{"id":1368,"date":"2013-10-08T08:13:02","date_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:13:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=936"},"modified":"2013-10-08T08:13:02","modified_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:13:02","slug":"vols-20-24","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/vols-20-24\/","title":{"rendered":"Vols. 20-24"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#243\">Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 3<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#242\">Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 2<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#241\">Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 1<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#233\">Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 3<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#232\">Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 2<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#231\">Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 1<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#223\">Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 3<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#222\">Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 2<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#221\">Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 1<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#213\">Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 3<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#212\">Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 2<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#211\">Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 1<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#203\">Volume 20 &#8211; Issue 3<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#202\">Volume 20 &#8211; Issue 2<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"#201\">Volume 20 &#8211; Issue 1<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"243\"><\/a>Volume 24, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 2001<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Article<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Forward to Fundamental Alteration: Addressing ADA Title II Integration Lawsuits after Olmstead v. L. C. <em>Jefferson D.E. Smith &amp; Steve P. Calandrillo <\/em> p. 695<\/p>\n<p><strong>Essays<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cMultiply and Replenish\u201d: Considering Same-Sex Marriage in Light of State Interests in Marital Procreation <em>Lynn D. Wardle <\/em> p. 771<\/p>\n<p>Fourteenth Amendment Unenumerated Rights Jurisprudence: An Essay in Response to Stenberg v. Carhart <em>David M. Smolin<\/em> p. 815<\/p>\n<p><strong>Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo Law. . . Abridging\u201d <em>Joel M. Gora<\/em> p. 841<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United States Supreme Court, 1999 Term<\/p>\n<p>Yes, Virginia (Tech), Our Government Is One of Limited Powers: United States v. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000) p. 895<\/p>\n<p>Not Because They Are Brown, But Because of EA: Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000) p.921<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"242\"><\/a>Volume 24, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 2001<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Advice to the New American President<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Advice to the Next Conservative President of the United States <em>Steven G. Calabresi<\/em> p. 369<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles &amp; Essays<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Everything I Need to Know About Presidents I Learned from Dr. Seuss <em>Gary Lawson <\/em> p. 381<\/p>\n<p>White House Action on Civil Justice Reform: A Menu for the New Millennium <em>Victor E. Schwartz <\/em> p. 393<\/p>\n<p>Biological Terrorism: Legal Measures for Preventing Catastrophe <em>Barry Kellman <\/em> p. 417<\/p>\n<p>Ending Our Anti-Union Federal Employment Policy <em>Eugene Scalia <\/em> p. 489<\/p>\n<p>Advice to the New President on the FCC and Communications Policy <em>Daniel E. Troy <\/em> p. 503<\/p>\n<p>Judicial Selection: A Pragmatic Approach <em>Ed R. Haden <\/em> p. 531<\/p>\n<p>Civil Rights Law Enforcement: A Time for Healing <em>Clint Bolick<\/em> p. 555<\/p>\n<p>Religion, the Public Square, and the Presidency <em>Eric W. Treene <\/em> p. 573<\/p>\n<p>Reaffirming Marriage: A Presidential Priority <em>David Orgon Coolidge &amp; William C. Duncan <\/em> p. 623<\/p>\n<p>Free &amp; Green: A New Approach to Environmental Protection <em>Jonathan H. Adler <\/em> p. 653<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"241\"><\/a>Volume 24, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 2000<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Law and the Political Process<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Campaign Finance and Media Influence <em>Danny J. Boggs <\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n<p>Empirical Evidence in the Debate on Campaign Finance Reform <em>John R. Lott <\/em> p. 9<\/p>\n<p>The Constitutional Question <em>Frank I. Michelman <\/em> p. 17<\/p>\n<p>Against the Scribes: Campaign Finance Reform Revisited <em>John O. McGinnis<\/em> p. 25<\/p>\n<p>Freedom of Speech and Speech about Political Candidates: The Unintended Consequences of Three Proposals <em>Eugene Volokh <\/em> p. 47<\/p>\n<p>The Dangers, and Promise, of Shrink Missouri <em>E. Joshua Rosenkranz <\/em> p. 71<\/p>\n<p>Political Parties and Spending Limits <em>Jan Witold Baran <\/em> p. 83<\/p>\n<p>Oversight of Regulated Political Markets <em>Samuel Issacharoff<\/em> p. 91<\/p>\n<p>The Redistricting Cases: Original Mistakes and Current Consequences <em>Michael W. McConnell <\/em> p. 103<\/p>\n<p>Diffusion of Political Power and the Voting Rights Act <em>Richard H. Pildes <\/em> p. 119<\/p>\n<p>The Dirty Little Secrets of Shaw <em>Melissa L. Saunders <\/em> p. 141<\/p>\n<p>The Revitalization of Democracy in the New Millennium <em>Steven G. Calabresi <\/em> p. 151<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRevitalizing Democracy\u201d: Some Caveats <em>Charles Fried <\/em> p. 155<\/p>\n<p>The Necessity for Constrained Deliberation <em>Richard A. Epstein <\/em> p. 159<\/p>\n<p>Revitalizing Democracy <em>Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 165<\/p>\n<p>Power to the Voters <em>Richard D. Parker <\/em> p. 179<\/p>\n<p><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Constitution and the Courts: A Question of Legitimacy <em>James L. Buckley<\/em> p. 189<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Demystifying Antitrust State Action Doctrine <em>Steven Semeraro<\/em> p. 203<\/p>\n<p>Misunderstood Precedent: Andrew Jackson and the Real Case against Censure <em>James C. Ho<\/em> p. 283<\/p>\n<p><strong>Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Judicial Brezhnev Doctrine <em>Scott D. Gerber<\/em> p. 309<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United States Supreme Court, 1999 Term<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow Solemn Is the Duty of the Mighty Chief\u201d: Mediating the Conflict of Rights in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 120 S. Ct. 2446 (2000) p. 319<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"233\"><\/a>Volume 23, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 2000<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Right to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia <em>Neil M. Gorsuch<\/em> p. 599<\/p>\n<p>In Defense of the Exclusionary Rule <em>Timothy Lynch<\/em> p. 711<\/p>\n<p>Revitalizing Consent <em>Ilya Somin<\/em> p. 753 <strong>Essays<\/strong> Scholars and Judges: Reason and Power <em>Charles Fried<\/em> p. 807<\/p>\n<p>In Defense of Corporate Criminal Liability <em>Lawrence Friedman<\/em> p. 833<\/p>\n<p><strong>Empirical Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Assessing Regulatory Impact Analyses: The Failure of Agencies to Comply With Executive Order 12,866 <em>Robert W. Hahn, Jason K. Burnett, Yee-Ho I. Chan, Elizabeth A. Mader, and Petrea R. Moyle<\/em> p. 859<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"232\"><\/a>Volume 23, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 2000<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Alden Trilogy: Praise and Protest <em>Roger C. Hartley<\/em> p. 323<\/p>\n<p>A Blessing in Disguise: Protesting Minority Faiths Through State Religious Freedom Non-Restoration Acts <em>Gary S. Gildin<\/em> p. 411<\/p>\n<p>Death, Ethics, and the State <em>Brian C. Kalt<\/em> p. 487<\/p>\n<p><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Tenth Amendment Among the Shadows: On Reading the Constitution in Plato\u2019s Cave <em>Jay S. Bybee<\/em> p. 551<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United States Court of Appeal, 1999<\/p>\n<p>D.C. Circuit Revives Nondelegation Doctrine&#8230;Or Does It? American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. EPA, 175 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1999), modified, 195 F.3d 4 (D.C. Cir. 1999) p. 581<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"231\"><\/a>Volume 23, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 1999<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong> Competition, Free Markets, and the Law<\/p>\n<p>Federalist Society Assistant Editors p. 1<\/p>\n<p>Panel I: First Principles: Is There a Role for Antitrust Law? p. 3<\/p>\n<p>Does Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage? <em>Frank Easterbrook<\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n<p>Is Antitrust Obsolete? <em>Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 11<\/p>\n<p>The Case for Reforming the Antitrust Regulations (If Repeal is Not an Option) <em>Fred L. Smith, Jr.<\/em> p. 23<\/p>\n<p>Panel II: International Law &amp; Federalist: What Is the Reach of Regulation? p. 59<\/p>\n<p>Regulation of Franchisor Opportunism and Production of the Institutional Framework: Federal Monopoly or Competition Between the States? <em>Alan J. Meese<\/em> p. 61<\/p>\n<p>Externalities in Open Economy Antitrust and Their Implications For Internationl Competition Policy <em>Alan O. Sykes<\/em> p. 89<\/p>\n<p>International Law and Federalism: What is the Reach of Regulation? <em>Diane P. Wood<\/em> p. 97<\/p>\n<p>Debate: Public Choice: Do Politics Corrupt Antitrust Enforcement? p. 111<\/p>\n<p>The Politics of Federal Antitrust Enforcement <em>William J. Baer and David A. Balto<\/em> p. 113<\/p>\n<p>Economics Versus Politics in Antitrust <em>Fred S. McChesney<\/em> p. 133<\/p>\n<p>Panel III: Does Regulation Promote Efficiency in Network Industries? P. 145<\/p>\n<p>Network Industries and Antitrust <em>A. Douglas Melamed<\/em> p. 147<\/p>\n<p>Regulating Network Industries: A Look at Intel <em>Randal C. Picker<\/em> p. 159<\/p>\n<p>Panel IV: Does Consumer Choice Need to Be Managed? p. 195<\/p>\n<p>Should Government Attempt to Influence Consumer Preference? <em>Daniel D. Polsby<\/em> p. 197<\/p>\n<p>From Consumer Sovereignty to Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Incompletely Theorized Agreement? <em>Cass R. Sunstein<\/em> p. 203<\/p>\n<p>Using Warnings to Extend the Boundaries of Consumer Sovereignty <em>W. Kip Viscusi<\/em> p. 211<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Party Revisited: An Empirical Comparison of State and Lower Federal Court Interpretations of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission <em>Brett Christopher Gerry<\/em> p. 233 <strong>Recent Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United States Supreme Court, 1999 Term<\/p>\n<p>The Promise and Perils of \u201cPrivileges or Immunities\u201d: Saenz v. Roe, 119 S.Ct. 1518 (1999) p. 295<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"223\"><\/a>Volume 22, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1999<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Union \u201cCorporate Campaigns\u201d As Blackmail: The RICO Battle at Bayou Steel <em>Herbert R. Northrup and Charles H. Steen<\/em> p. 771<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTyphoid