| Symposium: Competition, Free Markets, and the Law |
| 1 | The Eighteenth Annual National Student Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Policy — 1999 | Federalist Society Assistant Editors |
| Panel I: First Principles: Is There a Role for Antitrust Law? |
| 5 | Does Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage? | Frank Easterbrook |
| 11 | Is Antitrust Obsolete? | Lino A. Graglia |
| 23 | The Case for Reforming the Antitrust Regulations (If Repeal is Not an Option) | Fred L. Smith, Jr. |
| Panel II: International Law & Federalist: What Is the Reach of Regulation? |
| 61 | Regulation of Franchisor Opportunism and Production of the Institutional Framework: Federal Monopoly or Competition Between the States? | Alan J. Meese |
| 89 | Externalities in Open Economy Antitrust and Their Implications For Internationl Competition Policy | Alan O. Sykes |
| 97 | International Law and Federalism: What is the Reach of Regulation? | Diane P. Wood |
| Debate: Public Choice: Do Politics Corrupt Antitrust Enforcement? |
| 113 | The Politics of Federal Antitrust Enforcement | William J. Baer and David A. Balto |
| 133 | Economics Versus Politics in Antitrust | Fred S. McChesney |
| Panel III: Does Regulation Promote Efficiency in Network Industries? |
| 147 | Network Industries and Antitrust | A. Douglas Melamed |
| 159 | Regulating Network Industries: A Look at Intel | Randal C. Picker |
| Panel IV: Does Consumer Choice Need to Be Managed? |
| 197 | Should Government Attempt to Influence Consumer Preference? | Daniel D. Polsby |
| 203 | From Consumer Sovereignty to Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Incompletely Theorized Agreement? | Cass R. Sunstein |
| 211 | Using Warnings to Extend the Boundaries of Consumer Sovereignty | W. Kip Viscusi |
| Article |
| 233 | Party Revisited: An Empirical Comparison of State and Lower Federal Court Interpretations of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission | Brett Christopher Gerry |
| Recent Case: The United States Supreme Court, 1999 Term |
| 295 | The Promise and Perils of “Privileges or Immunities”: Saenz v. Roe, 119 S.Ct. 1518 (1999) | |