{"id":3988,"date":"2026-03-15T20:19:32","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T00:19:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3988"},"modified":"2026-03-15T20:19:32","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T00:19:32","slug":"volume-32","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-32\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 32"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
THE GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION: A RETROSPECTIVE<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
813<\/td>Reflections on Events and Changes at the Department of Justice<\/a><\/td>John Ashcroft<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
831<\/td>National Security and the Rule of Law<\/a><\/td>Michael B. Mukasey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
843<\/td>The “Bush Doctrine”: Can Preventitive War Be Justified?<\/a><\/td>Robert J. Delahunty & John Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
867<\/td>Public Bioethics and the Bush Presidency<\/a><\/td>O. Carter Snead<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
915<\/td>Speaking Up For Marriage<\/a><\/td>William C. Duncan<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
931<\/td>Faith-Based Initiative 2.0: The Bush Faith-Based and Community Initiative<\/a><\/td>Stanley W. Carlson\u2010Thies<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
949<\/td>The Bush Administration and America’s International Religious Freedom Policy<\/a><\/td>Thomas F. Farr & William L. Saunders, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
971<\/td>Unfinished Business: The Bush Administration and Racial Preferences<\/a><\/td>Roger Clegg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
997<\/td>A Measured Approach: Employment and Labor Law During the George W. Bush Years<\/a><\/td>William J. Kilberg, Jason Schwartz & Joshua Chadwick<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1015<\/td>False Premises: The Accountability Fetish in Education<\/a><\/td>Martha Derthick & Joshua M. Dunn<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essay<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1035<\/td>The Constitution as the Playbook for Judicial Selection<\/a><\/td>Orrin G. Hatch<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1045<\/td>Measuring Meta-Doctrine: An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Minimalism in the Supreme Court<\/a><\/td>Robert Anderson IV<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1093<\/td>Testing the Boundaries of the First Amendment Press Clause: A Proposal for Protecting the Media from Newsgathering Torts<\/a><\/td>Anthony L. Fargo & Laurence B. Alexander<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1155<\/td>Reconsidering the Felony Murder Rule in Light of Modern Criticisms: Doesn’t the Conclusion Depend Upon the Particular Rule at Issue?<\/a><\/td>David Crump<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1187<\/td>Imperfect Minimalism: Unanswered Questions In Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.<\/em>, 128 S. Ct. 1396 (2008<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1197<\/td>“Wholly Foreign to the First Amendment”: The Demise of Campaign Finance’s Equalizing Rationale In Davis v. Federal Election Commission<\/em>, 128 S. Ct. 2759 (2008<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1211<\/td>Squaring the Circle: Reconciling Clear Statutory Text with Contradictory Statutory Purpose In United States v. Whitley<\/em>, 529 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2008)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL LAWYERS CONVENTION\u20142007<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
I. Is America Different From Other Major Democracies?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
451<\/td>The Separation of People and State<\/a><\/td>Randy E. Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
455<\/td>Exceptionalism in a Time of Stress<\/a><\/td>Graham Wilson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
II. The Constitution and American Exceptionalism: Citation of Foreign Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
475<\/td>An American Amendment<\/a><\/td>Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
III. American Exceptionalism, The War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
485<\/td>Answering the Critics of the Legal Case for the War on Terror<\/a><\/td>David B. Rivkin, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
495<\/td>American Exceptionalism, the War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World<\/a><\/td>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ESSAY<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
503<\/td>On Honor<\/a><\/td>Laurence H. Silberman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
513<\/td>Neutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought<\/a><\/td>John M. Breen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
599<\/td>Restricting Experimental Use<\/a><\/td>Alan Devlin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
653<\/td>The Use and Abuse of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation<\/a><\/td>Ganesh Sitaraman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
695<\/td>Why Can’t Martha Stewart Have A Gun?<\/a><\/td>C. Kevin Marshall<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
BOOK REVIEW<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
737<\/td>Exposing the Myth of Homo Economicus<\/a><\/td>Ronald J. Colombo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
767<\/td>Treaties, Execution, and Originalism\nMedell\u00edn v. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
785<\/td>The Validity of Conditional Sales: Competing Views on Patent Exhaustion in\nQuanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 2109 (2008)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
799<\/td>Shifting Courses In Admiralty:\nExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Twenty-Seventh Annual National Federalist Society Student Symposium on Law and Public Policy – 2008
The People & The Courts<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
I. Judicial Interference With Community Values<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Judicial Review, Local Values, and Pluralism<\/a><\/td>Richard W. Garnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Counting States<\/a><\/td>Roderick M. Hills, Jr<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Voting With Your Feet Is No Substitute for Constitutional Rights<\/a><\/td>Douglas Laycock<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Norm Change Or Judicial Decree? The Courts, The Public, and Welfare Reform<\/a><\/td>Amy L. Wax<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
II. The Merits of Selecting Our Judges<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>The Merits of Merit Selection<\/a><\/td>Thomas R. Phillips<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Merit Selection: Choosing Judges Based On Their Politics Under The Veil Of A Disarming Name<\/a><\/td>Clifford W. Taylor<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
III. Kelo, Grutter, and Popular Responses To Unpopular Decisions<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Achieving Equal Treatment Through The Ballot Box<\/a><\/td>Ward Connerly<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Political Responses To Supreme Court Decisions<\/a><\/td>Marci A. Hamilton<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
IV. The People’s Common Law: Is Law and Economics Anti-Democratic?<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Law and Economics: Realism or Democracy?<\/a><\/td>Henry E. Smith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
V. An Originalist Judge and the Media<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>An Interpretivist Judge and the Media<\/a><\/td>Stephen J. Markman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Limits Of Interpretivism<\/a><\/td>Richard Primus<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>A Response To Professor Primus<\/a><\/td>Stephen J. Markman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
VI. Tradition and the People’s Constitution<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Sodomy and Guns: Tradition as Democratic Deliberation and Constitutional Interpretation<\/a><\/td>William N. Eskridge, Jr<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ESSAY<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Tools Against Terror: All of the Above<\/a><\/td>Michael Chertoff<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
ARTICLES<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Public Displays of Affection … For God: Religious Moments After McCreary and Van Orden<\/a><\/td>Edith Brown Clement<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Manliness and the Constitution<\/a><\/td>John M. Kang<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Marketing Pharmaceutical Products in the Twentyfirst Century: An Analysis of the Continued Viability of Traditional Principles of Law in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising<\/a><\/td>Victor E. Schwartz, Cary Silverman, Michael J. Hulka &Christopher E. Appel<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Returning to the Pruneyard: The Unconstitutionality of State-Sanctioned Trespass in the Name of Speech<\/a><\/td>Gregory C. Sisk<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
BOOK REVIEW<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Lessons From the Rise of Legal Conservatism<\/a><\/td>Ilya Somin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
RECENT DEVELOPMENT<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>Inventing the “Right To Vote” in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 128 S. Ct. 1610 (2008)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 THE GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION: A RETROSPECTIVE 813 Reflections on Events and Changes at the Department of Justice John Ashcroft 831 National Security and the Rule of Law Michael B. Mukasey 843 The “Bush Doctrine”: Can Preventitive War Be Justified? Robert J. Delahunty & John Yoo 867 Public Bioethics and the Bush Presidency O. Carter Snead 915 Speaking Up For Marriage William C. Duncan 931 Faith-Based Initiative 2.0: The Bush Faith-Based and Community […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3988","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12k","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3988"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3988\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}