Mary\u201d Meets the ADA: A Case Study of the \u201cDirect Threat\u201d Standard Under the Americans with Disabilities Act <em>Jeffrey A. Van Detta<\/em> p. 849<\/p>\n<p>Religious Speech in the Workplace: Harassment Or Protected Speech? <em>Thomas C. Berg<\/em> p. 959<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/p>\n<p>Second-Guessing the Quality of Mercy: Due Process in State Executive Clemency Proceedings, Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard, 118 S.Ct. 1244 (1998) p. 1009<\/p>\n<p>Passing the Buck: The Supreme Court\u2019s Failure to Clarify Qualified Immunity Doctrine to Protect Public Officials From Frivolous Lawsuits, Crawford-El v. Britton, 118 S. Ct. 1584 (1998) p. 1031<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United States Court of Appeals, 1998<\/p>\n<p>Chevron Up in Smoke?: Tobacco at the Crossroads of Administrative Law, Brown v. Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food &amp; Drug Administration, 153 F.3d 155 (4th Cir. 1998) p. 1057<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"222\"><\/a>Volume 22, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1999<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Removing Criminal Aliens: The Pitfalls and Promises of Federalism <em>Peter H. Schuck and John Williams <\/em> p. 367<\/p>\n<p>Losing Control of America&#8217;s Future&#8211;The Census, Birthright Citizenship, and Illegal Aliens <em>Charles Wood<\/em> p. 465<\/p>\n<p>The Guilty and the \u201cInnocent\u201d: An Examination of Alleged Cases of Wrongful Conviction from False Confessions <em>Paul G. Cassell <\/em> p. 523<\/p>\n<p><strong>Special Presidential Impeachment Section<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Essay: Lies and Law <em>Robert F. Nagel<\/em> p. 605<\/p>\n<p>Perjurer in the White House? The Constitutional Case for Perjury and Obstruction of Justice As High Crimes and Misdemeanors <em>Charles J. Cooper<\/em> p. 619<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Sanctuaries After the Clinton Sex Scandals <em>Randall K. Miller<\/em> p. 647<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/p>\n<p>Attorney-Client Privilege-Dead or Alive?: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Swidler &amp; Berlin v. United States, 118 S.Ct. 2081 (1998) p. 735<\/p>\n<p>Is HIV Really a \u201cDisability\u201d?: The Scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act After Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S.Ct. 2196 (1998) p. 751<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"221\"><\/a>Volume 22, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 1998<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Reviving the Structural Constitution<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel I: Formalism and Functionalism Reconsidered<\/strong> p. 11<\/p>\n<p>Formalism, Functionalism, Ignorance, <em>Judge Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 13<\/p>\n<p>Relationships Between Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Powers Cases <em>William N. Eskridge, Jr.<\/em> p. 21<\/p>\n<p>Toward a Principled Interpretation of the Commerce Clause <em>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 31<\/p>\n<p>Formalism, Functionalism, and the Separation of Powers <em>Burt Neuborne <\/em> p. 45<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel II: Congress and the Judiciary<\/strong> p. 53<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Trust and Jurisdiction\u2014The Tug-of-War between Congress and the Federal Courts <em>Dennis Jacobs <\/em> p. 55<\/p>\n<p>Religion in Congress and the Courts: Issues of Institutional Competence <em>Lillian R. BeVier<\/em> p. 59<\/p>\n<p>Federalism As a Structural Threat to Liberty <em>Douglas Laycock<\/em> p. 67<\/p>\n<p>Congress As Partner\/Congress As Adversary <em>Lawrence G. Sager<\/em> p. 85<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel III: Constitutional Federalism Reborn<\/strong> p. 91<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Constitutional Federalism Reborn <em>Alex Kozinski<\/em> p. 93<\/p>\n<p>The