{"id":3987,"date":"2026-03-15T19:57:54","date_gmt":"2026-03-15T23:57:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3987"},"modified":"2026-03-15T19:57:54","modified_gmt":"2026-03-15T23:57:54","slug":"volume-33","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-33\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 33"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL
LAWYERS CONVENTION \u2014 2009<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
907<\/td>BEING HONEST ABOUT BEING HONEST AGENTS<\/a><\/td>Guido Calabresi<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
915<\/td>JUDGES AS HONEST AGENTS<\/a><\/td>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
925<\/td>WHY CONSERVATIVES, AND OTHERS, HAVE TROUBLE SUPPORTING THE MEANINGFUL ENFORCEMENT OF FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS<\/a><\/td>Alan Brownstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
935<\/td>FEDERALISM AND FAITH REDUX<\/a><\/td>Ira C. Lupu<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
943<\/td>RELIGION AND ITS RELATION TO LIMITED GOVERNMENT<\/a><\/td>Michael W. McConnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
953<\/td>THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE WAR ON TERROR<\/a><\/td>Michael B. Mukasey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ESSAY<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
963<\/td>THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL JUDGE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION: SOME PERSPECTIVES FROM THE NINTH CIRCUIT<\/a><\/td>Diarmuid F. O\u2019Scannlain<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
987<\/td>LOVE, TRUTH, AND THE ECONOMY: A REFLECTION ON BENEDICT XVI\u2019S CARITAS IN VERITATE<\/em><\/a><\/td>John M. Breen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1031<\/td>CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN KENNEDY V. LOUISIANA<\/em>?<\/a><\/td>Richard M. R\u00e9<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1107<\/td>RATIONAL PLEADING IN THE MODERN WORLD OF CIVIL LITIGATION: THE LESSONS AND PUBLIC POLICY BENEFITS OF TWOMBLY AND IQBAL<\/em><\/a><\/td>Victor E. Schwartz & Christopher E. Appel<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
BOOK REVIEW<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1151<\/td>THE ROLE OF THE FAMILY IN CRIMINAL LAW: PRIVILEGE OR PUNISH<\/em><\/a><\/td>Gerard V. Bradley<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1177<\/td>CHEVRON<\/em>\u2019S SLIDING SCALE IN Wyeth v. Levine<\/em>, 129 S. Ct. 1187 (2009)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1191<\/td>A RETREAT FROM DECISION BY RULE IN Ashcroft v. Iqbal<\/em>, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1203<\/td>THE DECLINE OF THE COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS IN Nebraska Public Power District v. United States<\/em>,
590 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2010)<\/a><\/td>		<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
387<\/td>WHY I WILL NEVER BE A KEYNESIAN<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
407<\/td>UNAFFORDABLE HOUSING AND POLITICAL KICKBACKS ROCKED THE AMERICAN ECONOMY<\/a><\/td>Darrell Issa<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
421<\/td>CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2007\u20132009<\/a><\/td>William Poole<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
443<\/td>SMITH VERSUS KEYNES: ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE POST\u2010CRISIS ERA<\/a><\/td>Samuel Gregg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
465<\/td>THE BANKS VERSUS THE CONSTITUTION<\/a><\/td>Ron Paul<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
476<\/td>STRAW MAN CAPITALISM AND A NEW PATH TO PROSPERITY<\/a><\/td>Stephen Moore & Tyler Grimm<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
487<\/td>FREEDOM AND EQUALITY IN MARKET EXCHANGE: SOME NATURAL LAW REFLECTIONS<\/a><\/td>Christopher Tollefsen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
495<\/td>THE CONSTITUTION AND ITS MORAL WARNINGS<\/a><\/td>Hadley Arkes<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
507<\/td>THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: MORAL FAILURE OR COGNITIVE FAILURE?<\/a><\/td>Arnold Kling<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
519<\/td>THE CASE AGAINST THE FISCAL STIMULUS<\/a><\/td>Jeffrey Miron<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
531<\/td>CUMULATING POLICY CONSEQUENCES, FRIGHTENED OVERREACTIONS, AND THE CURRENT SURGE OF GOVERNMENT\u2019S SIZE, SCOPE, AND POWER<\/a><\/td>Robert Higgs<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
557<\/td>ANTITRUST IN AN ERA OF MARKET FAILURE<\/a><\/td>Alan Devlin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
607<\/td>FACILITATING ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH THROUGH REFORM OF THE SECURITIES CLASS\u2010ACTION SYSTEM: EXPLORING ARBITRATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO LITIGATION<\/a><\/td>Bradley J. Bondi<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
639<\/td>THE DISTORTING INCENTIVES FACING THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION<\/a><\/td>Jonathan R. Macey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
671<\/td>THE REDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC RISK IN THE UNITED STATES FINANCIAL SYSTEM<\/a><\/td>Hal S. Scott<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
735<\/td>THE SCANDAL BENEATH THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: GETTING A VIEW FROM A MORAL\u2010CULTURAL MENTAL MODEL<\/a><\/td>Kevin T. Jackson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
