{"id":2477,"date":"2022-07-07T14:46:06","date_gmt":"2022-07-07T19:46:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=2477"},"modified":"2025-11-21T17:34:39","modified_gmt":"2025-11-21T21:34:39","slug":"vol-45-46","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/vol-45-46\/","title":{"rendered":"Vol. 45-48"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Volume 48 – Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Winter 2025<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

43rd Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium<\/h3>\n

Why Separate Powers?<\/h5>\n

 <\/p><\/td><\/tr>

1<\/td>States in the Separation of Powers<\/a><\/td>Ernest Young<\/td><\/tr>
33<\/td>Answered by Text<\/a><\/td>Jennifer L. Mascott & Eli Nachmany<\/td><\/tr>
73<\/td>The Major Questions Doctrine, Post-Chevron<\/em>? Skidmore<\/em>, Loper-Bright<\/em>, and a Good-Faith Emergency Question Doctrine<\/a><\/td>Jed Handelsman Shugerman<\/td><\/tr>
107<\/td>Life, the Universe, and the Judicial Power<\/a><\/td>Gary Lawson<\/td><\/tr>
125<\/td>Judicial Review and the Legislative Power in the Roberts Court<\/a><\/td>Amanda L. Tyler<\/td><\/tr>
149<\/td>The Separation of Powers is a They, Not an It<\/a><\/td>Cass R. Sunstein<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

181<\/td>The Ciceronian Origins of American Law and Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Jack Ferguson<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speeches<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

275<\/td>2023 Vaughan Lecture: Good and Evil in the American Founding<\/a><\/td>Stephen E. Sachs<\/td><\/tr>
307<\/td>2024 Vaughan Lecture: The Natural Law Moment in Constitutional Theory<\/a><\/td>J. Joel Alicea<\/td><\/tr>
329<\/td>Reflections on The Natural Law Moment in Constitutional Theory<\/em><\/a><\/td>Conor Casey<\/td><\/tr>
345<\/td>Is and Ought: A Response to Joel Alicea<\/a><\/td>Stephen E. Sachs<\/td><\/tr>
361<\/td>Originalism and Truth-Telling: A Reply to Stephen Sachs<\/a><\/td>J. Joel Alicea<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Note<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

369<\/td>Structural Textualism and Major Questions<\/a><\/td>\n
\n
Johnathan Meilaender<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td><\/tr>
\n

In Memoriam: Prof. Charles Fried<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

369<\/td>Charles Fried as <\/a>Friend<\/a><\/td>\n
\n
Randall Kennedy<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td><\/tr>
369<\/td>Recollections of Charles Fried<\/a><\/td>\n
\n
Richard Fallon<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Volume 47 – Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Fall 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Symposium<\/h3>\n

History and Tradition<\/h5>\n<\/td><\/tr>
539<\/td>Dobbs <\/em>and the Originalists<\/a><\/td>Stephen E. Sachs<\/td><\/tr>
563<\/td>The Levels-of-Generality Game: “History and Tradition” in the Roberts Court<\/a><\/td>Reva B. Siegel<\/td><\/tr>
613<\/td>Tension Between Constitutional Meaning and Constitutional Construction<\/a><\/td>Stephanie H. Barclay<\/td><\/tr>
635<\/td>Tradition, Originalism, and General Fundamental Law<\/a><\/td>Jud Campbell<\/td><\/tr>
659<\/td>History, Tradition, and Federalism<\/a><\/td>Jason Mazzone<\/td><\/tr>
699<\/td>Commentary: Some Thoughts and Questions About Federalism, and General Fundamental Law, As Regards History and Tradition in Constitutional Adjudication<\/a><\/td>Vikram David Amar<\/td><\/tr>
713<\/td>History, Tradition, and Natural Rights<\/a><\/td>Bradley Rebeiro<\/td><\/tr>
\n
Keynote<\/h5>\n<\/td><\/tr>
745<\/td>The Road to Tradition or Perdition? An Originalist Critique of Traditionalism in Constitutional Interpretation<\/a><\/td>Hon. Kevin C. Newsom<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speech<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

757<\/td>“Now . . . This”<\/a><\/td>Hon. Justin R. Walker<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

771<\/td>Political Rivalries Among the States, Incommensurability, and the Dormant Commerce Clause<\/a><\/td>R. George Wright<\/td><\/tr>
807<\/td>Rational Nondelegation<\/a><\/td>John Yoo<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Note<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

857<\/td>Structural Implementation and the Major Questions Doctrine<\/a><\/td>\n
\n
Nate Bartholomew<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 47 \u2013 Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spring 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Speech<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

