{"id":3990,"date":"2026-03-15T22:35:40","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T02:35:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3990"},"modified":"2026-03-17T13:16:44","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T17:16:44","slug":"volume-30","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-30\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 30"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
791<\/td>An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren<\/a><\/td>David R. Stras & Ryan W. Scott<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
831<\/td>Can States Tax National Banks to Educate Consumers About Predatory Lending Practices?<\/a><\/td>Howell E. Jackson & Stacy A. Anderson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
885<\/td>Charter Schools and Collective Bargaining: Compatible Marriage or Illegitimate Relationship?<\/a><\/td>Martin H. Malin & Charles Taylor Kerchner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
939<\/td>Or for Poorer? How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Liberty<\/a><\/td>Roger Severino<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Notes<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
983<\/td>The Newer Textualism: Justice Alito’s Statutory Interpretation<\/a><\/td>Elliott M. Davis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1005<\/td>The Other Way to Amend the Constitution: The Article V Constitutional Convention Amendment Process<\/a><\/td>James Kenneth Rogers<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1023<\/td>Antitrust and Positional Arms Races<\/a><\/td>Michael Sabin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
The Supreme Court of the United States, 2005 & 2006 Terms<\/td><\/tr>
1047<\/td>A Principled Limitation on Judicial Interference: Garcetti v. Ceballos<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 1951 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Andrew Bernie<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1059<\/td>Convoluting the Confrontation Right: Davis v. Washington<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2266 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Candice Chiu<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1071<\/td>Subordination of Powers: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2749 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Jay D. Dealy<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1085<\/td>A Sentence Reinstated, a Text Set Aside: Shirking the Lockett Dilemma in Ayers v. Belmontes<\/em>, 127 S. Ct. 469 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Saritha Komatireddy<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
463<\/td>The Right to Be Present Before Military Commissions and Federal Courts: Protecting National Security in an Age of Classified Information<\/a><\/td>James Nicholas Boeving<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
579<\/td>If You (Re)Build It, They Will Come: Contracts to Remake the Rules of Litigation in Arbitration’s Image<\/a><\/td>Henry S. Noyes<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
649<\/td>Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence<\/a><\/td>Don B. Kates & Gary Mauser<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
695<\/td>Majoritarian Democracy in a Federalist System: The Late Chief Justice Rehnquist and the First Amendment<\/a><\/td>Sheri J. Engelken<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Book Review<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
727<\/td>An Indirect Argument for Limiting Presidential Power<\/a><\/td>Aaron Nielson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Note<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
749<\/td>Retroactive Rulemaking<\/a><\/td>Geoffrey C. Weien<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
The Supreme Court of the United States, 2005 Term<\/td><\/tr>
767<\/td>Legal Injection: The Supreme Court Enters the Lethal Injection Debate: Hill v. McDonough<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2096 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Megan Greer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
781<\/td>The Court’s Missed Opportunity to Draw the Line on Partisan Gerrymandering: LULAC v. Perry<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2594 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Aaron Brooks<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
International Law and the State of the Constitution<\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>What is an International Rule of Law?<\/a><\/td>Dennis Jacobs<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
7<\/td>The Comparative Disadvantage of Customary International Law<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
15<\/td>The Rule of International Law<\/a><\/td>Jeremy Waldron<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>America Self-Defense Shouldn’t Be Too Distracted by International Law<\/a><\/td>Jeremy Rabkin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
65<\/td>The Constitutional Status of Customary International Law<\/a><\/td>Saikrishna Prakash<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
73<\/td>Executive Power v. International Law<\/a><\/td>Robert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
115<\/td>Enforceability of International Tribunals’ Decisions in the United States<\/a><\/td>Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
119<\/td>Enforcing the Avena<\/em> Decision in U.S. Courts<\/a><\/td>Curtis A. Bradley<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
127<\/td>International Adjudicators and Judicial Independence<\/a><\/td>John Harrison<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
137<\/td>Executive Power in Foreign Affairs<\/a><\/td>Alex Kozinski<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
141<\/td>The Textual Basis of the President’s Foreign Affairs Power<\/a><\/td>Michael D. Ramsey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
153<\/td>The Most Dangerous Branch Abroad<\/a><\/td>Martin S. Flaherty<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
173<\/td>Foreign and International Law Sources in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation<\/a><\/td>William H. Pryor Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
177<\/td>International Law as a Resource in Constitutional Interpretation<\/a><\/td>Gerald L. Neuman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
191<\/td>Constitutional Law and Transnational Comparisons: The Youngstown<\/em> Decision and American Exceptionalism<\/a><\/td>Vicki C. Jackson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
223<\/td>Foreign Sources and the American Constitution<\/a><\/td>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
231<\/td>Contracting Out of the Culture Wars: How the Law Should Enforce and Communities of Faith Should Encourage More Enduring Marital Commitments<\/a><\/td>Jamie Alan Aycock<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
283<\/td>The Law and Economics of Software Security<\/a><\/td>Robert W. Hahn & Anne Layne-Farrar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
355<\/td>Law Outside the Market: The Social Utility of the Private Foundation<\/a><\/td>Carl J. Schramm<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
The Supreme Court of the United States, 2005 Term<\/td><\/tr>
417<\/td>Don’t Knock Them Until We Try Them: Civil Suits as a Remedy for Knock-and-Announce Violations After Hudson v. Michigan<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Jonathan Papik<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
427<\/td>The Slow, Just, Unfinished Demise of the Buckley<\/em> Compromise: Randall v. Sorrell<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2479 (2006)<\/a><\/td>James Coleman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
439<\/td>Equipoise, Collective Rights and the Future of the Death Penalty: Kansas v. Marsh<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2516 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Benjamin Barron<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
451<\/td>Elevating Choice Over Quality of Representation: United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez<\/em>, 126 S. Ct. 2557 (2006)<\/a><\/td>Paul Alessio Mezzina<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Articles 791 An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren David R. Stras & Ryan W. Scott 831 Can States Tax National Banks to Educate Consumers About Predatory Lending Practices? Howell E. Jackson & Stacy A. Anderson 885 Charter Schools and Collective Bargaining: Compatible Marriage or Illegitimate Relationship? Martin H. Malin & Charles Taylor Kerchner 939 Or for Poorer? How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Liberty Roger Severino Notes […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3990","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12m","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3990\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}