Revival of States&#8217; Rights: A Progress Report and a Proposal <em>Lynn A. Baker<\/em> p. 95<\/p>\n<p>The Necessary and Proper Clause As an Intrinsic Restraint on Federal Lawmaking Power <em>David E. Engdahl <\/em> p. 107<\/p>\n<p>But When Exactly Was Judicially-Enforced Federalism \u201cBorn\u201d in the First Place? <em>Larry D. Kramer<\/em> p. 123<\/p>\n<p>American Political Culture and the Failures of Process Federalism <em>William Marshall<\/em> p. 139<\/p>\n<p>Panel IV: Federalism in Constitutional Context p. 157<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Federalism in Constitutional Context <em>Max Boot<\/em> p. 159<\/p>\n<p>Context and Complementarity within Federalism Doctrine <em>Evan H. Caminker <\/em> p. 161<\/p>\n<p>In the Beginning Are the States <em>John C. Harrison <\/em> p. 173<\/p>\n<p>Federalism in Constitutional Context <em>Roderick M. Hills, Jr. <\/em> p. 181<\/p>\n<p>Judicial Review and Federalism <em>John C. Yoo<\/em> p. 197<\/p>\n<p>Panel V: Undoing the New Deal? p. 205<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Undoing the New Deal <em>Pasco M. Bowman II <\/em> p. 207<\/p>\n<p>The Cartelization of Commerce <em>Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 209<\/p>\n<p>The Constitutional Virtues and Vices of the New Deal <em>Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 219<\/p>\n<p>Undoing the New Deal through the New Presidentialism Cynthia R. Farina p. 227<\/p>\n<p>Evaluating the New Deal <em>Richard B. Stewart<\/em> p. 239<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Formalism and State Sovereignty in Printz v. United States: Cooperation by Consent <em>Andrew S. Gold<\/em> p. 247<\/p>\n<p>Mend It Or End It? What To Do with the Independent Counsel Statute <em>Julian A. Cook, III <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The United State Courts of Appeals, 1998<\/p>\n<p>Cutting the Gordian Knot of Affirmative Action: Lutheran Church-Missouri Syndod v. FCC, 141 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 1998) p. 339<\/p>\n<p>The Sixth Circuit Navigates the Post-Romer Wreckage: Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinatti, Inc. v. City of Cincinatti, 128 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 1997) p. 351<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"213\"><\/a>Volume 21, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 1998<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Blaine\u2019s Wake: School Choice, The First Amendment, and State Constitutional Law <em>Joseph P. Viteritti<\/em> p. 657<\/p>\n<p>Gun Shy: The Second Amendment as an \u201cUnderenforced Constitutional Norm\u201d <em>Brannon P. Denning<\/em> p. 719<\/p>\n<p>Who Counts?: Determining the Availability of Minority Businesses for Public Contracting After Croson <em>George R. La Noue<\/em> p. 793<\/p>\n<p>Shall We Kill all the Lawyers First?: Insider and Outsider Views of the Legal Profession <em>Amy E. Black and Stanley Rothman<\/em> p. 835<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court\u2019s Shifting Tolerance for Public Aid to Parochial Schools and the Implications for Educational Choice: Agostini v. Felton, 117 S. Ct. 1997 (1997)<\/p>\n<p>p. 861<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Case<\/strong> Ninth Circuit Ignores Principles of Federalism and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: Bates v. Jones, 131 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) p. 881<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"212\"><\/a>Volume 21, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 1998<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Strange Career of Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment <em>Eugene Scalia<\/em> p. 307<\/p>\n<p>Cyberjam: The Law and Economics of Internet Congestion of the Telephone Network <em>J. Gregory Sidak and Daniel F. Spulber<\/em> p. 327<\/p>\n<p>Toward a More Coherent Dormant Commerce Clause: A Proposed Unitary Framework <em>Michael A. Lawrence<\/em> p. 395<\/p>\n<p>Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of the Federal Appointments