• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Harvard JSEL

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law (“JSEL”) provides the academic community, the sports and entertainment industries, and the legal profession with scholarly analysis and research related to the legal aspects of the sports and entertainment world.

  • About Us
    • Our Journal
    • Masthead
    • Constitution
    • Contact
  • Print Edition
    • Current Edition
    • Previous Editions
    • Submissions
  • Online Content
    • Highlights
    • Commentary
    • Event Coverage
    • Career Spotlights
    • Sponsor Articles
  • Special Issues
    • Special Issue 2020: Name, Image, and Likeness
    • Special Issue 2021: NCAA v. Alston
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Is Age Really Nothing But A Number?

JSEL · January 26, 2017 · Leave a Comment

New-imdb-logo

Earlier this month, the IMDb (Internet Movie Database) filed a lawsuit requesting an injunction against the Actor Age Censorship Law, a California law that allows actors to demand that IMDb remove all references to their age from the website. This piece of legislation was passed in late 2016 and was supported by the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA), which claimed that potential employers were using information about an actor’s age obtained from IMDb when making casting decisions, according to L.A. Weekly and The Hollywood Reporter. The law seeks to remedy this by allowing actors to demand that certain subscription-based websites remove references to their age, which affects IMDb’s subscription-only casting service website IMDb Pro, as well as the free-to-use main website.

IMDb began their legal challenge in IMDb v. Kenealy in late 2016, after the Actor Age Censorship Law was passed but before it took effect on January 1st, 2017.  As explained by The Hollywood Reporter, on January 5th IMDb requested a preliminary injunction seeking to prevent California’s attorney general from enforcing the law. The website is arguing that the ability to include an actor’s age as part of their biography is free speech protected by the First Amendment, and as such it would be unconstitutional to prevent IMDb from displaying this information. Conversely, California argues that the Actor Age Censorship Law is necessary to protect actors from age-related discrimination, and are allowed to restrict this information as an actor’s age falls within the category of commercial speech under Central Hudson.

The case is also drawing attention from outside parties, as several California law professors filed an amicus brief supporting IMDb’s free speech argument, and SAG-AFTRA is seeking to be joined as a defendant along with California’s attorney general.

Tyler Bittner is an Entertainment Highlight Contributor for the Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law and a current first year student at Harvard Law School (Class of 2019).

Filed Under: Highlight Tagged With: entertainment, Highlight, Litigation, privacy, publicity rights

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Information
jsel@mail.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2024 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law