{"id":4009,"date":"2026-03-16T09:56:21","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T13:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/?page_id=4009"},"modified":"2026-03-22T17:46:59","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T21:46:59","slug":"volume-14","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/volume-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 14"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium on Law and Philosophy<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
615<\/td>Foreword: Unenumerated Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law<\/a><\/td>Randy E. Barnett<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
645<\/td>Rules and the Rule of Law<\/a><\/td>Frederick Schauer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
695<\/td>The Gap<\/a><\/td>Larry Alexander<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
703<\/td>Rules and Social Facts<\/a><\/td>Jules L. Coleman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
727<\/td>Comment: Legal Theory and the Role of Rules<\/a><\/td>Ruth Gavison<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
771<\/td>Three Concepts of Rules<\/a><\/td>Michael S. Moore<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
797<\/td>Positivism, I Presume? . . . Comments on Schauer\u2019s \u201cRules and Rule of Law\u201d<\/a><\/td>Gerald J. Postema<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
823<\/td>Presumptive Positivism and Trivial Cases<\/a><\/td>Margaret Jane Radin<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
839<\/td>The Rules of Jurisprudence: A Reply<\/a><\/td>Frederick Schauer<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Note<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
853<\/td>Footnote 6: Justice Scalia\u2019s Attempt to Impose a Rule of Law on Substantive Due Process<\/a><\/td>Gregory C. Cook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
895<\/td>Extension to the Right to Counsel: Minnick v. Mississippi<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
903<\/td>Regulation of Racist Speech: In re Welfare of R.A.V.<\/em>, 464 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
913<\/td>Sanctioning Clients Under Rule 11: Business Guides Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 922 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
924<\/td>Section 1983 Claims Involving Commerce Clause Violations: Dennis v. Higgins<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 865 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
931<\/td>Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases: Cheek v. United States<\/em>, 111 S. Ct. 604 (1991)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 2<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: American Education: Legal and Policy Issues<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
305<\/td>What\u2019s Wrong With Our Universities?<\/a><\/td>Derek Bok<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
335<\/td>What\u2019s Wrong With Our Universities? An Additional View<\/a><\/td>A. Kenneth Pye<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
355<\/td>Achieving Our National Education Goals: Overarching Strategies<\/a><\/td>Lauro F. Cavazos<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
367<\/td>Becoming Preeminent in Education: America\u2019s Greatest Challenge<\/a><\/td>Augustus F. Hawkins<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
397<\/td>The Value of Private Property in Education: Innovation, Production, and Employment<\/a><\/td>Philip K. Porter & Michael L. Davis<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
427<\/td>What Is a Teacher\u2019s Job?: An Examination of the Social and Legal Causes of Role Expansion and Its Consequences<\/a><\/td>Judith H. Cohen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
447<\/td>Is Local Control of the Schools Still a Viable Option?<\/a><\/td>Charles F. Faber<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
483<\/td>Judicial Review of the Special Educational Program Requirements Under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Be Going?<\/a><\/td>Dixie Snow Huefner<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
517<\/td>School Finance Litigation: A New Wave of Reform<\/a><\/td>Julie K. Underwood & William E. Sparkman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
545<\/td>Academic Tenure: An Economic Critique<\/a><\/td>Robert W. McGee & Walter E. Block<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
565<\/td>Leaving Them Speechless: A Critique of Speech Restrictions on Campus<\/a><\/td>Kathryn Marie Dessayer & Arthur J. Burke<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
I.H.S.-Eberhard Competition Winner<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
583<\/td>The Imbalance of Power and the Presidential Veto: A Case for the Item Veto<\/a><\/td>Diane-Michele Krasnow<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Issue 1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Symposium: The Future of Civil Rights Law<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Panel I: What Are Civil Rights and to Whom Do They Belong?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
1<\/td>Introduction: Civil Rights Politics as Interest-Group Politics<\/a><\/td>Daniel B. Rodriguez<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
8<\/td>Some Observations on Broadly Construing Civil Rights Laws<\/a><\/td>Charles A. Shanor<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
13<\/td>Women\u2019s Rights and Social Wrongs<\/a><\/td>Deborah L. Rhode<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
21<\/td>Civil Rights, Human Rights, Gay Rights: Minorities and the Humanity of the Different<\/a><\/td>Evan Wolfson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel II: The Role of Government in Closing the Socio-Economic Gap for Minorities<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
