{"id":1369,"date":"2013-10-08T08:13:20","date_gmt":"2013-10-08T15:13:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=938"},"modified":"2021-06-24T12:37:49","modified_gmt":"2021-06-24T12:37:49","slug":"vols-25-29","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/vols-25-29\/","title":{"rendered":"Vols. 25-29"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

Volume 29 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 29 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 29 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 28 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 28 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 28 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 27 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 27 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 27 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 26 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 26 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 26 – Issue 1<\/a>
\nVolume 25 – Issue 3<\/a>
\nVolume 25 – Issue 2<\/a>
\nVolume 25 – Issue 1<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 29, Number 3 – Summer 2006<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered<\/a>, Steven G. Calabresi & James Lindgren<\/em><\/p>\n

The Ideological Stakes of Eliminating Life Tenure<\/a>, Ward Farnsworth<\/em><\/p>\n

The Making of a New Copyright Lockean<\/a>, Lior Zemer<\/em><\/p>\n

An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws<\/a>, Douglas W. Allen<\/em><\/p>\n

Toward a Basal Tenth Amendment: A Riposte to National Bank Preemption of State Consumer Protection Laws<\/a>, Keith R. Fisher<\/em><\/p>\n

Address<\/strong><\/p>\n

Before Roe v. Wade<\/em>: Judge Friendly’s Draft Abortion Opinion<\/a>, A. Raymond Randolph<\/em><\/p>\n

Notes<\/strong><\/p>\n

Federalism on ICE: State and Local Enforcement of Federal Immigration Law<\/a>, Daniel Booth<\/em><\/p>\n

Flexible Standards, Deferential Review: Daubert<\/em>‘s Legacy of Confusion<\/a>, Cassandra H. Welch<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Cases <\/strong><\/p>\n

Uncovering Coherence in Compelled Subsidy of Speech Doctrine: Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass’n<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2055 (2005)<\/a>, Mark Champoux<\/em><\/p>\n

Defining the Court’s Role as Faithful Agent in Statutory Interpretation: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2611 (2005)<\/a>, Joel Schellhammer<\/em><\/p>\n

Unjustly Usurping the Parental Right: Fields v. Palmdale School District<\/em>, 427 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2005)<\/a>, Elliott M. Davis<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>Volume 29, Number 2 – Spring 2006<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In Memoriam: William H. Rehnquist<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chief Justice Rehnquist’s Enduring, Democratic Constitution<\/a>, Richard W. Garnett<\/em><\/p>\n

The Notion of a Living Constitution<\/a>, William H. Rehnquist <\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Seeing Government Purpose Through the Objective Observer’s Eyes: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Debates<\/a>, Kristi L. Bowman<\/em><\/p>\n

Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London<\/em>: An Argument for Banning Economic Development Takings<\/a>, Charles E. Cohen<\/em><\/p>\n

Defining the Contours of the Emerging Fraudulent Misjoinder Doctrine<\/a>, E. Farish Percy<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

The Conservative Influence of the Federalist Society on the Harvard Law School Student Body<\/a>, George W. Hicks, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Note<\/strong><\/p>\n

Defending America’s Children: How the Current System Gets It Wrong<\/a>, Tracy Leigh Dodds<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

United States Supreme Court, 2004 Term<\/p>\n

Good History, Good Law (and by Coincidence Good Policy Too): Granholm v. Heald<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 1885 (2005)<\/a>, Aaron Nielson<\/em><\/p>\n

Restraining Eminent Domain Through Just Compensation: Kelo v. New London<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005)<\/a>, Brett Talley<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>Volume 29, Number 1 – Fall 2005<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Law and Freedom<\/p>\n

The Nature and Importance of Liberty<\/a>, Charles Fried<\/em><\/p>\n

Freedom<\/a>, Michael S. Moore<\/em><\/p>\n

Not Necessarily in Conflict: Americans Can Be Both United and Culturally Diverse<\/a>, Jennifer C. Braceras <\/em><\/p>\n

The Human Nature of Freedom and Identity–We Hold More than Random Thoughts<\/a>, Douglas W. Kmiec<\/em><\/p>\n

Five Theses on Identity Politics<\/a>, Richard D. Parker <\/em><\/p>\n

News for the Libertarians: The Moral Tradition Already Contains the Libertarian Premises<\/a>, Hadley Arkes<\/em><\/p>\n

