{"id":3928,"date":"2026-03-12T17:52:52","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T21:52:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3928"},"modified":"2026-03-12T17:52:52","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T21:52:52","slug":"volume-35","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-35\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 35"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention\u20142011<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
821<\/td><\/a>REFLECTIONS ON HOSANNA-TABOR<\/em><\/a><\/td>Michael McConnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
839<\/td><\/a>HOSANNA-TABOR<\/em> AND THE MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION<\/a><\/td>Douglas Laycock<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
863<\/td><\/a>MEET THE NEW BOSS: CONTINUITY IN PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS?<\/a><\/td>Michael D. Ramsey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Fourth Annual Rosenkranz Debate<\/strong><\/strong>
Resolved: Congress Acted Within Its Authority in Enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
873<\/td><\/a>THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: SWIMMING IN THE STREAM OF COMMERCE<\/a><\/td>Laurence H. Tribe<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
887<\/td><\/a>THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF FEDERAL POWER<\/a><\/td>Paul Clement<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
897<\/td><\/a>THE AVAILABILITY OF COMMON LAW PRIVILEGES FOR WITNESSES IN CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS<\/a><\/td>Michael D. Bopp & DeLisa Lay<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
933<\/td><\/a>THE ETHICS OF OPPOSING CERTIORARI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT<\/a><\/td>Aaron Tang<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Note<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
797<\/td><\/a>ARBITRATION, CLASS WAIVERS, AND STATUTORY RIGHTS<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Law in an Age of Austerity<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
453<\/td><\/a><\/a>FISCAL POLICY IN AN ERA OF AUSTERITY<\/a><\/td>David M. Schizer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
487<\/td><\/a><\/a>THE REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT TO INDEX CAPITAL GAINS FOR INFLATION: A SEQUAL<\/a><\/td>Charles J. Cooper & Vincent Colatriano<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
525<\/td><\/a><\/a>JUDICIAL COMPULSION AND THE PUBLIC FISC\u2014A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW<\/a><\/td>Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, E. Duncan Getchell Jr., & Wesley G. Russell Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
543<\/td><\/a><\/a>REDUCING THE DRUG WAR’S DAMAGE TO GOVERNMENT BUDGETS<\/a><\/td>David B. Kopel & Trevor Burrus<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
569<\/td><\/a><\/a>PAPERS, PLEASE: DOES THE CONSTITUTION PERMIT THE STATES A ROLE IN IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT?<\/a><\/td>John C. Eastman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
593<\/td><\/a><\/a>ITS HOUR COME ROUND AT LAST? STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE GREAT STATE DEBT CRISIS OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY<\/a><\/td>Ernest A. Young<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
933<\/td><\/a>THE ETHICS OF OPPOSING CERTIORARI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT<\/a><\/td>Aaron Tang<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Symposium on Judicial Independence<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
623<\/td><\/a><\/a>JUDICIAL SELECTION RECONSIDERED: A PLEA FOR RADICAL MODERATION<\/a><\/td>Charles Gardner Geyh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
643<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a>CONTESTING THE JUDICIAL POWER IN THE STATES<\/a><\/td>G. Alan Tarr<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
663<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a>IF MEN WERE ANGELS<\/a><\/td>William R. Casto<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
671<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a>CONCLUDING THOUGHTS FROM ADA, OHIO<\/a><\/td>Scott Douglas Gerber<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
681<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a>AGAINST LIABILITY FOR PRIVATE RISK-EXPOSURE<\/a><\/td>Sheila B. Scheuerman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
743<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a>A FAREWELL TO HARMS: AGAINST PRESUMING IRREPARABLE INJURY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION<\/a><\/td>Anthony DiSarro<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Note<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
797<\/td><\/a><\/a><\/a>STARE DECISIS IN AN ORIGINALIST CONGRESS<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Thirtieth Annual Federalist Society National Student Symposium<\/strong><\/strong>