41<\/td>The Impact of Federal Civil Rights Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks<\/a><\/td>John J. Donahue III<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
53<\/td>Addressing the Gap: Some Thoughts on the Government\u2019s Role<\/a><\/td>Jeffery Robinson<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
58<\/td>The Separation of Race and States<\/a><\/td>Jennifer Roback<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel III: The Effects Test\u2013Forced Quotas or Elimination of Racism?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
65<\/td>Introduction: The Age of Ambiguity<\/a><\/td>Lawrence J. Siskind<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
68<\/td>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: From Prohibiting to Requiring Racial Discrimination in Employment<\/a><\/td>Lino A. Graglia<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
78<\/td>Proving Discriminatory Intent in Constitutional Law Disparate Impact Cases<\/a><\/td>William Cohen<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
84<\/td>Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio<\/em>: A Step Toward Eliminating Quotas in the American Workplace<\/a><\/td>Charles J. Cooper<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
93<\/td>Competing Conceptions of \u201cRacial Discrimination\u201d: A Response to Cooper and Graglia<\/a><\/td>Randall L. Kennedy<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel IV: The Limits on Judicial Power in Ordering Remedies<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
103<\/td>Civil Rights and Remedies<\/a><\/td>Frank H. Easterbrook<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
112<\/td>The Limitlessness of Judicial Capacity to Right Constitutional Wrongs<\/a><\/td>Michael H. Sussman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
120<\/td>Judicial Remedies: Braking the Power to Fix It<\/a><\/td>William Bradford Reynolds<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel V: New Frontiers in Civil Rights<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
129<\/td>Introduction: A Walk Through the Civil Rights World<\/a><\/td>R. Gaull Silberman<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
131<\/td>On the Right to Be Sheltered from the \u201cRight to Die\u201d<\/a><\/td>Hadley Arkes<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
137<\/td>Unfinished Business: A Civil Rights Strategy for America\u2019s Third Century<\/a><\/td>Clint Bolick<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
142<\/td>Civil Rights and the New Federal Judiciary: The Retreat from Fairness<\/a><\/td>Stephen Reinhardt<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
150<\/td>Civil Rights, Economic Progress, and Common Sense<\/a><\/td>Edwin Meese III<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Panel VI: Civil Rights, Civility, and Free Speech\u2013What Takes Precedence?<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
157<\/td>Discriminatory Harassment and Free Speech<\/a><\/td>Thomas C. Grey<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
165<\/td>Freedom Through Moral Education<\/a><\/td>Alan L. Keyes<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Articles<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
173<\/td>The Exclusionary Rule and the Meaning of Separation of Powers<\/a><\/td>Ruth W. Grant<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
205<\/td>The Social Costs of Populist Antitrust: A Public Choice Perspective<\/a><\/td>Michael E. DeBow<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Book Review<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
225<\/td>The Clerisy of Power (review of Robert H. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law<\/em>)<\/a><\/td>David B. Sentelle<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
Recent Developments: The U.S. Supreme Court, 1989 Term<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
237<\/td>Abortion Parental Notification Statutes: Hodgson v. Minnesota<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2926 (1990) and Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2972 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
248<\/td>Constitutional Protection of the \u201cRefusal-of-Treatment\u201d: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2841 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
259<\/td>Equal Protection and Affirmative Action in Broadcast Licensing: Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission<\/em>, 110 S. Ct 2997 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
270<\/td>Federal Judicial Authority to Increase Local Taxes: Missouri v. Jenkins<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2997 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
282<\/td>Free Exercise of Religion: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 1595 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr>
292<\/td>Political Patronage and the First Amendment: Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois<\/em>, 110 S. Ct. 2729 (1990)<\/a><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Issue 3 Symposium on Law and Philosophy 615 Foreword: Unenumerated Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Randy E. Barnett 645 Rules and the Rule of Law Frederick Schauer 695 The Gap Larry Alexander 703 Rules and Social Facts Jules L. Coleman 727 Comment: Legal Theory and the Role of Rules Ruth Gavison 771 Three Concepts of Rules Michael S. Moore 797 Positivism, I Presume? . . . Comments on Schauer\u2019s \u201cRules and Rule of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4009","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PeZSiL-12F","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4009"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4009\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}