Process <em>Michael J. Gerhardt<\/em> p. 467<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Common Law of ERISA <em>Jeffrey A. Brauch<\/em> p. 541<\/p>\n<p><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Will Laywering Strangle Democratic Capitalism?: A Retrospective <em>The Honorable Laurence H. Silberman<\/em> p. 607<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/p>\n<p>Free Speech and Freer Speech: Glickman v. Wileman Bros. &amp; Elliot, Inc., 117 S. Ct. 2130 (1997) p. 623<\/p>\n<p>Congress Fumbles with the Internet: Reno v. ACLU, 117 S.Ct. 2329 (1997) p. 637<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"211\"><\/a>Volume 21, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 1997<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Law and Economics and the Rule of Law<\/p>\n<p>Federalist Society Assistant Editors p. 1<\/p>\n<p>Panel I: What Is the \u201cLaw\u201d in Law and Economics p. 3<\/p>\n<p>Law, Economics, and the Power of the State <em>Lillian R. BeVier<\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n<p>The Judiciary and Free Markets <em>Henry G. Manne<\/em> p. 11<\/p>\n<p>Limits to Economics as a Norm for Judicial Decisions <em>Stephen F. Williams<\/em> p. 39<\/p>\n<p>Law, Science, and Law and Economics <em>Mark V. Tushnet<\/em> p. 47<\/p>\n<p>Panel II: Law, Economics, and Social Conservatism p. 53<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Law, Economics, and Social Conservatism <em>Carolyn B. Kuhl<\/em> p. 55<\/p>\n<p>Externalities Everywhere?: Morals and the Police Power <em>Richard A. Epstein<\/em> p. 61<\/p>\n<p>Of Sex and Drugs, and Rock\u2019N\u2019Roll: Does Law and Economics Support Social Regulation? <em>Eric Rasmusen<\/em> p. 71<\/p>\n<p>Panel III: The Attraction of Law and Economics: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline? p. 83<\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline? <em>Steven L. Schwarcz<\/em> p. 85<\/p>\n<p>The Autonomy of Law in Law and Economics <em>Cass R. Sunstein<\/em> p. 89<\/p>\n<p>Law is a Sometime Autonomous Discipline <em>E. Allan Farnsworth<\/em> p. 95<\/p>\n<p>Standards, Rules, and Social Norms <em>Eric A. Posner<\/em> p. 101<\/p>\n<p>Panel IV: How Should Judges Use Economics? p. 119<\/p>\n<p>Law and Economics Should be Used for Economic Questions <em>David B. Sentelle<\/em> p. 121<\/p>\n<p>Judges and Economics: Normative, Positive, and Experimental Perspectives <em>Saul Levmore<\/em> p. 129<\/p>\n<p>Three Proposals to Harness Private Information in Contract <em>Ian Ayres<\/em> p. 135<\/p>\n<p>What Would Burke Think of Law and Economics? <em>Stephen B. Presser<\/em> p. 147<\/p>\n<p>Panel V: Law And. . . .<\/p>\n<p>The Market for \u201cLaw-and\u201d Scholarship <em>Robert C. Ellickson<\/em> p. 157<\/p>\n<p>Law and the Social Sciences <em>Jonathan R. Macey<\/em> p. 171<\/p>\n<p>Panel VI: Public Choice and the Structural Constitution p. 179<\/p>\n<p>Class Legislation, Public Choice, and the Structural Constitution <em>Jeffrey Rosen<\/em> p. 181<\/p>\n<p>The Original Constitution and its Decline: A Public Choice Perspective <em>John O. McGinnis<\/em> p. 195<\/p>\n<p>Purchasing Political Inaction: How Regulators Use the Threat of Legal \u201cReform\u201d to Extort Payoffs <em>Fred S. McChesney<\/em> p. 211<\/p>\n<p>Does Public Choice Theory Justify Judicial Activism After All? <em>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em> p. 219<\/p>\n<p><strong>Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Scalia Contra Mundum <em>Hadley Arkes<\/em> p. 231<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong> T<\/p>\n<p>he Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/p>\n<p>Privatizing Section 1983 Immunity: The Prison Guard\u2019s Dilemma After Richardson v. McKnight, 117 S. Ct. 2100 (1997) p. 251<\/p>\n<p>Balancing Away the Freedom of Speech: Turner Broadcasting System v. FCC, 117 S. Ct. 1174 (1997) p. 272<\/p>\n<p>A Jurisdictional Vacuum in the Wake of Camps Newfound\/Owatonna?: Camps Newfound\/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison, 117 S. Ct. 1590 (1997) p. 288<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"203\"><\/a>Volume 20, Issue 3<\/strong> Summer 1997<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Natural Law v. Natural Rights: What Are They &#8211; How Do They Differ?