{"id":3925,"date":"2026-03-12T16:44:48","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T20:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3925"},"modified":"2026-03-13T13:42:07","modified_gmt":"2026-03-13T17:42:07","slug":"volume-37","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-37\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 37"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Federalist Society National Lawyers’ Convention\u20142013<\/strong>
Textualism and the Role of Judges<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
705<\/td>Beyond Textualism: Why Originalist Theory Must Apply Beyond General Principles of Interpretation to Constitutional Law<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
721<\/td>Textualism and the Bill of Rights<\/a><\/td>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
729<\/td>Textualism and District of Columbia v. Heller<\/em><\/a><\/td>Eugene Volokh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
737<\/td>The Limits of Textualism in Interpreting the Confrontation Clause<\/a><\/td>Stephanos Bibas<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Thirteenth Annual Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
743<\/td>Law’s Irony<\/a><\/td>Hon. Neil M. Gorsuch<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
757<\/td>Bulk Metadata Collection: Statutory and Constitutional Considerations<\/a><\/td>Laura K. Donohue<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
901<\/td>The Legality of the National Security Agency’s Bulk Data Surveillance Programs<\/a><\/td>John Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
931<\/td>The New Private-Regulation Skepticism: Due Process, Non-Delegation, and Antitrust Challenges<\/a><\/td>Alexander Volokh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1009<\/td>The Empty Promise of Behavioral Antitrust<\/a><\/td>Alan Devlin & Michael Jacobs<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1065<\/td>Strict Liability Offenses, Incarceration, and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause<\/a><\/td>Paul J. Larkin, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1123<\/td>What’s the Point of Originalism?<\/a><\/td>Donald L. Drakeman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Notes<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1151<\/td>Neither “Ministerial” nor an “Exception”: The Ministerial Exception in Light of Hosanna-Tabor<\/em><\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
1171<\/td>Duty or Dignity? Competing Approaches to the Free Exercise Rights of For-Profit Corporations<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Executive Discretion and the Rule of Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
377<\/td>Take Care Now: Stare Decisis and the President\u2019s Duty to Defend Acts of Congress<\/a><\/td>Curt A. Levey & Kenneth A. Klukowski<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
425<\/td>Regulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Activity Without OMB and Cost-Benefit Review<\/a><\/td>John D. Graham & Cory R. Liu<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
447<\/td>Responding to Agency Avoidance of OIRA<\/a><\/td>Nina A. Mendelson & Jonathan B. Wiener<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
523<\/td>Agency Discretion as \u201cWhac-a-Mole\u201d: The Challenge of Restricting Agency Use of Nonlegislative Rules<\/a><\/td>Stuart Shapiro<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
553<\/td>\u201cAgency Threats\u201d and the Rule of Law: An Offer You Can\u2019t Refuse<\/a><\/td>Jerry Brito<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
579<\/td>Sue, Settle, and Shut Out the States: Destroying the Environmental Benefits of Cooperative Federalism<\/a><\/td>Henry N. Butler & Nathaniel J. Harris<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Speech<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
629<\/td>Don\u2019t Mess With Texas Judges: In Praise of the State Judiciary<\/a><\/td>Hon. Jennifer Walker Elrod<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Notes<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
653<\/td>Building on Executive Order 13,636 to Encourage Information Sharing for Cybersecurity Purposes<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
677<\/td>Detainment Power: The Limits of the President\u2019s Power to Suspend Habeas Corpus During Military Conflicts<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
695<\/td>Rules versus Standards in City of Arlington v. FCC<\/em>, 132 S. Ct. 1421 (2012)<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Thirty-Second Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium on Law and Public Policy\u20142013<\/strong>
The Federal Leviathan: Is There Any Area of Modern Life to Which Federal Government Power Does Not Extend?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
