Voting and Elections Rights

Amicus, Courts & Judicial Interpretation, Voting and Elections Rights

Judicial Elections in Mining Country: Money, Speech, and Influence

This summer, the Supreme Court quickly dispensed with a campaign finance law from Montana in ​American Tradition Partnership, even though the state argued that there was, indeed, a history of corruption that gave the state a compelling interest in limiting independent campaign expenditures. This decision did not speak explicitly about judicial elections, but a more recent decision of the 9th Circuit has invoked Citizens United to weigh in on a different speech issue concerning judicial elections, making the relationship between money, speech, law, and politics deliciously convoluted.

Scroll to Top