s Job?: An Examination of the Social and Legal Causes of Role Expansion and Its Consequences Judith H. Cohen<\/em> p. 427<\/p>\n

Is Local Control of the Schools Still a Viable Option? Charles F. Faber<\/em> p. 447<\/p>\n

Judicial Review of the Special Educational Program Requirements Under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Be Going? Dixie Snow Huefner<\/em> p. 483<\/p>\n

School Finance Litigation: A New Wave of Reform Julie K. Underwood & William E. Sparkman<\/em> p. 517<\/p>\n

Academic Tenure: An Economic Critique Robert W. McGee & Walter E. Block<\/em> p. 545<\/p>\n

Leaving Them Speechless: A Critique of Speech Restrictions on Campus Kathryn Marie Dessayer & Arthur J. Burke<\/em> p. 565<\/p>\n

I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Imbalance of Power and the Presidential Veto: A Case for the Item Veto Diane-Michele Krasnow<\/em> p. 583<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 14, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 1991<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Future of Civil Rights Law<\/p>\n

Panel I:<\/strong> What Are Civil Rights and to Whom Do They Belong?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: Civil Rights Politics as Interest-Group Politics Daniel B. Rodriguez<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

Some Observations on Broadly Construing Civil Rights Laws Charles A. Shanor<\/em> p. 8<\/p>\n

Women\u2019s Rights and Social Wrongs Deborah L. Rhode<\/em> p. 13<\/p>\n

Civil Rights, Human Rights, Gay Rights: Minorities and the Humanity of the Different Evan Wolfson<\/em> p. 21<\/p>\n

Panel II: The Role of Government in Closing the Socio-Economic Gap for Minorities<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Impact of Federal Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks John J. Donahue III<\/em> p. 41<\/p>\n

Addressing the Gap: Some Thoughts on the Government\u2019s Role Jeffery Robinson<\/em> p. 53<\/p>\n

The Separation of Race and States Jennifer Roback<\/em> p. 58<\/p>\n

Panel III:<\/strong> The Effects Test\u2013Forced Quotas or Elimination of Racism?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: The Age of Ambiguity Lawrence J. Siskind<\/em> p. 65<\/p>\n

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: From Prohibiting to Requiring Racial Discrimination in Employment Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 68<\/p>\n

Proving Discriminatory Intent in Constitutional Law Disparate Impact Cases William Cohen<\/em> p. 78<\/p>\n

Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio<\/em>: A Step Toward Eliminating Quotas in the American Workplace Charles J. Cooper<\/em> p. 84<\/p>\n

Competing Conceptions of \u201cRacial Discrimination\u201d: A Response to Cooper and Graglia Randall L. Kennedy<\/em> p. 93<\/p>\n

Panel IV: The Limits on Judicial Power in Ordering Remedies<\/strong><\/p>\n

Civil Rights and Remedies Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 103<\/p>\n

The Limitlessness of Judicial Capacity to Right Constitutional Wrongs Michael H. Sussman<\/em> p. 112<\/p>\n

Judicial Remedies: Braking the Power to Fix It William Bradford Reynolds<\/em> p. 120<\/p>\n

Panel V: New Frontiers in Civil Rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: A Walk Through the Civil Rights World R. Gaull Silberman<\/em> p. 129<\/p>\n

On the Right to Be Sheltered from the \u201cRight to Die\u201d Hadley Arkes<\/em> p. 131<\/p>\n

Unfinished Business: A Civil Rights Strategy for America\u2019s Third Century Clint Bolick<\/em> p. 137<\/p>\n

Civil Rights and the New Federal Judiciary: The Retreat from Fairness Stephen Reinhardt<\/em> p. 142<\/p>\n

Civil Rights, Economic Progress, and Common Sense Edwin Meese III<\/em> p. 150<\/p>\n

Panel VI: Civil Rights, Civility, and Free Speech\u2013What Takes Precedence?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Discriminatory Harassment and Free Speech Thomas C. Grey<\/em> p. 157<\/p>\n