289<\/td>You Are the Last Line of Defense<\/a><\/td>Bari Weiss<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

309<\/td>The Meaning and Ambiguity of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/a><\/td>Kurt T. Lash<\/td><\/tr>
395<\/td>Due Process and the Standing Doctrine<\/a><\/td>Emile J. Katz<\/td><\/tr>
465<\/td>Citizenship and Solicitude: How to Overrule Employment Division v. Smith<\/em> and Washington v. Davis<\/em><\/a><\/td>Christopher R. Green<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Note<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

507<\/td>Original Understanding of \u201cBackground Principles\u201d in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid<\/em><\/a><\/td>\n
\n
Mary Catherine Jenkins & Juliette Turner-Jones<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 47 – Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Winter 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Law and Democracy<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1<\/td>Remarks to the Federalist Society National Student Symposium<\/a><\/td>Governor Greg Abbott<\/td><\/tr>
13<\/td>Four Views of the Nature of the Union<\/a><\/td>Jud Campbell<\/td><\/tr>
39<\/td>Templates of American Democracy for the 21st Century: The Importance of Looking at American State Constitutions<\/a><\/td>Sanford Levinson<\/td><\/tr>
57<\/td>What Democracy is Not<\/a><\/td>Daniel H. Lowenstein<\/td><\/tr>
65<\/td>How Federalism Promotes Unity Through Diversity<\/a><\/td>Ilya Somin<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speeches<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

75<\/td>The Value of Dissent<\/a><\/td>Hon. Patrick Bumatay<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

95<\/td>Boycotts: A First Amendment History<\/a><\/td>Josh Halpern and Lavi M. Ben Dor<\/td><\/tr>
167<\/td>History, Public Rights, and Article III Standing<\/a><\/td>Owen B. Smitherman<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Notes<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

231<\/td>Legal Choices: The State Constitutionality of School Voucher Programs<\/a><\/td>Theodore Steinmeyer<\/td><\/tr>
263<\/td>Compelling Compliance: Disciplining Agencies Through Statutory Deadlines<\/a><\/td>Marisa Sylvester<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 46 – Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Fall 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Symposium<\/h3>\n

Common Good Constitutionalism<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

937<\/td>Strict Scrutiny, Religious Liberty, and the Common Good <\/a><\/td>Stephanie H. Barclay<\/td><\/tr>
957<\/td>Originalism, Common Good Constitutionalism, and Our Common Adversary: Fair-Weather Originalism<\/a><\/td>Hon. James C. Ho<\/td><\/tr>
967<\/td>“Indispensably Obligatory”: Natural Law and the American Legal Tradition<\/a><\/td>Hon. Paul B. Matey<\/td><\/tr>
983<\/td>\n

When<\/span> Moral<\/span> P<\/span>rinciples Meet<\/span> the Normative<\/span> or Deliberative<\/span> Stance<\/span> of Judges<\/span>: The <\/span>Layers <\/span>of Common <\/span>Good <\/span>C<\/span>onstitutionalism<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>

Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco<\/td><\/tr>
1009<\/td>Equal Dignity and the Common Good <\/a><\/td>Michael Foran<\/td><\/tr>
1029<\/td>Common Good Gun Rights<\/a><\/td>Darrell A. H. Miller<\/td><\/tr>
1055<\/td>The Irish Constitution and Common Good Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Conor Casey<\/td><\/tr>
1091<\/td>The \u201cCommon Good\u201d in Hungarian Judicial Interpretation: Footnotes for America Debates on Common Good Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>M\u00e1rton Sulyok<\/td><\/tr>
1123<\/td>Towards a Liberal Common Good Constitutionalism for Polarized Times<\/a><\/td>Linda C. McClain & James E. Fleming<\/td><\/tr>
1149<\/td>Flourishing, Virtue, and Common Good Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Lawrence B. Solum<\/td><\/tr>
1177<\/td>Experiments of Living Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Cass R. Sunstein<\/td><\/tr>
1197<\/td>Common Good Constitutionalism and Common Good Originalism: A Convergence?<\/a><\/td>Josh Hammer<\/td><\/tr>
1217<\/td>Originalism, Common Good Constitutionalism, and Transparency<\/a><\/td>Michael L. Smith<\/td><\/tr>
1243<\/td>The Common Good as a Reason to Follow the Original Meaning of the United States Constitution<\/a><\/td>Lee J. Strang<\/td><\/tr>
1271<\/td>According to Law<\/a><\/td>Stephen E. Sachs<\/td><\/tr>
1299<\/td>Enriching Legal Theory<\/a><\/td>Adrian Vermeule<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speech<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1331<\/td>The 2023 Scalia Lecture: Beyond Textualism?<\/a><\/td>William Baude<\/td><\/tr>
\n

