{"id":4002,"date":"2026-03-15T23:38:48","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:38:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=4002"},"modified":"2026-03-20T12:58:16","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T16:58:16","slug":"volume-20","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-20\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 20"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Natural Law v. Natural Rights: What Are They – How Do They Differ?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
627<\/td>Natural-Law Originalism – Or Why Justice Scalia (Almost) Gets It Right<\/a><\/td>Douglas W. Kmiec<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
655<\/td>A Law Professor’s Guide to Natural Law and Natural Rights<\/a><\/td>Randy E. Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
683<\/td>The Dangers of Natural Rights<\/a><\/td>Richard Tuck<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
695<\/td>Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law?<\/a><\/td>Michael P. Zuckert<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
733<\/td>The \u201cConservation Game\u201d: The Possibility of Voluntary Cooperation in Preserving Buildings of Cultural Importance<\/a><\/td>Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
791<\/td>The Economics of Airline Safety and Security: An Analysis of the White House Commission’s Recommendations<\/a><\/td>Robert W. Hahn<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
829<\/td>Building Trust: Conservatives and the Environment<\/a><\/td>Mark Eliot Shere<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
867<\/td>The Rule of Saint Benedict: The Debates over the Interpretation of an Ancient Legal and Spiritual Document<\/a><\/td>James L. J. Nuzzo<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Essay<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
887<\/td>The Tao of Federalism<\/a><\/td>Calvin R. Massey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
905<\/td>An Improper Extension of Civil Litigation by Indigents: M. L. B. v. S. L. J.<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 555 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
921<\/td>A Valuation Standard That is Difficult to Swallow: Interpreting \u00a7 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in Associates Commerical Corp. v. Rash<\/em>, 117 S. Ct. 1879 (1997)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Case<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
937<\/td>Cramming Down the House: The Valuation of Collateral in In re Taffi<\/em>, 96 F.3d 1190 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Justice and the Criminal Justice Process–Symposium on Law and Public Policy-1996<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Panel I: Protections Against Self Incrimination: a Path or Roadblock to Justice?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
327<\/td>Miranda’s \u201cNegligible\u201d Effect on Law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations<\/a><\/td>Paul G. Cassell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
347<\/td>Bashing Miranda Is Unjustified–And Harmful<\/a><\/td>Stephen J. Schulhofer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
375<\/td>Miranda Stories<\/a><\/td>Peter Arenella<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel II: Justice for All? Racial Minorities, Crime Victims, and the Local Community<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
391<\/td>Civil Rights and the Criminal Justice System<\/a><\/td>Clint Bolick<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
397<\/td>Race, the Criminal Justice System, and Community-Oriented Policing<\/a><\/td>Reuben M. Greenberg<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
405<\/td>Crime, Politics, and Race<\/a><\/td>Samuel R. Gross<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
417<\/td>Racism in the Criminal Justice System: Problems and Suggestions<\/a><\/td>Thomas J. Nolan<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel III: What Belongs in a Criminal Trial: the Role of Exclusionary Rules<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
425<\/td>Six Observations on the Exclusionary Rule<\/a><\/td>The Honorable Stephen J. Markman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
435<\/td>Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure?<\/a><\/td>Carol S. Steiker<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
443<\/td>The Virtues and Vices of the Exclusionary Rule<\/a><\/td>William J. Stuntz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
457<\/td>Against Exclusion (Except to Protect Truth Or Prevent Privacy Violations)<\/a><\/td>Akhil Reed Amar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel IV: Juries and the Criminal Justice System: What Role?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
469<\/td>A Unanimous Jury Is Fundamental to Our Democracy<\/a><\/td>Barbara A. Babcock<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
475<\/td>Jury Bashing and the O.J. Simpson<\/a><\/td>Gerald F. Uelmen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
483<\/td>What Is Wrong with American Juries and How to Fix It<\/a><\/td>Richard K. Willard<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
489<\/td>Making Juries Better Factfinders<\/a><\/td>Daniel P. Collins<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel V: The Role of Lawyers and the Search for Truth in the Criminal Justice System<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
503<\/td>Adversary Inferences<\/a><\/td>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
513<\/td>The Adversarial-Accusatorial Label: A Constraint on the Search for Truth<\/a><\/td>Joseph D. Grano<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
519<\/td>Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Search for Truth<\/a><\/td>Charles M. Sevilla<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel VI: Feds Fighting Crime: When and How<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
531<\/td>Criticisms of Federal Counter-Terrorism Laws<\/a><\/td>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
543<\/td>A National Strategy against Crime<\/a><\/td>Richard K. Willard<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Article<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
555<\/td>Market Ordering versus Statutory Control of Termination Decisions: A Case for the Inefficiency of Just Cause Dismissal Requirements<\/a><\/td>John P. Frantz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Development: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1995 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
605<\/td>A Case for Speedier Executions: Felker v. Turpin<\/em>, 116 S. Ct. 2333 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Case<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
615<\/td>A Quick Case for Including Same-Sex Harassment Under Title VII: Quick v. Donaldson, Co., Inc.<\/em>, 90 F.3d 1372 (8th Cir. 1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Volume Introduction<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1<\/td>Introduction: Twentieth Anniversary Volume, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy<\/em><\/a><\/td>E. Spencer Abraham<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Remark<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
19<\/td>Remarks in Honor of Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Supreme Court of the United States<\/a><\/td>The Hon. J. Michael Luttig<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
23<\/td>Political Economy of Just Compensation: Lessons from the Military Draft for the Takings Issue, The<\/a><\/td>Fischel, William A.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
65<\/td>Comment on Fischel’s Political Economy of Just Compensation<\/a><\/td>Robert E. Litan<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
75<\/td>Takings Legislation: A Comment<\/a><\/td>Robert C. Ellickson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
85<\/td>Takings and Progressive Rate Taxation<\/a><\/td>Calvin R. Massey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
127<\/td>The Model Physician-Assisted Suicide Act and the Jurisprudence of Death<\/a><\/td>Scott Fitzgibbon and Kwan Kew Lai<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
175<\/td>The Use and Abuse of History in Compassion in Dying<\/em><\/a><\/td>Dwight G. Duncan and Peter Lubin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
215<\/td>Colorado’s Amendment 2: A Result in Search of a Reason<\/a><\/td>John Daniel Dailey and Paul Farley<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1995 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
279<\/td>Innocent Owners and Guilty Property: Bennis v. Michigan<\/em>, 116 S. Ct. 994 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
292<\/td>Civil Forfeiture as Jeopardy: United States v. Ursery<\/em>, 116 S. Ct. 2135 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
310<\/td>\u201cWorse than TXO\u201d: Substantive Due Reasonableness in BMW of North America v. Gore<\/em>, 116 S. Ct. 1589 (1996)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Symposium: Natural Law v. Natural Rights: What Are They – How Do They Differ? 627 Natural-Law Originalism – Or Why Justice Scalia (Almost) Gets It Right Douglas W. Kmiec 655 A Law Professor’s Guide to Natural Law and Natural Rights Randy E. Barnett 683 The Dangers of Natural Rights Richard Tuck 695 Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law? Michael P. Zuckert Articles 733 The \u201cConservation Game\u201d: The Possibility of Voluntary Cooperation in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"class_list":["post-4002","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12y","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}