• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Harvard JSEL

The Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law (“JSEL”) provides the academic community, the sports and entertainment industries, and the legal profession with scholarly analysis and research related to the legal aspects of the sports and entertainment world.

  • About Us
    • Our Journal
    • Masthead
    • Constitution
    • Contact
  • Print Edition
    • Current Edition
    • Previous Editions
    • Submissions
  • Online Content
    • Highlights
    • Commentary
    • Event Coverage
    • Career Spotlights
    • Sponsor Articles
  • Special Issues
    • Special Issue 2020: Name, Image, and Likeness
    • Special Issue 2021: NCAA v. Alston
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Spotify Agrees To Improve Song Matching Practices In $30 Million Settlement With Publishers

JSEL · April 15, 2016 · Leave a Comment

7749080996_bee3bfbf9e_oSpotify and the National Music Publishing Association have reached a $30 million settlement agreement to compensate publishers and songwriters for unpaid royalties that resulted from unmatched songs in its database. According to the Agreement, the $30 million will constitute a “payout pool” where $5 million is a “penalty pool.” Under the Agreement, publishers will claim and provide ownership of songs in the unpaid and unmatched pool of songs, and then Spotify will compensate the publishers for the relevant number of streams. Each publisher will also receive additional payments based on their market share from the penalty pool.

Unique to this Agreement is the creation of a set of best practices for Spotify and provision of a direct licensing path between Spotify and publishers. Under the new practices, Spotify must use reasonable efforts to match all the music that it hosts, and must hold “regular discussions” on improving the matching process. Future royalty payments will be certified by an independent accounting firm.

While settlements in the tens of millions are no surprise in the music industry, creating legally binding best practices to strengthen the relationship between streaming services and publishers is. While the Agreement’s provisions are limited to publishers participating in the settlement, it is likely, or at least hopeful, that the creation of these practices will spillover into all of Spotify’s publishing dealings.

Learn more about the settlement here.

Jennifer Marr is an Entertainment and Sports Highlight Contributor for the Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law and a current first year student at Harvard Law School (Class of 2018).

Filed Under: Highlight Tagged With: entertainment, Highlight, royalties, Spotify

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Information
jsel@mail.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2024 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law