{"id":4008,"date":"2026-03-16T09:43:45","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T13:43:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=4008"},"modified":"2026-03-22T17:32:05","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T21:32:05","slug":"volume-15","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-15\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 15"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium on Risks and Wrongs<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue<\/td><\/tr>
621<\/td>Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice<\/a><\/td>Larry Alexander<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
637<\/td>Risks and Wrongs<\/a><\/td>Jules L. Coleman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
649<\/td>Rational Choice and the Law<\/a><\/td>Jean Hampton<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
683<\/td>Jules and the Tortist<\/a><\/td>David Gauthier<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
711<\/td>On the Domain and Market Rhetoric<\/a><\/td>Margaret Jane Radin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
733<\/td>The Relation Between Competition and Cooperation<\/a><\/td>Steven Walt<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
747<\/td>Interpreting Torts, Explaining Contracts<\/a><\/td>Alan Schwartz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
771<\/td>The Primacy of Cooperation, Rational Bargaining, and an Economic Theory of Part of the Common Law<\/a><\/td>Christopher T. Wonnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
783<\/td>Rational Bargaining Theory and Contract: Default Rules, Hypothetical Consent, the Duty to Disclose, and Fraud<\/a><\/td>Randy E. Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
805<\/td>Efficiency and Rational Bargaining in Contractual Settings<\/a><\/td>Richard Craswell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
839<\/td>Why is Corrective Justice Just?<\/a><\/td>Emily Sherwin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
849<\/td>Jules Coleman and Corrective Justice in Tort Law: A Critique and Reformulation<\/a><\/td>Kenneth W. Simons<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
889<\/td>Rational Contractarianism, Corrective Justice, and Tort Law<\/a><\/td>Richard J. Arneson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
917<\/td>The Mixed Conception of Corrective Justice<\/a><\/td>Stephen R. Perry<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
939<\/td>Tort Law as a Comparative Institution: Reply to Perry<\/a><\/td>Claire Finkelstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Article<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
965<\/td>Natural Rights and the Constitution: The Original \u201cOriginal Intent\u201d<\/a><\/td>Terry Brennan<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1031<\/td>Limitations of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Presley v. Etowah County Commission<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 820 (1992)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1040<\/td>The Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Statements by Child Victims of Sexual Abuse: White v. Illinois<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 736 (1992)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1050<\/td>The Eighth Amendment in Section 1983 Cases: Hudson v. McMillian<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 995 (1992)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
1060<\/td>Criminal Anti-Profit Statutes and the First Amendment: Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. New York Crime Victims Bd.<\/em>, 112 S. Ct. 501 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: Free Market Environmentalism: The Role of the Market in Environmental Protection<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College–1991<\/td><\/tr>
297<\/td>Free Market Versus Political Environmentalism<\/a><\/td>Terry L. Anderson & Donald R. Leal<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
311<\/td>Debunking Wholesale Private Enforcement of Environmental Rights<\/a><\/td>Edward Brunet<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
325<\/td>The Tragedy of the Commons, Part Two<\/a><\/td>James E. Krier<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
349<\/td>Protecting the Environment from Orthodox Environmentalism<\/a><\/td>James L. Huffman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
371<\/td>The Fallacies of Free Market Environmentalism<\/a><\/td>Michael C. Blumm<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
391<\/td>Behind Schedule and Over Budget: The Case of Markets, Water, and Environment<\/a><\/td>Zach Willey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
427<\/td>Property Rights, Environmental Resources, and the Future<\/a><\/td>Richard L. Stroup & Sandra L. Goodman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
455<\/td>A Property Rights Strategy for Protecting the Environment: A Comment on Stroup and Goodman<\/a><\/td>Reuben C. Plantico<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
467<\/td>Bureaucratic Issues and Environmental Concerns: A Review of the History of Federal Land Ownership and Management<\/a><\/td>Gary D. Libecap<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
489<\/td>Institutional Fantasylands: From Scientific Management to Free Market Environmentalism<\/a><\/td>Peter S. Menell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
511<\/td>Free Market Environmentalism: Wonder Drug or Snake Oil?<\/a><\/td>William Funk<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
517<\/td>Escaping Environmental Feudalism<\/a><\/td>Bruce Yandle<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Article<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
541<\/td>The Worst Should Go First: Deferral Registries in Asbestos Litigation<\/a><\/td>Peter H. Schuck<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
