• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Harvard JSEL

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law (“JSEL”) provides the academic community, the sports and entertainment industries, and the legal profession with scholarly analysis and research related to the legal aspects of the sports and entertainment world.

  • About Us
    • Our Journal
    • Masthead
    • Constitution
    • Contact
  • Print Edition
    • Current Edition
    • Previous Editions
    • Submissions
  • Online Content
    • Highlights
    • Commentary
    • Event Coverage
    • Career Spotlights
    • Sponsor Articles
  • Special Issues
    • Special Issue 2020: Name, Image, and Likeness
    • Special Issue 2021: NCAA v. Alston
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fox’s Empire Trademark Suit

JSEL · March 25, 2015 · Leave a Comment

According the to the Hollywood Reporter, Fox filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking a declaratory judgment that will support its continued use of the title “Empire” for its television series of the same name. This trademark suit comes after the Network received demands from Empire Distribution (a company that represents musical artists such as Sean Paul and Kendrick Lamar) to cease use of the title or pay for its use. On March 6, Empire Distribution sent a letter to Fox demanding that Fox either pay $5 million and make some of Empire’s clients guest starts on the show, pay Empire $8 million, or cease use of the title. Rather than submit to Empire’s demands, Fox filed this lawsuit.

The Network believes it has a strong case as Empire Distribution previously filed for trademark registration for the name “Empire” in connection with non-electronic music recordings, and was denied trademark protection due to a likelihood of confusion. Similarly, many other companies and products have used the word “Empire” as well, including a film entitled “Empire Records.” Therefore, it is likely that the term may be too generic to allow to Empire Distribution to have any hold over its use. Yet, until the court issues a decision, the dispute is far from over (as evidenced by judgment in the Blurred Lines case earlier this month, which also began as a request for a declaratory judgment).

Filed Under: Highlight Tagged With: entertainment, intellectual property, television, trademark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Information
jsel@mail.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2024 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law