Erosion of Lee v. Weisman in the Lower Courts
Last month, in one of the largest curtailments of the Establishment Clause in recent history, the Seventh Circuit Court of […]
Last month, in one of the largest curtailments of the Establishment Clause in recent history, the Seventh Circuit Court of […]
In the wake of several recent high-profile tragedies, several states have enacted or toughened laws aimed at suppressing the phenomenon
“[T]his is tough and I’m stuck on this.” Justice Breyer expressed the prevailing theme of the oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC. The oral arguments demonstrated that the justices are having a difficult time delineating the boundaries of the ministerial exception. Professor Laycock sketches out a broad ministerial exception that would prevent judges from interpreting religious doctrines where a church’s interpretation could reasonably vary […]
The arrest of a group of Muslim students in California for heckling a speech by the Israeli ambassador to the
In its decision earlier this year in Snyder v. Phelps, the Supreme Court controversially held that the First Amendment protected
Stephen Colbert has increased the visibility of super PACs with Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow. And if Colbert’s goal is
In a ruling that could play a significant role in solidifying the emerging consensus that citizens have a constitutional interest
Last week, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that a California school district did
A round-up of some of the top stories in civil rights and civil liberties news.
The Supreme Court has declined to take the case of a Texas high school cheerleader who was kicked off the squad after refusing to cheer for the basketball player whom she alleges raped her. The Fifth Circuit ruling not only upheld the school’s right to punish her for refusing to cheer, but dismissed her suit as frivolous, requiring her family to cover the school’s legal fees.
In a relatively little-noted decision last term, the Supreme Court favored a particular vision of federalism over the protection of religious freedom. The 6-2 ruling, in Sossamon v. Texas, barred money damages in private actions brought by prisoners against state and local governments under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA). Sossamon continues a trend of denying prisoners any effective opportunity for the enforcement of their rights.