Safety and<\/em> Freedom: Common Concerns for Conservatives, Libertarians, and Civil Libertarians<\/a>, Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/p>\n

The Virtues of Preemptive Deterrence<\/a>, David B. Rivkin, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Toward the Framers’ Understanding of “Advice and Consent”: A Historical and Textual Inquiry<\/a>, Adam J. White<\/em><\/p>\n

Ending the War on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay Detainees<\/a>, Tung Yin <\/em><\/p>\n

Using Information Markets to Improve Public Decision Making<\/a>, Robert W. Hahn & Paul C. Tetlock <\/em><\/p>\n

Against Foreign Law<\/a>, Robert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Developments <\/strong><\/p>\n

United States Supreme Court, 2004 Term<\/p>\n

Imposing Necessary Boundaries on Judicial Discretion: Clingman v. Beaver<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2029 (2005)<\/a>, Lowell J. Schiller<\/em><\/p>\n

Placing Unnecessary Limits on Associational Freedoms and Voting Rights: Clingman v. Beaver<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2029 (2005)<\/a>, M. Jason Scoggins <\/em><\/p>\n

Paying for the Sins of Their Users: Liability and Growing Uncertainty in a Digital Age: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)<\/a>, John Lobato<\/em><\/p>\n

Chasing Finality: Federal Collateral Relief in the Wake of Pace v. DiGuglielmo<\/em>, 125 S. Ct. 1807 (2005)<\/a>, N. Noelle Francis<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

<\/a>Volume 28, Number 3 – Summer 2005<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Review of Unenumerated Rights: Does Marbury’s Holding Apply in a Post-Warren Court World?, John C. Eastman <\/em>, p. 713<\/p>\n

State Attempts to Define Religion: The Ramifications of Applying Mandatory Prescription Contraceptive Coverage Statutes to Religious Employers, Susan J. Stabile <\/em>, p. 741<\/p>\n

If Racial Desegregation, Then Same-Sex Marriage? Originalism and the Supreme Court’s Fourteenth Amendment, Kenyon Bunch <\/em>, p. 781<\/p>\n

The Rule of Law Problem: Unconstitutional Class Actions and Options for Reform, Mark Moller <\/em>, p. 855<\/p>\n

The Clash of Rival and Incompatible Philosophical Traditions Within Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism Grounded in the Central Western Philosophical Tradition, Lee J. Strang <\/em>, p. 909<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 28, Number 2 – Spring 2005<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Patriot Act and the Wall Between Foreign Intelligence and Law Enforcement, Richard Henry Seamon & William Dyland Gardner<\/em>, p. 319<\/p>\n

The Quasi War Cases, J. Gregory Sidak, <\/em>p. 465<\/p>\n

RLUIPA At Four: Evaluating the Success and Constitutionality of RLUIPA’s Prisoner Provisions, Derek L. Gaubatz, <\/em>p. 501<\/p>\n

“Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness”: “Sham” Secular Purposes in Ten Commandments Displays, Susanna Dokupil, <\/em>p. 609<\/p>\n

A Gleeful Obituary for Poletown Neighborhood Council v. Detroit<\/em>, Timothy Sandefur, <\/em>p. 651<\/p>\n

Property and Environment: Thoughts on an Evolving Relationship, J. Peter Byrne, <\/em>p. 679<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rewriting the Terms: The Contract Clause and Special-Interest Legislation in RUI One Corp v. City of Berkeley<\/em>, Thomas E. Mitchell, p. 691<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 28, Number 1 – Winter 2005<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Private Law: The New Frontier for Limited Government
\nJohn C. P. Goldberg
\nCarl T. Bogus
\nJill E. Fisch
\nJames W. Ely, Jr.
\nJames L. Huffman
\nThomas W. Merrill
\nJohn O. McGinnis
\nJide O. Nzelibe
\nPhilip K. Howard
\nDavid A. Hyman & Charles Silver<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Anti-Discrimination Eighth Amendment Laurence Claus<\/em> Why Is Congress Still Regulating Noncommercial Activity?, Alex Kreit<\/em><\/p>\n

The Constitutional Option to Change Senate Rules and Procedures: A Majoritarian Means to Overcome the Filibuster<\/a>, Martin B. Gold & Dimple Gupta<\/em><\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Historical Origins of the Rule of Law in the American Constitutional Order, Steven G. Calabresi<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