Note<\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1353<\/td>Privacy and Prophylactics<\/a><\/td>Moshe Schwartz<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 46 – Special Issue<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Summer 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Symposium<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

629<\/td>Introduction: The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito<\/a><\/td>Robert P. George<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
653<\/td>The Originalist Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito<\/a><\/td>J. Joel Alicea<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
671<\/td>The Contextual Textualism of Justice Alito<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
687<\/td>Justice Alito’s First Amendment Vigilance on the Third Circuit<\/a><\/td>Hon. Stephanos Bibas<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
703<\/td>The Prudent Judge<\/a><\/td>Hon. Steven Menashi<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
727<\/td>Erie<\/em> and Contemporary Federal Courts Doctrine<\/a><\/td>Jack Goldsmith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
743<\/td>Justice Alito on Criminal Law<\/a><\/td>Kate Stith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
765<\/td>Justice Alito on Criminal Procedure<\/a><\/td>Hon. Andrew S. Oldham<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
787<\/td>Justice Alito: A Justice of Foxes and Hedgehogs<\/a><\/td>Hon. Amul Thapar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
811<\/td>An Architect of Religious Liberty Docrtines for the Roberts Court<\/a><\/td>Gabrielle Girgis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
831<\/td>Samuel Alito’s Conservatism\u2014Burkean and American<\/a><\/td>Adam J. White<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
861<\/td>Reason and Fiat in the Jurisprudence of Justice Alito<\/a><\/td>Adrian Vermeule<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
879<\/td>Justice Alito’s Free Speech Jurisprudence<\/a><\/td>Keith E. Whittington<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
901<\/td>The Elevation of Reality over Restraint in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization<\/em><\/a><\/td>Kevin C. Walsh<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 46 – Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spring 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Symposium
\n<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Administrative Law in the States<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

303<\/td>Learning from Laboratories of Liberty<\/a><\/td>Adam J. White<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
307<\/td>Administrative Law in the States: An Introduction to the Symposium<\/a><\/td>Hon. Jeffrey S. Sutton
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
323<\/td>The Administrative State and Separation of Powers in Wisconsin<\/a><\/td>Hon. Brian Hagedorn<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
337<\/td>Administrative Deference in Colorado<\/a><\/td>Hon. Melissa Hart
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
349<\/td>Georgia Judicial Deference to Executive Branch Agency Legal Interpretations<\/a><\/td>Hon. Nels S.D. Peterson
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
361<\/td>Something There is That Doesn’t Love a Wall<\/a><\/td>Hon. Caleb Stegall
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
377<\/td>Nondelegation in Pennsylvania<\/a><\/td>Hon. David N. Wecht & Lawrence McIntyre
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

In Memoriam
\n<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

389<\/td>In Memoriam: Sen. Orrin Hatch<\/a><\/td>Sen. Mike Lee
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

395<\/td>“This”<\/a><\/td>Cass R. Sunstein
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
419<\/td>Keeping Our Balance: Why the Free Exercise Clause Needs Text, History, and Tradition<\/a><\/td>William J. Haun
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
457<\/td>The Constraint of History<\/a><\/td>Lorianne Updike Toler & Robert Capodilupo
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Note<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

549<\/td>The Necessary and Proper Investigatory Power<\/a><\/td>Brett Raffish
\n<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 46 – Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Winter 2023<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists: <\/strong><\/h3>\n

Revisiting the Founding Debates<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1<\/td>Were the Founders Themselves Originalists?<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
15<\/td>The Anti-Federalists: Planting the Seeds of American Populism?<\/a><\/td>Michelle M. Kundmueller<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>21st Century Federalism: A View from the States<\/a><\/td>Hon. Jeffrey S. Sutton<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
43<\/td>“Partly Federal, Partly National”: The Founders’ Middle Course<\/a><\/td>Michael McConnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
57<\/td>The Original Federalist Theory of Implied Powers<\/a><\/td>John Mikhail<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speeches<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

69<\/td>Wither the Consumer Welfare Standard?<\/a><\/td>Hon. Douglas H. Ginsburg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
87<\/td>The Province of Law<\/a><\/td>Hon. Neomi Rao<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

105<\/td>Official Immunity at the Founding<\/a><\/td>Hon. Andrew S. Oldham<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
135<\/td>Liquidating the Independent State Legislature Theory<\/a><\/td>Michael Weingartner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Notes<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