Capitalism, Markets, and the Constitution<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
I. Economic Freedoms and the Constitution<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>DOES THE CONSTITUTION PROTECT ECONOMIC LIBERTY?<\/a><\/td>Randy Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
13<\/td>ECONOMIC FREEDOMS AND THE CONSTITUTION<\/a><\/td>Jeffrey Rosen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
II. Economic Theory, Civic Virtue, and the Meaning of the Constitution<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
27<\/td>THE CONSTITUTION AND ECONOMIC LIBERTY<\/a><\/td>James W. Ely Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
37<\/td>ENLIGHTENMENT ECONOMICS AND THE FRAMING OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION<\/a><\/td>Ren\u00e9e Lettow Lerner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
47<\/td>JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, JUDICIAL VIRTUE, AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CONSTITUTION<\/a><\/td>Nelson Lund<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
61<\/td>THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION<\/a><\/td>G. Edward White<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
III. Federalism and Interstate Competition<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
89<\/td>INTERSTATE COMPETITION AND THE RACE TO THE TOP<\/a><\/td>Jonathan H. Adler<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
101<\/td>FISCAL FEDERALISM AS A CONSTRAINT ON STATES<\/a><\/td>Clayton P. Gillette<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
115<\/td>FEDERALISM AS A DISCOVERY PROCESS AND A CATALYST FOR HUMILITY<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
121<\/td>DEPOLITICIZING FEDERALISM<\/a><\/td>Louis Michael Seidman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
IV. The Welfare State and American Exceptionalism<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
131<\/td>NATIONAL HEALTHCARE AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE<\/a><\/td>William P. Marshall<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
153<\/td>AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE HEALTHCARE REFORM DEBATE<\/a><\/td>Jeremy Rabkin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
171<\/td>AMERICAN DIGNITY AND HEALTHCARE REFORM<\/a><\/td>Neomi Rao<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
V. Economic Uncertainty and the Role of the Courts<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
187<\/td>ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS<\/a><\/td>Paul G. Mahoney<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
195<\/td>ECONOMIC UNCERTAINY, THE COURTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW<\/a><\/td>Todd Zywicki<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Reflections on the Law of September 11: A Ten-Year Retrospective<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
213<\/td>DEFERENCE TO THE EXECUTIVE IN THE UNITED STATES AFTER SEPTEMBER 11: CONGRESS, THE COURTS, AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL<\/a><\/td>Eric A. Posner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
245<\/td>U.S. INTELLIGENCE IN THE WAKE OF SEPTEMBER 11: THE RISE OF THE SPY COMMANDO AND REORGANIZED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES<\/a><\/td>Frederick P. Hitz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essay<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
259<\/td>WHAT WOULD HAMILTON DO?<\/a><\/td>Michael W. McConnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
283<\/td>IN DEFENSE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, OR THE PROMISE OF LAWFUL RULE<\/a><\/td>Timothy Sandefur<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
351<\/td>IN PRAISE OF HOSTILITY: ANTIAUTHORITARIANISM AS FREE SPEECH PRINCIPLE<\/a><\/td>John M. Kang<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
797<\/td>STATE LAW CLAIMS AND ARTICLE III IN Stern v. Marshall<\/em>, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
439<\/td>MAINTAINING THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE STANDARD FOR PATENT INVALIDITY CHALLENGES IN Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership<\/em>, 131 S. Ct. 2238 (2011)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 The Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention\u20142011 821 REFLECTIONS ON HOSANNA-TABOR Michael McConnell 839 HOSANNA-TABOR AND THE MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION Douglas Laycock 863 MEET THE NEW BOSS: CONTINUITY IN PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS? Michael D. Ramsey Fourth Annual Rosenkranz DebateResolved: Congress Acted Within Its Authority in Enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 873 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: SWIMMING IN THE STREAM OF COMMERCE Laurence H. Tribe 887 THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3928","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-11m","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}