Preventing Terrorist Attacks on Offshore Platforms: Do States Have Sufficient Legal Tools?
Assaf Harel
4 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 131 (2012)
Photo courtesy of NASA
Assaf Harel
4 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 131 (2012)
Photo courtesy of NASA
Norman Abrams – 4 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 58 (2012)
Photo courtesy of U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
George D. Brown
4 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 1 (2012)
Screen capture courtesy of U.S. Department of Justice
Judge Evan J. Wallach
3 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 431 (2012)
Erin Creegan
3 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 373 (2012)
Although national security threats are often treated independently, Erin Creegan draws connections among four categories of crimes — treason, espionage, sabotage, and terrorism — to address what the Government can do to detect, prevent, prosecute and punish national security crimes.
Picture courtesy of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
By Siddhartha M. Velandy* — Click here to read the full text of the Article In the midst of a shifting international order, the U.S. Department of Defense stands uniquely positioned to intensify global innovation in the energy arena. This Article describes the mechanics by which DoD can ignite a mutually-beneficial green energy “arms race.” In this role, the military reprises a historical function of driving technological advancement, combining its operational requirements and legislative prerogatives to grow investment and create consistent demand. The Article also discusses the legal and regulatory regimes that may be enlisted and exported through transgovernmental networks