{"id":1808,"date":"2017-10-22T21:21:57","date_gmt":"2017-10-23T01:21:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/?p=1808"},"modified":"2023-07-25T11:55:37","modified_gmt":"2023-07-25T15:55:37","slug":"judge-blocks-for-zeke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/2017\/10\/judge-blocks-for-zeke\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge Blocks for Zeke"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1809\" src=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016-236x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"236\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016-236x300.jpg 236w, https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016-768x978.jpg 768w, https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016-805x1024.jpg 805w, https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/78\/2017\/10\/Ezekiel_Elliott_vs._the_Redskins_in_2016.jpg 1294w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 236px) 100vw, 236px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>On October 17, Judge Paul Crotty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/10\/17\/sports\/football\/ezekiel-elliott-dallas-cowboys-suspension.html\">temporary restraining order<\/a> in favor of Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott. In his ruling, Crotty asked the NFL to address why a full preliminary injunction to hold off the suspension further should not be issued. Crotty <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.com\/nfl\/2017\/10\/17\/ezekiel-elliott-suspension-new-york-court-hearings-cowboys\">noted<\/a> that Elliott faced irreparable harm if forced to miss games and questioned the fairness of the NFL\u2019s arbitration process. Prior to the start of the 2017-18 season, the NFL handed Elliott a 6-game suspension stemming from 2016 allegations of domestic violence. An NFL arbiter upheld the suspension. Then, on September 8 \u2013 days prior to the start of the season \u2013 the Eastern District of Texas <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/09\/08\/sports\/federal-judge-halts-ezekiel-elliotts-suspension.html\">enjoined<\/a> the NFL from imposing the suspension. Elliott has since played in all five of the Cowboys\u2019 games this season (the team\u2019s bye was Week 6 of the season). However, on Friday October 13, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the September 8 decision and reinstated Elliott\u2019s suspension.<\/p>\n<p>The NFLPA and Elliott followed up by petitioning the Southern District of New York to grant a temporary restraining order. Although it is unusual to involve two different federal circuits, Elliott was able to seek the temporary restraining order in the S.D.N.Y. because the NFL itself filed a lawsuit against Elliott in New York to combat Elliott\u2019s Texas suit.<\/p>\n<p>To <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.com\/nfl\/2017\/10\/17\/ezekiel-elliott-suspension-new-york-court-hearing\">obtain<\/a> the temporary restraining order, the NFLPA and Elliott needed to distinguish the process used to sanction Elliott from the process used to sanction New England quarterback Tom Brady in 2015. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/articles\/975522\/nfl-players-union-wins-bid-to-halt-elliott-suspension\">upheld<\/a> Brady\u2019s suspension due to the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement, and the Second Circuit is binding on the Southern District of New York. Additionally, the NFLPA and Elliott needed to convince the court that missing games would constitute irreparable harm, meaning that monetary damages in the future would not remedy an erroneous action in the present. The temporary restraining order is set to expire upon the earlier of October 30 or a separate ruling from Judge Katherine Polk Failla, to whom the case was assigned originally but is on vacation. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit also may review this case. If the court does not review Elliott\u2019s case until after the 2017 season, the earliest Elliott would serve a suspension would be the 2018-19 season.<\/p>\n<p><em>Ian Ferrell is a Sports Highlight Contributor for the Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law and a current first year student at Harvard Law School (Class of 2020).<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On October 17, Judge Paul Crotty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a temporary restraining order in favor of Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott. In his ruling, Crotty asked the NFL to address why a full preliminary injunction to hold off the suspension further should not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[99,87,39,14],"ppma_author":[382],"class_list":["post-1808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-highlight","tag-highlight","tag-litigation","tag-nfl","tag-sports-2"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZjrR-ta","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"authors":[{"term_id":382,"user_id":39,"is_guest":0,"slug":"jsel","display_name":"JSEL","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4abb87a025d5a7951a4b4249facf4d22ea8002b216770229a96689038d0f83bc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1808"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/jsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=1808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}