No More \u2018Cherry-picking\u2019: the Real History of the 21st Amendment\u2019s \u00a7 2<\/p>\n

Case Comment: Roche v. Empagran<\/em> Threats in the Line of Duty: Police Officers and the First Amendment in State v. Valdivia<\/em> and Connecticut v. Deloreto<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 27, Number 3 – Summer 2004<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Rule of Law in Conflict and Post-Conflict Situations<\/p>\n

Rediscovering International Law Through Dialogue Rather than Diatribe: Reflections on an International Legal Conference in the Aftermath of Operation Iraqi Freedom, David D. Jividen<\/em>, p. 691<\/p>\n

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law, A.P.V. Rogers<\/em>, p. 725<\/p>\n

U.S. Security Strategies: A Legal Assessment, Michael N. Schmitt<\/em>, p. 737<\/p>\n

Operation Iraqi Freedom: Legal and Policy Considerations, Robert F. Turner<\/em>, p. 765<\/p>\n

Ethical and Legal Dimensions of the Bush \u201cPreemption\u201d Strategy, Martin L. Cook<\/em>, p. 797<\/p>\n

Just Peace and the Asymmetric Threat: National Self-Defense in Uncharted Waters, Michael Novak<\/em>, p. 817<\/p>\n

Factors in War to Peace Transitions, Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg<\/em>, p. 843<\/p>\n

Comments on War, Yoram Dinstein<\/em>, p. 877<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Is Regulation Good for You?, Robert W. Hahn & Rohit Malik<\/em>, p. 893<\/p>\n

Unprincipled Family Dissolution: The American Law Institute\u2019s Recommendations for Spousal Support and Division of Property, David Westfall<\/em>, p. 917<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Forcible Antipsychotic Medication and the Unfortunate Side Effects of Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003), Debra A. Breneman<\/em>, p. 965<\/p>\n

Abandoning Bedrock Principles?: The Musgrave Amendment and Federalism, John Bash<\/em>, p. 985<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 27, Number 2 – Spring 2004<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Debate<\/strong><\/p>\n

From the Federalist Society National Lawyer\u2019s Conference \u2013 2003<\/p>\n

The Use of International Law in Judicial Decisions, Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson III<\/em>, p. 423<\/p>\n

The Use of International Law in the American Adjudicative Process, Hon. Patricia M. Wald<\/em>, p. 431<\/p>\n

Speech<\/strong><\/p>\n

Clarifying the State Action and Noerr Exemptions, Timothy J. Muris<\/em>, p. 443<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Law\u2019s Culture: Conservativism and the American Constitutional Order, Bruce P. Frohnen<\/em>, p. 459<\/p>\n

Liberal Originalism: A Past for the Future, Timothy Sandefur<\/em>, p. 489<\/p>\n

The Federal Marriage Amendment and Rule by Judges, Dwight G. Duncan<\/em>, p. 543<\/p>\n

Rethinking Judicial Activism and Restraint in State School Finance Litigation, Larry J. Obhof<\/em>, p. 569<\/p>\n

Abusive Trademark Litigation and the Incredible Shrinking Confusion Doctrine: Trademark Abuse in the Context of Entertainment Media and Cyberspace, K.J. Greene<\/em>, p. 609<\/p>\n

Introducing the \u201cHeartland Departure,\u201d Adam Lamparello<\/em>, p. 643<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 27, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 2003<\/h2>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Law and Human Dignity<\/p>\n

Does Technology Spell Trouble with a Capital \u201cT\u201d?: Human Dignity and Public Policy David A. Hyman<\/em> p. 3<\/p>\n

Retribution: The Central Aim of Punishment Gerard V. Bradley<\/em> p. 19<\/p>\n

Dignity and Desert in Punishment Theory Kyron Huigens<\/em> p. 33<\/p>\n

Inevitable Mens Rea Stephen J. Morse<\/em> p. 51<\/p>\n

Pope John Paul II and the Dignity of the Human Being Rev. John J. Coughlin, O.F.M.<\/em> p. 65<\/p>\n

Religious Liberty and Human Dignity: A Tale of Two Declarations Kevin J. Hasson<\/em> p. 81<\/p>\n

The Welfare Debate: Getting Past the Bumper Stickers Peter B. Edelman<\/em> p. 93<\/p>\n

A Crisis of Caring: A Catholic Critique of American Welfare Reform Vincent D. Rougeau<\/em> p. 101<\/p>\n

