{"id":3996,"date":"2026-03-15T23:19:53","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:19:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=3996"},"modified":"2026-03-19T14:56:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T18:56:13","slug":"volume-25","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 25"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
835<\/td>Reflections on the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy<\/em><\/a><\/td>Douglas H. Ginsburg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Symposium: The United States Chamber of Commerce: Institute for Legal Reform<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Welcome Letters<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
840<\/td>Dear Colleague Letter<\/a><\/td>Governor John Engler<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
843<\/td>Introductory Remarks on the Federalism Symposium<\/a><\/td>James Wootton<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
847<\/td>Introductory Remarks on the Federalism Symposium<\/a><\/td>John P. Schmitz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
849<\/td>Locating the Boundaries: The Scope of Congress\u2019s Power to Regulate Commerce<\/a><\/td>Robert H. Bork & Daniel E. Troy<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
895<\/td>Business, the States, and Federalism\u2019s Political Economy<\/a><\/td>Michael S. Greve<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
931<\/td>Re-Entering the Arena: Restoring a Judicial Role for Enforcing Limits on Federal Mandates<\/a><\/td>John C. Eastman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
953<\/td>The Problem of Tort Reform: Federalism and the Regulation of Lawyers<\/a><\/td>Robert R. Gasaway<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Response<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
966<\/td>Beware the Trumpets of War: A Response to Kenneth Anderson<\/a><\/td>Anne-Marie Slaughter<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
977<\/td><\/a>The First Amendment and Problems of Political Viability: The Case of Internet Pornography<\/a><\/td>Mark C. Alexander<\/em><\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1031<\/td>Toward a National Putative Father Registry Database<\/a><\/td>Mary Beck<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1095<\/td>A Lockean Analysis of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment<\/a><\/td>Douglas G. Smith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Comment<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1171<\/td>Anastoff, Unpublished Opinions, and Federal Appellate Justice<\/a><\/td>Carl Tobias<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The United States Supreme Court, 2000 & 2001 Terms<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1185<\/td>The End of Compelled Contributions for Subsidized Advertising?: United States v. United Foods<\/em>, 533 U.S. 405 (2001)<\/a><\/td>Paul M. Schoenhard<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
1201<\/td>The Keys to the Castle: A New Standard for Warrentless Home Searches in United States v. Knights<\/em>, 122 S. Ct. 587 (2001)<\/a><\/td>Jonathan T. Skrmetti<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Law and the War on Terrorism<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Prologue: Presidential Addresses on the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
ix<\/td>Remarks on the National Day of Prayer and Remembrance<\/a><\/td>George W. Bush<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
xiii<\/td>Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People<\/a><\/td>George W. Bush<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Foreword<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
399<\/td>Freedom and Security After September 11<\/a><\/td>Viet D. Dinh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essays<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
407<\/td>Homeland: An Essay on Patriotism<\/a><\/td>Richard D. Parker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
429<\/td>Why They Hate Us: The Role of Social Dynamics<\/a><\/td>Cass R. Sunstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
441<\/td>Civil Liberties and Human Rights in the Aftermath of September 11<\/a><\/td>Philip B. Heymann<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
457<\/td>Choices of Law, Choices of War<\/a><\/td>Noah Feldman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
487<\/td>The President\u2019s Constitutional Authority to Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorist Organizations and the Nations that Harbor or Support Them<\/a><\/td>Robert J. Delahunty & John C. Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
The Military Action Against Terrorists under International Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
519<\/td>The War on Terrorism and the Modern Relevance of the Congressional Power to “Declare War”<\/a><\/td>Robert F. Turner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
539<\/td>The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter<\/a><\/a><\/td>Michael J. Glennon<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
559<\/td>America\u2019s New War on Terror: The Case for Self-Defense Under International Law<\/a><\/td>Jack M. Beard<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
The Military Tribunal Order<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
591<\/td>What to Do with Bin Laden and Al Quaeda Terrorists?: A Qualified Defense of Military Commissions and United States Policy on Detainees at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base<\/a><\/td>Kenneth Anderson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
635<\/td>On Justice and War: Contradictions in the Proposed Military Tribunals<\/a><\/td>George P. Fletcher<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
653<\/td>When Justice Goes to War: Prosecuting Terrorists before Military Commissions<\/a><\/td>Diane F. Orentlicher & Robert Kogod Goldman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
665<\/td>Terrorism, Federalism, and Police Misconduct<\/a><\/td>William J. Stuntz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
681<\/td>Fear and the Regulatory Model of Counterterrorism<\/a><\/td>Eric A. Posner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
699<\/td>The Consequences of Enlisting Federal Grand Juries in the War on Terrorism: Assessing the USA PATRIOT Act’s Changes to Grand Jury Secrecy<\/a><\/td>Sara Sun Beale & James E. Felman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
721<\/td>An International Criminal Law Approach to Bioterrorism<\/a><\/td>Barry Kellman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
743<\/td>\u201cSecurity Review\u201d and the First Amendment<\/a><\/td>William E. Lee<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
765<\/td>Unleashing the Rogue Elephant: September 11 and Letting the CIA be the CIA<\/a><\/td>Frederick P. Hitz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
781<\/td>Re-Constructing Global Aviation in an Era of the \u201cCivil Aircraft as a Weapon of Destruction\u201d<\/a><\/td>Phillip A. Karber<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
815<\/td>Who Should Deal with Foreign Terrorists on U.S. Soil?: Socio-Legal Consequences of September 11 and the Ongoing Threat of Terrorist Attacks in America<\/a><\/td>David A. Klinger & Dave Grossman<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Is Technology Changing the Law?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>The Symbiosis of Constitutionalism and Technology<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
15<\/td>The State and the Networked Economy<\/a><\/td>Mark F. Grady<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>Stalking the Mark of Cain<\/a><\/td>Michael Edmund O’Neill<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
61<\/td>The Genome and the Law: Should Increased Genetic Knowledge Change the Law?<\/a><\/td>E. Donald Elliott<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
71<\/td>Does Technology Require New Law<\/a><\/td>David Friedman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
87<\/td>The Costs of Privacy<\/a><\/td>Kent Walker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
129<\/td>Technology as Security<\/a><\/td>Declan McCullagh<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
143<\/td>They’re Making a Federal Case Out of It. . . In State Court<\/a><\/td>John H. Beisner & Jessica Davidson Miller<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
209<\/td>Congress Goes to Court: The Past, Present, and Future of Legislator Standing<\/a><\/td>Anthony Clark Arend & Catherine B. Lotrionte<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
283<\/td>Freedom of Speech and True Threats<\/a><\/td>Jennifer E. Rothman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essay<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
369<\/td>Close but No Cigar: A Reply to Professor Graglia<\/a><\/td>T. Kyle King<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The United States Supreme Court, 2000 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
385<\/td>Juris Doctores or Doctores Divinitatis: Good News Club v. Milford Central School<\/em>, 533 U.S. 98 (2001)<\/a><\/td>Austin W. Bramwell<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 835 Reflections on the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Douglas H. Ginsburg Symposium: The United States Chamber of Commerce: Institute for Legal Reform Welcome Letters 840 Dear Colleague Letter Governor John Engler 843 Introductory Remarks on the Federalism Symposium James Wootton 847 Introductory Remarks on the Federalism Symposium John P. Schmitz 849 Locating the Boundaries: The Scope of Congress\u2019s Power to Regulate Commerce Robert H. Bork & […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3996","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12s","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3996\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}