{"id":4001,"date":"2026-03-15T23:36:30","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:36:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=4001"},"modified":"2026-03-20T12:50:26","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T16:50:26","slug":"volume-21","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 21"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
657<\/td>Blaine\u2019s Wake: School Choice, The First Amendment, and State Constitutional Law<\/a><\/td>Joseph P. Viteritti<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
719<\/td>Gun Shy: The Second Amendment as an \u201cUnderenforced Constitutional Norm\u201d<\/a><\/td>Brannon P. Denning<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
793<\/td>Who Counts?: Determining the Availability of Minority Businesses for Public Contracting After Croson<\/em><\/a><\/td>George R. La Noue<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
835<\/td>Shall We Kill all the Lawyers First?: Insider and Outsider Views of the Legal Profession<\/a><\/td>Amy E. Black and Stanley Rothman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
861<\/td>The Supreme Court\u2019s Shifting Tolerance for Public Aid to Parochial Schools and the Implications for Educational Choice: Agostini v. Felton<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 1997 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Case<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
881<\/td>Ninth Circuit Ignores Principles of Federalism and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: Bates v. Jones<\/em>, 131 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
307<\/td>The Strange Career of Quid Pro Quo<\/em> Sexual Harassment<\/a><\/td>Eugene Scalia<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
327<\/td>Cyberjam: The Law and Economics of Internet Congestion of the Telephone Network<\/a><\/td>J. Gregory Sidak and Daniel F. Spulber<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
395<\/td>Toward a More Coherent Dormant Commerce Clause: A Proposed Unitary Framework<\/a><\/td>Michael A. Lawrence<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
467<\/td>Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of the Federal Appointments Process<\/a><\/td>Michael J. Gerhardt<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
541<\/td>The Federal Common Law of ERISA<\/a><\/td>Jeffrey A. Brauch<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essay<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
607<\/td>Will Laywering Strangle Democratic Capitalism?: A Retrospective<\/a><\/td>The Honorable Laurence H. Silberman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
623<\/td>Free Speech and Freer Speech: Glickman v. Wileman Bros. & Elliot, Inc.<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 2130 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
637<\/td>Congress Fumbles with the Internet: Reno v. ACLU<\/em>, 117 S.Ct. 2329 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Law and Economics and the Rule of Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Panel I: What Is the \u201cLaw\u201d in Law and Economics<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>Law, Economics, and the Power of the State<\/a><\/td>Lillian R. BeVier<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
11<\/td>The Judiciary and Free Markets<\/a><\/td>Henry G. Manne<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
39<\/td>Limits to Economics as a Norm for Judicial Decisions<\/a><\/td>Stephen F. Williams<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
47<\/td>Law, Science, and Law and Economics<\/a><\/td>Mark V. Tushnet<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel II: Law, Economics, and Social Conservatism<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
55<\/td>Introduction: Law, Economics, and Social Conservatism<\/a><\/td>Carolyn B. Kuhl<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
61<\/td>Externalities Everywhere?: Morals and the Police Power<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
71<\/td>Of Sex and Drugs, and Rock\u2019N\u2019Roll: Does Law and Economics Support Social Regulation?<\/a><\/td>Eric Rasmusen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel III: The Attraction of Law and Economics: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
85<\/td>Introduction: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline?<\/a><\/td>Steven L. Schwarcz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
89<\/td>The Autonomy of Law in Law and Economics<\/a><\/td>Cass R. Sunstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
95<\/td>Law is a Sometime Autonomous Discipline<\/a><\/td>E. Allan Farnsworth<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
101<\/td>Standards, Rules, and Social Norms<\/a><\/td>Eric A. Posner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel IV: How Should Judges Use Economics?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
121<\/td>Law and Economics Should be Used for Economic Questions<\/a><\/td>David B. Sentelle<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
129<\/td>Judges and Economics: Normative, Positive, and Experimental Perspectives<\/a><\/td>Saul Levmore<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
135<\/td>Three Proposals to Harness Private Information in Contract<\/a><\/td>Ian Ayres<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
147<\/td>What Would Burke Think of Law and Economics?<\/a><\/td>Stephen B. Presser<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel V: Law And. . . .<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
157<\/td>The Market for \u201cLaw-and\u201d Scholarship<\/a><\/td>Robert C. Ellickson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
171<\/td>Law and the Social Sciences<\/a><\/td>Jonathan R. Macey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel VI: Public Choice and the Structural Constitution<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
181<\/td>Class Legislation, Public Choice, and the Structural Constitution<\/a><\/td>Jeffrey Rosen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
195<\/td>The Original Constitution and its Decline: A Public Choice Perspective<\/a><\/td>John O. McGinnis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
211<\/td>Purchasing Political Inaction: How Regulators Use the Threat of Legal \u201cReform\u201d to Extort Payoffs<\/a><\/td>Fred S. McChesney<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
219<\/td>Does Public Choice Theory Justify Judicial Activism After All?<\/a><\/td>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Book Review<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
231<\/td>Scalia Contra Mundum<\/a><\/em><\/td>Hadley Arkes<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
251<\/td>Privatizing Section 1983 Immunity: The Prison Guard\u2019s Dilemma After Richardson v. McKnight<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 2100 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
272<\/td>Balancing Away the Freedom of Speech: Turner Broadcasting System v. FCC<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 1174 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
288<\/td>A Jurisdictional Vacuum in the Wake of Camps Newfound\/Owatonna<\/em>?: Camps Newfound\/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 1590 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Articles 657 Blaine\u2019s Wake: School Choice, The First Amendment, and State Constitutional Law Joseph P. Viteritti 719 Gun Shy: The Second Amendment as an \u201cUnderenforced Constitutional Norm\u201d Brannon P. Denning 793 Who Counts?: Determining the Availability of Minority Businesses for Public Contracting After Croson George R. La Noue 835 Shall We Kill all the Lawyers First?: Insider and Outsider Views of the Legal Profession Amy E. Black and Stanley Rothman Recent Developments: The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"class_list":["post-4001","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12x","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}