779<\/td>DOES THE STATE CREATE THE MARKET\u2014AND SHOULD IT PURSUE EFFICIENCY?<\/a><\/td>Timothy Sandefur<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
807<\/td>INTELLECTUAL HAZARD: HOW CONCEPTUAL BIASES IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS CONTRIBUTED TO THE CRISIS OF 2008<\/a><\/td>Geoffrey P. Miller & Gerald Rosenfeld<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
NOTES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
841<\/td>PUBLICITY RIGHTS, FALSE ENDORSEMENT, AND THE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
863<\/td>AN INTERPRETIVE FRAMEWORK FOR NARROWER IMMUNITY UNDER SECTION 230 OF THE
COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT<\/a><\/td>		<\/td><\/tr>
885<\/td>PUNISHMENT AND STUDENT SPEECH: STRAINING THE REACH OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
THE TWENTY\u2010EIGHTH ANNUAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL STUDENT SYMPOSIUM
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
I. Is The Separation of Powers Principle Exportable?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>IS THE SEPARATION OF POWERS EXPORTABLE?<\/a><\/td>Steven G. Calabresi & Kyle Bady<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
17<\/td>THE CASE FOR PROMOTING DEMOCRACY THROUGH EXPORT CONTROL<\/a><\/td>Oona Hathaway<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
II. Medell\u00edn v. Texas<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
25<\/td>DEFENDING U.S. SOVEREIGNTY, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND FEDERALISM IN MEDELL\u00cdN V. TEXAS<\/a><\/td>Ted Cruz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
III. Confirmation Battles and Presidential Nominations<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
39<\/td>IN PRAISE OF SUPREME COURT FILIBUSTERS<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
47<\/td>JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS: CHECKS AND BALANCES IN PRACTICE<\/a><\/td>Rachel Brand<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
IV. The Administrative State and the Constitution<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
55<\/td>BURYING THE CONSTITUTION UNDER A TARP<\/a><\/td>Gary Lawson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
73<\/td>DELEGATION AND JUDICIAL REVIEW<\/a><\/td>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
87<\/td>DECONSTRUCTING NONDELEGATION<\/a><\/td>Cynthia R. Farina<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
103<\/td>LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE, AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE<\/a><\/td>Peter M. Shane<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
V. War Powers and the Executive<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
113<\/td>THE WAR POWER<\/a><\/td>Michael Stokes Paulsen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
139<\/td>CLEAR STATEMENT RULES AND EXECUTIVE WAR POWERS<\/a><\/td>Curtis A. Bradley<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Exchange<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
149<\/td>THE PUZZLE OF HAMILTON\u2019S FEDERALIST NO. 77<\/a><\/td>Seth Barrett Tillman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
169<\/td>THE TRADITIONAL VIEW OF HAMILTON\u2019S FEDERALIST NO. 77 AND AN UNEXPECTED CHALLENGE: A RESPONSE TO SETH BARRETT TILLMAN<\/a><\/td>Jeremy D. Bailey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essays on Heller<\/em><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
185<\/td>THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS IN THE STATES: AMBIGUITY, FALSE MODESTY, AND (MAYBE) ANOTHER WIN FOR ORIGINALISM<\/a><\/td>Clark M. Neily III<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
203<\/td>SECOND AMENDMENT REDUX: SCRUTINY, INCORPORATION, AND THE HELLER PARADOX<\/a><\/td>Robert A. Levy<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
217<\/td>ORIGINALISM AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: TWO CASE STUDIES OF CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE
IN SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING<\/a><\/td>		Douglas H. Ginsburg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
239<\/td>REVIVING NECESSITY IN EMINENT DOMAIN<\/a><\/td>Robert C. Bird<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
283<\/td>THE LONELY DEATH OF PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING<\/a><\/td>Richard M. Esenberg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Book Review<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
333<\/td>A FAINT\u2010HEARTED LIBERTARIAN AT BEST: THE SWEET MYSTERY OF JUSTICE ANTHONY KENNEDY<\/a><\/td>Ilya Shapiro<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
361<\/td>TITLE VII\u2019S CONFLICTING \u201cTWIN PILLARS\u201d IN Ricci v. DeStefano<\/em>, 129 S. Ct. 2658 (2009)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
375<\/td>FEDERALISM BY JURY IN United States v. Fell<\/em>, 571 F.3d 264 (2d Cir. 2009)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONALLAWYERS CONVENTION \u2014 2009 907 BEING HONEST ABOUT BEING HONEST AGENTS Guido Calabresi 915 JUDGES AS HONEST AGENTS Frank H. Easterbrook 925 WHY CONSERVATIVES, AND OTHERS, HAVE TROUBLE SUPPORTING THE MEANINGFUL ENFORCEMENT OF FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS Alan Brownstein 935 FEDERALISM AND FAITH REDUX Ira C. Lupu 943 RELIGION AND ITS RELATION TO LIMITED GOVERNMENT Michael W. McConnell 953 THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE WAR ON TERROR Michael B. Mukasey ESSAY […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3987","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12j","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3987\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}