Social Welfare, Human Dignity, and the Puzzle of What We Owe Each Other Amy L. Wax<\/em> p. 121<\/p>\n

The Limits of International Law in Protecting Dignity John O. McGinnis<\/em> p. 137<\/p>\n

What We Can Learn About Human Dignity from International Law Jeremy Rabkin<\/em> p. 145<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s Senate Confirmation Battles and the Role of the Federal Judiciary Diarmuid F. O\u2019Scannlain<\/em> p. 169<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Our Broken Judicial Confirmation Process and the Need for Filibuster Reform John Cornyn<\/em> p. 181<\/p>\n

Beyond State Farm: Due Process Constraints on Noneconomic Compensatory Damages Paul DeCamp<\/em> p. 231<\/p>\n

Davey\u2019s Plea: Blair, Witters, and the Protection of Religious Freedom Joseph P. Viteritti<\/em> p. 299<\/p>\n

Roe and the New Frontier Lisa Shaw Roy<\/em> p. 339<\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Diversity Lie Brian P. Fitzpatrick<\/em> p. 385<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Supreme Court, 2003 Term<\/p>\n

Struck Out Looking: Continued Confusion in Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review After Ewing v. California, 123 S. Ct. 1179 (2003) Joshua R. Pater<\/em> p. 399<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 26, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 2003<\/h2>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo<\/em> p. 668<\/p>\n

An Empirical Test of justice Scalia\u2019s Commitment to the Rule of Law Gary Lawson<\/em> p. 803<\/p>\n

The Retroactive and Prospective Application of Judicial Decisions Bradley Scott Shannon<\/em> p. 811<\/p>\n

Federalism in Antitrust Robert W. Hahn & Anne Layne-Farrar<\/em> p. 877<\/p>\n

Private Property Rights, Economic Freedom, and Professor Coase: A Critique of Friedman, McCloskey, Medema, and Zorn Walter Block<\/em> p. 923<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

Defining Extortion: Rico, Hobbs, and Statutory Interpretation in in Scheidler v National Organization for Women, Inc., 123 S. Ct. 1057 (2003). Daniel B. Kelly<\/em> p. 953<\/p>\n

Marijuana or Football (or the Future Farmers of America): Board of Education v. Earls, 122 S. Ct 2550 (2002). Brian Kim<\/em> p. 973<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 26, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 2003<\/h2>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism Guido Pincione<\/em> p. 397<\/p>\n

Science and Religion Twenty Years After McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, Public Education, and the New Challenge of Intelligent Design Francis J. Beckwith<\/em> p. 455<\/p>\n

Stopping Time: The Pro-Slavery and \u201cIrrevocable\u201d Thirteenth Amendment A. Christopher Bryant<\/em> p. 501<\/p>\n

An Overview and Evaluation of State Blaine Amendments: Origins, Scope, and First Amendment Concerns Mark Edward DeForrest<\/em> p. 551<\/p>\n

A Matter of Constitutional Luck: The General Applicability Requirement in Free Exercise Jurisprudence p. 627<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 26, Number 1<\/strong> Winter 2003<\/h2>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Law and Truth<\/p>\n

The Proliferation of Legal Truth Jack M. Balkin<\/em> p. 5<\/p>\n

Truth, Truths, \u201cTruth,\u201d \u201cTruths\u201d in the Law Susan Haack<\/em> p. 17<\/p>\n

The Plain Truth About Legal Truth Michael Moore<\/em> p. 23<\/p>\n

From Postmodernism to Law and Truth Dennis Patterson<\/em> p. 49<\/p>\n

History for the Non-Originalist Rebecca Brown<\/em> p. 69<\/p>\n

Forms of Originalism and the Study of History John Harrison<\/em> p. 83<\/p>\n

On Finding (and Losing) Our Origins Larry Kramer<\/em> p. 95<\/p>\n

The Exclusionary Rule Guido Calabresi<\/em> p. 111<\/p>\n

In Defense of the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule Yale Kamisar<\/em> p. 119<\/p>\n

Truth, Justice, and the Jury Shari Diamond<\/em> p. 143<\/p>\n

Is the Criminal Process about Truth?: A German Perspective Thomas Weigend<\/em> p. 157<\/p>\n

America\u2019s Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice Gerald Walpin<\/em> p. 175<\/p>\n

