{"id":2046,"date":"2015-10-05T14:32:45","date_gmt":"2015-10-05T14:32:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/?p=2046"},"modified":"2016-03-08T04:01:14","modified_gmt":"2016-03-08T04:01:14","slug":"equal-sovereignty-from-dred-scott-to-drivers-licenses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/2015\/10\/05\/equal-sovereignty-from-dred-scott-to-drivers-licenses\/","title":{"rendered":"Equal Sovereignty: From Dred Scott to Driver\u2019s Licenses"},"content":{"rendered":"

By: Charles McGonigal*<\/a><\/p>\n

On Friday, Alabama closed thirty-one Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) offices. These closings wouldn\u2019t normally be national news, but Alabama has selectively closed offices in counties with high populations of people of color, leaving no facilities in those counties to issue driver\u2019s licenses. As photo IDs are now required to vote in that state, these actions threaten the ability of individuals in these counties to exercise their right to vote. Alabama\u2019s latest trampling of voting rights owes its (hopefully temporary) existence to Chief Justice John Roberts\u2019 activist invocation of a non-Constitutional doctrine associated with Dred Scott<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Under the 1965 Voting Rights\u00a0Act[footnote]1. The history of the Voting Rights Act and Shelby County<\/em> is summarized from Ryan Haygood\u2019s excellent article<\/a> published by HLPR in August, including discriminatory actions by Alabama since 1965 and other states since 2013.[\/footnote], the U.S. Justice Department must preclear any changes to voting rules in several states with histories of discrimination. The Act\u2019s drafters correctly expected state officials to find novel ways to keep minority voters away from the polls. Preclearance ensured that protracted legal battles would delay implementation of such changes rather than their removal.<\/p>\n

Chief Justice Roberts, in 2013\u2019s Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder<\/em><\/a>, found the Act\u2019s definition of historically discriminatory jurisdictions unconstitutional partly because it violated the \u201cequal sovereignty\u201d doctrine, which holds that every state has fully equal rights and powers. This doctrine is outside the Constitution\u2019s text. In fact, the Constitutional Convention rejected such a \u00a0clause, although it has been included in statutes admitting each state. It only came into constitutional jurisprudence in Dred Scott v. Sandford<\/em><\/a>, which held that allowing black Americans full citizenship would violate slave states\u2019 equal sovereignty<\/a>. Because equal sovereignty is only a historical tradition, it makes a tenuous basis for the unconstitutionality of a statute, especially considering Congress\u2019 in-depth review of the Voting Rights Act in its 2006 re-authorization.<\/p>\n

To be fair, Alabama is offering plausible reasons<\/a> for the office closures. The state\u2019s budget was slashed across the board, also resulting in the closure of several parks and National Guard armories. While the legislature did include budget language urging departments to cut administration instead of services, DMV administrators unsurprisingly chose not to cut their own staff members. Instead, they closed a disproportionate number of DMV offices in areas that are generally poorer and have majority African-American populations.<\/p>\n

Even if deprivation of the vote was not the purpose, Alabama\u2019s actions will certainly have a disparate impact on minority and poor populations. The 28 counties<\/a> that no longer have a DMV office include 8 of the 10 counties with the highest minority populations<\/a> in Alabama and 14 of the 20 poorest counties<\/a> in the state. Voters with lower socio-economic status have less ability to travel to another county to get an ID, especially if they have to take off work during regular business hours. Slightly less negatively, one aspect of these closures is that the reduction in services is not huge as the satellite offices were previously staffed only on days when district offices could send employees.<\/p>\n

The combination of voter ID requirements and the removal of DMV offices creates a disparate impact. This combination will be subject to a court challenge and eventually overturned as it is impeding the constitutional rights of Alabama voters. Hopefully, this example (among too many others) will demonstrate to the Court that preclearance is unfortunately still necessary for equal voting rights. Without preclearance, though, the new procedures will remain in place while the challenge slogs through the courts.<\/p>\n

*<\/a> Charles McGonigal\u00a0is a second year law student at Harvard Law School.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By: Charles McGonigal* On Friday, Alabama closed thirty-one Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) offices. These closings wouldn\u2019t normally be national […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2047,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[228,227,226,201,202],"class_list":["post-2046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-dred-scott","tag-equal-sovereignty","tag-voting-id-laws","tag-voting-rights","tag-voting-rights-act"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\/2015\/10\/file7891293246889.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peZQka-x0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2046"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.harvard.edu\/lpr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}