{"id":3924,"date":"2026-03-12T16:35:01","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T20:35:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3924"},"modified":"2026-03-12T16:35:01","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T20:35:01","slug":"volume-38","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-38\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 38"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Federalist Society National Lawyer’s Convention–2014<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
781<\/td>Working Backwards: How Employment Regulation Hurts Unemployed Millenials<\/a><\/td>Gail Heriot<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
789<\/td>Contractual Solutions for Employment Law Problems<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
803<\/td>Employment Regulation and Youth Employment: A Critical Perspective<\/a><\/td>J.H. Verkerke<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
817<\/td>Originalism as a Theory of Legal Change<\/a><\/td>Stephen E. Sachs<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
889<\/td>Why Non-Originalism Does Not Justify Departing From the Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause<\/a><\/td>Michael B. Rappaport<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
973<\/td>Behavioral Public Choice: The Behavioral Paradox of Government Policy<\/a><\/td>W. Kip Viscusi & Ted Gayer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1009<\/td>State “Competitor’s Veto” Laws and the Right to Earn a Living: Some Paths to Federal Reform<\/a><\/td>Timothy Sandefur<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
National Security and the Separation of Powers<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
451<\/td>Advising the President: The Growing Scope of Executive Power to Protect America<\/a><\/td>Alberto R. Gonzales<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
509<\/td>The Argument for a New and Flexible Authorization for the Use of Military Force<\/a><\/td>William S. Castle<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
547<\/td>Exploring U.S. Treaty Practice Through a Military Lens<\/a><\/td>Geoffrey S. Corn & Dru Brenner-Beck<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Article<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
629<\/td>The Founders’ Origination Clause and Implications for the Affordable Care Act<\/a><\/td>Robert G. Natelson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Notes<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
711<\/td>Textualism and the Presumption of Reasonable Drafting<\/a><\/td>Cory R. Liu<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
729<\/td>Liberty Requires Accountability: Checking Delegations to Independent Agencies<\/a><\/td>David Casazza<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
729<\/td>Liberty Requires Accountability: Checking Delegations to Independent Agencies<\/a><\/td>David Casazza<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Development<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
761<\/td>“Your Raisins or Your Life”: The Harrowing of the Takings Clause in Horne v. U.S. Department of Agriculture<\/em>, 750 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2014)<\/a><\/td>William K. Lane III<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Thirty-Third Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium on Law and Public Policy – 2014<\/strong>
Security vs. Freedom: Contemporary Controversies<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>Why the NSA Data Seizures are Unconstitutional<\/a><\/td>Randy Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
21<\/td>The Constitution Follows the Drone: Targeted Killings, Legal Constraints, and Judicial Safeguards<\/a><\/td>Martin S. Flaherty<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
43<\/td>Drone On: The Commander in Chief Power to Target and Kill Americans<\/a><\/td>Michael Stokes Paulsen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
63<\/td>The Obama Administration’s Unprecedented Lawlessness<\/a><\/td>Senator Ted Cruz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
117<\/td>Section 702 and the Collection of International Telephone and Internet Content<\/a><\/td>Laura K. Donohue<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
267<\/td>The Paradox of Administrative Preemption<\/a><\/td>David S. Rubenstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
337<\/td>The Dynamic Incorporation of Foreign Law and the Constitutional Regulation of Federal Lawmaking<\/a><\/td>Paul J. Larkin, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Development<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
437<\/td>Whose Religion Matters in Corporate RFRA Claims After Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores<\/em>?, 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014)<\/a><\/td>Spencer Churchill<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 The Federalist Society National Lawyer’s Convention–2014 781 Working Backwards: How Employment Regulation Hurts Unemployed Millenials Gail Heriot 789 Contractual Solutions for Employment Law Problems Richard A. Epstein 803 Employment Regulation and Youth Employment: A Critical Perspective J.H. Verkerke Articles 817 Originalism as a Theory of Legal Change Stephen E. Sachs 889 Why Non-Originalism Does Not Justify Departing From the Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause Michael B. Rappaport 973 Behavioral Public Choice: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3924","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-11i","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3924"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3924\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}