Freedom Through Moral Education Alan L. Keyes<\/em> p. 165<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Exclusionary Rule and the Meaning of Separation of Powers Ruth W. Grant<\/em> p. 173<\/p>\n

The Social Costs of Populist Antitrust: A Public Choice Perspective Michael E. DeBow<\/em> p. 205<\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Clerisy of Power (review of Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law) David B. Sentelle<\/em> p. 225<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The U.S. Supreme Court, 1989 Term<\/p>\n

Abortion Parental Notification Statutes: Hodgson v. Minnesota<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2926 (1990) and Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2972 (1990) p. 237<\/p>\n

Constitutional Protection of the \u201cRefusal-of-Treatment\u201d: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2841 (1990) p. 248<\/p>\n

Equal Protection and Affirmative Action in Broadcast Licensing: Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission<\/em>, 110 S. Ct 2997 (1990) p. 259<\/p>\n

Federal Judicial Authority to Increase Local Taxes: Missouri v. Jenkins<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2997 (1990) p. 270<\/p>\n

Free Exercise of Religion: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 1595 (1990) p. 282<\/p>\n

Political Patronage and the First Amendment: Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990) p. 292<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 13, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1990<\/h3>\n

Symposium on Law and Philosophy<\/strong> Sponsored by the Institute for Human Studies<\/p>\n

Forward: Owning Ideas Dale A. Nance<\/em> p. 757<\/p>\n

What is Property? Boudewijn Bouckaert<\/em> p. 775<\/p>\n

Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects Tom G. Palmer<\/em> p. 817<\/p>\n

Economic Incentives in Markets for Information and Innovation Ejan Mackaay<\/em> p. 867<\/p>\n

Patents, Copyrights , and Trademarks: Property or Monopoly? Roger E. Meiners & Robert J. Staaf<\/em> p. 911<\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

A \u201cFrightful Political Dragon\u201d Indeed: Why Constitutional Challenges Cannot Subdue the Gerrymander Allan B. Moore<\/em> p. 949<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Child Abuse and the Fifth Amendment: Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 900 p. 1017<\/p>\n

Double Jeopardy, Due Process, and Evidence from Prior Acquittals: Dowling v. United States<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 668 (1990) p. 1027<\/p>\n

Foreigners, Foreign Property, and the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 1056 (1990) p. 1037<\/p>\n

Legislative Immunity and City Councils: Spallone v. United States<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 625 (1990) p. 1049<\/p>\n

Race-Based Peremptory Challenges and the Sixth Amendment: Holland v. Illinois<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 803 (1990) p. 1061<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 13, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1990<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Labor & Employment Law in the 1990s<\/p>\n

Forward Charles Fried<\/em> The Railway Labor Act\u2014Time for Repeal? Herbert R. Northup<\/em> Unions, Politics and Public Policy: A (Somewhat) Revisionist Approach Dan. C. Heldman<\/em> Will a More Interventionist NLRA Revive Organized Labor? Leo Troy<\/em> Revolution Ahead: Communications Workers v. Beck<\/em><\/p>\n

Rex H. Reed<\/em> A Subjectivist Economic Analysis of Government-Mandated Employee Benefits Don Bellante & Philip K. Porter<\/em> AIDS in the Workplace: Public and Corporate Policy Marian V. Heacock & Gregory P. Orvis<\/em><\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

Age Discrimination, Wages, and Economics: What Judicial Standard? Peter H. Harris<\/em> p. 715<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 13, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 1990<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Property: The Founding, the Welfare States, and Beyond<\/p>\n

Panel I: The Idea of Property<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: Property and Justice Tom Bethell<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n

Property and Necessity Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 2<\/p>\n

National Rights and Property Rights Ellen Frankel Paul<\/em> p. 10<\/p>\n

Debate <\/strong><\/p>\n

Liability\u2014The New \u201cNew Property\u201d<\/p>\n

Introduction: Of Profligacy, Piracy, and Private Property Alex Kozinski<\/em> p. 17<\/p>\n