Layers and Truth-Telling Albert Alschuler<\/em> p. 189<\/p>\n

Corporate Fraud: See, Lawyers Susan Koniak<\/em> p. 195<\/p>\n

Lawyers as the Enemies of Truth John O. McGinnis<\/em> p. 231<\/p>\n

A Tale of Truth in Modern America William Otis<\/em> p. 235<\/p>\n

Articles<\/strong><\/p>\n

Politics and the Principle that Elected Legislators Should Make the Laws David Schoenbrod<\/em> p. 239<\/p>\n

The Myth of a Conservative Supreme Court: The October 2000 Term Lino A. Graglia<\/em> p. 281<\/p>\n

The Faith-Based Initiative, Charitable Choice, and Protecting the Free Speech Rights of Faith-Based Organizations Vernadette Ramirez Broyles, Esq. <\/em> p. 315<\/p>\n

Response<\/strong><\/p>\n

Security Reviews of Media Reports on Military Operations: A Response to Professor Lee Major William A. Wilcox, Jr.<\/em> p. 355<\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

Thomas Jefferson\u2019s Retrospective on the Establishment Clause Douglas G. Smith<\/em> p. 369<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Supreme Court, 2001 Term<\/p>\n

How Little Control? Volition and the Civil Confinement of Sexually Violent Predators in Kansas v. Crane, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002) p. 384<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 25, Number 3<\/strong> Summer 2002<\/h2>\n

Reflections on the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Douglas H. Ginsburg<\/em> p. 835<\/p>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Chamber of Commerce: Institute for Legal Reform<\/p>\n

Welcome Letters<\/strong><\/p>\n

Governor John Engler <\/em> p. 840 Governor Frank Keating<\/em> p. 841<\/p>\n

Introductory Remarks on the Federalism Symposium James Wootton<\/em> p. 843 John P. Schmitz<\/em> p. 847<\/p>\n

Locating the Boundaries: The Scope of Congress\u2019s Power to Regulate Commerce Robert H. Bork & Daniel E. Troy<\/em> p. 849<\/p>\n

Business, the States, and Federalism\u2019s Political Economy Michael S. Greve<\/em> p. 895<\/p>\n

Re-Entering the Arena: Restoring a Judicial Role for Enforcing Limits on Federal Mandates John C. Eastman<\/em> p. 931<\/p>\n

The Problem of Tort Reform: Federalism and the Regulation of Lawyers Robert R. Gasaway<\/em> p. 953<\/p>\n

Response<\/strong><\/p>\n

The First Amendment and Problems of Political Viability: The Case of Internet Pornography Mark C. Alexander<\/em> p. 977<\/p>\n

Toward a National Putative Father Registry Database Mary Beck<\/em> p. 1031<\/p>\n

A Lockean Analysis of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment Douglas G. Smith<\/em> p. 1095<\/p>\n

Comment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anastoff, Unpublished Opinions, and Federal Appellate Justice Carl Tobias<\/em> p. 1171<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Supreme Court, 2000 & 2001 Terms<\/p>\n

The End of Compelled Contributions for Subsidized Advertising?: United States v. United Foods, 533 U.S. 405 (2001) Paul M. Schoenhard<\/em> p. 1185<\/p>\n

The Keys to the Castle: A New Standard for Warrentless Home Searches in United States v. Knights, 122 S. Ct. 587 (2001) Jonathan T. Skrmetti <\/em> p. 1201<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 25, Number 2<\/strong> Spring 2002<\/h2>\n

Law and the War on Terrorism<\/strong> Presidential Addresses on the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001<\/p>\n

Prologue<\/p>\n

Remarks on the National Day of Prayer and Remembrance, p. ix<\/p>\n

Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, p. xiii<\/p>\n

Foreword <\/strong><\/p>\n

Freedom and Security After September 11, Viet D. Dinh,<\/em> p. 399<\/p>\n

Essays<\/strong><\/p>\n

Homeland: An Essay on Patriotism, Richard D. Parker,<\/em> p. 407<\/p>\n

Why They Hate Us: The Role of Social Dynamics, Cass R. Sunstein,<\/em> p. 429<\/p>\n

Civil Liberties and Human Rights in the Aftermath of September 11, Philip B. Heymann,<\/em> p. 441<\/p>\n

