{"id":4000,"date":"2026-03-15T23:34:19","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=4000"},"modified":"2026-03-20T10:56:03","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T14:56:03","slug":"volume-22","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 22"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
771<\/td>Union \u201cCorporate Campaigns\u201d As Blackmail: The RICO Battle at Bayou Steel<\/a><\/td>Herbert R. Northrup and Charles H. Steen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
849<\/td>\u201cTyphoid Mary\u201d Meets the ADA: A Case Study of the \u201cDirect Threat\u201d Standard Under the Americans with Disabilities Act<\/a><\/td>Jeffrey A. Van Detta<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
959<\/td>Religious Speech in the Workplace: Harassment Or Protected Speech?<\/a><\/td>Thomas C. Berg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1009<\/td>Second-Guessing the Quality of Mercy: Due Process in State Executive Clemency Proceedings, Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard<\/em>, 118 S.Ct. 1244 (1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1031<\/td>Passing the Buck: The Supreme Court\u2019s Failure to Clarify Qualified Immunity Doctrine to Protect Public Officials From Frivolous Lawsuits, Crawford-El v. Britton<\/em>, 118 S. Ct. 1584 (1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Case: The United States Court of Appeals, 1998<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1057<\/td>Chevron<\/em> Up in Smoke?: Tobacco at the Crossroads of Administrative Law, Brown v. Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food & Drug Administration<\/em>, 153 F.3d 155 (4th Cir. 1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
367<\/td>Removing Criminal Aliens: The Pitfalls and Promises of Federalism<\/a><\/td>Peter H. Schuck and John Williams<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
465<\/td>Losing Control of America’s Future–The Census, Birthright Citizenship, and Illegal Aliens<\/a><\/td>Charles Wood<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
523<\/td>The Guilty and the \u201cInnocent\u201d: An Examination of Alleged Cases of Wrongful Conviction from False Confessions<\/a><\/td>Paul G. Cassell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Special Presidential Impeachment Section<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
605<\/td>Essay: Lies and Law<\/a><\/td>Robert F. Nagel<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
619<\/td>Perjurer in the White House? The Constitutional Case for Perjury and Obstruction of Justice As High Crimes and Misdemeanors<\/a><\/td>Charles J. Cooper<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
647<\/td>Presidential Sanctuaries After the Clinton Sex Scandals<\/a><\/td>Randall K. Miller<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
735<\/td>Attorney-Client Privilege-Dead or Alive?: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Swidler & Berlin v. United States<\/em>, 118 S.Ct. 2081 (1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
751<\/td>Is HIV Really a \u201cDisability\u201d?: The Scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act After Bragdon v. Abbott<\/em>, 118 S.Ct. 2196 (1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Reviving the Structural Constitution<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Panel I: Formalism and Functionalism Reconsidered<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
3<\/td>The Structural Constitution and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty<\/a><\/td>Steven G. Calabresi<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
13<\/td>Formalism, Functionalism, Ignorance<\/a><\/a><\/td>Judge Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/em><\/td><\/tr>
21<\/td>Relationships Between Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Powers Cases<\/a><\/td>William N. Eskridge, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>Toward a Principled Interpretation of the Commerce Clause<\/a><\/td>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
45<\/td>Formalism, Functionalism, and the Separation of Powers<\/a><\/td>Burt Neuborne<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel II: Congress and the Judiciary<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
55<\/td>Introduction: Trust and Jurisdiction\u2014The Tug-of-War between Congress and the Federal Courts<\/a><\/td>Dennis Jacobs<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
59<\/td>Religion in Congress and the Courts: Issues of Institutional Competence<\/a><\/td>Lillian R. BeVier<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
67<\/td>Federalism As a Structural Threat to Liberty<\/a><\/td>Douglas Laycock<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
85<\/td>Congress As Partner\/Congress As Adversary<\/a><\/td>Lawrence G. Sager<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel III: Constitutional Federalism Reborn<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
93<\/td>Introduction: Constitutional Federalism Reborn<\/a><\/td>Alex Kozinski<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
95<\/td>The Revival of States’ Rights: A Progress Report and a Proposal<\/a><\/td>Lynn A. Baker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
107<\/td>The Necessary and Proper Clause As an Intrinsic Restraint on Federal Lawmaking Power<\/a><\/td>David E. Engdahl<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
123<\/td>But When Exactly Was Judicially-Enforced Federalism \u201cBorn\u201d in the First Place?<\/a><\/td>Larry D. Kramer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
139<\/td>American Political Culture and the Failures of Process Federalism<\/a><\/td>William Marshall<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel IV: Federalism in Constitutional Context<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
159<\/td>Introduction: Federalism in Constitutional Context<\/a><\/td>Max Boot<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
161<\/td>Context and Complementarity within Federalism Doctrine<\/a><\/td>Evan H. Caminker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
173<\/td>In the Beginning Are the States<\/a><\/td>John C. Harrison<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
181<\/td>Federalism in Constitutional Context<\/a><\/td>Roderick M. Hills, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
197<\/td>Judicial Review and Federalism<\/a><\/td>John C. Yoo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel V: Undoing the New Deal?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
207<\/td>Introduction: Undoing the New Deal<\/a><\/td>Pasco M. Bowman II<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
209<\/td>The Cartelization of Commerce<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
219<\/td>The Constitutional Virtues and Vices of the New Deal<\/a><\/td>Akhil Reed Amar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
227<\/td>Undoing the New Deal through the New Presidentialism<\/a><\/td>Cynthia R. Farina<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
239<\/td>Evaluating the New Deal<\/a><\/td>Richard B. Stewart<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
247<\/td>Formalism and State Sovereignty in Printz v. United States<\/em>: Cooperation by Consent<\/a><\/td>Andrew S. Gold<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
279<\/td>Mend It Or End It? What To Do with the Independent Counsel Statute<\/a><\/td>Julian A. Cook, III<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Cases: The United State Courts of Appeals, 1998<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
339<\/td>Cutting the Gordian Knot of Affirmative Action: Lutheran Church-Missouri Syndod v. FCC<\/em>, 141 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 1998)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
351<\/td>The Sixth Circuit Navigates the Post-Romer<\/em> Wreckage: Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinatti, Inc. v. City of Cincinatti<\/em>, 128 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Articles 771 Union \u201cCorporate Campaigns\u201d As Blackmail: The RICO Battle at Bayou Steel Herbert R. Northrup and Charles H. Steen 849 \u201cTyphoid Mary\u201d Meets the ADA: A Case Study of the \u201cDirect Threat\u201d Standard Under the Americans with Disabilities Act Jeffrey A. Van Detta 959 Religious Speech in the Workplace: Harassment Or Protected Speech? Thomas C. Berg Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term 1009 Second-Guessing the Quality of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4000","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12w","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}