<\/p>\n<p>Natural-Law Originalism &#8211; Or Why Justice Scalia (Almost) Gets It Right <em>Douglas W. Kmiec<\/em> p. 627<\/p>\n<p>A Law Professor&#8217;s Guide to Natural Law and Natural Rights <em>Randy E. Barnett<\/em> p. 655<\/p>\n<p>The Dangers of Natural Rights <em>Richard Tuck<\/em> p. 683<\/p>\n<p>Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law? <em>Michael P. Zuckert<\/em> p. 695<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The \u201cConservation Game\u201d: The Possibility of Voluntary Cooperation in Preserving Buildings of Cultural Importance <em>Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir<\/em> p. 733<\/p>\n<p>The Economics of Airline Safety and Security: An Analysis of the White House Commission&#8217;s Recommendations <em>Robert W. Hahn<\/em> p. 791<\/p>\n<p>Building Trust: Conservatives and the Environment <em>Mark Eliot Shere<\/em> p. 829<\/p>\n<p>The Rule of Saint Benedict: The Debates over the Interpretation of an Ancient Legal and Spiritual Document <em>James L. J. Nuzzo<\/em> p. 867<\/p>\n<p><strong>Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Tao of Federalism <em>Calvin R. Massey<\/em> p. 887<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/p>\n<p>An Improper Extension of Civil Litigation by Indigents: M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 117 S. Ct. 555 (1996) p. 905<\/p>\n<p>A Valuation Standard That is Difficult to Swallow: Interpreting \u00a7 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in Associates Commerical Corp. v. Rash, 117 S. Ct. 1879 (1997) p. 921<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Case<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cramming Down the House: The Valuation of Collateral in In re Taffi, 96 F.3d 1190 (1996) p. 937<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"202\"><\/a>Volume 20, Number 2<\/strong> Winter 1997<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Symposium<\/strong> Justice and the Criminal Justice Process&#8211;Symposium on Law and Public Policy-1996<\/p>\n<p>Federalist Society Assistant Editors p. 323<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel I: Protections Against Self Incrimination: a Path or Roadblock to Justice?<\/strong> p. 325<\/p>\n<p>Miranda&#8217;s \u201cNegligible\u201d Effect on Law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations Paul G. Cassell p. 327<\/p>\n<p>Bashing Miranda Is Unjustified&#8211;And Harmful <em>Stephen J. Schulhofer<\/em> p. 347<\/p>\n<p>Miranda Stories <em>Peter Arenella<\/em> p. 375<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel II: Justice for All? Racial Minorities, Crime Victims, and the Local Community<\/strong> p. 389<\/p>\n<p>Civil Rights and the Criminal Justice System <em>Clint Bolick<\/em> p. 391<\/p>\n<p>Race, the Criminal Justice System, and Community-Oriented Policing <em>Reuben M. Greenberg<\/em> p. 397<\/p>\n<p>Crime, Politics, and Race <em>Samuel R. Gross<\/em> p. 405<\/p>\n<p>Racism in the Criminal Justice System: Problems and Suggestions <em>Thomas J. Nolan<\/em> p. 417<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel III: What Belongs in a Criminal Trial: the Role of Exclusionary Rules<\/strong> p. 423<\/p>\n<p>Six Observations on the Exclusionary Rule <em>The Honorable Stephen J. Markman<\/em> p. 425<\/p>\n<p>Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Carol S. Steiker p. 435<\/p>\n<p>The Virtues and Vices of the Exclusionary Rule <em>William J. Stuntz<\/em> p. 443<\/p>\n<p>Against Exclusion (Except to Protect Truth Or Prevent Privacy Violations) <em>Akhil Reed Amar<\/em> p. 457<\/p>\n<p><strong>Panel IV: Juries and the Criminal Justice System: What Role?