NCAA

Commentary

States Can Use Advertising and Consumer Protection Law to Avoid Rolling the Dice with Online Sports Betting

By: Brandon McCoy             Prior to Super Bowl Sunday, one of the most popular gambling days of the year, Massachusetts opened sportsbooks in its three brick-and-mortar casinos: Encore Boston Harbor, MGM Springfield, and Plainridge Park Casino. The state joined 32 others and the District of Columbia in offering sports betting, either online or in person. […]

Highlight

Volume 13, Issue 2 is now live!

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law is thrilled to share that Volume 13, Issue 2 is now live. The Issue begins with an essay from Professor Irene Calboli and Vera Sevastianova on the impact of the ongoing Russo-Ukraine conflict on fashion and trademark law. From there, this Issue of JSEL features four scholarly

Highlight

New Jersey Voters Reject Gambling on New Jersey College Athletics

In addition to voting in state and local elections last week, New Jerseyans passed judgment on a ballot question concerning betting on college sporting events in the state. The question read: “Do you approve amending the Constitution to permit wagering through casinos and current or former horse racetracks on all college sport or athletic events?”

Updates

Our Special Issue Fall 2021: NCAA v. Alston is Now Online

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law has published its 2021 Special Issue on NCAA v. Alston. Visit the Special Issue – Alston page to read the latest exciting scholarship on the implications for professional sports leagues, the interplay of antitrust and labor in the decision, what the future may hold for college sports,

Highlight

The NIL Era Has Arrived: What the Coming of July 1 Means for the NCAA

From September 2019—when California became the first state to pass a name, image, and likeness (NIL) law—until now, the intercollegiate athletic community has fielded a deluge of new enacted and proposed regulations from states, Congress, the NCAA, and now individual institutions. As the proverbial NIL floor was shifting, there was one thing on everyone’s minds:

Highlight

NCAA v. Alston at the Supreme Court

March 31, 2021 marked an important moment in the history of college sports. The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving the NCAA for the first time in nearly 40 years. This article provides a comprehensive summary of that argument. What is Alston and how did we get here? The question at issue

Sponsor Articles

Ropes & Gray – In Licensing Journal, Attorneys Examine NCAA Student-Athlete “Right of Publicity” Proposal

To read this article as originally published on Ropes & Gray’s website, click here. To address student–athlete com­pensation issues, the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Council approved and introduced a pro­posal that would allow student–athletes, under certain circumstances, to profit off of the exploitation of their names, images, and likenesses, sometimes known as the

Interviews

Analyzing a Creative NIL Proposal – Interview with HLS Clinical Professor Brian Price

In the midst of the ongoing debate over student-athlete compensation and the expansion of Name, Image, and Likeness rights, a Professor at Georgia Tech, and former college athlete himself, Baratunde Cola, has proposed a unique idea: have student-athletes create nonprofit organizations to receive endorsement money, have those athletes pay themselves a portion of the incoming

Scroll to Top