• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Harvard JSEL

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law (“JSEL”) provides the academic community, the sports and entertainment industries, and the legal profession with scholarly analysis and research related to the legal aspects of the sports and entertainment world.

  • About Us
    • Our Journal
    • Masthead
    • Constitution
    • Contact
  • Print Edition
    • Current Edition
    • Previous Editions
    • Submissions
  • Online Content
    • Highlights
    • Commentary
    • Event Coverage
    • Career Spotlights
    • Sponsor Articles
  • Special Issues
    • Special Issue 2020: Name, Image, and Likeness
    • Special Issue 2021: NCAA v. Alston
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Breakdown Services Lawsuit

JSEL · November 18, 2014 · Leave a Comment

According to the Hollywood Reporter, Breakdown Services is seeking a preliminary injunction against  three individuals–Frank Moran, Louise Yanofsky and Steven Rubin–who manipulated the system to bypass a credential check. Breakdown Services receives scripts and requests for script reads from casting directors. Then these submissions are sent to licensed talent agents and qualified personal managers who screen the roles before they are passed on to the actors and actresses. The casting directors use the service because they know that their materials will be in the hands of qualified and reputable actors and actresses–this limits the number of unqualified submissions and “leaks” of movie plots on various websites. If Breakdown is unable to maintain this confidentiality with the directors, directors will use other services to distribute their materials.

Moran, Yanofsky, and Rubin collected these breakdowns and distributed them directly to the talent–leading to obviously inappropriate actors reading for various roles (i.e. a thin actor reading for a “husky” part). The defendants charged actors for the distribution of these materials as well as for representation (however, agents only are permitted to earn compensation through commission). They also joined talent agencies strictly to obtain access to the breakdowns. Ultimately, Breakdown Services asserts claims of tortious interference and unfair competition. The court has yet to rule on the request for a preliminary injunction.

Filed Under: Highlight Tagged With: confidentiality, entertainment

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Information
jsel@mail.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2024 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law