<\/strong> p. 467<\/p>\n<p>A Unanimous Jury Is Fundamental to Our Democracy <em>Barbara A. Babcock<\/em> p. 469<\/p>\n<p>Jury Bashing and the O.J. Simpson <em>Gerald F. Uelmen<\/em> p. 475<\/p>\n<p>What Is Wrong with American Juries and How to Fix It <em>Richard K. Willard<\/em> p. 483<\/p>\n<p>Making Juries Better Factfinders <em>Daniel P. Collins<\/em> p. 489<\/p>\n<p>Panel V: The Role of Lawyers and the Search for Truth in the Criminal Justice System p. 501<\/p>\n<p>Adversary Inferences <em>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em> p. 503<\/p>\n<p>The Adversarial-Accusatorial Label: A Constraint on the Search for Truth <em>Joseph D. Grano<\/em> p. 513<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Search for Truth <em>Charles M. Sevilla<\/em> p. 519<\/p>\n<p>Panel VI: Feds Fighting Crime: When and How p. 529<\/p>\n<p>Criticisms of Federal Counter-Terrorism Laws <em>Nadine Strossen<\/em> p. 531<\/p>\n<p>A National Strategy against Crime, <em>Richard K. Willard<\/em> p. 543<\/p>\n<p><strong>Article <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Market Ordering versus Statutory Control of Termination Decisions: A Case for the Inefficiency of Just Cause Dismissal Requirements <em>John P. Frantz<\/em> p. 555<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Development<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1995 Term<\/p>\n<p>A Case for Speedier Executions: Felker v. Turpin, 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996) p. 605<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Case<\/strong> A Quick Case for Including Same-Sex Harassment Under Title VII: Quick v. Donaldson, Co., Inc., 90 F.3d 1372 (8th Cir. 1996) p. 615<\/p>\n<h2><strong><a name=\"201\"><\/a>Volume 20, Issue 1<\/strong> Fall 1996<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Volume Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Introduction: Twentieth Anniversary Volume, Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy <em>E. Spencer Abraham<\/em> p. 1<\/p>\n<p><strong>Remark<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Remarks in Honor of Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Supreme Court of the United States <em>The Hon. J. Michael Luttig<\/em> p. 19<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Political Economy of Just Compensation: Lessons from the Military Draft for the Takings Issue, The <em>Fischel, William A. <\/em> p. 23<\/p>\n<p>Comment on Fischel&#8217;s Political Economy of Just Compensation <em>Robert E. Litan<\/em> p. 65<\/p>\n<p>Takings Legislation: A Comment <em>Robert C. Ellickson<\/em> p. 75<\/p>\n<p>Takings and Progressive Rate Taxation <em>Calvin R. Massey<\/em> p. 85<\/p>\n<p>The Model Physician-Assisted Suicide Act and the Jurisprudence of Death <em>Scott Fitzgibbon and Kwan Kew Lai<\/em> p. 127<\/p>\n<p>The Use and Abuse of History in Compassion in Dying <em>Dwight G. Duncan and Peter Lubin <\/em> p. 175<\/p>\n<p>Colorado&#8217;s Amendment 2: A Result in Search of a Reason <em>John Daniel Dailey and Paul Farley<\/em> p. 215<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court of the United States, 1995 Term<\/p>\n<p>Innocent Owners and Guilty Property: Bennis v. Michigan, 116 S. Ct. 994 (1996) p. 279<\/p>\n<p>Civil Forfeiture as Jeopardy: United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135 (1996) p. 292<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWorse than TXO\u201d: Substantive Due Reasonableness in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S. Ct. 1589 (1996) p. 310<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 3 Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 2 Volume 24 &#8211; Issue 1 Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 3 Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 2 Volume 23 &#8211; Issue 1 Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 3 Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 2 Volume 22 &#8211; Issue 1 Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 3 Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 2 Volume 21 &#8211; Issue 1 Volume 20 &#8211; Issue 3 Volume 20 &#8211; Issue 2 Volume 20 &#8211; Issue [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1368","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-m4","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}