• Skip to content
  • Skip to footer
Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR)

Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR)

The Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR) aims to be the premier journal covering the laws of business organization and capital markets. HBLR will publish articles from professors, practitioners, and policymakers on corporate law and governance, securities and capital markets law, financial regulation and financial institutions, law and finance, financial distress and bankruptcy, and related subjects.

  • About
    • Organization
    • Submissions
    • Student Writing
    • Masthead
      • Volume 15 Masthead (2025)
      • Volume 14 Masthead (2024)
      • Volume 13 Masthead (2023)
      • Volume 12 Masthead (2022)
      • Volume 11 Masthead (2021)
      • Volume 10 Masthead (2020)
      • Volume 9 Masthead (2019)
      • Volume 8 Masthead (2018)
      • Volume 7 Masthead (2017)
      • Volume 6 Masthead (2016)
      • Volume 5 Masthead (2015)
      • Volume 4 Masthead (2014)
      • Volume 3 Masthead (2013)
      • Volume 2 Masthead (2012)
      • Volume 1 Masthead (2011)
      • Editors-in-Chief Emeriti
  • Print
    • Order Issues
    • Volume 15 (2025)
      • Volume 15, Issue 1
      • Volume 15, Issue 2
    • Volume 14 (2024)
      • Volume 14, Issue 1
      • Volume 14, Issue 2
    • Volume 13 (2023)
      • Volume 13, Issue 1
      • Volume 13, Issue 2
    • Volume 12 (2022)
      • Volume 12, Issue 1
      • Volume 12, Issue 2
    • Volume 11 (2021)
      • Volume 11, Issue 1
    • Volume 10 (2020)
      • Volume 10, Issue 1
      • Volume 10, Issue 2
    • Volume 9 (2019)
      • Volume 9, Issue 1
      • Volume 9, Issue 2
    • Volume 8 (2018)
      • Volume 8, Issue 1
      • Volume 8, Issue 2
    • Volume 7 (2017)
      • Volume 7, Issue 1
      • Volume 7, Issue 2
    • Volume 6 (2016)
      • Volume 6, Issue 1
      • Volume 6, Issue 2
    • Volume 5 (2015)
      • Volume 5, Issue 1
      • Volume 5, Issue 2
    • Volume 4 (2014)
      • Volume 4, Issue 1
      • Volume 4, Issue 2
    • Volume 3 (2013)
      • Volume 3, Issue 1
      • Volume 3, Issue 2
    • Volume 2 (2012)
      • Volume 2, Issue 1
      • Volume 2, Issue 2
    • Volume 1 (2011)
      • Volume 1, Issue 1 (2011)
  • Columns
    • Volume 15 (2024-2025)
    • Volume 14 (2023–2024)
    • Volume 12 (2021-2022)
    • Volume 11 (2020-2021)
    • Volume 10 (2019-2020)
    • Volume 9 (2018-2019)
    • Volume 8 (2017-2018)
    • Volume 7 (2016-2017)
    • Volume 6 (2015-2016)
    • Volume 5 (2014-2015)
    • Volume 4 (2013-2014)
    • Volume 3 (2012-2013)
    • Volume 2 (2011-2012)
    • Volume 1 (2010-2011)
  • Topics
    • Banking
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Business & Corporations
    • Consumer Protection
    • Corporate Law & Governance
    • Entrepreneurship & Startups
    • Environment, Social, & Governance
    • Human Rights & Labor
    • Industry
    • Investing & Asset Management
    • Legal & Regulatory Compliance
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Politics & Economics
    • Securities & Financial Regulation
    • Taxation
    • Technology & Innovation

MY HOME

FEATURED ESSAY • SECURITIES & FINANCIAL REGULATION

CAN SECTION 11 BE SAVED?: “TRACING” A PATH TO ITS SURVIVAL

John C. Coffee, Jr. & Joshua Mitts

Last term, a unanimous Supreme Court held in Slack Techs. v Pirani that purchasers of securities must “trace” their shares to the registration statement that contains the alleged misstatement or omission in order to be able to assert a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. Lawyers and law firms on both sides of the case agreed (with differing emotions) that the decision eclipsed Section 11, which had been the federal securities laws’ strongest litigation remedy for investors. We disagree with this conclusion that Section 11 is doomed, but we recognize the danger. Both in an amicus brief we filed with the Court and now in this article, we show how tracing can be performed and thus Section 11 preserved.

POLITICS & ECONOMICS

THICKER THAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Olivia Schwartz

As Saudi Arabia implements Vision 2030, it may do so in a way that jeopardizes this longstanding relationship. Saudi Arabia is in the midst of creating an artificial intelligence hub in Saudi Arabia. However, with continuing U.S.-People’s Republic of China (PRC) tensions, Saudi Arabia will likely have to choose between the United States and the People’s Republic of China.

TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

ENDING THE CRYPTO TAX HAVEN

Noam Noked

There is growing global concern regarding the use of crypto for tax evasion and financial crimes. To address this problem, over sixty jurisdictions have recently committed to implement the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). CARF transposes the Common Reporting Standard (CRS)—designed for the traditional financial industry—onto the crypto industry.

CORPORATE LAW & GOVERNANCE

LOCAL FIRM GOVERNANCE

Anne M. Choike

Since the turn of the millennium, diverse cities—large and small, red and blue—have undertaken initiatives aimed at the governance of firms. These novel initiatives aim to constrain executive compensation, require board diversity, promote stakeholder governance, support the establishment of worker cooperatives, and beyond. These developments mean we must add localities to the conventional framework of firm governance.

CONSUMER PROTECTION

“PRICE DISCRIMINATION” DISCRIMINATION

Talia B. Gillis

Credit price personalization, where lenders set prices based on individual borrower and loan characteristics, is a common practice across many loan types, with conventional accounts of its harms focusing on the ways in which risk-based pricing, or setting prices based on borrowers’ credit risk, can lead to disparities for protected groups like racial minorities and women.

LEGAL & REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

BOEING: THE MULTITUDE OF ITS TROUBLES

Erica (Xinhui) Chen

Boeing, the aviation giant corporation, has been facing a multitude of troubles in recent years. Two accidents of Boeing 737 Max resulted in the deaths of 346 people and revealed the flawed engineering safety control of Boeing. Four years after the deadly accidents, Boeing is still deeply entangled in their aftermath. This Column walks through the multi-faceted troubles Boeing is facing, and briefly explores the organizational causes embedded in Boeing’s culture.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, & GOVERNANCE

ACTIVISM ON HOLD: THE LEGAL BARRIERS TO SHAREHOLDER IMPACT LITIGATION

Dennis Ronel

This Column examines the challenges shareholder activists face when seeking to hold managers accountable through litigation, highlighting three key obstacles: the entrenched shareholder primacy doctrine, the protective nature of the business judgment rule, and the stringent evidentiary requirements under Delaware law.

Footer

Follow Us

  • X
  • LinkedIn

Contact Us

1585 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
hblr@mail.law.harvard.edu

Copyright © 2025 Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR). All Rights Reserved.