Who Owns the Cherry Pit? Peter Huber<\/em> p. 22<\/p>\n

Tort Law and Deterrence: A Response to Dr. Huber Joseph A. Page<\/em> p. 30<\/p>\n

Panel II:<\/strong> Property and the Constitution<\/strong><\/p>\n

Forty Acres and a Mule: A Republican Theory of Minimal Entitlements Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 37<\/p>\n

Protecting Property\u2014Law and Politics Charles Fried<\/em> p. 44<\/p>\n

Private Property and Public Office Jeremy Rabkin<\/em> p. 54<\/p>\n

Property as Politics Frederick Schauer<\/em> p. 60<\/p>\n

Panel III:<\/strong> Regulation and Property\u2013Allies or enemies?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Three Systems of Land-Use Control Robert C. Ellickson<\/em> p. 67<\/p>\n

The (Unlikely) Death for Property James E. Krier<\/em> p. 75<\/p>\n

Takings Analysis of Regulations Gale A. Norton<\/em> p. 84<\/p>\n

Privprop, Regprop, and Beyond Richard B. Stewart<\/em> p. 91<\/p>\n

Panel IV: Intellectual and Informational Property Rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction: Property in Mass Media Law Lee C. Bollinger<\/em> p. 97<\/p>\n

Owning What Doesn\u2019t Exist Stephen L. Carter<\/em> p. 99<\/p>\n

Intellectual Property is Still Property Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 108<\/p>\n

Property Rights in Inventions, Writings, and Marks Edmund W. Kitch<\/em> p. 119<\/p>\n

Panel V:<\/strong> Ownership of Life<\/strong><\/p>\n

Surrogate Motherhood from the Perspective of Family Law Carl E. Schnierer<\/em> p. 125<\/p>\n

The Social Utility of Surrogacy Peter H. Schuck<\/em> p. 132<\/p>\n

Surrogacy, Slavery, and the Ownership of Life Anita L. Allen<\/em> p. 139<\/p>\n

The Personhood of Unborn Children: A First Principle in \u201cSurrogate Motherhood\u201d Analysis Walter M. Weber<\/em> p. 150<\/p>\n

Final Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rights and Realism\u2014Making the Constitution Work Edwin Meese III<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Regulation: Past Present, and Future Robert W. Hahn<\/em> p. 167<\/p>\n

Confirmation Ethics: President Reagan\u2019s Nominees to the United States Supreme Court Steven Lubet<\/em> p. 229<\/p>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Restrain and the Non-Decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services<\/em><\/p>\n

Christopher A Crain<\/em> p. 263<\/p>\n

Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Constitutionality of the Delaware Anti-Takeover States C. William Baxley<\/em> p. 319<\/p>\n

Judge versus Professor: Frank Easterbrook and the Wisconsin Anti-Takeover Statute Douglas L. Madsen<\/em> p. 355<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The U.S. Supreme Court, 1988 Term<\/p>\n

Constitutional Limits to Punitive Damage Awards: Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.<\/em>, 109 S. Ct. 2909 (1989) p. 369<\/p>\n

Disparate Impact Doctrine Revisited: Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio<\/em>, 109 S. Ct. 2115 (1989) p. 383<\/p>\n

Religious Displays and the First Amendment: County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union<\/em>, 109 S. Ct. 3086 (1989) p. 399<\/p>\n

Youth, Mental Retardation, and Capital Punishment: Penry v. Lynaugh<\/em>, 109 S. Ct. 2934 (1989) and Stanford v. Kentucky<\/em>, 109 S. Ct. 2969 (1989) p. 415<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Volume 19 – Issue 3 Volume 19 – Issue 2 Volume 19 – Issue 1 Volume 18 – Issue 3 Volume 18 – Issue 2 Volume 18 – Issue 1 Volume 17 – Issue 3 Volume 17 – Issue 2 Volume 17 – Issue 1 Volume 16 – Issue 3 Volume 16 – Issue 2 Volume 16 – Issue 1 Volume 15 – Issue 3 Volume 15 – Issue 2 Volume 15 – Issue […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1367","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-m3","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}