{"id":3995,"date":"2026-03-15T23:19:57","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:19:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3995"},"modified":"2026-03-19T14:33:47","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T18:33:47","slug":"volume-26","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-26\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 26"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
668<\/td>The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century<\/a><\/td>Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
803<\/td>An Empirical Test of Justice Scalia\u2019s Commitment to the Rule of Law<\/a><\/td>Gary Lawson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
811<\/td>The Retroactive and Prospective Application of Judicial Decisions<\/a><\/td>Bradley Scott Shannon<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
877<\/td>Federalism in Antitrust<\/a><\/td>Robert W. Hahn & Anne Layne-Farrar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
923<\/td>Private Property Rights, Economic Freedom, and Professor Coase: A Critique of Friedman, McCloskey, Medema, and Zorn<\/a><\/td>Walter Block<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
953<\/td>Defining Extortion: Rico, Hobbs, and Statutory Interpretation in in Scheidler v National Organization for Women, Inc.<\/em>, 123 S. Ct. 1057 (2003).<\/a><\/td>Daniel B. Kelly<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
973<\/td>Marijuana or Football (or the Future Farmers of America): Board of Education v. Earls<\/em>, 122 S. Ct 2550 (2002).<\/a><\/td>Brian Kim<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
397<\/td>Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism<\/a><\/td>Guido Pincione<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
455<\/td>Science and Religion Twenty Years After McLean v. Arkansas<\/em>: Evolution, Public Education, and the New Challenge of Intelligent Design<\/a><\/td>Francis J. Beckwith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
501<\/td>Stopping Time: The Pro-Slavery and \u201cIrrevocable\u201d Thirteenth Amendment<\/a><\/td>A. Christopher Bryant<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
551<\/td>An Overview and Evaluation of State Blaine Amendments: Origins, Scope, and First Amendment Concerns<\/a><\/td>Mark Edward DeForrest<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
627<\/td>A Matter of Constitutional Luck: The General Applicability Requirement in Free Exercise Jurisprudence<\/a><\/td>Christopher C. Lund<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Law and Truth<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>The Proliferation of Legal Truth<\/a><\/td>Jack M. Balkin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
17<\/td>Truth, Truths, \u201cTruth,\u201d \u201cTruths\u201d in the Law<\/a><\/td>Susan Haack<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
23<\/td>The Plain Truth About Legal Truth<\/a><\/td>Michael S. Moore<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
49<\/td>From Postmodernism to Law and Truth<\/a><\/td>Dennis Patterson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
69<\/td>History for the Non-Originalist<\/a><\/td>Rebecca Brown<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
83<\/td>Forms of Originalism and the Study of History<\/a><\/td>John Harrison<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
95<\/td>On Finding (and Losing) Our Origins<\/a><\/td>Larry Kramer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
111<\/td>The Exclusionary Rule<\/a><\/td>Guido Calabresi<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
119<\/td>In Defense of the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule<\/a><\/td>Yale Kamisar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
143<\/td>Truth, Justice, and the Jury<\/a><\/td>Shari Diamond<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
157<\/td>Is the Criminal Process about Truth?: A German Perspective<\/a><\/td>Thomas Weigend<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
175<\/td>America\u2019s Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice<\/a><\/td>Gerald Walpin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
189<\/td>Layers and Truth-Telling<\/a><\/td>Albert Alschuler<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
195<\/td>Corporate Fraud: See, Lawyers<\/a><\/td>Susan Koniak<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
231<\/td>Lawyers as the Enemies of Truth<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
235<\/td>A Tale of Truth in Modern America<\/a><\/td>William Otis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
239<\/td>Politics and the Principle that Elected Legislators Should Make the Laws<\/a><\/td>David Schoenbrod<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
281<\/td>The Myth of a Conservative Supreme Court: The October 2000 Term<\/a><\/td>Lino A. Graglia<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
315<\/td>The Faith-Based Initiative, Charitable Choice, and Protecting the Free Speech Rights of Faith-Based Organizations<\/a><\/td>Vernadette Ramirez Broyles, Esq.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Response<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
355<\/td>Security Reviews of Media Reports on Military Operations: A Response to Professor Lee<\/a><\/td>Major William A. Wilcox, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Book Review<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
369<\/td>Thomas Jefferson\u2019s Retrospective on the Establishment Clause<\/a><\/td>Douglas G. Smith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The United States Supreme Court, 2001 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
384<\/td>How Little Control? Volition and the Civil Confinement of Sexually Violent Predators in Kansas v. Crane<\/em>, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Articles 668 The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo 803 An Empirical Test of Justice Scalia\u2019s Commitment to the Rule of Law Gary Lawson 811 The Retroactive and Prospective Application of Judicial Decisions Bradley Scott Shannon 877 Federalism in Antitrust Robert W. Hahn & Anne Layne-Farrar 923 Private Property Rights, Economic Freedom, and Professor Coase: A Critique of Friedman, McCloskey, Medema, and Zorn Walter Block Recent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3995","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12r","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}