• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Harvard JSEL

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law (“JSEL”) provides the academic community, the sports and entertainment industries, and the legal profession with scholarly analysis and research related to the legal aspects of the sports and entertainment world.

  • About Us
    • Our Journal
    • Masthead
    • Constitution
    • Contact
  • Print Edition
    • Current Edition
    • Previous Editions
    • Submissions
  • Online Content
    • Highlights
    • Commentary
    • Event Coverage
    • Career Spotlights
    • Sponsor Articles
  • Special Issues
    • Special Issue 2020: Name, Image, and Likeness
    • Special Issue 2021: NCAA v. Alston
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Tidal, Microsoft, Google, Rhapsody, and Slacker Face The Billion Dollar Baby of Class Actions

JSEL · March 14, 2016 · Leave a Comment

 

2922084416_525dcdba25_zAccording to a breaking news story by Digital Music News, multiple music streaming services including Tidal, Microsoft, Google Play, Rhapsody, and Slacker will be facing multiple class action lawsuits for their alleged failures to acquire the appropriate mechanical licenses for song recordings in their repertoires. With each suit seeking hundreds of millions of dollars and royalty damages, this onslaught of litigation against music streaming services is looking to become a billion dollar baby for aggrieved artists and songwriters. Digital Music News reports that claims against each of these services were filed over the weekend, and should be announced this week. Perhaps the only one greeting this news with a smile is Spotify, who has been donning headlines due to its own class action suit for weeks. All of these lawsuits share the common theme of allegations that the service in question intentionally or negligently failed to obtain the necessary mechanical licenses for song recordings containing the plaintiffs’ compositions, and intentionally or negligently failed to pay the relevant royalties legally owed to plaintiffs.

Many of the defendants, including Spotify, Rhapsody, and Slacker, have attempted to retroactively remedy the issue by sending backdated NOIs (Notice of Intents) and removing the alleged infringing content. Whether these acts are construed as reasonable remedies or admissions guilt will be up to the courts.

Learn more about the story here: http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/03/05/200-million-spotify-class-action-will-soon-include-xbox-music-google-play-tidal-rhapsody-slacker/

Jennifer Marr is an Entertainment and Sports Highlight Contributor for the Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law and a current first year student at Harvard Law School (Class of 2018).

Filed Under: Highlight Tagged With: entertainment, Highlight, mechanical license, music

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Information
jsel@mail.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2024 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law