I. Crony Capitalism<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>CRONY CAPITALISM: RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW<\/a><\/td>Jonathan R. Macey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
II. Environmental and Property Laws<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
13<\/td>THE LEGITIMATE REACH OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVOLUTION<\/a><\/td>Lynn E. Blais<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
23<\/td>MODERN ENVIRONMENTALISTS OVERREACH: A PLEA FOR UNDERSTANDING BACKGROUND COMMON LAW PRINCIPLES<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
41<\/td>AGAINST THE EPA, ABSURDITY IS NO DEFENSE<\/a><\/td>Jeremy A. Rabkin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
III. Federalization of Criminal Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
51<\/td>INTENT-OPTIONAL CRIMINAL STATUTES: A PLEA FOR REFORM, AND A NOTE OF CAUTION TO REFORMERS<\/a><\/td>William G. Otis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
57<\/td>THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL \u201cCODE\u201d: RETURN OF OVERFEDERALIZATION<\/a><\/td>Julie Rose O\u2019Sullivan<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
IV. Limitations Attached to Federal Money<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
71<\/td>THE SPENDING POWER AFTER NFIB V. SEBELIUS<\/em><\/a><\/td>Lynn A. Baker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
83<\/td>COERCION, CONDITIONS, AND COMMANDEERING: A BRIEF NOTE ON THE MEDICAID HOLDING OF NFIB V. SEBELIUS<\/em><\/a><\/td>Michael S. Greve<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
93<\/td>VIVA CONDITIONAL FEDERAL SPENDING!<\/a><\/td>Samuel R. Bagenstos<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
V. Civil Rights<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
103<\/td>THE SUPREME COURT\u2019S PERVERSION OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT<\/a><\/td>Lino A. Graglia<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
113<\/td>THE ODD EVOLUTION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS STATE<\/a><\/td>R. Shep Melnick<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
137<\/td>INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY<\/a><\/td>Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
145<\/td>THE UNEASY CASE FOR INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY<\/a><\/td>Michael Stokes Paulsen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
165<\/td>TOWARD IMPROVED INTELLECTUAL DIVERSITY IN LAW SCHOOLS<\/a><\/td>George W. Dent, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
179<\/td>LEGAL ACADEMIA AND THE BLINDNESS OF THE ELITES<\/a><\/td>Paul Campos<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
187<\/td>HOW THE LAW SCHOOL CAN SUCCEED\u2014AN INVITATION<\/a><\/td>Sherif Girgis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
199<\/td>THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF \u201cVACANCIES THAT MAY HAPPEN DURING THE RECESS\u201d IN THE CONSTITUTION\u2019S RECESS APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE<\/a><\/td>Robert G. Natelson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
241<\/td>CRACK COCAINE, CONGRESSIONAL INACTION, AND EQUAL PROTECTION<\/a><\/td>Paul J. Larkin, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
295<\/td>COMPLETE DIVERSITY AND THE CLOSING OF THE FEDERAL COURTS<\/a><\/td>Charles J. Cooper & Howard C. Nielson, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Note<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
329<\/td>LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD: REEXAMINING THE APPLICATION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE TO CONVEYED PARTIES<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
347<\/td>THE RETURN OF CLASSICAL POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE IN ZIVOTOFSKY <\/em>EX REL. ZIVOTOFSKY V. CLINTON<\/em>, 132 S. CT. 1421 (2012)<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr>
363<\/td>A \u201c[NON]ESSENTIAL LIMIT ON OUR POWER\u201d: STANDING DOCTRINE AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN HOLLINGSWORTH V. PERRY<\/em>, 133 S. CT. 2652 (2013)<\/a><\/td> <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 The Federalist Society National Lawyers’ Convention\u20142013Textualism and the Role of Judges 705 Beyond Textualism: Why Originalist Theory Must Apply Beyond General Principles of Interpretation to Constitutional Law Richard A. Epstein 721 Textualism and the Bill of Rights Nadine Strossen 729 Textualism and District of Columbia v. Heller Eugene Volokh 737 The Limits of Textualism in Interpreting the Confrontation Clause Stephanos Bibas Thirteenth Annual Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture 743 Law’s Irony Hon. Neil […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3925","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-11j","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}