221<\/td>The Roberts Court’s Functionalist Turn in Administrative Law<\/a><\/td>Thomas A. Koenig & Benjamin R. Pontz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
257<\/td>The Meaning of “Public Meaning”: An Originalist Dilemma Embodied by Mahanoy Area School District<\/a><\/td>Frances Williamson<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 45 – Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Summer 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Essay<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

773<\/td>A Congressional Review Act for the Major Questions Doctrine<\/a><\/td>Christopher J. Walker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

795<\/td>Alexander Hamilton, the Nondelegation Doctrine, and the Creation of the United States<\/a><\/td>Aditya Bamzai<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
837<\/td>Private Delegation Outside of Executive Supervision<\/a><\/td>Jennifer L. Mascott<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Adapted Brief<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

927<\/td>Equal Protection and the Unborn Child: A Dobbs<\/em> Brief<\/a><\/td>John Finnis & Robert P. George<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Notes and Case Comments<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1033<\/td>A Standoff: Havens Realty v. Coleman<\/em> Tester Standing and TransUnion v. Ramirez<\/em> in the Circuit Courts<\/a><\/td>Catherine Cole<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1057<\/td>The Constitutionality of For-Cause Removal Protections for Inspectors General<\/a><\/td>Ari Spitzer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1077<\/td>TransUnion v. Ramirez<\/em>: Levels of Generality and Originalist Analogies<\/a><\/td>Jason Altabet<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the full issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 45 – Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spring 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

Essay<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

481<\/td>Restoring States’ Rights & Adhering to Cooperative Federalism in Environmental Policy<\/a><\/td>Senator Kevin Cramer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Remembrance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

503<\/td>In Remembrance of Barbara K. Olson<\/a><\/td>Ted Olson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

523<\/td>The Horseless Carriage of Constitutional Interpretation: Corpus Linguistics and the Meaning of “Direct Taxes” in Hylton v. United States<\/em><\/a><\/td>Hon. John K. Bush & A.J. Jeffries<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
571<\/td>Harm and Hegemony: The Decline of Free Speech in the United States<\/a><\/td>Jonathan Turley<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Notes and Case Comments<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

703<\/td>Political Nonexpenditures: “Defunding Boycotts” as Pure Speech<\/a><\/td>Hunter Pearl<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
731<\/td>The Ordinary Lawyer Corpus: The Federalist Papers Approach<\/a><\/td>Samantha Thorne<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
761<\/td>Quick Look Review as a New Path to Salvation: NCAA v. Alston<\/em>, 141 S. Ct. 2141 (2021)<\/a><\/td>Rogan Feng<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Volume 45 – Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Winter 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n

International Law and U.S. Foreign Policy<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

1<\/td>The Importance of the Legislature: International Law, Foreign Policy, and Article One Powers<\/a><\/td>Senator Mike Lee<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
17<\/td>Trade and Sovereignty: What You Can See By Looking<\/a><\/td>Ronald A. Cass<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>Myths and Realities of Global Governance<\/a><\/td>Oona A. Hathaway<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
55<\/td>The Democratic Limits of International Human Rights Law<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
69<\/td>On Unilateral Presidential War Powers<\/a><\/td>John Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Speech<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

83<\/td>Remarks to the 2020 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention<\/a><\/td>The Honorable Samuel A. Alito Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Essay<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

103<\/td>Myths of Common Good Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Conor Casey & Adrian Vermeule<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

147<\/td>Overbroad Injunctions Against Speech (Especially in Libel and Harassment Cases)<\/a><\/td>Eugene Volokh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
257<\/td>Lower Court Originalism<\/a><\/td>Ryan C. Williams<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
\n

Notes and Case Comments<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/td><\/tr>

349<\/td>The Future of Judicial Deference to the Commentary of the United States Sentencing Guidelines<\/a><\/td>John S. Acton<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
407<\/td>Arbitrary Property Interference During a Global Pandemic and Beyond<\/a><\/td>Brett Raffish<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
465<\/td>A Ministerial Exception for All Seasons: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru<\/em>, 140 S. Ct. 2049 (2020)<\/a><\/td>Jason J. Muehlhoff<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Download the complete issue here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Volume 48 – Issue 1 Winter 2025 43rd Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium Why Separate Powers?   1 States in the Separation of Powers Ernest Young 33 Answered by Text Jennifer L. Mascott & Eli Nachmany 73 The Major Questions Doctrine, Post-Chevron? Skidmore, Loper-Bright, and a Good-Faith Emergency Question Doctrine Jed Handelsman Shugerman 107 Life, the Universe, and the Judicial Power Gary Lawson 125 Judicial Review and the Legislative Power in the Roberts Court […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":134,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2477","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-DX","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/134"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}