Choices of Law, Choices of War, Noah Feldman,<\/em> p. 457<\/p>\n

The President\u2019s Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorist Organizations and the Nations that Harbor or Support Them Robert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo<\/em> p. 487<\/p>\n

Military Action Against Terrorists under International Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter Michael J. Glennon<\/em> p. 539<\/p>\n

America\u2019s New War on Terror: The Case for Self-Defense Under International Law Jack M. Beard<\/em> p. 559<\/p>\n

The Military Tribunal Order<\/strong><\/p>\n

What to Do with Bin Laden and Al Quaeda Terrorists?: A Qualified Defense of Military Commissions and United States Policy on Detainees at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Kenneth Anderson<\/em> p. 591<\/p>\n

On Justice and War: Contradictions in the Proposed Military Tribunals George P. Fletcher <\/em> p. 635<\/p>\n

When Justice Goes to War: Prosecuting Terrorists before Military Commissions Diane F. Orentlicher & Robert Kogod Goldman <\/em> p. 653<\/p>\n

Terrorism, Federalism, and Police Misconduct William J. Stuntz<\/em> p. 665<\/p>\n

Fear and the Regulatory Model of Counterterrorism Eric A. Posner <\/em> p. 681<\/p>\n

The Consequences of Enlisting Federal Grand Juries in the War on Terrorism: Assessing the USA PATRIOT Act’s Changes to Grand Jury Secrecy Sara Sun Beale & James E. Felman<\/em> p. 699<\/p>\n

An International Criminal Law Approach to Bioterrorism Barry Kellman <\/em> p. 721<\/p>\n

\u201cSecurity Review\u201d and the First Amendment William E. Lee <\/em> p. 743<\/p>\n

Unleashing the Rogue Elephant: September 11 and Letting the CIA be the CIA Frederick P. Hitz<\/em> p. 765<\/p>\n

Re-Constructing Global Aviation in an Era of the \u201cCivil Aircraft as a Weapon of Destruction\u201d Phillip A. Karber <\/em> p. 781<\/p>\n

Who Should Deal with Foreign Terrorists on U.S. Soil?: Socio-Legal Consequences of September 11 and the Ongoing Threat of Terrorist Attacks in America David A. Klinger & Dave Grossman <\/em> p. 815<\/p>\n

<\/a>Volume 25, Number 1<\/strong> Fall 2001<\/h3>\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/p>\n

Is Technology Changing the Law?<\/p>\n

The Symbiosis of Constitutionalism and Technology, John O. McGinnis,<\/em> p. 3<\/p>\n

The State and the Networked Economy, Mark F. Grady, <\/em> p. 15<\/p>\n

Stalking the Mark of Cain, Michael Edmund O’Neill,<\/em> p. 31<\/p>\n

The Genome and the Law: Should Increased Genetic Knowledge Change the Law?, E. Donald Elliott, <\/em> p. 61<\/p>\n

Does Technology Require New Law, David Friedman, <\/em> p. 71<\/p>\n

The Costs of Privacy, Kent Walker, <\/em> p. 87<\/p>\n

Technology as Security, Declan McCullagh, <\/em> p. 129<\/p>\n

They’re Making a Federal Case Out of It. . . In State Court, John H. Beisner & Jessica Davidson Miller, <\/em> p. 143<\/p>\n

Congress Goes to Court: The Past, Present, and Future of Legislator Standing, Anthony Clark Arend & Catherine B. Lotrionte, <\/em> p. 209<\/p>\n

Freedom of Speech and True Threats, Jennifer E. Rothman, <\/em> p. 283<\/p>\n

Essay<\/strong><\/p>\n

Close but No Cigar: A Reply to Professor Graglia, T. Kyle King, <\/em> p. 369<\/p>\n

Recent Developments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States Supreme Court, 2000 Term<\/p>\n

Juris Doctores or Doctores Divinitatis: Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98 (2001), Austin W. Bramwell,<\/em> p. 385<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Volume 29 – Issue 3 Volume 29 – Issue 2 Volume 29 – Issue 1 Volume 28 – Issue 3 Volume 28 – Issue 2 Volume 28 – Issue 1 Volume 27 – Issue 3 Volume 27 – Issue 2 Volume 27 – Issue 1 Volume 26 – Issue 3 Volume 26 – Issue 2 Volume 26 – Issue 1 Volume 25 – Issue 3 Volume 25 – Issue 2 Volume 25 – Issue […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1369","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-m5","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}