595<\/td>Back to the Future: The Supreme Court\u2019s Retroactivity Jurisprudence<\/a><\/td>Paul McGreal<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: The Bill of Rights After 200 Years<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1<\/td>Coexistence and Co-Dependence: Conservatism and Civil Liberties<\/a><\/td>Ralph K. Winter<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
5<\/td>What is the Federalist Society?<\/a><\/td>Owen M. Fiss<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel I: Should the Bill of Rights Fully Protect Fundamental Freedoms?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
11<\/td>Three Levels of Human Decisionmaking and the Protection of Fundamental Rights<\/a><\/td>William P. Barr<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
17<\/td>The Untenable Case for an Unconditional Right to Shelter<\/a><\/td>Robert C. Ellickson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
35<\/td>The Indivisibility of Liberty Under the Bill of Rights<\/a><\/td>Richard A. Epstein<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
43<\/td>What Constitutes Full Protection of Fundamental Freedoms?<\/a><\/td>Nadine Strossen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel II: How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Freedom and Civil Liberties?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
53<\/td>How Effective Are Bills of Rights in Protecting Individual Freedoms?<\/a><\/td>Theodore B. Olson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
55<\/td>The Effectiveness of Bills of Rights<\/td>John S. Baker, Jr.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
71<\/td>Bills of Rights and Regression to the Mean<\/a><\/td>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
85<\/td>The Role of Institutional Factors in Protecting Individual Liberties<\/a><\/td>Thomas W. Merrill<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
93<\/td>The Bill of Rights in America and Central East Europe<\/a><\/td>Herman Schwartz<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel III: The Bill of Rights and Governmental Structure: Republicanism and Mediating Institutions<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
99<\/td>Some Comments on \u201cThe Bill of Rights as a Constitution\u201d<\/a><\/td>Akhil Reed Amar<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
113<\/td>On Madison and Majoritarianism: A Response to Professor Amar<\/a><\/td>Walter Berns<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
119<\/td>On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial<\/a><\/td>[INSERT HERE]<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
129<\/td>The Role of Government Under the Bill of Rights<\/a><\/td>Kate Smith<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel IV: Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
139<\/td>Interpreting the Bill of Rights: A Dichotomy of Jurisprudential Approaches<\/a><\/td>Edwin D. Williamson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
141<\/td>Originalism and the Bill of Rights<\/a><\/td>Stephen L. Carter<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
149<\/td>How Should Courts Interpret the Bill of Rights?<\/a><\/td>Lino A Graglia<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
157<\/td>An Interpretivist Agenda<\/a><\/td>Gary S. Lawson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Debate<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Should Congress Pass Legislation Overruling the Supreme Court\u2019s Decision in the \u201cPeyote Case,\u201d Which Limits the Scope of the Free Exercise of Religion?<\/td><\/tr>
163<\/td>Religious Exercise: How Free?<\/a><\/td>Edwin Meese III<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
169<\/td>The Free Exercise Clause as a Rule About Rules<\/a><\/td>John Harrison<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
181<\/td>Should Congress Pass Legislation Restoring the Broader Interpretation of Free Exercise of Religion?<\/a><\/td>Michael W. McConnell<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
191<\/td>Microenterprise: Human Reconstruction in America\u2019s Inner Cities<\/a><\/td>Lewis D. Solomon<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
223<\/td>The Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading: A Legal, Economic, and Ethical Analysis<\/a><\/td>Steven R. Salbu<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The U.S. Supreme Court, 1990 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
255<\/td>Inferring Actual Malice from Altered Quotations, Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 2419 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
266<\/td>Confidential Media Sources and the First Amendment: Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 2513 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
275<\/td>The Death Penalty and Victim Impact Evidence: Payne v. Tennessee<\/em>, 11 S. Ct. 2597 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
284<\/td>Proportionality and the Eight Amendment: Harmelin v. Michigan<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 2680 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Symposium on Risks and Wrongs Annual Institute for Humane Studies Law and Philosophy Issue 621 Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice Larry Alexander 637 Risks and Wrongs Jules L. Coleman 649 Rational Choice and the Law Jean Hampton 683 Jules and the Tortist David Gauthier 711 On the Domain and Market Rhetoric Margaret Jane Radin 733 The Relation Between Competition and Cooperation Steven Walt 747 Interpreting Torts, Explaining Contracts Alan Schwartz 771 The Primacy […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4008","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12E","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4008\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}