Volume 21

Issue 3

Articles
657Blaine’s Wake: School Choice, The First Amendment, and State Constitutional LawJoseph P. Viteritti
719Gun Shy: The Second Amendment as an “Underenforced Constitutional Norm”Brannon P. Denning
793Who Counts?: Determining the Availability of Minority Businesses for Public Contracting After CrosonGeorge R. La Noue
835Shall We Kill all the Lawyers First?: Insider and Outsider Views of the Legal ProfessionAmy E. Black and Stanley Rothman
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term
861The Supreme Court’s Shifting Tolerance for Public Aid to Parochial Schools and the Implications for Educational Choice: Agostini v. Felton, 117 S. Ct. 1997 (1997)
Recent Case
881Ninth Circuit Ignores Principles of Federalism and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: Bates v. Jones, 131 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc)

Issue 2

Articles
307The Strange Career of Quid Pro Quo Sexual HarassmentEugene Scalia
327Cyberjam: The Law and Economics of Internet Congestion of the Telephone NetworkJ. Gregory Sidak and Daniel F. Spulber
395Toward a More Coherent Dormant Commerce Clause: A Proposed Unitary FrameworkMichael A. Lawrence
467Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of the Federal Appointments ProcessMichael J. Gerhardt
541The Federal Common Law of ERISAJeffrey A. Brauch
Essay
607Will Laywering Strangle Democratic Capitalism?: A RetrospectiveThe Honorable Laurence H. Silberman
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1996 Term
623Free Speech and Freer Speech: Glickman v. Wileman Bros. & Elliot, Inc., 117 S. Ct. 2130 (1997)
637Congress Fumbles with the Internet: Reno v. ACLU, 117 S.Ct. 2329 (1997)

Issue 1

Symposium: Law and Economics and the Rule of Law
Panel I: What Is the “Law” in Law and Economics
5Law, Economics, and the Power of the StateLillian R. BeVier
11The Judiciary and Free MarketsHenry G. Manne
39Limits to Economics as a Norm for Judicial DecisionsStephen F. Williams
47Law, Science, and Law and EconomicsMark V. Tushnet
Panel II: Law, Economics, and Social Conservatism
55Introduction: Law, Economics, and Social ConservatismCarolyn B. Kuhl
61Externalities Everywhere?: Morals and the Police PowerRichard A. Epstein
71Of Sex and Drugs, and Rock’N’Roll: Does Law and Economics Support Social Regulation?Eric Rasmusen
Panel III: The Attraction of Law and Economics: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline?
85Introduction: Is Law an Autonomous Discipline?Steven L. Schwarcz
89The Autonomy of Law in Law and EconomicsCass R. Sunstein
95Law is a Sometime Autonomous DisciplineE. Allan Farnsworth
101Standards, Rules, and Social NormsEric A. Posner
Panel IV: How Should Judges Use Economics?
121Law and Economics Should be Used for Economic QuestionsDavid B. Sentelle
129Judges and Economics: Normative, Positive, and Experimental PerspectivesSaul Levmore
135Three Proposals to Harness Private Information in ContractIan Ayres
147What Would Burke Think of Law and Economics?Stephen B. Presser
Panel V: Law And. . . .
157The Market for “Law-and” ScholarshipRobert C. Ellickson
171Law and the Social SciencesJonathan R. Macey
Panel VI: Public Choice and the Structural Constitution
181Class Legislation, Public Choice, and the Structural ConstitutionJeffrey Rosen
195The Original Constitution and its Decline: A Public Choice PerspectiveJohn O. McGinnis
211Purchasing Political Inaction: How Regulators Use the Threat of Legal “Reform” to Extort PayoffsFred S. McChesney
219Does Public Choice Theory Justify Judicial Activism After All?Thomas W. Merrill
Book Review
231Scalia Contra MundumHadley Arkes
Recent Developments: The Supreme Court of the United States, 1997 Term
251Privatizing Section 1983 Immunity: The Prison Guard’s Dilemma After Richardson v. McKnight, 117 S. Ct. 2100 (1997)
272Balancing Away the Freedom of Speech: Turner Broadcasting System v. FCC, 117 S. Ct. 1174 (1997)
288A Jurisdictional Vacuum in the Wake of Camps Newfound/Owatonna?: Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison, 117 S. Ct. 1590 (1997)
Scroll to Top